armodafinil 150 MG Oral Tablet

WARNINGS

Serious Rash, including Stevens-Johnson Syndrome Serious rash requiring hospitalization and discontinuation of treatment has been reported in adults in association with the use of modafinil and armodafinil and in children in association with the use of modafinil.

Armodafinil has not been studied in pediatric patients in any setting and is not approved for use in pediatric patients for any indication.

In clinical trials of modafinil (a racemic mixture of S and R enantiomers), the incidence of rash resulting in discontinuation was approximately 0.8% (13 per 1,585) in pediatric patients (age <17 years); these rashes included 1 case of possible Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and 1 case of apparent multi-organ hypersensitivity reaction.

Several of the cases were associated with fever and other abnormalities (e.g., vomiting, leukopenia).

The median time to rash that resulted in discontinuation was 13 days.

No such cases were observed among 380 pediatric patients who received placebo.

No serious skin rashes have been reported in adult clinical trials (0 per 4,264) of modafinil.

Rare cases of serious or life-threatening rash, including SJS, Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN), and Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) have been reported in adults and children in worldwide post-marketing experience with modafinil.

The reporting rate of TEN and SJS associated with modafinil use, which is generally accepted to be an underestimate due to underreporting, exceeds the background incidence rate.

Estimates of the background incidence rate for these serious skin reactions in the general population range between 1 to 2 cases per million-person years.

No serious skin rashes have been reported in adult clinical trials (0 per 1,595) of armodafinil.

However, cases of serious rash similar to those observed with modafinil including skin and mouth blistering have been reported in adults in postmarketing experience.

There are no factors that are known to predict the risk of occurrence or the severity of rash associated with armodafinil or modafinil.

Nearly all cases of serious rash associated with these drugs occurred within 1 to 5 weeks after treatment initiation.

However, isolated cases have been reported after prolonged treatment with modafinil (e.g., 3 months).

Accordingly, duration of therapy cannot be relied upon as a means to predict the potential risk heralded by the first appearance of a rash.

Although benign rashes also occur with armodafinil, it is not possible to reliably predict which rashes will prove to be serious.

Accordingly, armodafinil should ordinarily be discontinued at the first sign of rash, unless the rash is clearly not drug-related.

Discontinuation of treatment may not prevent a rash from becoming life-threatening or permanently disabling or disfiguring.

Angioedema and Anaphylactoid Reactions One serious case of angioedema and one case of hypersensitivity (with rash, dysphagia, and bronchospasm), were observed among 1,595 patients treated with armodafinil.

Patients should be advised to discontinue therapy and immediately report to their physician any signs or symptoms suggesting angioedema or anaphylaxis (e.g., swelling of face, eyes, lips, tongue or larynx; difficulty in swallowing or breathing; hoarseness).

Multi-organ Hypersensitivity Reactions Multi-organ hypersensitivity reactions, including at least one fatality in postmarketing experience, have occurred in close temporal association (median time to detection 13 days: range 4-33) to the initiation of modafinil.

A similar risk of multi-organ hypersensitivity reactions with armodafinil cannot be ruled out.

Although there have been a limited number of reports, multi-organ hypersensitivity reactions may result in hospitalization or be life-threatening.

There are no factors that are known to predict the risk of occurrence or the severity of multi-organ hypersensitivity reactions associated with modafinil.

Signs and symptoms of this disorder were diverse; however, patients typically, although not exclusively, presented with fever and rash associated with other organ system involvement.

Other associated manifestations included myocarditis, hepatitis, liver function test abnormalities, hematological abnormalities (e.g., eosinophilia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia), pruritus, and asthenia.

Because multi-organ hypersensitivity is variable in its expression, other organ system symptoms and signs, not noted here, may occur.

If a multi-organ hypersensitivity reaction is suspected, NUVIGIL should be discontinued.

Although there are no case reports to indicate cross-sensitivity with other drugs that produce this syndrome, the experience with drugs associated with multi-organ hypersensitivity would indicate this to be a possibility.

Persistent Sleepiness Patients with abnormal levels of sleepiness who take NUVIGIL should be advised that their level of wakefulness may not return to normal.

Patients with excessive sleepiness, including those taking NUVIGIL, should be frequently reassessed for their degree of sleepiness and, if appropriate, advised to avoid driving or any other potentially dangerous activity.

Prescribers should also be aware that patients may not acknowledge sleepiness or drowsiness until directly questioned about drowsiness or sleepiness during specific activities.

Psychiatric Symptoms Psychiatric adverse experiences have been reported in patients treated with modafinil.

Modafinil and armodafinil (NUVIGIL) are very closely related.

Therefore, the incidence and type of psychiatric symptoms associated with armodafinil are expected to be similar to the incidence and type of these events with modafinil.

Postmarketing adverse events associated with the use of modafinil have included mania, delusions, hallucinations, suicidal ideation and aggression, some resulting in hospitalization.

Many, but not all, patients had a prior psychiatric history.

One healthy male volunteer developed ideas of reference, paranoid delusions, and auditory hallucinations in association with multiple daily 600 mg doses of modafinil and sleep deprivation.

There was no evidence of psychosis 36 hours after drug discontinuation.

In the controlled trial NUVIGIL database, anxiety, agitation, nervousness, and irritability were reasons for treatment discontinuation more often in patients on NUVIGIL compared to placebo (NUVIGIL 1.2% and placebo 0.3%).

In the NUVIGIL controlled studies, depression was also a reason for treatment discontinuation more often in patients on NUVIGIL compared to placebo (NUVIGIL 0.6% and placebo 0.2%).

Two cases of suicide ideation were observed in clinical trials.

Caution should be exercised when NUVIGIL is given to patients with a history of psychosis, depression, or mania.

If psychiatric symptoms develop in association with NUVIGIL administration, consider discontinuing NUVIGIL.

DRUG INTERACTIONS

Drug-Drug Interactions The existence of multiple pathways for armodafinil metabolism, as well as the fact that a non-CYP-related pathway is the most rapid in metabolizing armodafinil, suggest that there is a low probability of substantive effects on the overall pharmacokinetic profile of NUVIGIL due to CYP inhibition by concomitant medications.

In vitro data demonstrated that armodafinil shows a weak inductive response for CYP1A2 and possibly CYP3A activities in a concentration-related manner and that CYP2C19 activity is reversibly inhibited by armodafinil.

Other CYP activities did not appear to be affected by armodafinil.

An in vitro study demonstrated that armodafinil is a substrate of P-glycoprotein.

Chronic administration of NUVIGIL at 250 mg reduced the systemic exposure to midazolam by 32% and 17% after single oral (5 mg) and intravenous (2 mg) doses, respectively, suggesting that administration of NUVIGIL moderately induces CYP3A activity.

Drugs that are substrates for CYP3A4/5, such as cyclosporine, may require dosage adjustment.

(See PRECAUTIONS, Drug Interactions ).

Chronic administration of NUVIGIL at 250 mg did not affect the pharmacokinetics of caffeine (200 mg), a probe substrate for CYP1A2 activity.

Coadministration of a single 400-mg dose of NUVIGIL with omeprazole (40 mg) increased systemic exposure to omeprazole by approximately 40%, indicating that armodafinil moderately inhibits CYP2C19 activity.

Drugs that are substrates for CYP2C19 may require dosage reduction.

(See PRECAUTIONS, Drug Interactions ).

OVERDOSAGE

Human Experience There were no overdoses reported in the NUVIGIL clinical studies.

Symptoms of NUVIGIL overdose are likely to be similar to those of modafinil.

Overdose in modafinil clinical trials included excitation or agitation, insomnia, and slight or moderate elevations in hemodynamic parameters.

From post-marketing experience with modafinil, there have been no reports of fatal overdoses involving modafinil alone (doses up to 12 grams).

Overdoses involving multiple drugs, including modafinil, have resulted in fatal outcomes.

Symptoms most often accompanying modafinil overdose, alone or in combination with other drugs have included; insomnia; central nervous system symptoms such as restlessness, disorientation, confusion, excitation and hallucination; digestive changes such as nausea and diarrhea; and cardiovascular changes such as tachycardia, bradycardia, hypertension and chest pain.

Overdose Management No specific antidote exists for the toxic effects of a NUVIGIL overdose.

Such overdoses should be managed with primarily supportive care, including cardiovascular monitoring.

If there are no contraindications, induced emesis or gastric lavage should be considered.

There are no data to suggest the utility of dialysis or urinary acidification or alkalinization in enhancing drug elimination.

The physician should consider contacting a poison-control center for advice in the treatment of any overdose.

DESCRIPTION

NUVIGIL ® (armodafinil) is a wakefulness-promoting agent for oral administration.

Armodafinil is the R-enantiomer of modafinil which is a mixture of the R- and S-enantiomers.

The chemical name for armodafinil is 2-[(R)-(diphenylmethyl)sulfinyl]acetamide.

The molecular formula is C 15 H 15 NO 2 S and the molecular weight is 273.35.

The chemical structure is: Armodafinil exists in multiple crystalline forms.

Form I, which is used in NUVIGIL, is the least soluble form of armodafinil and is a white to off-white, crystalline powder that is very slightly soluble in water, sparingly soluble in acetone and soluble in methanol.

At least 90% of the armodafinil particles used in NUVIGIL have a diameter less than 200 microns.

NUVIGIL tablets contain 50, 150, or 250 mg of armodafinil and the following inactive ingredients: croscarmellose sodium, lactose monohydrate, magnesium stearate, microcrystalline cellulose, povidone, and pregelatinized starch.

chemical structure

CLINICAL STUDIES

CLINICAL TRIALS The effectiveness of NUVIGIL in improving wakefulness has been established in the following sleep disorders: obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), narcolepsy and shift work disorder (SWD).

For each clinical trial, a p-value of ≤ 0.05 was required for statistical significance.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSA) The effectiveness of NUVIGIL in improving wakefulness in patients with excessive sleepiness associated with OSA was established in two 12-week, multi-center, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, double-blind studies of outpatients who met the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD) criteria for OSA (which are also consistent with the American Psychiatric Association DSM-IV criteria).

These criteria include either, 1) excessive sleepiness or insomnia, plus frequent episodes of impaired breathing during sleep, and associated features such as loud snoring, morning headaches or dry mouth upon awakening; or 2) excessive sleepiness or insomnia; and polysomnography demonstrating one of the following: more than five obstructive apneas, each greater than 10 seconds in duration, per hour of sleep; and one or more of the following: frequent arousals from sleep associated with the apneas, bradytachycardia, or arterial oxygen desaturation in association with the apneas.

In addition, for entry into these studies, all patients were required to have excessive sleepiness as demonstrated by a score ≥ 10 on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, despite treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).

Evidence that CPAP was effective in reducing episodes of apnea/hypopnea was required along with documentation of CPAP use.

Patients were required to be compliant with CPAP, defined as CPAP use ≥ 4 hours/night on ≥ 70% of nights.

CPAP use continued throughout the study.

In both studies, the primary measures of effectiveness were 1) sleep latency, as assessed by the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) and 2) the change in the patient’s overall disease status, as measured by the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at the final visit.

For a successful trial both measures had to show statistically significant improvement.

The MWT measures latency (in minutes) to sleep onset.

An extended MWT was performed with test sessions at 2 hour intervals between 9AM and 7PM.

The primary analysis was the average of the sleep latencies from the first four test sessions (9AM to 3PM).

For each test session, the subject was asked to attempt to remain awake without using extraordinary measures.

Each test session was terminated after 30 minutes if no sleep occurred or immediately after sleep onset.

The CGI-C is a 7-point scale, centered at No Change , and ranging from Very Much Worse to Very Much Improved .

Evaluators were not given any specific guidance about the criteria they were to apply when rating patients.

In the first study, a total of 395 patients with OSA were randomized to receive NUVIGIL 150 mg/day, NUVIGIL 250 mg/day or matching placebo.

Patients treated with NUVIGIL showed a statistically significant improvement in the ability to remain awake compared to placebo-treated patients as measured by the MWT at final visit.

A statistically significant greater number of patients treated with NUVIGIL showed improvement in overall clinical condition as rated by the CGI-C scale at final visit.

The average sleep latencies (in minutes) in the MWT at baseline for the trials are shown in Table 1 below, along with the average change from baseline on the MWT at final visit.

The percentages of patients who showed any degree of improvement on the CGI-C in the clinical trials are shown in Table 2 below.

The two doses of NUVIGIL produced statistically significant effects of similar magnitudes on the MWT, and also on the CGI-C.

In the second study, 263 patients with OSA were randomized to either NUVIGIL 150 mg/day or placebo.

Patients treated with NUVIGIL showed a statistically significant improvement in the ability to remain awake compared to placebo-treated patients as measured by the MWT [Table 1].

A statistically significant greater number of patients treated with NUVIGIL showed improvement in overall clinical condition as rated by the CGI-C scale [Table 2].

Nighttime sleep measured with polysomnography was not affected by the use of NUVIGIL in either study.

Narcolepsy The effectiveness of NUVIGIL in improving wakefulness in patients with excessive sleepiness (ES) associated with narcolepsy was established in one 12-week, multi-center, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, double-blind study of outpatients who met the ICSD criteria for narcolepsy.

A total of 196 patients were randomized to receive NUVIGIL 150 or 250 mg/day, or matching placebo.

The ICSD criteria for narcolepsy include either 1) recurrent daytime naps or lapses into sleep that occur almost daily for at least three months, plus sudden bilateral loss of postural muscle tone in association with intense emotion (cataplexy), or 2) a complaint of excessive sleepiness or sudden muscle weakness with associated features: sleep paralysis, hypnagogic hallucinations, automatic behaviors, disrupted major sleep episode; and polysomnography demonstrating one of the following: sleep latency less than 10 minutes or rapid eye movement (REM) sleep latency less than 20 minutes and a Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) that demonstrates a mean sleep latency of less than 5 minutes and two or more sleep onset REM periods and no medical or mental disorder accounts for the symptoms.

For entry into these studies, all patients were required to have objectively documented excessive daytime sleepiness, via MSLT with a sleep latency of 6 minutes or less and the absence of any other clinically significant active medical or psychiatric disorder.

The MSLT, an objective polysomnographic assessment of the patient’s ability to fall asleep in an unstimulating environment, measured latency (in minutes) to sleep onset averaged over 4 test sessions at 2-hour intervals.

For each test session, the subject was told to lie quietly and attempt to sleep.

Each test session was terminated after 20 minutes if no sleep occurred or immediately after sleep onset.

The primary measures of effectiveness were: 1) sleep latency as assessed by the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) and 2) the change in the patient’s overall disease status, as measured by the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at the final visit (See CLINICAL TRIALS, OSA section above for a description of these measures).

Each MWT test session was terminated after 20 minutes if no sleep occurred or immediately after sleep onset in this study.

Patients treated with NUVIGIL showed a statistically significantly enhanced ability to remain awake on the MWT at each dose compared to placebo at final visit [Table 1].

A statistically significant greater number of patients treated with NUVIGIL at each dose showed improvement in overall clinical condition as rated by the CGI-C scale at final visit [Table 2].

The two doses of NUVIGIL produced statistically significant effects of similar magnitudes on the CGI-C.

Although a statistically significant effect on the MWT was observed for each dose, the magnitude of effect was observed to be greater for the higher dose.

Nighttime sleep measured with polysomnography was not affected by the use of NUVIGIL.

Shift Work Disorder (SWD) The effectiveness of NUVIGIL in improving wakefulness in patients with excessive sleepiness associated with SWD was demonstrated in a 12-week, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, clinical trial.

A total of 254 patients with chronic SWD were randomized to receive NUVIGIL 150 mg/day or placebo.

All patients met the ICSD criteria for chronic SWD [which are consistent with the American Psychiatric Association DSM-IV criteria for Circadian Rhythm Sleep Disorder: Shift Work Type].

These criteria include 1) either: a) a primary complaint of excessive sleepiness or insomnia which is temporally associated with a work period (usually night work) that occurs during the habitual sleep phase, or b) polysomnography and the MSLT demonstrate loss of a normal sleep-wake pattern (i.e., disturbed chronobiological rhythmicity); and 2) no other medical or mental disorder accounts for the symptoms, and 3) the symptoms do not meet criteria for any other sleep disorder producing insomnia or excessive sleepiness (e.g., time zone change [jet lag] syndrome).

It should be noted that not all patients with a complaint of sleepiness who are also engaged in shift work meet the criteria for the diagnosis of SWD.

In the clinical trial, only patients who were symptomatic for at least 3 months were enrolled.

Enrolled patients were also required to work a minimum of 5 night shifts per month, have excessive sleepiness at the time of their night shifts (MSLT score ≤ 6 minutes), and have daytime insomnia documented by a daytime polysomnogram (PSG).

The primary measures of effectiveness were 1) sleep latency, as assessed by the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) performed during a simulated night shift at the final visit, and 2) the change in the patient’s overall disease status, as measured by the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at the final visit.

(See CLINICAL TRIALS , Narcolepsy and OSA sections above for description of these measures).

Patients treated with NUVIGIL showed a statistically significant prolongation in the time to sleep onset compared to placebo-treated patients, as measured by the nighttime MSLT at final visit [Table 1].

A statistically significant greater number of patients treated with NUVIGIL showed improvement in overall clinical condition as rated by the CGI-C scale at final visit [Table 2].

Daytime sleep measured with polysomnography was not affected by the use of NUVIGIL.

Table 1.

Average Baseline Sleep Latency and Change from Baseline at Final Visit (MWT and MSLT in minutes) Disorder Measure NUVIGIL 150 mg* NUVIGIL 250 mg* Placebo *Significantly different than placebo for all trials (p<0.05) Baseline Change from Baseline Baseline Change from Baseline Baseline Change from Baseline OSA I MWT 21.5 1.7 23.3 2.2 23.2 -1.7 OSA II MWT 23.7 2.3 – – 23.3 -1.3 Narcolepsy MWT 12.1 1.3 9.5 2.6 12.5 -1.9 SWD MSLT 2.3 3.1 – – 2.4 0.4 Table 2.

Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) (Percent of Patients Who Improved at Final Visit) Disorder NUVIGIL 150 mg* NUVIGIL 250 mg* Placebo *Significantly different than placebo for all trials (p<0.05) OSA I 71% 74% 37% OSA II 71% – 53% Narcolepsy 69% 73% 33% SWD 79% – 59%

HOW SUPPLIED

NUVIGIL ® (armodafinil) Tablets [C-IV] 50 mg: Each round, white uncoated tablet is debossed with “C” on one side and “205” on the other.

NDC 63459-205-30 – Bottles of 30 150 mg: Each oval, white uncoated tablet is debossed with “C” on one side and “215” on the other.

NDC 63459-215-30 – Bottles of 30 250 mg: Each oval, white uncoated tablet is debossed with “C” on one side and “225” on the other.

NDC 63459-225-30 – Bottles of 30 Store at 20° – 25° C (68° – 77° F).

Distributed by: Cephalon, Inc.

Frazer, PA 19355 U.S.

Patent Nos.

RE37,516; 7,132,570; 7,297,346 NUVIGIL is a trademark of Cephalon, Inc.

or its affiliates.

© 2007-2010 Cephalon, Inc.

All rights reserved.

October 2010 NUV-006

GERIATRIC USE

Geriatric Use In elderly patients, elimination of armodafinil and its metabolites may be reduced as a consequence of aging.

Therefore, consideration should be given to the use of lower doses in this population (See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY and PRECAUTIONS ).

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

NUVIGIL is indicated to improve wakefulness in patients with excessive sleepiness associated with obstructive sleep apnea, narcolepsy and shift work disorder.

In OSA, NUVIGIL is indicated as an adjunct to standard treatment(s) for the underlying obstruction.

If continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the treatment of choice for a patient, a maximal effort to treat with CPAP for an adequate period of time should be made prior to initiating NUVIGIL.

If NUVIGIL is used adjunctively with CPAP, the encouragement of and periodic assessment of CPAP compliance is necessary.

In all cases, careful attention to the diagnosis and treatment of the underlying sleep disorder(s) is of utmost importance.

Prescribers should be aware that some patients may have more than one sleep disorder contributing to their excessive sleepiness.

The effectiveness of NUVIGIL in long-term use (greater than 12 weeks) has not been systematically evaluated in placebo-controlled trials.

The physician who elects to prescribe NUVIGIL for an extended time in patients should periodically re-evaluate long-term usefulness for the individual patient.

PEDIATRIC USE

Pediatric Use Safety and effectiveness of armodafinil use in individuals below 17 years of age have not been established.

Serious rash has been seen in pediatric patients receiving modafinil (See WARNINGS, Serious Rash, including Stevens-Johnson Syndrome ).

PREGNANCY

Pregnancy Patients should be advised to notify their physician if they become pregnant or intend to become pregnant during therapy.

Patients should be cautioned regarding the potential increased risk of pregnancy when using steroidal contraceptives (including depot or implantable contraceptives) with NUVIGIL and for one month after discontinuation of therapy (See Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility and Pregnancy ).

NUSRING MOTHERS

Nursing Mothers It is not known whether armodafinil or its metabolites are excreted in human milk.

Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when NUVIGIL tablets are administered to a nursing woman.

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) and Narcolepsy The recommended dose of NUVIGIL for patients with OSA or narcolepsy is 150 mg or 250 mg given as a single dose in the morning.

In patients with OSA, doses up to 250 mg/day, given as a single dose, have been well tolerated, but there is no consistent evidence that this dose confers additional benefit beyond that of the 150 mg/day dose (See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY and CLINICAL TRIALS ).

Shift Work Sleep Disorder (SWD) The recommended dose of NUVIGIL for patients with SWD is 150 mg given daily approximately 1 hour prior to the start of their work shift.

Dosage adjustment should be considered for concomitant medications that are substrates for CYP3A4/5, such as steroidal contraceptives, triazolam, and cyclosporine (See PRECAUTIONS , Drug Interactions ).

Drugs that are largely eliminated via CYP2C19 metabolism, such as diazepam, propranolol, and phenytoin may have prolonged elimination upon coadministration with NUVIGIL and may require dosage reduction and monitoring for toxicity (See PRECAUTIONS , Drug Interactions ).

In patients with severe hepatic impairment, NUVIGIL should be administered at a reduced dose (See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY and PRECAUTIONS ).

There is inadequate information to determine safety and efficacy of dosing in patients with severe renal impairment (See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY and PRECAUTIONS ).

In elderly patients, elimination of armodafinil and its metabolites may be reduced as a consequence of aging.

Therefore, consideration should be given to the use of lower doses in this population (See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY and PRECAUTIONS ).

Creon 6 (amylases 30,000 UNT / lipase 6000 UNT / proteases 19,000 UNT) Delayed Release Oral Capsule

DRUG INTERACTIONS

7 No drug interactions have been identified.

No formal interaction studies have been conducted.

OVERDOSAGE

10 There have been no reports of overdose in clinical trials or postmarketing surveillance with this formulation of CREON.

Chronic high doses of pancreatic enzyme products have been associated with fibrosing colonopathy and colonic strictures .

High doses of pancreatic enzyme products have been associated with hyperuricosuria and hyperuricemia, and should be used with caution in patients with a history of hyperuricemia, gout, or renal impairment .

[see Dosage and Administration ( ) and Warnings and Precautions ( )] 2.2 5.1 [see Warnings and Precautions ( )] 5.3

DESCRIPTION

11 CREON is a pancreatic enzyme preparation consisting of pancrelipase, an extract derived from porcine pancreatic glands.

Pancrelipase contains multiple enzyme classes, including porcine-derived lipases, proteases, and amylases.

Pancrelipase is a beige-white amorphous powder.

It is miscible in water and practically insoluble or insoluble in alcohol and ether.

Each delayed-release capsule for oral administration contains enteric-coated spheres (0.71–1.60 mm in diameter).

The active ingredient evaluated in clinical trials is lipase.

CREON is dosed by lipase units.

Other active ingredients include protease and amylase.

CREON contains the following inactive ingredients: cetyl alcohol, dimethicone, hypromellose phthalate, polyethylene glycol, and triethyl citrate.

9,500 USP units of protease; 15,000 USP units of amylase delayed-release capsules have a white opaque cap with imprint “CREON 1203” and a white opaque body.

The shells contain titanium dioxide and hypromellose.

3,000 USP units of lipase; 19,000 USP units of protease; 30,000 USP units of amylase delayed-release capsules have a Swedish-orange opaque cap with imprint “CREON 1206” and a blue opaque body.

The shells contain FD&C Blue No.

2, gelatin, red iron oxide, sodium lauryl sulfate, titanium dioxide, and yellow iron oxide.

6,000 USP units of lipase; 38,000 USP units of protease; 60,000 USP units of amylase delayed-release capsules have a brown opaque cap with imprint “CREON 1212” and a colorless transparent body.

The shells contain black iron oxide, gelatin, red iron oxide, sodium lauryl sulfate, titanium dioxide, and yellow iron oxide.

12,000 USP units of lipase; 76,000 USP units of protease; 120,000 USP units of amylase delayed-release capsules have a Swedish-orange opaque cap with imprint “CREON 1224” and a colorless transparent body.

The shells contain gelatin, red iron oxide, sodium lauryl sulfate, titanium dioxide, and yellow iron oxide.

24,000 USP units of lipase;

CLINICAL STUDIES

14 The short-term efficacy of CREON was evaluated in three studies conducted in 103 patients with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI).

Two studies were conducted in 49 patients with EPI due to cystic fibrosis (CF); one study was conducted in 54 patients with EPI due to chronic pancreatitis or pancreatectomy.

14.1 Cystic Fibrosis Studies 1 and 2 were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover studies in 49 patients, ages 7 to 43 years, with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency due to cystic fibrosis.

Study 1 included patients aged 12 to 43 years (n = 32).

The final analysis population was limited to 29 patients; 3 patients were excluded due to protocol deviations.

Study 2 included patients aged 7 to 11 years (n = 17).

The final analysis population was limited to 16 patients; 1 patient withdrew consent prior to stool collection during treatment with CREON.

In each study, patients were randomized to receive CREON at a dose of 4,000 lipase units/g fat ingested per day or matching placebo for 5 to 6 days of treatment, followed by crossover to the alternate treatment for an additional 5 to 6 days.

All patients consumed a high-fat diet (greater than or equal to 90 grams of fat per day, 40% of daily calories derived from fat) during the treatment periods.

The coefficient of fat absorption (CFA) was determined by a 72-hour stool collection during both treatments, when both fat excretion and fat ingestion were measured.

Each patient’s CFA during placebo treatment was used as their no-treatment CFA value.

In Study 1, mean CFA was 89% with CREON treatment compared to 49% with placebo treatment.

The mean difference in CFA was 41 percentage points in favor of CREON treatment with 95% CI: (34, 47) and p<0.001.

In Study 2, mean CFA was 83% with CREON treatment compared to 47% with placebo treatment.

The mean difference in CFA was 35 percentage points in favor of CREON treatment with 95% CI: (27, 44) and p<0.001.

Subgroup analyses of the CFA results in Studies 1 and 2 showed that mean change in CFA with CREON treatment was greater in patients with lower no-treatment (placebo) CFA values than in patients with higher no-treatment (placebo) CFA values.

There were no differences in response to CREON by age or gender, with similar responses to CREON observed in male and female patients, and in younger (under 18 years of age) and older patients.

The coefficient of nitrogen absorption (CNA) was determined by a 72-hour stool collection during both treatments, when nitrogen excretion was measured and nitrogen ingestion from a controlled diet was estimated (based on the assumption that proteins contain 16% nitrogen).

Each patient’s CNA during placebo treatment was used as their no-treatment CNA value.

In Study 1, mean CNA was 86% with CREON treatment compared to 49% with placebo treatment.

The mean difference in CNA was 37 percentage points in favor of CREON treatment with 95% CI: (31, 42) and p<0.001.

In Study 2, mean CNA was 80% with CREON treatment compared to 45% with placebo treatment.

The mean difference in CNA was 35 percentage points in favor of CREON treatment with 95% CI: (26, 45) and p<0.001.

14.2 Chronic Pancreatitis or Pancreatectomy A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study was conducted in 54 adult patients, ages 32 to 75 years, with EPI due to chronic pancreatitis or pancreatectomy.

The final analysis population was limited to 52 patients; 2 patients were excluded due to protocol violations.

Ten patients had a history of pancreatectomy (7 were treated with CREON).

In this study, patients received placebo for 5 days (run-in period), followed by pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy as directed by the investigator for 16 days; this was followed by randomization to CREON or matching placebo for 7 days of treatment (double-blind period).

Only patients with CFA less than 80% in the run-in period were randomized to the double-blind period.

The dose of CREON during the double-blind period was 72,000 lipase units per main meal (3 main meals) and 36,000 lipase units per snack (2 snacks).

All patients consumed a high-fat diet (greater than or equal to 100 grams of fat per day) during the treatment period.

The CFA was determined by a 72-hour stool collection during the run-in and double-blind treatment periods, when both fat excretion and fat ingestion were measured.

The mean change in CFA from the run-in period to the end of the double-blind period in the CREON and Placebo groups is shown in .

Table 3 Table 3: Change in CFA in the Chronic Pancreatitis and Pancreatectomy Trial (Run-in Period to End of Double-Blind Period) *p<0.0001 CREON n = 24 Placebo n = 28 CFA [%] Run-in Period (Mean, SD) 54 (19) 57 (21) End of Double-Blind Period (Mean, SD) 86 (6) 66 (20) Change in CFA * [%] Run-in Period to End of Double-Blind Period (Mean, SD) 32 (18) 9 (13) Treatment Difference (95% CI) 21 (14, 28) Subgroup analyses of the CFA results showed that mean change in CFA was greater in patients with lower run-in period CFA values than in patients with higher run-in period CFA values.

Only 1 of the patients with a history of total pancreatectomy was treated with CREON in the study.

That patient had a CFA of 26% during the run-in period and a CFA of 73% at the end of the double-blind period.

The remaining 6 patients with a history of partial pancreatectomy treated with CREON on the study had a mean CFA of 42% during the run-in period and a mean CFA of 84% at the end of the double-blind period.

RECENT MAJOR CHANGES

Dosage and Administration, ( ) 6/2011 Infants (up to 12 months) 2.1 Dosage and Administration ( ) 6/2011 2.2 Dosage and Administration, ( ) 6/2011 Infants (up to 12 months) 2.2

GERIATRIC USE

8.5 Geriatric Use Clinical studies of CREON did not include sufficient numbers of subjects aged 65 and over to determine whether they respond differently from younger subjects.

Other reported clinical experience has not identified differences in responses between the elderly and younger patients.

DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS

3 The active ingredient in CREON evaluated in clinical trials is lipase.

CREON is dosed by lipase units.

Other active ingredients include protease and amylase.

Each CREON delayed-release capsule strength contains the specified amounts of lipase, protease, and amylase as follows: 3,000 USP units of lipase; 9,500 USP units of protease; 15,000 USP units of amylase delayed-release capsules have a white opaque cap with imprint “CREON 1203” and a white opaque body.

6,000 USP units of lipase; 19,000 USP units of protease; 30,000 USP units of amylase delayed-release capsules have an orange opaque cap with imprint “CREON 1206” and a blue opaque body.

12,000 USP units of lipase; 38,000 USP units of protease; 60,000 USP units of amylase delayed-release capsules have a brown opaque cap with imprint “CREON 1212” and a colorless transparent body.

24,000 USP units of lipase; 76,000 USP units of protease; 120,000 USP units of amylase delayed-release capsules have an orange opaque cap with imprint “CREON 1224” and a colorless transparent body.

Delayed-Release Capsules: 3,000 USP units of lipase; 9,500 USP units of protease; 15,000 USP units of amylase ( ) 3 Delayed-Release Capsules: 6,000 USP units of lipase; 19,000 USP units of protease; 30,000 USP units of amylase ( ) 3 Delayed-Release Capsules: 12,000 USP units of lipase; 38,000 USP units of protease; 60,000 USP units of amylase ( ) 3 Delayed-Release Capsules: 24,000 USP units of lipase; 76,000 USP units of protease; 120,000 USP units of amylase ( ) 3

MECHANISM OF ACTION

12.1 Mechanism of Action The pancreatic enzymes in CREON catalyze the hydrolysis of fats to monoglyceride, glycerol and free fatty acids, proteins into peptides and amino acids, and starches into dextrins and short chain sugars such as maltose and maltriose in the duodenum and proximal small intestine, thereby acting like digestive enzymes physiologically secreted by the pancreas.

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

1 CREON (pancrelipase) is indicated for the treatment of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency due to cystic fibrosis, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatectomy, or other conditions.

® CREON is a combination of porcine-derived lipases, proteases, and amylases indicated for the treatment of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency due to cystic fibrosis, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatectomy, or other conditions.

( ) 1

PEDIATRIC USE

8.4 Pediatric Use The short-term safety and effectiveness of CREON were assessed in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover studies of 49 patients with EPI due to cystic fibrosis, 25 of whom were pediatric patients.

Study 1 included 8 adolescents between 12 and 17 years of age.

Study 2 included 17 children between 7 and 11 years of age.

The safety and efficacy in pediatric patients in these studies were similar to adult patients .

[see Adverse Reactions ( ) and Clinical Studies ( )] 6.1 14 An open-label, single-arm, short-term study of CREON was conducted in 18 infants and children, ages 4 months to six years of age, with EPI due to cystic fibrosis.

Patients received their usual pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (mean dose of 7,000 lipase units/kg/day for a mean duration of 18.2 days) followed by CREON (mean dose of 7,500 lipase units/kg/day for a mean duration of 12.6 days).

The mean daily fat intake was 48 grams during treatment with usual pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy and 47 grams during treatment with CREON.

When patients were switched from their usual pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy to CREON, they demonstrated similar spot fecal fat testing results; the clinical relevance of spot fecal fat testing has not been demonstrated.

Adverse reactions that occurred in patients during treatment with CREON were vomiting, irritability, and decreased appetite .

[see Adverse Reactions ( )] 6.1 The safety and efficacy of pancreatic enzyme products with different formulations of pancrelipase consisting of the same active ingredient (lipases, proteases, and amylases) for treatment of children with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency due to cystic fibrosis have been described in the medical literature and through clinical experience.

Dosing of pediatric patients should be in accordance with recommended guidance from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Consensus Conferences .

Doses of other pancreatic enzyme products exceeding 6,000 lipase units/kg of body weight per meal have been associated with fibrosing colonopathy and colonic strictures in children less than 12 years of age .

[see Dosage and Administration ( )] 2.1 [see Warnings and Precautions ( )] 5.1

PREGNANCY

8.1 Pregnancy Teratogenic effects Pregnancy Category C: Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with pancrelipase.

It is also not known whether pancrelipase can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity.

CREON should be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed.

The risk and benefit of pancrelipase should be considered in the context of the need to provide adequate nutritional support to a pregnant woman with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency.

Adequate caloric intake during pregnancy is important for normal maternal weight gain and fetal growth.

Reduced maternal weight gain and malnutrition can be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.

NUSRING MOTHERS

8.3 Nursing Mothers It is not known whether this drug is excreted in human milk.

Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when CREON is administered to a nursing woman.

The risk and benefit of pancrelipase should be considered in the context of the need to provide adequate nutritional support to a nursing mother with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency.

WARNING AND CAUTIONS

5 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS Fibrosing colonopathy is associated with high-dose use of pancreatic enzyme replacement in the treatment of cystic fibrosis patients.

Exercise caution when doses of CREON exceed 2,500 lipase units/kg of body weight per meal (or greater than 10,000 lipase units/kg of body weight per day).

( ) 5.1 To avoid irritation of oral mucosa, do not chew CREON or retain in the mouth.

( ) 5.2 Exercise caution when prescribing CREON to patients with gout, renal impairment, or hyperuricemia.

( ) 5.3 There is theoretical risk of viral transmission with all pancreatic enzyme products including CREON.

( ) 5.4 Exercise caution when administering pancrelipase to a patient with a known allergy to proteins of porcine origin.

( ) 5.5 5.1 Fibrosing Colonopathy Fibrosing colonopathy has been reported following treatment with different pancreatic enzyme products.

Fibrosing colonopathy is a rare, serious adverse reaction initially described in association with high-dose pancreatic enzyme use, usually over a prolonged period of time and most commonly reported in pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis.

The underlying mechanism of fibrosing colonopathy remains unknown.

Doses of pancreatic enzyme products exceeding 6,000 lipase units/kg of body weight per meal have been associated with colonic stricture in children less than 12 years of age.

Patients with fibrosing colonopathy should be closely monitored because some patients may be at risk of progressing to stricture formation.

It is uncertain whether regression of fibrosing colonopathy occurs.

It is generally recommended, unless clinically indicated, that enzyme doses should be less than 2,500 lipase units/kg of body weight per meal (or less than 10,000 lipase units/kg of body weight per day) or less than 4,000 lipase units/g fat ingested per day 5, 6 1 1 [see Dosage and Administration ( )].

2.1 Doses greater than 2,500 lipase units/kg of body weight per meal (or greater than 10,000 lipase units/kg of body weight per day) should be used with caution and only if they are documented to be effective by 3-day fecal fat measures that indicate a significantly improved coefficient of fat absorption.

Patients receiving higher doses than 6,000 lipase units/kg of body weight per meal should be examined and the dosage either immediately decreased or titrated downward to a lower range.

5.2 Potential for Irritation to Oral Mucosa Care should be taken to ensure that no drug is retained in the mouth.

CREON should not be crushed or chewed or mixed in foods having a pH greater than 4.5.

These actions can disrupt the protective enteric coating resulting in early release of enzymes, irritation of oral mucosa, and/or loss of enzyme activity .

For patients who are unable to swallow intact capsules, the capsules may be carefully opened and the contents added to a small amount of acidic soft food with a pH of 4.5 or less, such as applesauce, at room temperature.

The CREON-soft food mixture should be swallowed immediately and followed with water or juice to ensure complete ingestion.

[see Dosage and Administration ( ) and Patient Counseling Information ( )] 2.2 17.1 5.3 Potential for Risk of Hyperuricemia Caution should be exercised when prescribing CREON to patients with gout, renal impairment, or hyperuricemia.

Porcine-derived pancreatic enzyme products contain purines that may increase blood uric acid levels.

5.4 Potential Viral Exposure from the Product Source CREON is sourced from pancreatic tissue from swine used for food consumption.

Although the risk that CREON will transmit an infectious agent to humans has been reduced by testing for certain viruses during manufacturing and by inactivating certain viruses during manufacturing, there is a theoretical risk for transmission of viral disease, including diseases caused by novel or unidentified viruses.

Thus, the presence of porcine viruses that might infect humans cannot be definitely excluded.

However, no cases of transmission of an infectious illness associated with the use of porcine pancreatic extracts have been reported.

5.5 Allergic Reactions Caution should be exercised when administering pancrelipase to a patient with a known allergy to proteins of porcine origin.

Rarely, severe allergic reactions including anaphylaxis, asthma, hives, and pruritus, have been reported with other pancreatic enzyme products with different formulations of the same active ingredient (pancrelipase).

The risks and benefits of continued CREON treatment in patients with severe allergy should be taken into consideration with the overall clinical needs of the patient.

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS

17 PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION See FDA-approved patient labeling (Medication Guide) 17.1 Dosing and Administration Instruct patients and caregivers that CREON should only be taken as directed by their healthcare professional.

Patients should be advised that the total daily dose should not exceed 10,000 lipase units/kg body weight/day unless clinically indicated.

This needs to be especially emphasized for patients eating multiple snacks and meals per day.

Patients should be informed that if a dose is missed, the next dose should be taken with the next meal or snack as directed.

Doses should not be doubled .

[see Dosage and Administration ( )] 2 Instruct patients and caregivers that CREON should always be taken with food.

Patients should be advised that CREON delayed-release capsules and the capsule contents must not be crushed or chewed as doing so could cause early release of enzymes and/or loss of enzymatic activity.

Patients should swallow the intact capsules with adequate amounts of liquid at mealtimes.

If necessary, the capsule contents can also be sprinkled on soft acidic foods .

[see Dosage and Administration ( )] 2 17.2 Fibrosing Colonopathy Advise patients and caregivers to follow dosing instructions carefully, as doses of pancreatic enzyme products exceeding 6,000 lipase units/kg of body weight per meal have been associated with colonic strictures in children below the age of 12 years .

[see Dosage and Administration ( )] 2 17.3 Allergic Reactions Advise patients and caregivers to contact their healthcare professional immediately if allergic reactions to CREON develop .

[see Warnings and Precautions ( )] 5.5 17.4 Pregnancy and Breast Feeding Instruct patients to notify their healthcare professional if they are pregnant or are thinking of becoming pregnant during treatment with CREON .

[see Use in Specific Populations ( )] 8.1 Instruct patients to notify their healthcare professional if they are breast feeding or are thinking of breast feeding during treatment with CREON .

[see Use in Specific Populations ( )] 8.3 Manufactured by: Abbott Products GmbH Hannover, Germany Marketed By: Abbott Laboratories North Chicago, IL 60064, U.S.A.

1055216 12E Rev Jul 2011 © 2011 Abbott Laboratories

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

2 CREON is not interchangeable with other pancrelipase products.

CREON is orally administered.

Therapy should be initiated at the lowest recommended dose and gradually increased.

The dosage of CREON should be individualized based on clinical symptoms, the degree of steatorrhea present, and the fat content of the diet as described in the Limitations on Dosing below .

[see Dosage and Administration ( ) and Warnings and Precautions ( )] 2.2 5.1 CREON is not interchangeable with any other pancrelipase product.

( ) 2.1 Do not crush or chew capsules and capsule contents.

For infants or patients unable to swallow intact capsules, the contents may be sprinkled on soft acidic food, e.g., applesauce.

( ) Dosing should not exceed the recommended maximum dosage set forth by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Consensus Conferences Guidelines.

( ) 2.1 2.2 Infants (up to 12 months) Prior to each feeding, infants may be given 3,000 lipase units (one capsule) per 120 mL of formula or per breast-feeding.

( ) 2.1 Do not mix CREON capsule contents directly into formula or breast milk prior to administration.

( ) 2.1 Children Older than 12 Months and Younger than 4 Years Begin with 1,000 lipase units/kg of body weight per meal for children less than age 4 years to a maximum of 2,500 lipase units/kg of body weight per meal (or less than or equal to 10,000 lipase units/kg of body weight per day), or less than 4,000 lipase units/g fat ingested per day.

( ) 2.2 Children 4 Years and Older and Adults Begin with 500 lipase units/kg of body weight per meal for those older than age 4 years to a maximum of 2,500 lipase units/kg of body weight per meal (or less than or equal to 10,000 lipase units/kg of body weight per day), or less than 4,000 lipase units/g fat ingested per day.

( ) 2.2 Adults with Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency Due to Chronic Pancreatitis or Pancreatectomy Individualize dosage based on clinical symptoms, the degree of steatorrhea present and the fat content of the diet.

( ) 2.2 2.1 Administration Infants (up to 12 months) CREON should be administered to infants immediately prior to each feeding, using a dosage of lipase units per 120 mL of formula or prior to breast-feeding.

Contents of the capsule may be administered directly to the mouth or with a small amount of applesauce.

Administration should be followed by breast milk or formula.

Contents of the capsule be mixed directly into formula or breast milk as this may diminish efficacy.

Care should be taken to ensure that CREON is not crushed or chewed or retained in the mouth, to avoid irritation of the oral mucosa.

3,000 should not Children and Adults CREON should be taken during meals or snacks, with sufficient fluid.

Capsules should be swallowed whole.

CREON capsules and capsule contents should not be crushed or chewed.

For patients who are unable to swallow intact capsules, the capsules may be carefully opened and the contents added to a small amount of acidic soft food with a pH of 4.5 or less, such as applesauce, at room temperature.

The CREON-soft food mixture should be swallowed immediately without crushing or chewing, and followed with water or juice to ensure complete ingestion.

Care should be taken to ensure that no drug is retained in the mouth.

2.2 Dosage Dosage recommendations for pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy were published following the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Consensus Conferences.

CREON should be administered in a manner consistent with the recommendations of the Patients may be dosed on a fat ingestion-based or actual body weight-based dosing scheme.

1, 2, 3 Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Consensus Conferences (also known as Conferences) provided in the following paragraphs, except for infants.

Although the Conferences recommend doses of 2,000 to 4,000 lipase units in infants up to 12 months, CREON is available in a 3,000 lipase unit capsule.

Therefore, the recommended dose of CREON in infants up to 12 months is 3,000 lipase units per 120 mL of formula or per breast-feeding.

Additional recommendations for pancreatic enzyme therapy in patients with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency due to chronic pancreatitis or pancreatectomy are based on a clinical trial conducted in these populations.

Infants (up to 12 months) CREON is available in the strength of 3,000 USP units of lipase thus infants may be given 3,000 lipase units (one capsule) per 120 mL of formula or per breast-feeding.

Do not mix CREON capsule contents directly into formula or breast milk prior to administration .

[see Administration ( )] 2.1 Children Older than 12 Months and Younger than 4 Years Enzyme dosing should begin with 1,000 lipase units/kg of body weight per meal for children less than age 4 years to a maximum of 2,500 lipase units/kg of body weight per meal (or less than or equal to 10,000 lipase units/kg of body weight per day), or less than 4,000 lipase units/g fat ingested per day.

Children 4 Years and Older and Adults Enzyme dosing should begin with 500 lipase units/kg of body weight per meal for those older than age 4 years to a maximum of 2,500 lipase units/kg of body weight per meal (or less than or equal to 10,000 lipase units/kg of body weight per day), or less than 4,000 lipase units/g fat ingested per day.

Usually, half of the prescribed CREON dose for an individualized full meal should be given with each snack.

The total daily dose should reflect approximately three meals plus two or three snacks per day.

Enzyme doses expressed as lipase units/kg of body weight per meal should be decreased in older patients because they weigh more but tend to ingest less fat per kilogram of body weight.

Adults with Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency Due to Chronic Pancreatitis or Pancreatectomy The initial starting dose and increases in the dose per meal should be individualized based on clinical symptoms, the degree of steatorrhea present, and the fat content of the diet.

In one clinical trial, patients received CREON at a dose of 72,000 lipase units per meal while consuming at least 100 g of fat per day .

Lower starting doses recommended in the literature are consistent with the 500 lipase units/kg of body weight per meal lowest starting dose recommended for adults in the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Consensus Conferences Guidelines.

Usually, half of the prescribed CREON dose for an individualized full meal should be given with each snack.

[see Clinical Studies ( )] 14.2 1, 2, 3, 4 Limitations on Dosing Dosing should not exceed the recommended maximum dosage set forth by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Consensus Conferences Guidelines.

If symptoms and signs of steatorrhea persist, the dosage may be increased by the healthcare professional.

Patients should be instructed not to increase the dosage on their own.

There is great inter-individual variation in response to enzymes; thus, a range of doses is recommended.

Changes in dosage may require an adjustment period of several days.

If doses are to exceed 2,500 lipase units/kg of body weight per meal, further investigation is warranted.

Doses greater than 2,500 lipase units/kg of body weight per meal (or greater than 10,000 lipase units/kg of body weight per day) should be used with caution and only if they are documented to be effective by 3-day fecal fat measures that indicate a significantly improved coefficient of fat absorption.

Doses greater than 6,000 lipase units/kg of body weight per meal have been associated with colonic stricture, indicative of fibrosing colonopathy, in children less than 12 years of age .

Patients currently receiving higher doses than 6,000 lipase units/kg of body weight per meal should be examined and the dosage either immediately decreased or titrated downward to a lower range.

1, 2, 3 [see Warnings and Precautions ( )] 5.1

Generic Name: OMEPRAZOLE
Brand Name: Omeprazole
  • Substance Name(s):
  • OMEPRAZOLE

DRUG INTERACTIONS

7 • Atazanavir and nelfinavir: Omeprazole reduces plasma levels of atazanavir and nelfinavir.

Concomitant use is not recommended ( 7.1 ) • Saquinavir: Omeprazole increases plasma levels of saquinavir.

Monitor for toxicity and consider dose reduction of saquinavir ( 7.1 ) • May interfere with drugs for which gastric pH affects bioavailability (e.g., ketoconazole, iron salts, erlotinib, ampicillin esters, and digoxin).

Patients treated with omeprazole and digoxin may need to be monitored for increases in digoxin toxicity ( 7.2 ) • Clopidogrel: Omeprazole decreases exposure to the active metabolite of clopidogrel.

( 7.3 , 12.3 ) • Cilostazol: Omeprazole increases systemic exposure of cilostazol and one of its active metabolites.

Consider dose reduction of cilostazol.

( 7.3 ) • Drugs metabolized by cytochrome P450 (e.g., diazepam, warfarin, phenytoin, cyclosporine, disulfiram, benzodiazepines): omeprazole can prolong their elimination.

Monitor and determine need for dose adjustments ( 7.3 ) • Patients treated with proton pump inhibitors and warfarin may need to be monitored for increases in INR and prothrombin time ( 7.3 ) • Combined inhibitor of CYP 2C19 and 3A4 (e.g.

voriconazole) may raise omeprazole levels ( 7.3 ) • Tacrolimus: Omeprazole may increase serum levels of tacrolimus ( 7.4 ) • Methotrexate: Omeprazole may increase serum levels of methotrexate ( 7.7 ) 7.1 Interference with Antiretroviral Therapy Concomitant use of atazanavir and nelfinavir with proton pump inhibitors is not recommended.

Co-administration of atazanavir with proton pump inhibitors is expected to substantially decrease atazanavir plasma concentrations and may result in a loss of therapeutic effect and the development of drug resistance.

Co-‑administration of saquinavir with proton pump inhibitors is expected to increase saquinavir concentrations, which may increase toxicity and require dose reduction.

Omeprazole has been reported to interact with some antiretroviral drugs.

The clinical importance and the mechanisms behind these interactions are not always known.

Increased gastric pH during omeprazole treatment may change the absorption of the antiretroviral drug.

Other possible interaction mechanisms are via CYP 2C19.

Reduced concentrations of atazanavir and nelfinavir For some antiretroviral drugs, such as atazanavir and nelfinavir, decreased serum levels have been reported when given together with omeprazole.

Following multiple doses of nelfinavir (1250 mg, twice daily) and omeprazole (40 mg daily), AUC was decreased by 36% and 92%, C max by 37% and 89% and C min by 39% and 75% respectively for nelfinavir and M8.

Following multiple doses of atazanavir (400 mg, daily) and omeprazole (40 mg, daily, 2 hr before atazanavir), AUC was decreased by 94%, C max by 96%, and C min by 95%.

Concomitant administration with omeprazole and drugs such as atazanavir and nelfinavir is therefore not recommended.

Increased concentrations of saquinavir For other antiretroviral drugs, such as saquinavir, elevated serum levels have been reported, with an increase in AUC by 82%, in C max by 75%, and in C min by 106%, following multiple dosing of saquinavir/ritonavir (1000/100 mg) twice daily for 15 days with omeprazole 40 mg daily co-administered days 11 to 15.

Therefore, clinical and laboratory monitoring for saquinavir toxicity is recommended during concurrent use with omeprazole.

Dose reduction of saquinavir should be considered from the safety perspective for individual patients.

There are also some antiretroviral drugs of which unchanged serum levels have been reported when given with omeprazole.

7.2 Drugs for Which Gastric pH Can Affect Bioavailability Because of its profound and long lasting inhibition of gastric acid secretion, it is theoretically possible that omeprazole may interfere with absorption of drugs where gastric pH is an important determinant of their bioavailability.

Like with other drugs that decrease the intragastric acidity, the absorption of drugs such as ketoconazole, ampicillin esters, iron salts and erlotinib can decrease, while the absorption of drugs such as digoxin can increase during treatment with omeprazole.

Concomitant treatment with omeprazole (20 mg daily) and digoxin in healthy subjects increased the bioavailability of digoxin by 10% (30% in two subjects).

Therefore, patients may need to be monitored when digoxin is taken concomitantly with omeprazole.

In the clinical trials, antacids were used concomitantly with the administration of omeprazole.

7.3 Effects on Hepatic Metabolism/Cytochrome P-450 Pathways Omeprazole can prolong the elimination of diazepam, warfarin and phenytoin, drugs that are metabolized by oxidation in the liver.

There have been reports of increased INR and prothrombin time in patients receiving proton pump inhibitors, including omeprazole, and warfarin concomitantly.

Increases in INR and prothrombin time may lead to abnormal bleeding and even death.

Patients treated with proton pump inhibitors and warfarin may need to be monitored for increases in INR and prothrombin time.

Although in normal subjects no interaction with theophylline or propranolol was found, there have been clinical reports of interaction with other drugs metabolized via the cytochrome P450 system (e.g., cyclosporine, disulfiram, benzodiazepines).

Patients should be monitored to determine if it is necessary to adjust the dosage of these drugs when taken concomitantly with omeprazole.

Concomitant administration of omeprazole and voriconazole (a combined inhibitor of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4) resulted in more than doubling of the omeprazole exposure.

Dose adjustment of omeprazole is not normally required.

However, in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, who may require higher doses up to 240 mg/day, dose adjustment may be considered.

When voriconazole (400 mg Q12h x 1 day, then 200 mg x 6 days) was given with omeprazole (40 mg once daily x 7 days) to healthy subjects, it significantly increased the steady-state C max and AUC 0-24 of omeprazole, an average of 2 times (90% CI: 1.8, 2.6) and 4 times (90% CI: 3.3, 4.4) respectively as compared to when omeprazole was given without voriconazole.

Omeprazole acts as an inhibitor of CYP 2C19.

Omeprazole, given in doses of 40 mg daily for one week to 20 healthy subjects in cross-‑over study, increased C max and AUC of cilostazol by 18% and 26% respectively.

C max and AUC of one of its active metabolites, 3,4-‑dihydro-cilostazol, which has 4 to 7 times the activity of cilostazol, were increased by 29% and 69% respectively.

Co-administration of cilostazol with omeprazole is expected to increase concentrations of cilostazol and its above mentioned active metabolite.

Therefore a dose reduction of cilostazol from 100 mg twice daily to 50 mg twice daily should be considered.

Drugs known to induce CYP2C19 or CYP3A4 (such as rifampin) may lead to decreased omeprazole serum levels.

In a cross-over study in 12 healthy male subjects, St John’s Wort (300 mg three times daily for 14 days), an inducer of CYP3A4, decreased the systemic exposure of omeprazole in CYP2C19 poor metabolisers (C max and AUC decreased by 37.5% and 37.9%, respectively) and extensive metabolisers (C max and AUC decreased by 49.6% and 43.9%, respectively).

Avoid concomitant use of St.

John’s Wort or rifampin with omeprazole.

Clopidogrel Omeprazole is an inhibitor of CYP2C19 enzyme.

Clopidogrel is metabolized to its active metabolite in part by CYP2C19.

Concomitant use of omeprazole 80 mg results in reduced plasma concentrations of the active metabolite of clopidogrel and a reduction in platelet inhibition.

Avoid concomitant administration of omeprazole with clopidogrel.

When using omeprazole, consider use of alternative anti-platelet therapy [ see Pharmacokinetics (12.3) ].

There are no adequate combination studies of a lower dose of omeprazole or a higher dose of clopidogrel in comparison with the approved dose of clopidogrel.

7.4 Tacrolimus Concomitant administration of omeprazole and tacrolimus may increase the serum levels of tacrolimus.

7.5 Interactions with Investigations of Neuroendocrine Tumors Drug-induced decrease in gastric acidity results in enterochromaffin-like cell hyperplasia and increased Chromogranin A levels which may interfere with investigations for neuroendocrine tumors [ see Warnings and Precautions (5.8) and Clinical Pharmacology (12) ].

7.6 Combination Therapy with Clarithromycin Concomitant administration of clarithromycin with other drugs can lead to serious adverse reactions due to drug interactions [see Warnings and Precautions in prescribing information for clarithromycin].

Because of these drug interactions, clarithromycin is contraindicated for co-administration with certain drugs [see Contraindications in prescribing information for clarithromycin].

7.7 Methotrexate Case reports, published population pharmacokinetic studies, and retrospective analyses suggest that concomitant administration of PPIs and methotrexate (primarily at high dose; see methotrexate prescribing information) may elevate and prolong serum levels of methotrexate and/or its metabolite hydroxymethotrexate.

However, no formal drug interaction studies of methotrexate with PPIs have been conducted [ see Warnings and Precautions (5.9) ].

OVERDOSAGE

10 Reports have been received of overdosage with omeprazole in humans.

Doses ranged up to 2400 mg (120 times the usual recommended clinical dose).

Manifestations were variable, but included confusion, drowsiness, blurred vision, tachycardia, nausea, vomiting, diaphoresis, flushing, headache, dry mouth, and other adverse reactions similar to those seen in normal clinical experience.

[ See Adverse Reactions (6) ] Symptoms were transient, and no serious clinical outcome has been reported when omeprazole was taken alone.

No specific antidote for omeprazole overdosage is known.

Omeprazole is extensively protein bound and is, therefore, not readily dialyzable.

In the event of overdosage, treatment should be symptomatic and supportive.

As with the management of any overdose, the possibility of multiple drug ingestion should be considered.

For current information on treatment of any drug overdose, contact a Poison Control Center at 1-800-222-1222.

Single oral doses of omeprazole at 1350, 1339, and 1200 mg/kg were lethal to mice, rats, and dogs, respectively.

Animals given these doses showed sedation, ptosis, tremors, convulsions, and decreased activity, body temperature, and respiratory rate and increased depth of respiration.

DESCRIPTION

11 The active ingredient in omeprazole delayed-release capsules is a substituted benzimidazole, 5-methoxy-2-[[(4-methoxy-3, 5-dimethyl-2-pyridinyl) methyl] sulfinyl]-1 H -benzimidazole, a compound that inhibits gastric acid secretion.

Its empirical formula is C 17 H 19 N 3 O 3 S, with a molecular weight of 345.42.

The structural formula is: Omeprazole is a white to off-white crystalline powder that melts with decomposition at about 155°C.

It is a weak base, freely soluble in ethanol and methanol, and slightly soluble in acetone and isopropanol and very slightly soluble in water.

The stability of omeprazole is a function of pH; it is rapidly degraded in acid media, but has acceptable stability under alkaline conditions.

Omeprazole Delayed-Release Capsules meet USP Dissolution Test 2.

Omeprazole is supplied as delayed-release capsules for oral administration.

Each delayed-release capsule contains either 10 mg, 20 mg or 40 mg of omeprazole in the form of enteric-coated granules with the following inactive ingredients: magnesium hydroxide, mannitol, methacrylic acid copolymer dispersion, povidone and triethyl citrate.

The capsule shells have the following inactive ingredients: gelatin, red iron oxide and titanium dioxide.

The capsule imprinting ink contains ammonium hydroxide, black iron oxide, ethyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol, n-butyl alcohol, potassium hydroxide, propylene glycol and shellac.

chemical-structure

CLINICAL STUDIES

14 14.1 Duodenal Ulcer Disease Active Duodenal Ulcer In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 147 patients with endoscopically documented duodenal ulcer, the percentage of patients healed (per protocol) at 2 and 4 weeks was significantly higher with omeprazole 20 mg once daily than with placebo (p ≤ 0.01).

Treatment of Active Duodenal Ulcer % of Patients Healed Omeprazole Placebo 20 mg a.m.

(n=99) a.m.

(n=48) Week 2 (p ≤ 0.01) 41 13 Week 4 75 27 Complete daytime and nighttime pain relief occurred significantly faster (p ≤ 0.01) in patients treated with omeprazole 20 mg than in patients treated with placebo.

At the end of the study, significantly more patients who had received omeprazole had complete relief of daytime pain (p ≤ 0.05) and nighttime pain (p ≤ 0.01).

In a multicenter, double-blind study of 293 patients with endoscopically documented duodenal ulcer, the percentage of patients healed (per protocol) at 4 weeks was significantly higher with omeprazole 20 mg once daily than with ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d.

(p < 0.01).

Treatment of Active Duodenal Ulcer % of Patients Healed Omeprazole Ranitidine 20 mg a.m.

150 mg twice daily (n = 145) (n = 148) Week 2 42 34 Week 4 (p < 0.01) 82 63 Healing occurred significantly faster in patients treated with omeprazole than in those treated with ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d.

(p < 0.01).

In a foreign multinational randomized, double-blind study of 105 patients with endoscopically documented duodenal ulcer, 20 mg and 40 mg of omeprazole were compared with 150 mg b.i.d.

of ranitidine at 2, 4 and 8 weeks.

At 2 and 4 weeks both doses of omeprazole were statistically superior (per protocol) to ranitidine, but 40 mg was not superior to 20 mg of omeprazole, and at 8 weeks there was no significant difference between any of the active drugs.

Treatment of Active Duodenal Ulcer % of Patients Healed Omeprazole Ranitidine 20 mg (n=34) 40 mg (n=36) 150 mg twice daily (n=35) Week 2 (p ≤ 0.01) 83 83 53 Week 4 97 100 82 Week 8 100 100 94 H.

pylori Eradication in Patients with Duodenal Ulcer Disease Triple Therapy (omeprazole/clarithromycin/amoxicillin) Three U.S., randomized, double-blind clinical studies in patients with H.

pylori infection and duodenal ulcer disease (n = 558) compared omeprazole plus clarithromycin plus amoxicillin with clarithromycin plus amoxicillin.

Two studies (1 and 2) were conducted in patients with an active duodenal ulcer, and the other study (3) was conducted in patients with a history of a duodenal ulcer in the past 5 years but without an ulcer present at the time of enrollment.

The dose regimen in the studies was omeprazole 20 mg twice daily plus clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily plus amoxicillin 1 g twice daily for 10 days; or clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily plus amoxicillin 1 g twice daily for 10 days.

In studies 1 and 2, patients who took the omeprazole regimen also received an additional 18 days of omeprazole 20 mg once daily.

Endpoints studied were eradication of H.

pylori and duodenal ulcer healing (studies 1 and 2 only).

H.

pylori status was determined by CLOtest ® , histology and culture in all three studies.

For a given patient, H.

pylori was considered eradicated if at least two of these tests were negative, and none was positive.

The combination of omeprazole plus clarithromycin plus amoxicillin was effective in eradicating H.

pylori .

Table 5 Per-Protocol and Intent-to-Treat H.

pylori Eradication Rates % of Patients Cured [95% Confidence Interval] Omeprazole + Clarithromycin + Amoxicillin Clarithromycin + Amoxicillin Per-Protocol Patients were included in the analysis if they had confirmed duodenal ulcer disease (active ulcer, studies 1 and 2; history of ulcer within 5 years, study 3) and H.

pylori infection at baseline defined as at least two of three positive endoscopic tests from CLOtest ® , histology, and/or culture.

Patients were included in the analysis if they completed the study.

Additionally, if patients dropped out of the study due to an adverse event related to the study drug, they were included in the analysis as failures of therapy.

The impact of eradication on ulcer recurrence has not been assessed in patients with a past history of ulcer.

Intent-to-Treat Patients were included in the analysis if they had documented H.

pylori infection at baseline and had confirmed duodenal ulcer disease.

All dropouts were included as failures of therapy.

Per-Protocol Intent-to-Treat Study 1 (p < 0.05) versus clarithromycin plus amoxicillin.

77 [64, 86] (n = 64) 69 [57, 79] (n = 80) 43 [31, 56] (n = 67) 37 [27, 48] (n = 84) Study 2 78 [67, 88] (n = 65) 73 [61, 82] (n = 77) 41 [29, 54] (n = 68) 36 [26, 47] (n = 83) Study 3 90 [80, 96] (n = 69) 83 [74, 91] (n = 84) 33 [24, 44] (n = 93) 32 [23, 42] (n = 99) Dual Therapy (omeprazole/clarithromycin) Four randomized, double-blind, multi-center studies (4, 5, 6, and 7) evaluated omeprazole 40 mg once daily plus clarithromycin 500 mg three times daily for 14 days, followed by omeprazole 20 mg once daily, (Studies 4, 5, and 7) or by omeprazole 40 mg once daily (Study 6) for an additional 14 days in patients with active duodenal ulcer associated with H.

pylori .

Studies 4 and 5 were conducted in the U.S.

and Canada and enrolled 242 and 256 patients, respectively.

H.

pylori infection and duodenal ulcer were confirmed in 219 patients in Study 4 and 228 patients in Study 5.

These studies compared the combination regimen to omeprazole and clarithromycin monotherapies.

Studies 6 and 7 were conducted in Europe and enrolled 154 and 215 patients, respectively.

H.

pylori infection and duodenal ulcer were confirmed in 148 patients in Study 6 and 208 patients in Study 7.

These studies compared the combination regimen with omeprazole monotherapy.

The results for the efficacy analyses for these studies are described below.

H.

pylori eradication was defined as no positive test (culture or histology) at 4 weeks following the end of treatment, and two negative tests were required to be considered eradicated of H.

pylori .

In the per-protocol analysis, the following patients were excluded: dropouts, patients with missing H.

pylori tests post-treatment, and patients that were not assessed for H.

pylori eradication because they were found to have an ulcer at the end of treatment.

The combination of omeprazole and clarithromycin was effective in eradicating H.

pylori .

Table 6 H.

pylori Eradication Rates (Per-Protocol Analysis at 4 to 6 Weeks) % of Patients Cured [95% Confidence Interval] Omeprazole + Clarithromycin Omeprazole Clarithromycin U.S.

Studies Study 4 74 [60, 85] Statistically significantly higher than clarithromycin monotherapy (p < 0.05) Statistically significantly higher than omeprazole monotherapy (p < 0.05) (n = 53) 0 [0, 7] (n = 54) 31 [18, 47] (n = 42) Study 5 64 [51, 76] (n = 61) 0 [0, 6] (n = 59) 39 [24, 55] (n = 44) Non U.S.

Studies Study 6 83 [71, 92] (n = 60) 1 [0, 7] (n = 74) N/A Study 7 74 [64, 83] (n = 86) 1 [0, 6] (n = 90) N/A Ulcer healing was not significantly different when clarithromycin was added to omeprazoletherapy compared with omeprazole therapy alone.

The combination of omeprazole and clarithromycin was effective in eradicating H.

pylori and reduced duodenal ulcer recurrence.

Table 7 Duodenal Ulcer Recurrence Rates by H.

pylori Eradication Status % of Patients with Ulcer Recurrence H.

pylori eradicated H.

pylori eradication status assessed at same time point as ulcer recurrence H.

pylori not eradicated U.S.

Studies Combined results for omeprazole + clarithromycin, omeprazole, and clarithromycin treatment arms 6 months post-treatment Study 4 (p ≤ 0.01) versus proportion with duodenal ulcer recurrence who were not H.

pylori eradicated 35 (n=49) 60 (n=88) Study 5 8 (n=53) 60 (n=106) Non U.S.

Studies Combined results for omeprazole + clarithromycin and omeprazole treatment arms 6 months post-treatment Study 6 5 (n=43) 46 (n=78) Study 7 6 (n=53) 43 (n=107) 12 months post-treatment Study 6 5 (n=39) 68 (n=71) 14.2 Gastric Ulcer In a U.S.

multicenter, double-blind, study of omeprazole 40 mg once daily, 20 mg once daily, and placebo in 520 patients with endoscopically diagnosed gastric ulcer, the following results were obtained.

Treatment of Gastric Ulcer % of Patients Healed (All Patients Treated) Omeprazole 20 mg once daily (n=202) Omeprazole 40 mg once daily (n=214) Placebo (n=104) Week 4 47.5 (p < 0.01) omeprazole 40 mg or 20 mg versus placebo 55.6 30.8 Week 8 74.8 82.7, (p < 0.05) omeprazole 40 mg versus 20 mg 48.1 For the stratified groups of patients with ulcer size less than or equal to 1 cm, no difference in healing rates between 40 mg and 20 mg was detected at either 4 or 8 weeks.

For patients with ulcer size greater than 1 cm, 40 mg was significantly more effective than 20 mg at 8 weeks.

In a foreign, multinational, double-blind study of 602 patients with endoscopically diagnosed gastric ulcer, omeprazole 40 mg once daily, 20 mg once daily, and ranitidine 150 mg twice a day were evaluated.

Treatment of Gastric Ulcer % of Patients Healed (All Patients Treated) Omeprazole 20 mg once daily (n=200) Omeprazole 40 mg once daily (n=187) Ranitidine 150 twice daily.

(n=199) Week 4 63.5 78.1 (p < 0.01) omeprazole 40 mg versus ranitidine , (p < 0.01) omeprazole 40 mg versus 20 mg 56.3 Week 8 81.5 91.4, 78.4 14.3 Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Symptomatic GERD A placebo-controlled study was conducted in Scandinavia to compare the efficacy of omeprazole 20 mg or 10 mg once daily for up to 4 weeks in the treatment of heartburn and other symptoms in GERD patients without erosive esophagitis.

Results are shown below.

% Successful Symptomatic Outcome Defined as complete resolution of heartburn Omeprazole 20 mg a.m.

Omeprazole 10 mg a.m.

Placebo a.m.

All patients 46 (p < 0.005) versus 10 mg , (p < 0.005) versus placebo (n=205) 31 (n=199) 13 (n=105) Patients with confirmed GERD 56, (n=115) 36 (n=109) 14 (n=59) 14.4 Erosive Esophagitis In a U.S.

multicenter double-blind placebo controlled study of 20 mg or 40 mg of omeprazole delayed-release capsules in patients with symptoms of GERD and endoscopically diagnosed erosive esophagitis of grade 2 or above, the percentage healing rates (per protocol) were as follows: Week 20 mg Omeprazole (n=83) 40 mg Omeprazole (n=87) Placebo (n=43) 4 39 (p < 0.01) omeprazole versus placebo.

45 7 8 74 75 14 In this study, the 40 mg dose was not superior to the 20 mg dose of omeprazole in the percentage healing rate.

Other controlled clinical trials have also shown that omeprazole is effective in severe GERD.

In comparisons with histamine H 2 -receptor antagonists in patients with erosive esophagitis, grade 2 or above, omeprazole in a dose of 20 mg was significantly more effective than the active controls.

Complete daytime and nighttime heartburn relief occurred significantly faster (p < 0.01) in patients treated with omeprazole than in those taking placebo or histamine H 2 – receptor antagonists.

In this and five other controlled GERD studies, significantly more patients taking 20 mg omeprazole (84%) reported complete relief of GERD symptoms than patients receiving placebo (12%).

Long Term Maintenance Of Healing of Erosive Esophagitis In a U.S.

double-blind, randomized, multicenter, placebo controlled study, two dose regimens of omeprazole were studied in patients with endoscopically confirmed healed esophagitis.

Results to determine maintenance of healing of erosive esophagitis are shown below.

Life Table Analysis Omeprazole 20 mg once daily (n=138) Omeprazole 20 mg 3 days per week (n=137) Placebo (n=131) Percent in endoscopic remission at 6 months (p < 0.01) Omeprazole 20 mg once daily versus Omeprazole 20 mg 3 consecutive days per week or placebo.

70 34 11 In an international multicenter double-blind study, omeprazole 20 mg daily and 10 mg daily were compared with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily in patients with endoscopically confirmed healed esophagitis.

The table below provides the results of this study for maintenance of healing of erosive esophagitis.

Life Table Analysis Omeprazole 20 mg once daily (n=131) Omeprazole 10 mg once daily (n=133) Ranitidine 150 mg twice daily (n=128) Percent in endoscopic remission at 12 months (p = 0.01) omeprazole 20 mg once daily versus omeprazole 10 mg once daily or Ranitidine.

77 (p = 0.03) omeprazole 10 mg once daily versus Ranitidine.

58 46 In patients who initially had grades 3 or 4 erosive esophagitis, for maintenance after healing 20 mg daily of omeprazole was effective, while 10 mg did not demonstrate effectiveness.

14.5 Pathological Hypersecretory Conditions In open studies of 136 patients with pathological hypersecretory conditions, such as Zollinger-Ellison (ZE) syndrome with or without multiple endocrine adenomas, omeprazole delayed-release capsules significantly inhibited gastric acid secretion and controlled associated symptoms of diarrhea, anorexia, and pain.

Doses ranging from 20 mg every other day to 360 mg per day maintained basal acid secretion below 10 mEq/hr in patients without prior gastric surgery, and below 5 mEq/hr in patients with prior gastric surgery.

Initial doses were titrated to the individual patient need, and adjustments were necessary with time in some patients [ See Dosage and Administration (2) ].

Omeprazole was well tolerated at these high dose levels for prolonged periods (> 5 years in some patients).

In most ZE patients, serum gastrin levels were not modified by omeprazole.

However, in some patients serum gastrin increased to levels greater than those present prior to initiation of omeprazole therapy.

At least 11 patients with ZE syndrome on long-term treatment with omeprazole developed gastric carcinoids.

These findings are believed to be a manifestation of the underlying condition, which is known to be associated with such tumors, rather than the result of the administration of omeprazole.

[ See Adverse Reactions (6) ] 14.6 Pediatric GERD Symptomatic GERD The effectiveness of omeprazole for the treatment of nonerosive GERD in pediatric patients 2 to 16 years of age is based in part on data obtained from pediatric patients in an uncontrolled Phase III studies.

[ See Use in Specific Populations (8.4) ] The study enrolled 113 pediatric patients 2 to 16 years of age with a history of symptoms suggestive of nonerosive GERD.

Patients were administered a single dose of omeprazole (10 mg or 20 mg, based on body weight) for 4 weeks either as an intact capsule or as an open capsule in applesauce.

Successful response was defined as no moderate or severe episodes of either pain-related symptoms or vomiting/regurgitation during the last 4 days of treatment.

Results showed success rates of 60% (9/15; 10 mg omeprazole) and 59% (58/98; 20 mg omeprazole), respectively.

Healing of Erosive Esophagitis In an uncontrolled, open-label dose-titration study, healing of erosive esophagitis in pediatric patients 1 to 16 years of age required doses that ranged from 0.7 to 3.5 mg/kg/day (80 mg/day).

Doses were initiated at 0.7 mg/kg/day.

Doses were increased in increments of 0.7 mg/kg/day (if intraesophageal pH showed a pH of < 4 for less than 6% of a 24-hour study).

After titration, patients remained on treatment for 3 months.

Forty-four percent of the patients were healed on a dose of 0.7 mg/kg body weight; most of the remaining patients were healed with 1.4 mg/kg after an additional 3 months’ treatment.

Erosive esophagitis was healed in 51 of 57 (90%) children who completed the first course of treatment in the healing phase of the study.

In addition, after 3 months of treatment, 33% of the children had no overall symptoms, 57% had mild reflux symptoms, and 40% had less frequent regurgitation/vomiting.

Maintenance of Healing of Erosive Esophagitis In an uncontrolled, open-label study of maintenance of healing of erosive esophagitis in 46 pediatric patients, 54% of patients required half the healing dose.

The remaining patients increased the healing dose (0.7 to a maximum of 2.8 mg/kg/day) either for the entire maintenance period, or returned to half the dose before completion.

Of the 46 patients who entered the maintenance phase, 19 (41%) had no relapse.

In addition, maintenance therapy in erosive esophagitis patients resulted in 63% of patients having no overall symptoms.

HOW SUPPLIED

16 /STORAGE AND HANDLING Omeprazole delayed-release capsules, USP 10 mg are available for oral administration as hard gelatin capsules with a pink opaque body and a reddish brown opaque cap.

“APO 010” is imprinted on each capsule in black ink.

They are supplied as follows: Bottles of 30 (NDC 63187-061-30) Bottles of 60 (NDC 63187-061-60) Bottles of 90 (NDC 63187-061-90) Bottles of 120 (NDC 63187-061-72) Bottles of 180 (NDC 63187-061-78) Omeprazole delayed-release capsules, USP 20 mg are available for oral administration as hard gelatin capsules with a pink opaque body and a reddish brown opaque cap.

“APO 020” is imprinted on each capsule in black ink.

They are supplied as follows: Bottles of 14 (NDC 63187-070-14) Bottles of 30 (NDC 63187-070-30) Bottles of 60 (NDC 63187-070-60) Bottles of 90 (NDC 63187-070-90) Bottles of 120 (NDC 63187-070-120) Bottles of 180 (NDC 63187-070-180) Storage Store omeprazole delayed-release capsules in a tight container protected from light and moisture.

Store at 20° to 25°C (68° to 77°F); excursions permitted to 15° to 30°C (59° to 86°F) [see USP Controlled Room Temperature].

RECENT MAJOR CHANGES

Warnings and Precautions, Interaction with Clopidogrel ( 5.4 ) 10/2012 Warnings and Precautions, Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea ( 5.3 ) 09/2012

GERIATRIC USE

8.5 Geriatric Use Omeprazole was administered to over 2000 elderly individuals (≥ 65 years of age) in clinical trials in the U.S.

and Europe.

There were no differences in safety and effectiveness between the elderly and younger subjects.

Other reported clinical experience has not identified differences in response between the elderly and younger subjects, but greater sensitivity of some older individuals cannot be ruled out.

Pharmacokinetic studies have shown the elimination rate was somewhat decreased in the elderly and bioavailability was increased.

The plasma clearance of omeprazole was 250 mL/min (about half that of young volunteers) and its plasma half-life averaged one hour, about twice that of young healthy volunteers.

However, no dosage adjustment is necessary in the elderly.

[ See Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ]

DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS

3 Omeprazole delayed-release capsules, USP 10 mg are hard gelatin capsules with a pink opaque body and a reddish brown opaque cap.

“APO 010” is imprinted on each capsule in black ink.

Omeprazole delayed-release capsules, USP 20 mg are hard gelatin capsules with a pink opaque body and a reddish brown opaque cap.

“APO 020” is imprinted on each capsule in black ink.

Omeprazole delayed-release capsules, USP 40 mg are hard gelatin capsules with a pink opaque body and a reddish brown opaque cap.

“APO 040” is imprinted on each capsule in black ink.

Omeprazole delayed-release capsules, 10 mg, 20 mg and 40 mg ( 3 )

MECHANISM OF ACTION

12.1 Mechanism of Action Omeprazole belongs to a class of antisecretory compounds, the substituted benzimidazoles, that suppress gastric acid secretion by specific inhibition of the H + /K + ATPase enzyme system at the secretory surface of the gastric parietal cell.

Because this enzyme system is regarded as the acid (proton) pump within the gastric mucosa, omeprazole has been characterized as a gastric acid-pump inhibitor, in that it blocks the final step of acid production.

This effect is dose-related and leads to inhibition of both basal and stimulated acid secretion irrespective of the stimulus.

Animal studies indicate that after rapid disappearance from plasma, omeprazole can be found within the gastric mucosa for a day or more.

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

1 Omeprazole is a proton pump inhibitor indicated for: • Treatment in adults of duodenal ulcer ( 1.1 ) and gastric ulcer ( 1.2 ) • Treatment in adults and children of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) ( 1.3 ) and maintenance of healing of erosive esophagitis ( 1.4 ) The safety and effectiveness of omeprazole in pediatric patients <1 year of age have not been established.

( 8.4 ) 1.1 Duodenal Ulcer (adults) Omeprazole delayed-release capsules, USP are indicated for short-term treatment of active duodenal ulcer in adults.

Most patients heal within four weeks.

Some patients may require an additional four weeks of therapy.

Omeprazole delayed-release capsules, USP, in combination with clarithromycin and amoxicillin, are indicated for treatment of patients with H.

pylori infection and duodenal ulcer disease (active or up to 1-year history) to eradicate H.

pylori in adults.

Omeprazole delayed-release capsules, USP, in combination with clarithromycin are indicated for treatment of patients with H.

pylori infection and duodenal ulcer disease to eradicate H.

pylori in adults.

Eradication of H.

pylori has been shown to reduce the risk of duodenal ulcer recurrence [ see Clinical Studies (14.1 ) and Dosage and Administration (2) ].

Among patients who fail therapy, omeprazole delayed-release capsules with clarithromycin are more likely to be associated with the development of clarithromycin resistance as compared with triple therapy.

In patients who fail therapy, susceptibility testing should be done.

If resistance to clarithromycin is demonstrated or susceptibility testing is not possible, alternative antimicrobial therapy should be instituted.

[ See Microbiology section (12.4) ], and the clarithromycin package insert, Microbiology section.) 1.2 Gastric Ulcer (adults) Omeprazole delayed-release capsules, USP are indicated for short-term treatment (4 to 8 weeks) of active benign gastric ulcer in adults.

[ See Clinical Studies (14.2) ] 1.3 Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) (adults and pediatric patients) Symptomatic GERD Omeprazole delayed-release capsules, USP are indicated for the treatment of heartburn and other symptoms associated with GERD in pediatric patients and adults.

Erosive Esophagitis Omeprazole delayed-release capsules, USP are indicated for the short-term treatment (4 to 8 weeks) of erosive esophagitis that has been diagnosed by endoscopy in pediatric patients and adults.

[ See Clinical Studies (14.4) ] The efficacy of omeprazole delayed-release capsules, USP used for longer than 8 weeks in these patients has not been established.

If a patient does not respond to 8 weeks of treatment, an additional 4 weeks of treatment may be given.

If there is recurrence of erosive esophagitis or GERD symptoms (e.g., heartburn), additional 4 to 8 week courses of omeprazole may be considered.

1.4 Maintenance of Healing of Erosive Esophagitis (adults) Omeprazole delayed-release capsules, USP are indicated to maintain healing of erosive esophagitis in pediatric patients and adults.

Controlled studies do not extend beyond 12 months.

[ See Clinical Studies (14.4) ] 1.5 Pathological Hypersecretory Conditions Omeprazole delayed-release capsules, USP are indicated for the long-term treatment of pathological hypersecretory conditions (e.g., Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, multiple endocrine adenomas and systemic mastocytosis) in adults.

PEDIATRIC USE

8.4 Pediatric Use Use of omeprazole in pediatric and adolescent patients 2 to 16 years of age for the treatment of GERD and maintenance of healing of erosive esophagitis is supported by a) extrapolation of results from adequate and well-controlled studies that supported the approval of omeprazole for adults, and b) safety and pharmacokinetic studies performed in pediatric and adolescent patients.

[ See Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics, Pediatric for pharmacokinetic information (12.3) and Dosage and Administration (2) , Adverse Reactions (6.1) and Clinical Studies, (14.6) ].

The safety and effectiveness of omeprazole for the treatment of GERD in patients <1 year of age have not been established.

The safety and effectiveness of omeprazole for other pediatric uses have not been established.

PREGNANCY

8.1 Pregnancy Pregnancy Category C Risk Summary There are no adequate and well-controlled studies with omeprazole in pregnant women.

Available epidemiologic data fail to demonstrate an increased risk of major congenital malformations or other adverse pregnancy outcomes with first trimester omeprazole use.

Reproduction studies in rats and rabbits resulted in dose-dependent embryolethality at omeprazole doses that were approximately 5.5 to 56 times higher than the human dose.

Omeprazole should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus.

Human Data Four epidemiological studies compared the frequency of congenital abnormalities among infants born to women who used omeprazole during pregnancy with the frequency of abnormalities among infants of women exposed to H 2 -receptor antagonists or other controls.

A population-based retrospective cohort epidemiological study from the Swedish Medical Birth Registry, covering approximately 99% of pregnancies, from 1995 to 99, reported on 955 infants (824 exposed during the first trimester with 39 of these exposed beyond first trimester, and 131 exposed after the first trimester) whose mothers used omeprazole during pregnancy.

The number of infants exposed in utero to omeprazole that had any malformation, low birth weight, low Apgar score, or hospitalization was similar to the number observed in this population.

The number of infants born with ventricular septal defects and the number of stillborn infants was slightly higher in the omeprazole-exposed infants than the expected number in this population.

A population-based retrospective cohort study covering all live births in Denmark from 1996 to 2009, reported on 1,800 live births whose mothers used omeprazole during the first trimester of pregnancy and 837, 317 live births whose mothers did not use any proton pump inhibitor.

The overall rate of birth defects in infants born to mothers with first trimester exposure to omeprazole was 2.9% and 2.6% in infants born to mothers not exposed to any proton pump inhibitor during the first trimester.

A retrospective cohort study reported on 689 pregnant women exposed to either H 2 -blockers or omeprazole in the first trimester (134 exposed to omeprazole) and 1,572 pregnant women unexposed to either during the first trimester.

The overall malformation rate in offspring born to mothers with first trimester exposure to omeprazole, an H 2 -blocker, or were unexposed was 3.6%, 5.5%, and 4.1% respectively.

A small prospective observational cohort study followed 113 women exposed to omeprazole during pregnancy (89% first trimester exposures).

The reported rate of major congenital malformations was 4% in the omeprazole group, 2% in controls exposed to non-‑teratogens, and 2.8% in disease-paired controls.

Rates of spontaneous and elective abortions, preterm deliveries, gestational age at delivery, and mean birth weight were similar among the groups.

Several studies have reported no apparent adverse short-term effects on the infant when single dose oral or intravenous omeprazole was administered to over 200 pregnant women as premedication for cesarean section under general anesthesia.

Animal Data Reproductive studies conducted with omeprazole in rats at oral doses up to 138 mg/kg/day (about 56 times the human dose on a body surface area basis) and in rabbits at doses up to 69 mg/kg/day (about 56 times the human dose on a body surface area basis) did not disclose any evidence for a teratogenic potential of omeprazole.

In rabbits, omeprazole in a dose range of 6.9 to 69.1 mg/kg/day (about 5.5 to 56 times the human dose on a body surface area basis) produced dose-related increases in embryo-lethality, fetal resorptions, and pregnancy disruptions.

In rats, dose-related embryo/fetal toxicity and postnatal developmental toxicity were observed in offspring resulting from parents treated with omeprazole at 13.8 to 138.0 mg/kg/day (about 5.6 to 56 times the human doses on a body surface area basis).

NUSRING MOTHERS

8.3 Nursing Mothers Omeprazole is present in human milk.

Omeprazole concentrations were measured in breast milk of a woman following oral administration of 20 mg.

The peak concentration of omeprazole in breast milk was less than 7% of the peak serum concentration.

This concentration would correspond to 0.004 mg of omeprazole in 200 mL of milk.

Caution should be exercised when omeprazole is administered to a nursing woman.

WARNING AND CAUTIONS

5 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS Symptomatic response does not preclude the presence of gastric malignancy ( 5.1 ) Atrophic gastritis: has been noted with long-term therapy ( 5.2 ) PPI therapy may be associated with increased risk of Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea.

( 5.3 ) Avoid concomitant use of omeprazole with clopidogrel.

( 5.4 ) Bone Fracture: Long-term and multiple daily dose PPI therapy may be associated with an increased risk for osteoporosis-related fractures of the hip, wrist or spine.

( 5.5 ) Hypomagnesemia has been reported rarely with prolonged treatment with PPIs ( 5.6 ) Avoid concomitant use of omeprazole with St John’s Wort or rifampin due to the potential reduction in omeprazole concentrations ( 5.7 , 7.3 ) Interactions with diagnostic investigations for Neuroendocrine Tumors: Increases in intragastric pH may result in hypergastrinemia and enterochromaffin-like cell hyperplasia and increased Choromogranin A levels which may interfere with diagnostic investigations for neuroendocrine tumors.

( 5.8 , 12.2 ) 5.1 Concomitant Gastric Malignancy Symptomatic response to therapy with omeprazole does not preclude the presence of gastric malignancy.

5.2 Atrophic Gastritis Atrophic gastritis has been noted occasionally in gastric corpus biopsies from patients treated long-term with omeprazole.

5.3 Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea Published observational studies suggest that PPI therapy like omeprazole may be associated with an increased risk of Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea, especially in hospitalized patients.

This diagnosis should be considered for diarrhea that does not improve [ see Adverse Reactions (6.2) ].

Patients should use the lowest dose and shortest duration of PPI therapy appropriate to the condition being treated.

Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD) has been reported with use of nearly all antibacterial agents.

For more information specific to antibacterial agents (clarithromycin and amoxicillin) indicated for use in combination with omeprazole, refer to WARNINGS and PRECAUTIONS sections of those package inserts.

5.4 Interaction with Clopidogrel Avoid concomitant use of omeprazole with clopidogrel.

Clopidogrel is a prodrug.

Inhibition of platelet aggregation by clopidogrel is entirely due to an active metabolite.

The metabolism of clopidogrel to its active metabolite can be impaired by use with concomitant medications, such as omeprazole, that inhibit CYP2C19 activity.

Concomitant use of clopidogrel with 80 mg omeprazole reduces the pharmacological activity of clopidogrel, even when administered 12 hours apart.

When using omeprazole, consider alternative anti-platelet therapy [ see Drug Interactions (7.3) and Pharmacokinetics (12.3) ].

5.5 Bone Fracture Several published observational studies suggest that proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy may be associated with an increased risk for osteoporosis-related fractures of the hip, wrist, or spine.

The risk of fracture was increased in patients who received high-dose, defined as multiple daily doses, and long-term PPI therapy (a year or longer).

Patients should use the lowest dose and shortest duration of PPI therapy appropriate to the condition being treated.

Patients at risk for osteoporosis-related fractures should be managed according to established treatment guidelines.

[ see Dosage and Administration (2) and Adverse Reactions (6.3) ] 5.6 Hypomagnesemia Hypomagnesemia, symptomatic and asymptomatic, has been reported rarely in patients treated with PPIs for at least three months, in most cases after a year of therapy.

Serious adverse events include tetany, arrhythmias, and seizures.

In most patients, treatment of hypomagnesemia required magnesium replacement and discontinuation of the PPI.

For patients expected to be on prolonged treatment or who take PPIs with medications such as digoxin or drugs that may cause hypomagnesemia (e.g., diuretics), health care professionals may consider monitoring magnesium levels prior to initiation of PPI treatment and periodically.

[ See Adverse Reactions (6.3) ] 5.7 Concomitant Use of Omeprazole with St John’s Wort or Rifampin Drugs which induce CYP2C19 or CYP3A4 (such as St John’s Wort or rifampin) can substantially decrease omeprazole concentrations.

[ See Drug Interactions (7.3) ].

Avoid concomitant use of omeprazole with St John’s Wort or rifampin.

5.8 Interactions with Diagnostic Investigations for Neuroendocrine Tumors Serum chromogranin A (CgA) levels increase secondary to drug-induced decreases in gastric acidity.

The increased CgA level may cause false positive results in diagnostic investigations for neuroendocrine tumors.

Providers should temporarily stop omeprazole treatment before assessing CgA levels and consider repeating the test if initial CgA levels are high.

If serial tests are performed (e.g.

for monitoring), the same commercial laboratory should be used for testing, as reference ranges between tests may vary.

5.9 Concomitant use of Omeprazole with Methotrexate Literature suggests that concomitant use of PPIs with methotrexate (primarily at high dose; see methotrexate prescribing information) may elevate and prolong serum levels of methotrexate and/or its metabolite, possibly leading to methotrexate toxicities.

In high-dose methotrexate administration a temporary withdrawal of the PPI may be considered in some patients.

[ See Drug Interactions ( 7.7 ) ]

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS

17 PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION “See FDA-Approved Medication Guide” Omeprazole delayed-release capsule should be taken before eating.

Patients should be informed that the omeprazole delayed-release capsule should be swallowed whole.

For patients who have difficulty swallowing capsules, the contents of an omeprazole delayed-release capsule can be added to applesauce.

One tablespoon of applesauce should be added to an empty bowl and the capsule should be opened.

All of the pellets inside the capsule should be carefully emptied on the applesauce.

The pellets should be mixed with the applesauce and then swallowed immediately with a glass of cool water to ensure complete swallowing of the pellets.

The applesauce used should not be hot and should be soft enough to be swallowed without chewing.

The pellets should not be chewed or crushed.

The pellets/applesauce mixture should not be stored for future use.

Advise patients to immediately report and seek care for diarrhea that does not improve.

This may be a sign of Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea [ see Warnings and Precautions (5.3) ].

Advise patients to immediately report and seek care for any cardiovascular or neurological symptoms including palpitations, dizziness, seizures, and tetany as these may be signs of hypomagnesemia [ see Warnings and Precautions (5.6) ].

APOTEX INC.

OMEPRAZOLE DELAYED-RELEASE CAPSULES, USP 10 mg, 20 mg and 40 mg Manufactured by: Manufactured for: Apotex Inc.

Apotex Corp.

Toronto, Ontario Weston, Florida Canada M9L 1T9 USA 33326 Repackaged by: Proficient Rx LP Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 Revised: June 2013 Revision: 17

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

2 Omeprazole delayed-release capsules should be taken before eating.

In the clinical trials, antacids were used concomitantly with omeprazole.

Patients should be informed that the omeprazole delayed-release capsule should be swallowed whole.

For patients unable to swallow an intact capsule, alternative administration options are available [ See Dosage and Administration (2.8) ].

Indication Omeprazole Dose Frequency Treatment of Active Duodenal Ulcer ( 2.1 ) 20 mg Once daily for 4 weeks.

Some patients may require an additional 4 weeks H.

pylori Eradication to Reduce the Risk of Duodenal Ulcer Recurrence ( 2.2 ) Triple Therapy: Omeprazole 20 mg Each drug twice daily for 10 days Amoxicillin 1000 mg Clarithromycin 500 mg Dual Therapy: Omeprazole 40 mg Once daily for 14 days Clarithromycin 500 mg Three times daily for 14 days Gastric Ulcer ( 2.3 ) 40 mg Once daily for 4 to 8 weeks GERD ( 2.4 ) 20 mg Once daily for 4 to 8 weeks Maintenance of Healing of Erosive Esophagitis ( 2.5 ) 20 mg Once daily Pathological Hypersecretory Conditions ( 2.6 ) 60 mg (varies with individual patient) Once daily Pediatric Patients (2 to 16 years of age) ( 2.7 ) Weight Dose GERD And Maintenance of Healing of Erosive Esophagitis 10 < 20 kg 10 mg Once daily ≥ 20 kg 20 kg 2.1 Short-Term Treatment of Active Duodenal Ulcer The recommended adult oral dose of omeprazole delayed-release capsules are 20 mg once daily.

Most patients heal within four weeks.

Some patients may require an additional four weeks of therapy.

2.2 H.

pylori Eradication for the Reduction of the Risk of Duodenal Ulcer Recurrence Triple Therapy (omeprazole/clarithromycin/amoxicillin) The recommended adult oral regimen is omeprazole delayed-release capsules 20 mg plus clarithromycin 500 mg plus amoxicillin 1000 mg each given twice daily for 10 days.

In patients with an ulcer present at the time of initiation of therapy, an additional 18 days of omeprazole delayed-release capsules 20 mg once daily is recommended for ulcer healing and symptom relief.

Dual Therapy (omeprazole/clarithromycin) The recommended adult oral regimen is omeprazole delayed-release capsules 40 mg once daily plus clarithromycin 500 mg three times daily for 14 days.

In patients with an ulcer present at the time of initiation of therapy, an additional 14 days of omeprazole delayed-release capsules 20 mg once daily is recommended for ulcer healing and symptom relief.

2.3 Gastric Ulcer The recommended adult oral dose is 40 mg once daily for 4 to 8 weeks.

2.4 Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) The recommended adult oral dose for the treatment of patients with symptomatic GERD and no esophageal lesions is 20 mg daily for up to 4 weeks.

The recommended adult oral dose for the treatment of patients with erosive esophagitis and accompanying symptoms due to GERD is 20 mg daily for 4 to 8 weeks.

2.5 Maintenance of Healing of Erosive Esophagitis The recommended adult oral dose is 20 mg daily.

[ See Clinical Studies (14.4) ] 2.6 Pathological Hypersecretory Conditions The dosage of omeprazole delayed-release capsules in patients with pathological hypersecretory conditions varies with the individual patient.

The recommended adult oral starting dose is 60 mg once daily.

Doses should be adjusted to individual patient needs and should continue for as long as clinically indicated.

Doses up to 120 mg three times daily have been administered.

Daily dosages of greater than 80 mg should be administered in divided doses.

Some patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome have been treated continuously with omeprazole delayed-release capsules for more than 5 years.

2.7 Pediatric Patients For the treatment of GERD and maintenance of healing of erosive esophagitis, the recommended daily dose for pediatric patients 2 to 16 years of age is as follows: Patient Weight Omeprazole Daily Dose 10 < 20 kg 10 mg ≥ 20 kg 20 mg On a per kg basis, the doses of omeprazole required to heal erosive esophagitis in pediatric patients are greater than those for adults.

Alternative administrative options can be used for pediatric patients unable to swallow an intact capsule [ See Dosage and Administration (2.8) ].

2.8 Alternative Administration Options Omeprazole is available as a delayed-release capsule.

For patients who have difficulty swallowing capsules, the contents of an omeprazole delayed-release capsule can be added to applesauce.

One tablespoon of applesauce should be added to an empty bowl and the capsule should be opened.

All of the pellets inside the capsule should be carefully emptied on the applesauce.

The pellets should be mixed with the applesauce and then swallowed immediately with a glass of cool water to ensure complete swallowing of the pellets.

The applesauce used should not be hot and should be soft enough to be swallowed without chewing.

The pellets should not be chewed or crushed.

The pellets/applesauce mixture should not be stored for future use.

WARNINGS

CARDIOVASCULAR EFFECTS Cardiovascular Thrombotic Events Clinical trials of several COX-2 selective and nonselective NSAIDsof up to three years duration have shown an increased risk of seriouscardiovascular (CV) thrombotic events, myocardial infarction, andstroke, which can be fatal.

All NSAIDs, both COX-2 selective and nonselective,may have a similar risk.

Patients with known CV disease orrisk factors for CV disease may be at greater risk.

To minimize thepotential risk for an adverse CV event in patients treated with anNSAID, the lowest effective dose should be used for the shortestduration possible.

Physicians and patients should remain alert for thedevelopment of such events, even in the absence of previous CVsymptoms.

Patients should be informed about the signs and/orsymptoms of serious CV events and the steps to take if they occur.

There is no consistent evidence that concurrent use of aspirin mitigatesthe increased risk of serious CV thrombotic events associatedwith NSAID use.

The concurrent use of aspirin and an NSAID doesincrease the risk of serious GI events (see GI ) .

Two large, controlled clinical trials of a COX-2 selective NSAID forthe treatment of pain in the first 10-14 days following CABG surgeryfound an increased incidence of myocardial infarction and stroke (see CONTRAINDICATIONS ).

Hypertension NSAIDs including IBU tablets, can lead to onset of new hypertensionor worsening of preexisting hypertension, either of which maycontribute to the increased incidence of CV events.

Patients takingthiazides or loop diuretics may have impaired response to these therapieswhen taking NSAIDs.

NSAIDs, including IBU tablets, should beused with caution in patients with hypertension.

Blood pressure (BP)should be monitored closely during the initiation of NSAID treatmentand throughout the course of therapy.

Congestive Heart Failure and Edema Fluid retention and edema have been observed in some patients taking NSAIDs.

IBU tablets should be used with caution in patients with fluid retention or heart failure.

Gastrointestinal Effects – Risk of Ulceration, Bleeding, and Perforation NSAIDs, including IBU tablets, can cause serious gastrointestinal(GI) adverse events including inflammation, bleeding, ulceration, and perforation of the stomach, small intestine, or large intestine, which can be fatal.

These serious adverse events can occur at any time, with or without warning symptoms, in patients treated with NSAIDs.

Only one in five patients, who develop a serious upper GI adverse event on NSAID therapy, is symptomatic.

Upper GI ulcers, gross bleeding, or perforation caused by NSAIDs occur in approximately 1% of patientstreated for 3-6 months, and in about 2-4% of patients treated for oneyear.

These trends continue with longer duration of use, increasing the likelihood of developing a serious GI event at some time during the course of therapy.

However, even short-term therapy is not without risk.

NSAIDs should be prescribed with extreme caution in thosewith a prior history of ulcer disease or gastrointestinal bleeding.Patients with a prior history of peptic ulcer disease and/or gastrointestinal bleeding who use NSAIDs have a greater than 10-fold increased risk for developing a GI bleed compared to patients treatedwith neither of these risk factors.

Other factors that increase the riskof GI bleeding in patients treated with NSAIDs include concomitant use of oral corticosteroids or anticoagulants, longer duration of NSAID therapy, smoking, use of alcohol, older age, and poor general health status.

Most spontaneous reports of fatal GI events are in elderly or debilitated patients and therefore, special care should be taken in treating this population.

To minimize the potential risk for an adverse GI event in patients treated with an NSAID, the lowest effective dose should be used for the shortest possible duration.

Patients and physicians should remain alert for signs and symptoms of GIulcerations and bleeding during NSAID therapy and promptly initiate additional evaluation and treatment if a serious GI event is suspected.This should include discontinuation of the NSAID until a serious GI adverse event is ruled out.

For high-risk patients, alternate therapies that do not involve NSAIDs should be considered.

Renal Effects Long-term administration of NSAIDs has resulted in renal papillary necrosis and other renal injury.

Renal toxicity has also been seen in patients in whom renal prostaglandins have a compensatory role in the maintenance of renal perfusion.

In these patients, administration of a NSAID may cause a dose dependent reduction in prostaglandin formation and, secondarily, in renal blood flow, which may precipitate overt renal decompensation.

Patients at greatest riskof this reaction are those with impaired renal function, heart failure,liver dysfunction, those taking diuretics and ACE inhibitors, and the elderly.

Discontinuation of NSAID therapy is usually followed by recovery to the pretreatment state.

Advanced Renal Disease No information is available from controlled clinical studies regarding the use of Ibuprofen tablets in patients with advanced renal disease.Therefore, treatment with IBU tablets is not recommended in these patients with advanced renal disease.

If IBU tablet therapy must be initiated, close monitoring of the patients renal function is advisable.

Anaphylactoid Reactions As with other NSAIDs, anaphylactoid reactions may occur inpatients without known prior exposure to IBU tablets.

IBU tablets should not be given to patients with the aspirin triad.

This symptom complex typically occurs in asthmatic patients who experience rhinitis with or without nasal polyps, or who exhibit severe, potentially fatal bronchospasm after taking aspirin or other NSAIDs (see CONTRAINDICATIONS and PRECAUTIONS, Preexisting Asthma) .

Emergency help should be sought in cases where an anaphylactoidreaction occurs.

Skin Reactions NSAIDs, including IBU tablets, can cause serious skin adverse events such as exfoliative dermatitis, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome(SJS), and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), which can be fatal.These serious events may occur without warning.

Patients should be informed about the signs and symptoms of serious skin manifestations and use of the drug should be discontinued at the first appearance of skin rash or any other sign of hypersensitivity.

Pregnancy In late pregnancy, as with other NSAIDs, IBU tablets should beavoided because it may cause premature closure of the ductus arteriosus.

DRUG INTERACTIONS

Drug Interactions ACE-inhibitors: Reports suggest that NSAIDs may diminish the antihypertensiveeffect of ACE-inhibitors.

This interaction should be given considerationin patients taking NSAIDs concomitantly with ACE-inhibitors.

Aspirin When IBU tablets are administered with aspirin, its protein bindingis reduced, although the clearance of free IBU tablets is notaltered.

The clinical significance of this interaction is not known; however,as with other NSAIDs, concomitant administration of ibuprofenand aspirin is not generally recommended because of the potential forincreased adverse effects.

OVERDOSAGE

Approximately 11⁄2 hours after the reported ingestion of from 7 to10 Ibuprofen tablets (400 mg), a 19-month old child weighing 12 kgwas seen in the hospital emergency room, apneic and cyanotic,responding only to painful stimuli.

This type of stimulus, however,was sufficient to induce respiration.

Oxygen and parenteral fluidswere given; a greenish-yellow fluid was aspirated from the stomachwith no evidence to indicate the presence of ibuprofen.

Two hoursafter ingestion the child’s condition seemed stable; she still respondedonly to painful stimuli and continued to have periods of apnea lastingfrom 5 to 10 seconds.

She was admitted to intensive care andsodium bicarbonate was administered as well as infusions of dextroseand normal saline.

By four hours post-ingestion she could bearoused easily, sit by herself and respond to spoken commands.Blood level of ibuprofen was 102.9 μg/mL approximately 81⁄2 hoursafter accidental ingestion.

At 12 hours she appeared to be completelyrecovered.

In two other reported cases where children (each weighingapproximately 10 kg) accidentally, acutely ingested approximately120 mg/kg, there were no signs of acute intoxication or late sequelae.Blood level in one child 90 minutes after ingestion was 700 μg/mL —about 10 times the peak levels seen in absorption-excretion studies.A 19-year old male who had taken 8,000 mg of ibuprofen over aperiod of a few hours complained of dizziness, and nystagmus wasnoted.

After hospitalization, parenteral hydration and three days bedrest, he recovered with no reported sequelae.

In cases of acute overdosage, the stomach should be emptied byvomiting or lavage, though little drug will likely be recovered if morethan an hour has elapsed since ingestion.

Because the drug is acidicand is excreted in the urine, it is theoretically beneficial to administeralkali and induce diuresis.

In addition to supportive measures, the useof oral activated charcoal may help to reduce the absorption andreabsorption of Ibuprofen tablets.

DESCRIPTION

IBU tablets contain the active ingredient ibuprofen, which is (±) -2 – ( p – isobutylphenyl) propionic acid.

Ibuprofen is a white powde rwith a melting point of 74-77° C and is very slightly soluble in water(<1 mg/mL) and readily soluble in organic solvents such as ethanol and acetone.

The structural formula is represented below: IBU, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), is availablein 400 mg, 600 mg, and 800 mg tablets for oral administration.Inactive ingredients: carnauba wax, colloidal silicon dioxide,croscarmellose sodium, hypromellose, magnesium stearate, microcrystallinecellulose, polydextrose, polyethylene glycol, polysorbate,titanium dioxide.

strucuture

HOW SUPPLIED

IBU tablets are available in the following strengths, colors and sizes: 400 mg (white, oval, debossed 4I) Boxes of 25×30 UD 750 NDC 63739-442-01 Boxes of 10×10 UD 100 NDC 63739-442-10 600 mg (white, caplet, debossed 6I) Boxes of 25×30 UD 750 NDC 63739-443-01 Boxes of 10×10 UD 100 NDC 63739-443-10 800 mg (white, caplet, debossed 8I) Boxes of 25×30 UD 750 NDC 63739-444-01 Boxes of 10×10 UD 100 NDC 63739-444-10 Store at room temperature.

Avoid excessive heat 40°C (104°F).

Manufactured by: Dr.

Reddy’s Laboratories Louisiana, LLC Shreveport, LA 71106 Distributed by: McKesson Packaging Services a business unit of McKesson Corporation 7101 Weddington Rd.

Concord, NC 28027 Issued February, 2010 IS-442-M55-03-B-R2

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

Carefully consider the potential benefits and risks of Ibuprofentablets and other treatment options before deciding to use Ibuprofen.Use the lowest effective dose for the shortest duration consistent withindividual patient treatment goals (see WARNINGS ).

IBU tablets are indicated for relief of the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis.

IBU tablets are indicated for relief of mild to moderate pain.

IBU tablets are also indicated for the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea.

Controlled clinical trials to establish the safety and effectiveness of IBU tablets in children have not been conducted.

PREGNANCY

Pregnancy In late pregnancy, as with other NSAIDs, IBU tablets should beavoided because it may cause premature closure of the ductus arteriosus.

BOXED WARNING

Cardiovascular Risk • NSAIDs may cause an increased risk of serious cardiovascularthrombotic events, myocardial infarction, and stroke,which can be fatal.

This risk may increase with duration ofuse.

Patients with cardiovascular disease or risk factors forcardiovascular disease may be at greater risk (See WARNINGS ).

• IBU tablets are contraindicated for treatment of peri-operativepain in the setting of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)surgery (See WARNINGS ).

Gastrointestinal Risk • NSAIDS cause an increased risk of serious gastrointestinaladverse events including bleeding, ulceration, and perforationof the stomach or intestines, which can be fatal.

These eventscan occur at any time during use and without warning symptoms.Elderly patients are at greater risk for serious gastrointestinalevents.

(See WARNINGS ).

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS

Information for Patients Patients should be informed of the following information beforeinitiating therapy with an NSAID and periodically during the course ofongoing therapy.

Patients should also be encouraged to read theNSAID Medication Guide that accompanies each prescription dispensed • IBU tablets like other NSAIDs, may cause serious CV side effects,such as MI or stroke, which may result in hospitalization and evendeath.

Although serious CV events can occur without warningsymptoms, patients should be alert for the signs and symptoms ofchest pain, shortness of breath, weakness, slurring of speech, andshould ask for medical advice when observing any indicative sign orsymptoms.

Patients should be apprised of the importance of thisfollow-up (see WARNINGS, Cardiovascular Effects ).

• IBU tablets, like other NSAIDs, can cause GI discomfort and, rarely,serious GI side effects, such as ulcers and bleeding, which mayresult in hospitalization and even death.

Although serious GI tractulcerations and bleeding can occur without warning symptoms,patients should be alert for the signs and symptoms of ulcerationsand bleeding, and should ask for medical advice when observingany indicative signs or symptoms including epigastric pain, dyspepsia,melena, and hematemesis.

Patients should be apprised of theimportance of this follow-up (see WARNINGS, Gastrointestinal Effects-Risk of Ulceration , Bleeding and Perforation) .

• IBU tablets, like other NSAIDs, can cause serious skin side effectssuch as exfoliative dermatitis, SJS and TEN, which may result inhospitalization and even death.

Although serious skin reactions mayoccur without warning, patients should be alert for the signs andsymptoms of skin rash and blisters, fever, or other signs of hypersensitivitysuch as itching, and should ask for medical advice whenobserving any indicative sign or symptoms.

Patients should beadvised to stop the drug immediately if they develop any type ofrash and contact their physicians as soon as possible.

• Patients should promptly report signs or symptoms of unexplainedweight gain or edema to their physicians.

• Patients should be informed of the warning signs and symptoms ofhepatotoxicity (e.g., nausea, fatigue, lethargy, pruritus, jaundice,right upper quadrant tenderness and “flu-like” symptoms).

If theseoccur, patients should be instructed to stop therapy and seek immediatemedical therapy.

• Patients should be informed of the signs of an anaphylactoid reaction(e.g.

difficulty breathing, swelling of the face or throat).

If theseoccur, patients should be instructed to seek immediate emergencyhelp (see WARNINGS) .

• In late pregnancy, as with other NSAIDs, IBU tablets should beavoided because it may cause premature closure of the ductus arteriosus.

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

Carefully consider the potential benefits and risks of IBU tabletsand other treatment options before deciding to use IBU tablets.

Usethe lowest effective dose for the shortest duration consistent withindividual patient treatment goals (see WARNINGS).

After observing the response to initial therapy with IBU tablets, thedose and frequency should be adjusted to suit an individual patient’sneeds.Do not exceed 3200 mg total daily dose.

If gastrointestinal complaintsoccur, administer IBU tablets with meals or milk.

Rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis, including flare-ups ofchronic disease: Suggested Dosage: 1200 mg-3200 mg daily (400 mg, 600 mg or800 mg tid or qid).

Individual patients may show a better responseto 3200 mg daily, as compared with 2400 mg, although in well-controlledclinical trials patients on 3200 mg did not show a better meanresponse in terms of efficacy.

Therefore, when treating patients with3200 mg/day, the physician should observe sufficient increased clinicalbenefits to offset potential increased risk.The dose should be tailored to each patient, and may be loweredor raised depending on the severity of symptoms either at time of initiatingdrug therapy or as the patient responds or fails to respond.In general, patients with rheumatoid arthritis seem to require higherdoses of IBU tablets than do patients with osteoarthritis.

The smallest dose of IBU tablets that yields acceptable controlshould be employed.

A linear blood level dose-response relationshipexists with single doses up to 800 mg (See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGYfor effects of food on rate of absorption).

The availability of three tablet strengths facilitates dosage adjustment.In chronic conditions, a therapeutic response to therapy with IBU tablets is sometimes seen in a few days to a week but most often isobserved by two weeks.

After a satisfactory response has beenachieved, the patient’s dose should be reviewed and adjusted asrequired.

Mild to moderate pain: 400 mg every 4 to 6 hours as necessaryfor relief of pain.In controlled analgesic clinical trials, doses of Ibuprofen tabletsgreater than 400 mg were no more effective than the 400 mg dose.

Dysmenorrhea: For the treatment of dysmenorrhea, beginningwith the earliest onset of such pain, IBU tablets should be given in adose of 400 mg every 4 hours as necessary for the relief of pain.

empagliflozin 5 MG / Metformin hydrochloride 500 MG Oral Tablet

Generic Name: EMPAGLIFLOZIN AND METFORMIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Brand Name: Synjardy
  • Substance Name(s):
  • EMPAGLIFLOZIN
  • METFORMIN HYDROCHLORIDE

DRUG INTERACTIONS

7 Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors may increase risk of lactic acidosis.

Consider more frequent monitoring.

( 7.2 ) Drugs that reduce metformin clearance (such as ranolazine, vandetanib, dolutegravir, and cimetidine) may increase the accumulation of metformin.

Consider the benefits and risks of concomitant use.

( 7.2 ) Alcohol can potentiate the effect of metformin on lactate metabolism.

Warn patients against excessive alcohol intake.

( 7.2 ) 7.1 Drug Interactions with Empagliflozin Diuretics Coadministration of empagliflozin with diuretics resulted in increased urine volume and frequency of voids, which might enhance the potential for volume depletion [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2) ] .

Insulin or Insulin Secretagogues Coadministration of empagliflozin with insulin or insulin secretagogues increases the risk for hypoglycemia [see Warnings and Precautions (5.6) ].

Positive Urine Glucose Test Monitoring glycemic control with urine glucose tests is not recommended in patients taking SGLT2 inhibitors as SGLT2 inhibitors increase urinary glucose excretion and will lead to positive urine glucose tests.

Use alternative methods to monitor glycemic control.

Interference with 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) Assay Monitoring glycemic control with 1,5-AG assay is not recommended as measurements of 1,5-AG are unreliable in assessing glycemic control in patients taking SGLT2 inhibitors.

Use alternative methods to monitor glycemic control.

7.2 Drug Interactions with Metformin Hydrochloride Drugs that Reduce Metformin Clearance Concomitant use of drugs that interfere with common renal tubular transport systems involved in the renal elimination of metformin (e.g., organic cationic transporter-2 [OCT2] / multidrug and toxin extrusion [MATE] inhibitors such as ranolazine, vandetanib, dolutegravir, and cimetidine) could increase systemic exposure to metformin and may increase the risk for lactic acidosis [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ].

Consider the benefits and risks of concomitant use.

Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors Topiramate or other carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (e.g., zonisamide, acetazolamide or dichlorphenamide) frequently causes a decrease in serum bicarbonate and induce non-anion gap, hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis.

Concomitant use of these drugs with SYNJARDY may increase the risk of lactic acidosis.

Consider more frequent monitoring of these patients [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) and Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ].

Drugs Affecting Glycemic Control Certain drugs tend to produce hyperglycemia and may lead to loss of glycemic control.

These drugs include the thiazides and other diuretics, corticosteroids, phenothiazines, thyroid products, estrogens, oral contraceptives, phenytoin, nicotinic acid, sympathomimetics, calcium channel blocking drugs, and isoniazid.

When such drugs are administered to a patient receiving SYNJARDY, the patient should be closely observed to maintain adequate glycemic control [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] .

When such drugs are withdrawn from a patient receiving SYNJARDY, the patient should be observed closely for hypoglycemia.

Alcohol Alcohol is known to potentiate the effect of metformin on lactate metabolism.

Warn patients against excessive alcohol intake while receiving SYNJARDY.

OVERDOSAGE

10 In the event of an overdose with SYNJARDY, contact the Poison Control Center.

Employ the usual supportive measures (e.g., remove unabsorbed material from the gastrointestinal tract, employ clinical monitoring, and institute supportive treatment) as dictated by the patient’s clinical status.

Removal of empagliflozin by hemodialysis has not been studied.

However, metformin is dialyzable with a clearance of up to 170 mL/min under good hemodynamic conditions.

Therefore, hemodialysis may be useful partly for removal of accumulated metformin from patients in whom SYNJARDY overdosage is suspected.

Metformin hydrochloride Overdose of metformin hydrochloride has occurred, including ingestion of amounts greater than 50 grams.

Hypoglycemia was reported in approximately 10% of cases, but no causal association with metformin has been established.

Lactic acidosis has been reported in approximately 32% of metformin overdose cases [see Boxed Warning and Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ].

DESCRIPTION

11 SYNJARDY tablets contain two oral antihyperglycemic drugs used in the management of type 2 diabetes: empagliflozin and metformin hydrochloride.

Empagliflozin Empagliflozin is an orally-active inhibitor of the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2).

The chemical name of empagliflozin is D-Glucitol,1,5-anhydro-1-C-[4-chloro-3-[[4-[[(3S)-tetrahydro-3-furanyl]oxy]phenyl]methyl]phenyl]-, (1S).

Its molecular formula is C 23 H 27 ClO 7 and the molecular weight is 450.91.

The structural formula is: Empagliflozin is a white to yellowish, non-hygroscopic powder.

It is very slightly soluble in water, sparingly soluble in methanol, slightly soluble in ethanol and acetonitrile; soluble in 50% acetonitrile/water; and practically insoluble in toluene.

Chemical Structure Metformin hydrochloride Metformin hydrochloride is a white to off-white crystalline compound with a molecular formula of C 4 H 11 N 5 ∙HCl and a molecular weight of 165.63.

Metformin hydrochloride is freely soluble in water and is practically insoluble in acetone, ether, and chloroform.

The pKa of metformin is 12.4.

The pH of a 1% aqueous solution of metformin hydrochloride is 6.68.

The structural formula is: Chemical Structure SYNJARDY SYNJARDY tablets for oral administration are available in four dosage strengths containing 5 mg empagliflozin and 500 mg metformin hydrochloride, 5 mg empagliflozin and 1000 mg metformin hydrochloride, 12.5 mg empagliflozin and 500 mg metformin hydrochloride, or 12.5 mg empagliflozin and 1000 mg metformin hydrochloride.

Each film-coated tablet of SYNJARDY contains the following inactive ingredients: copovidone, corn starch, colloidal silicon dioxide, magnesium stearate.

Film-coating: hypromellose, titanium dioxide, talc, polyethylene glycol 400, and yellow ferric oxide (5 mg/500 mg, 5 mg/1000 mg) or red ferric oxide and black ferrosoferric oxide (12.5 mg/500 mg, 12.5 mg/1000 mg).

CLINICAL STUDIES

14 14.1 SYNJARDY Glycemic Control Studies In patients with type 2 diabetes, treatment with empagliflozin and metformin produced clinically and statistically significant improvements in HbA1c compared to placebo.

Reductions in HbA1c were observed across subgroups including age, gender, race, and baseline body mass index (BMI).

Empagliflozin Add-On Combination Therapy with Metformin A total of 637 patients with type 2 diabetes participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in combination with metformin.

Patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on at least 1500 mg of metformin hydrochloride per day entered an open-label 2-week placebo run-in.

At the end of the run-in period, patients who remained inadequately controlled and had an HbA1c between 7 and 10% were randomized to placebo, empagliflozin 10 mg, or empagliflozin 25 mg.

At Week 24, treatment with empagliflozin 10 mg or 25 mg daily provided statistically significant reductions in HbA1c (p-value <0.0001), FPG, and body weight compared with placebo (see Table 7 ).

Table 7 Results at Week 24 From a Placebo-Controlled Study for Empagliflozin used in Combination with Metformin Empagliflozin 10 mg + Metformin N=217 Empagliflozin 25 mg + Metformin N=213 Placebo + Metformin N=207 a Modified intent to treat population.

Last observation on study (LOCF) was used to impute missing data at Week 24.

At Week 24, 9.7%, 14.1%, and 24.6% was imputed for patients randomized to empagliflozin 10 mg, empagliflozin 25 mg, and placebo, respectively.

b ANCOVA p-value <0.0001 (HbA1c: ANCOVA model includes baseline HbA1c, treatment, renal function, and region.

Body weight and FPG: same model used as for HbA1c but additionally including baseline body weight/baseline FPG, respectively.) c FPG (mg/dL); for empagliflozin 10 mg, n=216, for empagliflozin 25 mg, n=213, and for placebo, n=207 HbA1c (%) a Baseline (mean) 7.9 7.9 7.9 Change from baseline (adjusted mean) -0.7 -0.8 -0.1 Difference from placebo + metformin (adjusted mean) (95% CI) -0.6 b (-0.7, -0.4) -0.6 b (-0.8, -0.5) — Patients [n (%)] achieving HbA1c <7% 75 (38%) 74 (39%) 23 (13%) FPG (mg/dL) c Baseline (mean) 155 149 156 Change from baseline (adjusted mean) -20 -22 6 Difference from placebo + metformin (adjusted mean) -26 -29 — Body Weight Baseline mean in kg 82 82 80 % change from baseline (adjusted mean) -2.5 -2.9 -0.5 Difference from placebo (adjusted mean) (95% CI) -2.0 b (-2.6, -1.4) -2.5 b (-3.1, -1.9) — At Week 24, the systolic blood pressure was statistically significantly reduced compared to placebo by -4.1 mmHg (placebo-corrected, p-value <0.0001) for empagliflozin 10 mg and -4.8 mmHg (placebo-corrected, p-value <0.0001) for empagliflozin 25 mg.

Empagliflozin Initial Combination Therapy with Metformin A total of 1364 patients with type 2 diabetes participated in a double-blind, randomized, active-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in combination with metformin as initial therapy compared to the corresponding individual components.

Treatment-naïve patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes entered an open-label placebo run-in for 2 weeks.

At the end of the run-in period, patients who remained inadequately controlled and had an HbA1c between 7 and 10.5% were randomized to one of 8 active-treatment arms: empagliflozin 10 mg or 25 mg; metformin hydrochloride 1000 mg, or 2000 mg; empagliflozin 10 mg in combination with 1000 mg or 2000 mg metformin hydrochloride; or empagliflozin 25 mg in combination with 1000 mg or 2000 mg metformin hydrochloride.

At Week 24, initial therapy of empagliflozin in combination with metformin provided statistically significant reductions in HbA1c (p-value <0.01) compared to the individual components (see Table 8 ).

Table 8 Glycemic Parameters at 24 Weeks in a Study Comparing Empagliflozin and Metformin to the Individual Components as Initial Therapy Empagliflozin 10 mg + Metformin 1000 mg a N=161 Empagliflozin 10 mg + Metformin 2000 mg a N=167 Empagliflozin 25 mg + Metformin 1000 mg a N=165 Empagliflozin 25 mg + Metformin 2000 mg a N=169 Empagliflozin 10 mg N=169 Empagliflozin 25 mg N=163 Metformin 1000 mg a N=167 Metformin 2000 mg a N=162 HbA1c (%) a Metformin hydrochloride total daily dose, administered in two equally divided doses per day.

b p-value ≤0.0062 (modified intent to treat population [observed case] MMRM model included treatment, renal function, region, visit, visit by treatment interaction, and baseline HbA1c).

c p-value ≤0.0056 (modified intent to treat population [observed case] MMRM model included treatment, renal function, region, visit, visit by treatment interaction, and baseline HbA1c).

Baseline (mean) 8.7 8.7 8.8 8.7 8.6 8.9 8.7 8.6 Change from baseline (adjusted mean) -2.0 -2.1 -1.9 -2.1 -1.4 -1.4 -1.2 -1.8 Comparison vs empagliflozin (adjusted mean) (95% CI) -0.6 b (-0.9, -0.4) -0.7 b (-1.0, -0.5) -0.6 c (-0.8, -0.3) -0.7 c (-1.0, -0.5) — — — — Comparison vs metformin (adjusted mean) (95% CI) -0.8 b (-1.0, -0.6) -0.3 b (-0.6, -0.1) -0.8 c (-1.0, -0.5) -0.3 c (-0.6, -0.1) — — — — Patients [n (%)] achieving HbA1c <7% 96 (63%) 112 (70%) 91 (57%) 111 (68%) 69 (43%) 51 (32%) 63 (38%) 92 (58%) Empagliflozin Add-On Combination Therapy with Metformin and Sulfonylurea A total of 666 patients with type 2 diabetes participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in combination with metformin plus a sulfonylurea.

Patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes on at least 1500 mg per day of metformin hydrochloride and on a sulfonylurea, entered a 2-week open-label placebo run-in.

At the end of the run-in, patients who remained inadequately controlled and had an HbA1c between 7% and 10% were randomized to placebo, empagliflozin 10 mg, or empagliflozin 25 mg.

Treatment with empagliflozin 10 mg or 25 mg daily provided statistically significant reductions in HbA1c (p-value <0.0001), FPG, and body weight compared with placebo (see Table 9 ).

Table 9 Results at Week 24 from a Placebo-Controlled Study for Empagliflozin in Combination with Metformin and Sulfonylurea Empagliflozin 10 mg + Metformin + SU N=225 Empagliflozin 25 mg + Metformin + SU N=216 Placebo + Metformin + SU N=225 a Modified intent to treat population.

Last observation on study (LOCF) was used to impute missing data at Week 24.

At Week 24, 17.8%, 16.7%, and 25.3% was imputed for patients randomized to empagliflozin 10 mg, empagliflozin 25 mg, and placebo, respectively.

b ANCOVA p-value <0.0001 (HbA1c: ANCOVA model includes baseline HbA1c, treatment, renal function, and region.

Body weight and FPG: same model used as for HbA1c but additionally including baseline body weight/baseline FPG, respectively.) c FPG (mg/dL); for empagliflozin 10 mg, n=225, for empagliflozin 25 mg, n=215, for placebo, n=224 HbA1c (%) a Baseline (mean) 8.1 8.1 8.2 Change from baseline (adjusted mean) -0.8 -0.8 -0.2 Difference from placebo (adjusted mean) (95% CI) -0.6 b (-0.8, -0.5) -0.6 b (-0.7, -0.4) — Patients [n (%)] achieving HbA1c <7% 55 (26%) 65 (32%) 20 (9%) FPG (mg/dL) c Baseline (mean) 151 156 152 Change from baseline (adjusted mean) -23 -23 6 Difference from placebo (adjusted mean) -29 -29 — Body Weight Baseline mean in kg 77 78 76 % change from baseline (adjusted mean) -2.9 -3.2 -0.5 Difference from placebo (adjusted mean) (95% CI) -2.4 b (-3.0, -1.8) -2.7 b (-3.3, -2.1) — Active-Controlled Study vs Glimepiride in Combination with Metformin The efficacy of empagliflozin was evaluated in a double-blind, glimepiride-controlled, study in 1545 patients with type 2 diabetes with insufficient glycemic control despite metformin therapy.

Patients with inadequate glycemic control and an HbA1c between 7% and 10% after a 2-week run-in period were randomized to glimepiride or empagliflozin 25 mg.

At Week 52, empagliflozin 25 mg and glimepiride lowered HbA1c and FPG (see Table 10 , Figure 3 ).

The difference in observed effect size between empagliflozin 25 mg and glimepiride excluded the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 0.3%.

The mean daily dose of glimepiride was 2.7 mg and the maximal approved dose in the United States is 8 mg per day.

Table 10 Results at Week 52 from an Active-Controlled Study Comparing Empagliflozin to Glimepiride as Add-On Therapy in Patients Inadequately Controlled on Metformin Empagliflozin 25 mg + Metformin N=765 Glimepiride + Metformin N=780 a Modified intent to treat population.

Last observation on study (LOCF) was used to impute data missing at Week 52.

At Week 52, data was imputed for 15.3% and 21.9% of patients randomized to empagliflozin 25 mg and glimepiride, respectively.

b Non-inferior, ANCOVA model p-value <0.0001 (HbA1c: ANCOVA model includes baseline HbA1c, treatment, renal function, and region) c ANCOVA p-value <0.0001 (Body weight and FPG: same model used as for HbA1c but additionally including baseline body weight/baseline FPG, respectively.) d FPG (mg/dL); for empagliflozin 25 mg, n=764, for glimepiride, n=779 HbA1c (%) a Baseline (mean) 7.9 7.9 Change from baseline (adjusted mean) -0.7 -0.7 Difference from glimepiride (adjusted mean) (97.5% CI) -0.07 b (-0.15, 0.01) — FPG (mg/dL) d Baseline (mean) 150 150 Change from baseline (adjusted mean) -19 -9 Difference from glimepiride (adjusted mean) -11 — Body Weight Baseline mean in kg 82.5 83 % change from baseline (adjusted mean) -3.9 2.0 Difference from glimepiride (adjusted mean) (95% CI) -5.9 c (-6.3, -5.5) — Figure 3 Adjusted mean HbA1c Change at Each Time Point (Completers) and at Week 52 (mITT Population) – LOCF At Week 52, the adjusted mean change from baseline in systolic blood pressure was -3.6 mmHg, compared to 2.2 mmHg for glimepiride.

The differences between treatment groups for systolic blood pressure was statistically significant (p-value <0.0001).

At Week 104, the adjusted mean change from baseline in HbA1c was -0.75% for empagliflozin 25 mg and -0.66% for glimepiride.

The adjusted mean treatment difference was -0.09% with a 97.5% confidence interval of (-0.32%, 0.15%), excluding the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 0.3%.

The mean daily dose of glimepiride was 2.7 mg and the maximal approved dose in the United States is 8 mg per day.

The Week 104 analysis included data with and without concomitant glycemic rescue medication, as well as off-treatment data.

Missing data for patients not providing any information at the visit were imputed based on the observed off-treatment data.

In this multiple imputation analysis, 13.9% of the data were imputed for empagliflozin 25 mg and 12.9% for glimepiride.

At Week 104, empagliflozin 25 mg daily resulted in a statistically significant difference in change from baseline for body weight compared to glimepiride (-3.1 kg for empagliflozin 25 mg vs.

+1.3 kg for glimepiride; ANCOVA-LOCF, p-value <0.0001).

FIGURE 3 14.2 Empagliflozin Cardiovascular Outcome Study in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Empagliflozin is indicated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and established cardiovascular disease.

However, the effectiveness of SYNJARDY on reducing the risk of cardiovascular death in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and established cardiovascular disease has not been established.

The effect of empagliflozin on cardiovascular risk in adult patients with type 2 diabetes and established, stable, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is presented below.

The EMPA-REG OUTCOME study, a multicenter, multi-national, randomized, double-blind parallel group trial compared the risk of experiencing a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) between empagliflozin and placebo when these were added to and used concomitantly with standard of care treatments for diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Coadministered antidiabetic medications were to be kept stable for the first 12 weeks of the trial.

Thereafter, antidiabetic and atherosclerotic therapies could be adjusted, at the discretion of investigators, to ensure participants were treated according to the standard care for these diseases.

A total of 7020 patients were treated (empagliflozin 10 mg = 2345; empagliflozin 25 mg = 2342; placebo = 2333) and followed for a median of 3.1 years.

Approximately 72% of the study population was Caucasian, 22% was Asian, and 5% was Black.

The mean age was 63 years and approximately 72% were male.

All patients in the study had inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus at baseline (HbA1c greater than or equal to 7%).

The mean HbA1c at baseline was 8.1% and 57% of participants had diabetes for more than 10 years.

Approximately 31%, 22% and 20% reported a past history of neuropathy, retinopathy and nephropathy to investigators respectively and the mean eGFR was 74 mL/min/1.73 m 2 .

At baseline, patients were treated with one (~30%) or more (~70%) antidiabetic medications including metformin (74%), insulin (48%), and sulfonylurea (43%).

All patients had established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease at baseline including one (82%) or more (18%) of the following; a documented history of coronary artery disease (76%), stroke (23%) or peripheral artery disease (21%).

At baseline, the mean systolic blood pressure was 136 mmHg, the mean diastolic blood pressure was 76 mmHg, the mean LDL was 86 mg/dL, the mean HDL was 44 mg/dL, and the mean urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) was 175 mg/g.

At baseline, approximately 81% of patients were treated with renin angiotensin system inhibitors, 65% with beta-blockers, 43% with diuretics, 77% with statins, and 86% with antiplatelet agents (mostly aspirin).

The primary endpoint in EMPA-REG OUTCOME was the time to first occurrence of a Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE).

A major adverse cardiac event was defined as occurrence of either a cardiovascular death or a nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) or a nonfatal stroke.

The statistical analysis plan had pre-specified that the 10 and 25 mg doses would be combined.

A Cox proportional hazards model was used to test for non-inferiority against the pre-specified risk margin of 1.3 for the hazard ratio of MACE and superiority on MACE if non-inferiority was demonstrated.

Type-1 error was controlled across multiples tests using a hierarchical testing strategy.

Empagliflozin significantly reduced the risk of first occurrence of primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke (HR: 0.86; 95% CI 0.74, 0.99).

The treatment effect was due to a significant reduction in the risk of cardiovascular death in subjects randomized to empagliflozin (HR: 0.62; 95% CI 0.49, 0.77), with no change in the risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke (see Table 11 and Figure 4 and 5 ).

Results for the 10 mg and 25 mg empagliflozin doses were consistent with results for the combined dose groups.

Table 11 Treatment Effect for the Primary Composite Endpoint, and its Components a Placebo N=2333 Empagliflozin N=4687 Hazard ratio vs placebo (95% CI) a Treated set (patients who had received at least one dose of study drug) b p−value for superiority (2−sided) 0.04 c Total number of events Composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke (time to first occurrence) b 282 (12.1%) 490 (10.5%) 0.86 (0.74, 0.99) Non-fatal myocardial infarction c 121 (5.2%) 213 (4.5%) 0.87 (0.70, 1.09) Non-fatal stroke c 60 (2.6%) 150 (3.2%) 1.24 (0.92, 1.67) Cardiovascular death c 137 (5.9%) 172 (3.7%) 0.62 (0.49, 0.77) Figure 4 Estimated Cumulative Incidence of First MACE Figure 5 Estimated Cumulative Incidence of Cardiovascular Death The efficacy of empagliflozin on cardiovascular death was generally consistent across major demographic and disease subgroups.

Vital status was obtained for 99.2% of subjects in the trial.

A total of 463 deaths were recorded during the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial.

Most of these deaths were categorized as cardiovascular deaths.

The non-cardiovascular deaths were only a small proportion of deaths, and were balanced between the treatment groups (2.1% in patients treated with empagliflozin, and 2.4% of patients treated with placebo).

FIGURE 4 FIGURE 5

HOW SUPPLIED

16 /STORAGE AND HANDLING SYNJARDY (empagliflozin and metformin hydrochloride) tablets are available in the following strengths and packages: Tablet Strength Film-Coated Tablet, Color/Shape Tablet Markings Package Size NDC Number 5 mg/500 mg orange yellow, oval, biconvex Boehringer Ingelheim company symbol and “S5” debossed on one side; the other side is debossed with “500” Bottles of 60 Bottles of 180 0597-0159-60 0597-0159-18 5 mg/1000 mg brownish yellow, oval, biconvex Boehringer Ingelheim company symbol and “S5” debossed on one side; the other side is debossed with “1000” Bottles of 60 Bottles of 180 0597-0175-60 0597-0175-18 12.5 mg/500 mg pale brownish purple, oval, biconvex Boehringer Ingelheim company symbol and “S12” debossed on one side; the other side is debossed with “500” Bottles of 60 Bottles of 180 0597-0180-60 0597-0180-18 12.5 mg/1000 mg dark brownish purple, oval, biconvex Boehringer Ingelheim company symbol and “S12” debossed on one side; the other side is debossed with “1000” Bottles of 60 Bottles of 180 0597-0168-60 0597-0168-18 Storage Store at 25°C (77°F); excursions permitted to 15°-30°C (59°-86°F) [see USP Controlled Room Temperature].

Store in a safe place out of reach of children.

RECENT MAJOR CHANGES

Warnings and Precautions, Ketoacidosis ( 5.3 ) 1/2020

GERIATRIC USE

8.5 Geriatric Use Because renal function abnormalities can occur after initiating empagliflozin, metformin is substantially excreted by the kidney, and aging can be associated with reduced renal function, renal function should be assessed more frequently in elderly patients [see Dosage and Administration (2.2) and Warnings and Precautions (5.1 , 5.4) ].

Empagliflozin No empagliflozin dosage change is recommended based on age [see Dosage and Administration (2) ] .

In studies assessing the efficacy of empagliflozin in improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, a total of 2721 (32%) patients treated with empagliflozin were 65 years of age and older, and 491 (6%) were 75 years of age and older.

Empagliflozin is expected to have diminished glycemic efficacy in elderly patients with renal impairment [see Use in Specific Populations (8.6) ] .

The risk of volume depletion-related adverse reactions increased in patients who were 75 years of age and older to 2.1%, 2.3%, and 4.4% for placebo, empagliflozin 10 mg, and empagliflozin 25 mg.

The risk of urinary tract infections increased in patients who were 75 years of age and older to 10.5%, 15.7%, and 15.1% in patients randomized to placebo, empagliflozin 10 mg, and empagliflozin 25 mg, respectively [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2) and Adverse Reactions (6.1) ] .

Metformin hydrochloride Controlled clinical studies of metformin hydrochloride did not include sufficient numbers of elderly patients to determine whether they respond differently from younger patients, although other reported clinical experience has not identified differences in responses between the elderly and young patients.

In general, dose selection for an elderly patient should be cautious, usually starting at the low end of the dosing range, reflecting the greater frequency of decreased hepatic, renal, or cardiac function, and of concomitant disease or other drug therapy and the higher risk of lactic acidosis.

Assess renal function more frequently in elderly patients [see Contraindications (4) , Warnings and Precautions (5.1) , and Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ].

DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS

3 SYNJARDY is a combination of empagliflozin and metformin hydrochloride.

SYNJARDY is available in the following dosage forms and strengths: 5 mg empagliflozin/500 mg metformin hydrochloride tablets are orange yellow, oval, biconvex, film-coated tablets.

One side is debossed with the Boehringer Ingelheim company symbol and “S5”; the other side is debossed with “500”.

5 mg empagliflozin/1000 mg metformin hydrochloride tablets are brownish yellow, oval, biconvex, film-coated tablets.

One side is debossed with the Boehringer Ingelheim company symbol and “S5”; the other side is debossed with “1000”.

12.5 mg empagliflozin/500 mg metformin hydrochloride tablets are pale brownish purple, oval, biconvex, film-coated tablets.

One side is debossed with the Boehringer Ingelheim company symbol and “S12”; the other side is debossed with “500”.

12.5 mg empagliflozin/1000 mg metformin hydrochloride tablets are dark brownish purple, oval, biconvex, film-coated tablets.

One side is debossed with the Boehringer Ingelheim company symbol and “S12”; the other side is debossed with “1000”.

Tablets: 5 mg empagliflozin/500 mg metformin hydrochloride 5 mg empagliflozin/1000 mg metformin hydrochloride 12.5 mg empagliflozin/500 mg metformin hydrochloride 12.5 mg empagliflozin/1000 mg metformin hydrochloride ( 3 )

MECHANISM OF ACTION

12.1 Mechanism of Action SYNJARDY SYNJARDY combines 2 antihyperglycemic agents with complementary mechanisms of action to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, and metformin, a member of the biguanide class.

Empagliflozin Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) is the predominant transporter responsible for reabsorption of glucose from the glomerular filtrate back into the circulation.

Empagliflozin is an inhibitor of SGLT2.

By inhibiting SGLT2, empagliflozin reduces renal reabsorption of filtered glucose and lowers the renal threshold for glucose, and thereby increases urinary glucose excretion.

Metformin Metformin is an antihyperglycemic agent which improves glucose tolerance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, lowering both basal and postprandial plasma glucose.

It is not chemically or pharmacologically related to any other classes of oral antihyperglycemic agents.

Metformin decreases hepatic glucose production, decreases intestinal absorption of glucose, and improves insulin sensitivity by increasing peripheral glucose uptake and utilization.

Unlike SUs, metformin does not produce hypoglycemia in either patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus or normal subjects (except in special circumstances) [see Warnings and Precautions (5.6) ] and does not cause hyperinsulinemia.

With metformin therapy, insulin secretion remains unchanged while fasting insulin levels and day-long plasma insulin response may actually decrease.

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

1 SYNJARDY is a combination of empagliflozin and metformin hydrochloride indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus when treatment with both empagliflozin and metformin hydrochloride is appropriate .

Empagliflozin is indicated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and established cardiovascular disease [see Clinical Studies (14.2) ] .

However, the effectiveness of SYNJARDY on reducing the risk of cardiovascular death in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease has not been established.

SYNJARDY is a combination of empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor and metformin hydrochloride, a biguanide, indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus when treatment with both empagliflozin and metformin hydrochloride is appropriate.

Empagliflozin is indicated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and established cardiovascular disease.

However, the effectiveness of SYNJARDY on reducing the risk of cardiovascular death in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease has not been established.

( 1 ) Limitations of Use : Not recommended for patients with type 1 diabetes or for the treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis ( 1 ) Limitations of Use SYNJARDY is not recommended for patients with type 1 diabetes or for the treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis [see Warnings and Precautions (5.3) ] .

PEDIATRIC USE

8.4 Pediatric Use Safety and effectiveness of SYNJARDY in pediatric patients under 18 years of age have not been established.

PREGNANCY

8.1 Pregnancy Risk Summary Based on animal data showing adverse renal effects, SYNJARDY is not recommended during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.

Limited available data with SYNJARDY or empagliflozin in pregnant women are not sufficient to determine a drug-associated risk for major birth defects and miscarriage.

Published studies with metformin use during pregnancy have not reported a clear association with metformin and major birth defect or miscarriage risk (see Data ) .

There are risks to the mother and fetus associated with poorly controlled diabetes in pregnancy (see Clinical Considerations ) .

In animal studies, adverse renal changes were observed in rats when empagliflozin was administered during a period of renal development corresponding to the late second and third trimesters of human pregnancy.

Doses approximately 13-times the maximum clinical dose caused renal pelvic and tubule dilatations that were reversible.

Empagliflozin was not teratogenic in rats and rabbits up to 300 mg/kg/day, which approximates 48-times and 128-times, respectively, the maximum clinical dose of 25 mg when administered during organogenesis.

No adverse developmental effects were observed when metformin was administered to pregnant Sprague Dawley rats and rabbits during the period of organogenesis at doses up to 2- and 6-times, respectively, a 2000 mg clinical dose, based on body surface area (see Data ) .

The estimated background risk of major birth defects is 6-10% in women with pre-gestational diabetes with a HbA1c >7 and has been reported to be as high as 20-25% in women with HbA1c >10.

The estimated background risk of miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown.

In the U.S.

general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2-4% and 15-20%, respectively.

Clinical Considerations Disease-associated maternal and/or embryo/fetal risk: Poorly controlled diabetes in pregnancy increases the maternal risk for diabetic ketoacidosis, pre-eclampsia, spontaneous abortions, preterm delivery, stillbirth, and delivery complications.

Poorly controlled diabetes increases the fetal risk for major birth defects, stillbirth, and macrosomia related morbidity.

Data Human Data Published data from post-marketing studies have not reported a clear association with metformin and major birth defects, miscarriage, or adverse maternal or fetal outcomes when metformin was used during pregnancy.

However, these studies cannot definitely establish the absence of any metformin-associated risk because of methodological limitations, including small sample size and inconsistent comparator groups.

Animal Data Empagliflozin: Empagliflozin dosed directly to juvenile rats from postnatal day (PND) 21 until PND 90 at doses of 1, 10, 30 and 100 mg/kg/day caused increased kidney weights and renal tubular and pelvic dilatation at 100 mg/kg/day, which approximates 13-times the maximum clinical dose of 25 mg, based on AUC.

These findings were not observed after a 13 week drug-free recovery period.

These outcomes occurred with drug exposure during periods of renal development in rats that correspond to the late second and third trimester of human renal development.

In embryo-fetal development studies in rats and rabbits, empagliflozin was administered for intervals coinciding with the first trimester period of organogenesis in humans.

Doses up to 300 mg/kg/day, which approximates 48-times (rats) and 128-times (rabbits) the maximum clinical dose of 25 mg (based on AUC), did not result in adverse developmental effects.

In rats, at higher doses of empagliflozin causing maternal toxicity, malformations of limb bones increased in fetuses at 700 mg/kg/day or 154-times the 25 mg maximum clinical dose.

Empagliflozin crosses the placenta and reaches fetal tissues in rats.

In the rabbit, higher doses of empagliflozin resulted in maternal and fetal toxicity at 700 mg/kg/day, or 139-times the 25 mg maximum clinical dose.

In pre- and postnatal development studies in pregnant rats, empagliflozin was administered from gestation day 6 through to lactation day 20 (weaning) at up to 100 mg/kg/day (approximately 16-times the 25 mg maximum clinical dose) without maternal toxicity.

Reduced body weight was observed in the offspring at greater than or equal to 30 mg/kg/day (approximately 4-times the 25 mg maximum clinical dose).

Metformin hydrochloride: Metformin hydrochloride did not cause adverse developmental effects when administered to pregnant Sprague Dawley rats and rabbits at up to 600 mg/kg/day during the period of organogenesis.

This represents an exposure of approximately 2- and 6-times a clinical dose of 2000 mg, based on body surface area (mg/m 2 ) for rats and rabbits, respectively.

Empagliflozin and Metformin hydrochloride: No adverse developmental effects were observed when empagliflozin and metformin hydrochloride were coadministered to pregnant rats during the period of organogenesis at exposures of approximately 35- and 14-times the clinical AUC exposure of empagliflozin associated with the 10 mg and 25 mg doses, respectively, and 4-times the clinical AUC exposure of metformin associated with the 2000 mg dose.

BOXED WARNING

WARNING: LACTIC ACIDOSIS Postmarketing cases of metformin-associated lactic acidosis have resulted in death, hypothermia, hypotension, and resistant bradyarrhythmias.

The onset of metformin-associated lactic acidosis is often subtle, accompanied only by nonspecific symptoms such as malaise, myalgias, respiratory distress, somnolence, and abdominal pain.

Metformin-associated lactic acidosis was characterized by elevated blood lactate levels (>5 mmol/Liter), anion gap acidosis (without evidence of ketonuria or ketonemia), an increased lactate/pyruvate ratio; and metformin plasma levels generally >5 mcg/mL [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ] .

Risk factors for metformin-associated lactic acidosis include renal impairment, concomitant use of certain drugs (e.g., carbonic anhydrase inhibitors such as topiramate), age 65 years old or greater, having a radiological study with contrast, surgery and other procedures, hypoxic states (e.g., acute congestive heart failure), excessive alcohol intake, and hepatic impairment.

Steps to reduce the risk of and manage metformin-associated lactic acidosis in these high risk groups are provided in the full prescribing information [see Dosage and Administration (2.2) , Contraindications (4) , Warnings and Precautions (5.1) , Drug Interactions (7.2) , and Use in Specific Populations (8.6 , 8.7) ].

If metformin-associated lactic acidosis is suspected, immediately discontinue SYNJARDY and institute general supportive measures in a hospital setting.

Prompt hemodialysis is recommended [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ].

WARNING: LACTIC ACIDOSIS See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning.

Postmarketing cases of metformin-associated lactic acidosis have resulted in death, hypothermia, hypotension, and resistant bradyarrhythmias.

Symptoms included malaise, myalgias, respiratory distress, somnolence, and abdominal pain.

Laboratory abnormalities included elevated blood lactate levels, anion gap acidosis, increased lactate/pyruvate ratio; and metformin plasma levels generally >5 mcg/mL.

( 5.1 ) Risk factors include renal impairment, concomitant use of certain drugs, age ≥65 years old, radiological studies with contrast, surgery and other procedures, hypoxic states, excessive alcohol intake, and hepatic impairment.

Steps to reduce the risk of and manage metformin-associated lactic acidosis in these high risk groups are provided in the Full Prescribing Information.

( 5.1 ) If lactic acidosis is suspected, discontinue SYNJARDY and institute general supportive measures in a hospital setting.

Prompt hemodialysis is recommended.

( 5.1 )

WARNING AND CAUTIONS

5 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS Lactic Acidosis: See boxed warning ( 5.1 ) Hypotension: Before initiating SYNJARDY assess and correct volume status in patients with renal impairment, the elderly, in patients with low systolic blood pressure, and in patients on diuretics.

Monitor for signs and symptoms during therapy.

( 5.2 ) Ketoacidosis: Assess patients who present with signs and symptoms of metabolic acidosis for ketoacidosis, regardless of blood glucose level.

If suspected, discontinue SYNJARDY, evaluate and treat promptly.

Before initiating SYNJARDY, consider risk factors for ketoacidosis.

Patients on SYNJARDY may require monitoring and temporary discontinuation of therapy in clinical situations known to predispose to ketoacidosis.

( 5.3 ) Acute Kidney Injury and Impairment in Renal Function: Consider temporarily discontinuing in settings of reduced oral intake or fluid losses.

If acute kidney injury occurs, discontinue and promptly treat.

Monitor renal function during therapy.

( 5.4 ) Urosepsis and Pyelonephritis: Evaluate patients for signs and symptoms of urinary tract infections and treat promptly, if indicated ( 5.5 ) Hypoglycemia: Consider lowering the dose of insulin secretagogue or insulin to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia when initiating SYNJARDY ( 5.6 ) Necrotizing Fasciitis of the Perineum (Fournier’s Gangrene): Serious, life-threatening cases have occurred in both females and males.

Assess patients presenting with pain or tenderness, erythema, or swelling in the genital or perineal area, along with fever or malaise.

If suspected, institute prompt treatment.

( 5.7 ) Genital Mycotic Infections: Monitor and treat as appropriate ( 5.8 ) Hypersensitivity Reactions: Discontinue SYNJARDY, treat promptly, and monitor until signs and symptoms resolve ( 5.9 ) Vitamin B 12 Deficiency: Metformin may lower vitamin B 12 levels.

Monitor hematologic parameters annually.

( 5.10 ) Increased LDL-C: Monitor and treat as appropriate ( 5.11 ) Macrovascular Outcomes: There have been no clinical studies establishing conclusive evidence of macrovascular risk reduction with SYNJARDY.

( 5.12 ) 5.1 Lactic Acidosis There have been postmarketing cases of metformin-associated lactic acidosis, including fatal cases.

These cases had a subtle onset and were accompanied by nonspecific symptoms such as malaise, myalgias, abdominal pain, respiratory distress, or increased somnolence; however, hypothermia, hypotension, and resistant bradyarrhythmias have occurred with severe acidosis.

Metformin-associated lactic acidosis was characterized by elevated blood lactate concentrations (>5 mmol/Liter), anion gap acidosis (without evidence of ketonuria or ketonemia), and an increased lactate:pyruvate ratio; metformin plasma levels generally >5 mcg/mL.

Metformin decreases liver uptake of lactate increasing lactate blood levels which may increase the risk of lactic acidosis, especially in patients at risk.

If metformin-associated lactic acidosis is suspected, general supportive measures should be instituted promptly in a hospital setting, along with immediate discontinuation of SYNJARDY.

In SYNJARDY-treated patients with a diagnosis or strong suspicion of lactic acidosis, prompt hemodialysis is recommended to correct the acidosis and remove accumulated metformin (metformin hydrochloride is dialyzable, with a clearance of up to 170 mL/minute under good hemodynamic conditions).

Hemodialysis has often resulted in reversal of symptoms and recovery .

Educate patients and their families about the symptoms of lactic acidosis and if these symptoms occur instruct them to discontinue SYNJARDY and report these symptoms to their healthcare provider.

For each of the known and possible risk factors for metformin-associated lactic acidosis, recommendations to reduce the risk of and manage metformin-associated lactic acidosis are provided below: Renal Impairment: The postmarketing metformin-associated lactic acidosis cases primarily occurred in patients with significant renal impairment.

The risk of metformin accumulation and metformin-associated lactic acidosis increases with the severity of renal impairment because metformin is substantially excreted by the kidney.

Clinical recommendations based upon the patient’s renal function include [see Dosage and Administration (2.2) , Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] .

Before initiating SYNJARDY, obtain an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

SYNJARDY is contraindicated in patients with an eGFR below 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 [see Contraindications (4) ].

Obtain an eGFR at least annually in all patients taking SYNJARDY.

In patients at increased risk for the development of renal impairment (e.g., the elderly), renal function should be assessed more frequently.

Drug Interactions: The concomitant use of SYNJARDY with specific drugs may increase the risk of metformin-associated lactic acidosis: those that impair renal function, result in significant hemodynamic change, interfere with acid-base balance or increase metformin accumulation [see Drug Interactions (7.2) ] .

Therefore, consider more frequent monitoring of patients.

Age 65 or Greater: The risk of metformin-associated lactic acidosis increases with the patient’s age because elderly patients have a greater likelihood of having hepatic, renal, or cardiac impairment than younger patients.

Assess renal function more frequently in elderly patients [see Use in Specific Populations (8.5) ] .

Radiological Studies with Contrast: Administration of intravascular iodinated contrast agents in metformin-treated patients has led to an acute decrease in renal function and the occurrence of lactic acidosis.

Stop SYNJARDY at the time of, or prior to, an iodinated contrast imaging procedure in patients with an eGFR between 45 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ; in patients with a history of hepatic impairment, alcoholism, or heart failure; or in patients who will be administered intra-arterial iodinated contrast.

Re-evaluate eGFR 48 hours after the imaging procedure, and restart SYNJARDY if renal function is stable.

Surgery and Other Procedures: Withholding of food and fluids during surgical or other procedures may increase the risk for volume depletion, hypotension and renal impairment.

SYNJARDY should be temporarily discontinued while patients have restricted food and fluid intake.

Hypoxic States: Several of the postmarketing cases of metformin-associated lactic acidosis occurred in the setting of acute congestive heart failure (particularly when accompanied by hypoperfusion and hypoxemia).

Cardiovascular collapse (shock), acute myocardial infarction, sepsis, and other conditions associated with hypoxemia have been associated with lactic acidosis and may also cause prerenal azotemia.

When such events occur, discontinue SYNJARDY.

Excessive Alcohol Intake: Alcohol potentiates the effect of metformin on lactate metabolism and this may increase the risk of metformin-associated lactic acidosis.

Warn patients against excessive alcohol intake while receiving SYNJARDY.

Hepatic Impairment: Patients with hepatic impairment have developed cases of metformin-associated lactic acidosis.

This may be due to impaired lactate clearance resulting in higher lactate blood levels.

Therefore, avoid use of SYNJARDY in patients with clinical or laboratory evidence of hepatic disease.

5.2 Hypotension Empagliflozin causes intravascular volume contraction.

Symptomatic hypotension may occur after initiating empagliflozin [see Adverse Reactions (6.1) ] particularly in patients with renal impairment, the elderly, in patients with low systolic blood pressure, and in patients on diuretics.

Before initiating SYNJARDY, assess for volume contraction and correct volume status if indicated.

Monitor for signs and symptoms of hypotension after initiating therapy and increase monitoring in clinical situations where volume contraction is expected [see Use in Specific Populations (8.5) ] .

5.3 Ketoacidosis Reports of ketoacidosis, a serious life-threatening condition requiring urgent hospitalization have been identified in postmarketing surveillance in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving sodium glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, including empagliflozin.

Fatal cases of ketoacidosis have been reported in patients taking empagliflozin.

SYNJARDY is not indicated for the treatment of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus [see Indications and Usage (1) ] .

Patients treated with SYNJARDY who present with signs and symptoms consistent with severe metabolic acidosis should be assessed for ketoacidosis regardless of presenting blood glucose levels, as ketoacidosis associated with SYNJARDY may be present even if blood glucose levels are less than 250 mg/dL.

If ketoacidosis is suspected, SYNJARDY should be discontinued, patient should be evaluated, and prompt treatment should be instituted.

Treatment of ketoacidosis may require insulin, fluid and carbohydrate replacement.

In many of the postmarketing reports, and particularly in patients with type 1 diabetes, the presence of ketoacidosis was not immediately recognized and institution of treatment was delayed because presenting blood glucose levels were below those typically expected for diabetic ketoacidosis (often less than 250 mg/dL).

Signs and symptoms at presentation were consistent with dehydration and severe metabolic acidosis and included nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, generalized malaise, and shortness of breath.

In some but not all cases, factors predisposing to ketoacidosis such as insulin dose reduction, acute febrile illness, reduced caloric intake, surgery, pancreatic disorders suggesting insulin deficiency (e.g., type 1 diabetes, history of pancreatitis or pancreatic surgery), and alcohol abuse were identified.

Before initiating SYNJARDY, consider factors in the patient history that may predispose to ketoacidosis including pancreatic insulin deficiency from any cause, caloric restriction, and alcohol abuse.

For patients who undergo scheduled surgery, consider temporarily discontinuing SYNJARDY for at least 3 days prior to surgery [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.2 , 12.3) ] .

Consider monitoring for ketoacidosis and temporarily discontinuing SYNJARDY in other clinical situations known to predispose to ketoacidosis (e.g., prolonged fasting due to acute illness or post-surgery).

Ensure risk factors for ketoacidosis are resolved prior to restarting SYNJARDY.

Educate patients on the signs and symptoms of ketoacidosis and instruct patients to discontinue SYNJARDY and seek medical attention immediately if signs and symptoms occur.

5.4 Acute Kidney Injury and Impairment in Renal Function Empagliflozin causes intravascular volume contraction [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2) ] and can cause renal impairment [see Adverse Reactions (6.1) ] .

There have been postmarketing reports of acute kidney injury, some requiring hospitalization and dialysis, in patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors, including empagliflozin; some reports involved patients younger than 65 years of age.

Before initiating SYNJARDY, consider factors that may predispose patients to acute kidney injury including hypovolemia, chronic renal insufficiency, congestive heart failure and concomitant medications (diuretics, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, NSAIDs).

Consider temporarily discontinuing SYNJARDY in any setting of reduced oral intake (such as acute illness or fasting) or fluid losses (such as gastrointestinal illness or excessive heat exposure); monitor patients for signs and symptoms of acute kidney injury.

If acute kidney injury occurs, discontinue SYNJARDY promptly and institute treatment.

Empagliflozin increases serum creatinine and decreases eGFR.

Patients with hypovolemia may be more susceptible to these changes.

Renal function abnormalities can occur after initiating SYNJARDY [see Adverse Reactions (6.1) ] .

Renal function should be evaluated prior to initiation of SYNJARDY and monitored periodically thereafter.

More frequent renal function monitoring is recommended in patients with an eGFR below 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 .

Use of SYNJARDY is contraindicated in patients with an eGFR less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 [see Dosage and Administration (2.2) , Contraindications (4) and Use in Specific Populations (8.6) ] .

5.5 Urosepsis and Pyelonephritis There have been postmarketing reports of serious urinary tract infections including urosepsis and pyelonephritis requiring hospitalization in patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors, including empagliflozin.

Treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors increases the risk for urinary tract infections.

Evaluate patients for signs and symptoms of urinary tract infections and treat promptly, if indicated [see Adverse Reactions (6) ] .

5.6 Hypoglycemia with Concomitant Use with Insulin and Insulin Secretagogues Empagliflozin Insulin and insulin secretagogues are known to cause hypoglycemia.

The risk of hypoglycemia is increased when empagliflozin is used in combination with insulin secretagogues (e.g., sulfonylurea) or insulin [see Adverse Reactions (6.1) ] .

Therefore, a lower dose of the insulin secretagogue or insulin may be required to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia when used in combination with SYNJARDY .

Metformin Hypoglycemia does not occur in patients receiving metformin alone under usual circumstances of use, but could occur when caloric intake is deficient, when strenuous exercise is not compensated by caloric supplementation, or during concomitant use with other glucose-lowering agents (such as SUs and insulin) or ethanol.

Elderly, debilitated, or malnourished patients, and those with adrenal or pituitary insufficiency or alcohol intoxication are particularly susceptible to hypoglycemic effects.

Hypoglycemia may be difficult to recognize in the elderly, and in people who are taking β-adrenergic blocking drugs.

Monitor for a need to lower the dose of SYNJARDY to minimize the risk of hypoglycemia in these patients.

5.7 Necrotizing Fasciitis of the Perineum (Fournier’s Gangrene) Reports of necrotizing fasciitis of the perineum (Fournier’s gangrene), a rare but serious and life-threatening necrotizing infection requiring urgent surgical intervention, have been identified in postmarketing surveillance in patients with diabetes mellitus receiving SGLT2 inhibitors, including empagliflozin.

Cases have been reported in both females and males.

Serious outcomes have included hospitalization, multiple surgeries, and death.

Patients treated with SYNJARDY presenting with pain or tenderness, erythema, or swelling in the genital or perineal area, along with fever or malaise, should be assessed for necrotizing fasciitis.

If suspected, start treatment immediately with broad-spectrum antibiotics and, if necessary, surgical debridement.

Discontinue SYNJARDY, closely monitor blood glucose levels, and provide appropriate alternative therapy for glycemic control.

5.8 Genital Mycotic Infections Empagliflozin increases the risk for genital mycotic infections [see Adverse Reactions (6.1) ] .

Patients with a history of chronic or recurrent genital mycotic infections were more likely to develop genital mycotic infections.

Monitor and treat as appropriate.

5.9 Hypersensitivity Reactions There have been postmarketing reports of serious hypersensitivity reactions, (e.g., angioedema) in patients treated with empagliflozin, one of the components of SYNJARDY.

If a hypersensitivity reaction occurs, discontinue SYNJARDY; treat promptly per standard of care, and monitor until signs and symptoms resolve.

SYNJARDY is contraindicated in patients with a previous serious hypersensitivity reaction to empagliflozin or any of the excipients in SYNJARDY [see Contraindications (4) ] .

5.10 Vitamin B 12 Levels In controlled, 29-week clinical trials of metformin, a decrease to subnormal levels of previously normal serum vitamin B 12 levels, without clinical manifestations, was observed in approximately 7% of metformin-treated patients.

Such decrease, possibly due to interference with B 12 absorption from the B 12 -intrinsic factor complex, is, however, very rarely associated with anemia or neurologic manifestations due to the short duration (<1 year) of the clinical trials.

This risk may be more relevant to patients receiving long-term treatment with metformin, and adverse hematologic and neurologic reactions have been reported postmarketing.

The decrease in vitamin B 12 levels appears to be rapidly reversible with discontinuation of metformin or vitamin B 12 supplementation.

Measurement of hematologic parameters on an annual basis is advised in patients on SYNJARDY and any apparent abnormalities should be appropriately investigated and managed .

Certain individuals (those with inadequate vitamin B 12 or calcium intake or absorption) appear to be predisposed to developing subnormal vitamin B 12 levels.

In these patients, routine serum vitamin B 12 measurement at 2- to 3-year intervals may be useful.

5.11 Increased Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Increases in LDL-C can occur with empagliflozin.

Monitor and treat as appropriate.

5.12 Macrovascular Outcomes There have been no clinical studies establishing conclusive evidence of macrovascular risk reduction with SYNJARDY.

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS

17 PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION Advise the patient to read the FDA-approved patient labeling (Medication Guide).

Medication Guide Instruct patients to read the Medication Guide before starting SYNJARDY therapy and to reread it each time the prescription is renewed.

Instruct patients to inform their doctor or pharmacist if they develop any unusual symptom, or if any known symptom persists or worsens.

Inform patients of the potential risks and benefits of SYNJARDY and of alternative modes of therapy.

Also inform patients about the importance of adherence to dietary instructions, regular physical activity, periodic blood glucose monitoring and HbA1c testing, recognition and management of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, and assessment for diabetes complications.

Advise patients to seek medical advice promptly during periods of stress such as fever, trauma, infection, or surgery, as medication requirements may change.

Lactic Acidosis Inform patients of the risks of lactic acidosis due to the metformin component, its symptoms, and conditions that predispose to its development [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ] .

Advise patients to discontinue SYNJARDY immediately and to notify their doctor promptly if unexplained hyperventilation, malaise, myalgia, unusual somnolence, slow or irregular heart beat, sensation of feeling cold (especially in the extremities), or other nonspecific symptoms occur.

GI symptoms are common during initiation of metformin treatment and may occur during initiation of SYNJARDY therapy; however, advise patients to consult their doctor if they develop unexplained symptoms.

Although GI symptoms that occur after stabilization are unlikely to be drug related, such an occurrence of symptoms should be evaluated to determine if it may be due to metformin-induced lactic acidosis or other serious disease.

Hypotension Inform patients that hypotension may occur with SYNJARDY and advise them to contact their healthcare provider if they experience such symptoms [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2) ] .

Inform patients that dehydration may increase the risk for hypotension, and to have adequate fluid intake.

Ketoacidosis Inform patients that ketoacidosis is a serious life-threatening condition and that cases of ketoacidosis have been reported during use of empagliflozin, sometimes associated with illness or surgery among other risk factors.

Instruct patients to check ketones (when possible) if symptoms consistent with ketoacidosis occur even if blood glucose is not elevated.

If symptoms of ketoacidosis (including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, tiredness, and labored breathing) occur, instruct patients to discontinue SYNJARDY and seek medical attention immediately [see Warnings and Precautions (5.3) ] .

Acute Kidney Injury Inform patients that acute kidney injury has been reported during use of empagliflozin.

Advise patients to seek medical advice immediately if they have reduced oral intake (such as due to acute illness or fasting) or increased fluid losses (such as due to vomiting, diarrhea, or excessive heat exposure), as it may be appropriate to temporarily discontinue SYNJARDY use in those settings [see Warnings and Precautions (5.4) ] .

Serious Urinary Tract Infections Inform patients of the potential for urinary tract infections, which may be serious.

Provide them with information on the symptoms of urinary tract infections.

Advise them to seek medical advice if such symptoms occur [see Warnings and Precautions (5.5) ] .

Necrotizing Fasciitis of the Perineum (Fournier’s Gangrene) Inform patients that necrotizing infections of the perineum (Fournier’s gangrene) have occurred with empagliflozin, a component of SYNJARDY.

Counsel patients to promptly seek medical attention if they develop pain or tenderness, redness, or swelling of the genitals or the area from the genitals back to the rectum, along with a fever above 100.4°F or malaise [see Warnings and Precautions (5.7) ] .

Genital Mycotic Infections in Females (e.g., Vulvovaginitis) Inform female patients that vaginal yeast infections may occur and provide them with information on the signs and symptoms of vaginal yeast infections.

Advise them of treatment options and when to seek medical advice [see Warnings and Precautions (5.8) ] .

Genital Mycotic Infections in Males (e.g., Balanitis or Balanoposthitis) Inform male patients that yeast infection of penis (e.g., balanitis or balanoposthitis) may occur, especially in uncircumcised males and patients with chronic and recurrent infections.

Provide them with information on the signs and symptoms of balanitis and balanoposthitis (rash or redness of the glans or foreskin of the penis).

Advise them of treatment options and when to seek medical advice [see Warnings and Precautions (5.8) ] .

Monitoring of Renal Function Inform patients about the importance of regular testing of renal function when receiving treatment with SYNJARDY.

Instruct patients to inform their doctor that they are taking SYNJARDY prior to any surgical or radiological procedure, as temporary discontinuation of SYNJARDY may be required until renal function has been confirmed to be normal [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ] .

Hypoglycemia Inform patients that the risk of hypoglycemia is increased when SYNJARDY is used in combination with an insulin secretagogue (e.g., sulfonylurea), and that a lower dose of the insulin secretagogue may be required to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia [see Warnings and Precautions (5.6) ] .

Hypersensitivity Reactions Inform patients that serious hypersensitivity reactions, such as urticaria and angioedema, have been reported with empagliflozin, a component of SYNJARDY.

Advise patients to report immediately any skin reaction or angioedema, and to discontinue the drug until they have consulted prescribing physician [see Warnings and Precautions (5.9) ] .

Laboratory Tests Inform patients that elevated glucose in urinalysis is expected when taking SYNJARDY.

Pregnancy Advise pregnant women, and females of reproductive potential of the potential risk to a fetus with treatment with SYNJARDY [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1) ] .

Instruct females of reproductive potential to report pregnancies to their physicians as soon as possible.

Lactation Advise women that breastfeeding is not recommended during treatment with SYNJARDY [see Use in Specific Populations (8.2) ] .

Females and Males of Reproductive Potential Inform females that treatment with metformin may result in ovulation in some premenopausal anovulatory women which may lead to unintended pregnancy [see Use in Specific Populations (8.3) ] .

Missed Dose Instruct patients to take SYNJARDY only as prescribed.

If a dose is missed, it should be taken as soon as the patient remembers.

Advise patients not to double their next dose.

Blood Glucose and A1C Monitoring Inform patients that response to all diabetic therapies should be monitored by periodic measurements of blood glucose and HbA1c levels, with a goal of decreasing these levels toward the normal range.

Hemoglobin A1c monitoring is especially useful for evaluating long-term glycemic control.

Inform patients that the most common adverse reactions associated with the use of SYNJARDY are hypoglycemia, urinary tract infection, and nasopharyngitis.

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

2 Individualize the starting dose of SYNJARDY based on the patient’s current regimen ( 2.1 ) The maximum recommended dose is 12.5 mg empagliflozin/1000 mg metformin hydrochloride twice daily ( 2.1 ) Take twice daily with meals, with gradual dose escalation to reduce the gastrointestinal side effects due to metformin ( 2.1 ) Assess renal function before initiating.

SYNJARDY is contraindicated in patients with an eGFR below 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ( 2.2 , 4 ) SYNJARDY may need to be discontinued at time of, or prior to, iodinated contrast imaging procedures ( 2.3 ) 2.1 Recommended Dosage In patients with volume depletion not previously treated with empagliflozin, correct this condition before initiating SYNJARDY [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2) ] .

Individualize the starting dose of SYNJARDY based on the patient’s current regimen: – In patients on metformin hydrochloride, switch to SYNJARDY containing empagliflozin 5 mg with a similar total daily dose of metformin hydrochloride; – In patients on empagliflozin, switch to SYNJARDY containing metformin hydrochloride 500 mg with a similar total daily dose of empagliflozin; – In patients already treated with empagliflozin and metformin hydrochloride, switch to SYNJARDY containing the same total daily doses of each component.

Take SYNJARDY twice daily with meals; with gradual dose escalation to reduce the gastrointestinal side effects due to metformin [see Dosage Forms and Strengths (3) ].

Adjust dosing based on effectiveness and tolerability while not exceeding the maximum recommended daily dose of metformin hydrochloride 2000 mg and empagliflozin 25 mg [see Dosage and Administration (2.2) ].

2.2 Recommended Dosage in Patients with Renal Impairment Assess renal function prior to initiation of SYNJARDY and periodically, thereafter.

SYNJARDY is contraindicated in patients with an eGFR less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 [see Contraindications (4) and Warnings and Precautions (5.1 , 5.4) ] .

2.3 Discontinuation for Iodinated Contrast Imaging Procedures Discontinue SYNJARDY at the time of, or prior to, an iodinated contrast imaging procedure in patients with an eGFR between 45 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ; in patients with a history of liver disease, alcoholism or heart failure; or in patients who will be administered intra-arterial iodinated contrast.

Re-evaluate eGFR 48 hours after the imaging procedure; restart SYNJARDY if renal function is stable [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) ] .

calcium carbonate 750 MG (calcium 300 MG) Chewable Tablet

WARNINGS

Warnings

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

Uses relieves • heartburn • acid indigestion • sour stomach • upset stomach associated with these symptoms

INACTIVE INGREDIENTS

Inactive ingredients citric acid, dextrose, FD&C blue #1 aluminum lake, FD&C red #40 aluminum lake, flavors, glycerin, magnesium stearate, maltodextrin, mineral oil, sucralose

PURPOSE

Purpose Antacid

KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN

Keep out of reach of children.

ASK DOCTOR

Ask a doctor before use if you have • kidney stones • a calcium-restricted diet

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

Directions • adults and children 12 years of age and over: • chew 2-4 tablets as symptoms occur, or as directed by a doctor • do not take for symptoms that persist for more than 2 weeks unless advised by a doctor

ACTIVE INGREDIENTS

Active ingredient (in each tablet) Calcium carbonate USP 750mg

ASK DOCTOR OR PHARMACIST

Ask a doctor or pharmacist before use if you are presently taking a prescription drug.

Antacids may interact with certain prescription drugs.

lamotrigine 100 MG Oral Tablet [Lamictal]

DRUG INTERACTIONS

7 Significant drug interactions with lamotrigine are summarized in Table 13.

Additional details of these drug interaction studies are provided in the Clinical Pharmacology section [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

Table 13.

Established and Other Potentially Significant Drug Interactions Concomitant Drug Effect on Concentration of Lamotrigine or Concomitant Drug Clinical Comment Estrogen-containing oral contraceptive preparations containing 30 mcg ethinylestradiol and 150 mcg levonorgestrel ↓ lamotrigine Decreased lamotrigine levels approximately 50%.

↓ levonorgestrel Decrease in levonorgestrel component by 19%.

Carbamazepine (CBZ) and CBZ epoxide ↓ lamotrigine Addition of carbamazepine decreases lamotrigine concentration approximately 40%.

? CBZ epoxide May increase CBZ epoxide levels Phenobarbital/Primidone ↓ lamotrigine Decreased lamotrigine concentration approximately 40%.

Phenytoin (PHT) ↓ lamotrigine Decreased lamotrigine concentration approximately 40%.

Rifampin ↓ lamotrigine Decreased lamotrigine AUC approximately 40%.

Valproate ↑ lamotrigine Increased lamotrigine concentrations slightly more than 2-fold.

? valproate Decreased valproate concentrations an average of 25% over a 3-week period then stabilized in healthy volunteers; no change in controlled clinical trials in epilepsy patients.

↓= Decreased (induces lamotrigine glucuronidation).

↑= Increased (inhibits lamotrigine glucuronidation).

? = Conflicting data.

Valproate increases lamotrigine concentrations more than 2-fold.

(7, 12.3) Carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and primidone decrease lamotrigine concentrations by approximately 40%.

(7, 12.3) Oral estrogen-containing contraceptives and rifampin also decrease lamotrigine concentrations by approximately 50%.

(7, 12.3)

OVERDOSAGE

10 10.1 Human Overdose Experience Overdoses involving quantities up to 15 g have been reported for LAMICTAL, some of which have been fatal.

Overdose has resulted in ataxia, nystagmus, increased seizures, decreased level of consciousness, coma, and intraventricular conduction delay.

10.2 Management of Overdose There are no specific antidotes for lamotrigine.

Following a suspected overdose, hospitalization of the patient is advised.

General supportive care is indicated, including frequent monitoring of vital signs and close observation of the patient.

If indicated, emesis should be induced; usual precautions should be taken to protect the airway.

It should be kept in mind that lamotrigine is rapidly absorbed [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

It is uncertain whether hemodialysis is an effective means of removing lamotrigine from the blood.

In 6 renal failure patients, about 20% of the amount of lamotrigine in the body was removed by hemodialysis during a 4-hour session.

A Poison Control Center should be contacted for information on the management of overdosage of LAMICTAL.

DESCRIPTION

11 LAMICTAL (lamotrigine), an AED of the phenyltriazine class, is chemically unrelated to existing AEDs.

Its chemical name is 3,5-diamino-6-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)- as -triazine, its molecular formula is C 9 H 7 N 5 Cl 2 , and its molecular weight is 256.09.

Lamotrigine is a white to pale cream-colored powder and has a pK a of 5.7.

Lamotrigine is very slightly soluble in water (0.17 mg/mL at 25°C) and slightly soluble in 0.1 M HCl (4.1 mg/mL at 25°C).

The structural formula is: LAMICTAL Tablets are supplied for oral administration as 25 mg (white), 100 mg (peach), 150 mg (cream), and 200 mg (blue) tablets.

Each tablet contains the labeled amount of lamotrigine and the following inactive ingredients: lactose; magnesium stearate; microcrystalline cellulose; povidone; sodium starch glycolate; FD&C Yellow No.

6 Lake (100-mg tablet only); ferric oxide, yellow (150-mg tablet only); and FD&C Blue No.

2 Lake (200-mg tablet only).

LAMICTAL Chewable Dispersible Tablets are supplied for oral administration.

The tablets contain 2 mg (white), 5 mg (white), or 25 mg (white) of lamotrigine and the following inactive ingredients: blackcurrant flavor, calcium carbonate, low-substituted hydroxypropylcellulose, magnesium aluminum silicate, magnesium stearate, povidone, saccharin sodium, and sodium starch glycolate.

LAMICTAL ODT Orally Disintegrating Tablets are supplied for oral administration.

The tablets contain 25 mg (white to off-white), 50 mg (white to off-white), 100 mg (white to off-white), or 200 mg (white to off-white) of lamotrigine and the following inactive ingredients: artificial cherry flavor, crospovidone, ethylcellulose, magnesium stearate, mannitol, polyethylene, and sucralose.

LAMICTAL ODT Orally Disintegrating Tablets are formulated using technologies (Microcaps ® and AdvaTab ® ) designed to mask the bitter taste of lamotrigine and achieve a rapid dissolution profile.

Tablet characteristics including flavor, mouth-feel, after-taste, and ease of use were rated as favorable in a study of 108 healthy volunteers.

lamotrigine chemical structure

CLINICAL STUDIES

14 14.1 Epilepsy Monotherapy With LAMICTAL in Adults With Partial Seizures Already Receiving Treatment With Carbamazepine, Phenytoin, Phenobarbital, or Primidone as the Single Antiepileptic Drug: The effectiveness of monotherapy with LAMICTAL was established in a multicenter, double-blind clinical trial enrolling 156 adult outpatients with partial seizures.

The patients experienced at least 4 simple partial, complex partial, and/or secondarily generalized seizures during each of 2 consecutive 4-week periods while receiving carbamazepine or phenytoin monotherapy during baseline.

LAMICTAL (target dose of 500 mg/day) or valproate (1,000 mg/day) was added to either carbamazepine or phenytoin monotherapy over a 4-week period.

Patients were then converted to monotherapy with LAMICTAL or valproate during the next 4 weeks, then continued on monotherapy for an additional 12-week period.

Study endpoints were completion of all weeks of study treatment or meeting an escape criterion.

Criteria for escape relative to baseline were: (1) doubling of average monthly seizure count, (2) doubling of highest consecutive 2-day seizure frequency, (3) emergence of a new seizure type (defined as a seizure that did not occur during the 8-week baseline) that is more severe than seizure types that occur during study treatment, or (4) clinically significant prolongation of generalized tonic-clonic seizures.

The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of patients in each treatment group who met escape criteria.

The percentages of patients who met escape criteria were 42% (32/76) in the group receiving LAMICTAL and 69% (55/80) in the valproate group.

The difference in the percentage of patients meeting escape criteria was statistically significant ( P = 0.0012) in favor of LAMICTAL.

No differences in efficacy based on age, sex, or race were detected.

Patients in the control group were intentionally treated with a relatively low dose of valproate; as such, the sole objective of this study was to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of monotherapy with LAMICTAL, and cannot be interpreted to imply the superiority of LAMICTAL to an adequate dose of valproate.

Adjunctive Therapy With LAMICTAL in Adults With Partial Seizures: The effectiveness of LAMICTAL as adjunctive therapy (added to other AEDs) was established in 3 multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trials in 355 adults with refractory partial seizures.

The patients had a history of at least 4 partial seizures per month in spite of receiving one or more AEDs at therapeutic concentrations and, in 2 of the studies, were observed on their established AED regimen during baselines that varied between 8 to 12 weeks.

In the third, patients were not observed in a prospective baseline.

In patients continuing to have at least 4 seizures per month during the baseline, LAMICTAL or placebo was then added to the existing therapy.

In all 3 studies, change from baseline in seizure frequency was the primary measure of effectiveness.

The results given below are for all partial seizures in the intent-to-treat population (all patients who received at least one dose of treatment) in each study, unless otherwise indicated.

The median seizure frequency at baseline was 3 per week while the mean at baseline was 6.6 per week for all patients enrolled in efficacy studies.

One study (n = 216) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel trial consisting of a 24-week treatment period.

Patients could not be on more than 2 other anticonvulsants and valproate was not allowed.

Patients were randomized to receive placebo, a target dose of 300 mg/day of LAMICTAL, or a target dose of 500 mg/day of LAMICTAL.

The median reductions in the frequency of all partial seizures relative to baseline were 8% in patients receiving placebo, 20% in patients receiving 300 mg/day of LAMICTAL, and 36% in patients receiving 500 mg/day of LAMICTAL.

The seizure frequency reduction was statistically significant in the 500-mg/day group compared with the placebo group, but not in the 300-mg/day group.

A second study (n = 98) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover trial consisting of two 14-week treatment periods (the last 2 weeks of which consisted of dose tapering) separated by a 4-week washout period.

Patients could not be on more than 2 other anticonvulsants and valproate was not allowed.

The target dose of LAMICTAL was 400 mg/day.

When the first 12 weeks of the treatment periods were analyzed, the median change in seizure frequency was a 25% reduction on LAMICTAL compared with placebo (P <0.001).

The third study (n = 41) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial consisting of two 12-week treatment periods separated by a 4-week washout period.

Patients could not be on more than 2 other anticonvulsants.

Thirteen patients were on concomitant valproate; these patients received 150 mg/day of LAMICTAL.

The 28 other patients had a target dose of 300 mg/day of LAMICTAL.

The median change in seizure frequency was a 26% reduction on LAMICTAL compared with placebo ( P <0.01).

No differences in efficacy based on age, sex, or race, as measured by change in seizure frequency, were detected.

Adjunctive Therapy With LAMICTAL in Pediatric Patients With Partial Seizures: The effectiveness of LAMICTAL as adjunctive therapy in pediatric patients with partial seizures was established in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 199 patients 2 to 16 years of age (n = 98 on LAMICTAL, n = 101 on placebo).

Following an 8-week baseline phase, patients were randomized to 18 weeks of treatment with LAMICTAL or placebo added to their current AED regimen of up to 2 drugs.

Patients were dosed based on body weight and valproate use.

Target doses were designed to approximate 5 mg/kg/day for patients taking valproate (maximum dose: 250 mg/day) and 15 mg/kg/day for the patients not taking valproate (maximum dose: 750 mg/day).

The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change from baseline in all partial seizures.

For the intent-to-treat population, the median reduction of all partial seizures was 36% in patients treated with LAMICTAL and 7% on placebo, a difference that was statistically significant ( P <0.01).

Adjunctive Therapy With LAMICTAL in Pediatric and Adult Patients With Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: The effectiveness of LAMICTAL as adjunctive therapy in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome was established in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 169 patients 3 to 25 years of age (n = 79 on LAMICTAL, n = 90 on placebo).

Following a 4-week single-blind, placebo phase, patients were randomized to 16 weeks of treatment with LAMICTAL or placebo added to their current AED regimen of up to 3 drugs.

Patients were dosed on a fixed-dose regimen based on body weight and valproate use.

Target doses were designed to approximate 5 mg/kg/day for patients taking valproate (maximum dose: 200 mg/day) and 15 mg/kg/day for patients not taking valproate (maximum dose: 400 mg/day).

The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change from baseline in major motor seizures (atonic, tonic, major myoclonic, and tonic-clonic seizures).

For the intent-to-treat population, the median reduction of major motor seizures was 32% in patients treated with LAMICTAL and 9% on placebo, a difference that was statistically significant ( P <0.05).

Drop attacks were significantly reduced by LAMICTAL (34%) compared with placebo (9%), as were tonic-clonic seizures (36% reduction versus 10% increase for LAMICTAL and placebo, respectively).

Adjunctive Therapy With LAMICTAL in Pediatric and Adult Patients With Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures: The effectiveness of LAMICTAL as adjunctive therapy in patients with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures was established in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 117 pediatric and adult patients ≥2 years (n = 58 on LAMICTAL, n = 59 on placebo).

Patients with at least 3 primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures during an 8-week baseline phase were randomized to 19 to 24 weeks of treatment with LAMICTAL or placebo added to their current AED regimen of up to 2 drugs.

Patients were dosed on a fixed-dose regimen, with target doses ranging from 3 mg/kg/day to 12 mg/kg/day for pediatric patients and from 200 mg/day to 400 mg/day for adult patients based on concomitant AED.

The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change from baseline in primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures.

For the intent-to-treat population, the median percent reduction of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures was 66% in patients treated with LAMICTAL and 34% on placebo, a difference that was statistically significant ( P = 0.006).

14.2 Bipolar Disorder The effectiveness of LAMICTAL in the maintenance treatment of Bipolar I Disorder was established in 2 multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in adult patients who met DSM-IV criteria for Bipolar I Disorder.

Study 1 enrolled patients with a current or recent (within 60 days) depressive episode as defined by DSM-IV and Study 2 included patients with a current or recent (within 60 days) episode of mania or hypomania as defined by DSM-IV.

Both studies included a cohort of patients (30% of 404 patients in Study 1 and 28% of 171 patients in Study 2) with rapid cycling Bipolar Disorder (4 to 6 episodes per year).

In both studies, patients were titrated to a target dose of 200 mg of LAMICTAL, as add-on therapy or as monotherapy, with gradual withdrawal of any psychotropic medications during an 8- to 16-week open-label period.

Overall 81% of 1,305 patients participating in the open-label period were receiving 1 or more other psychotropic medications, including benzodiazepines, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), atypical antipsychotics (including olanzapine), valproate, or lithium, during titration of LAMICTAL.

Patients with a CGI-severity score of 3 or less maintained for at least 4 continuous weeks, including at least the final week on monotherapy with LAMICTAL, were randomized to a placebo-controlled, double-blind treatment period for up to 18 months.

The primary endpoint was TIME (time to intervention for a mood episode or one that was emerging, time to discontinuation for either an adverse event that was judged to be related to Bipolar Disorder, or for lack of efficacy).

The mood episode could be depression, mania, hypomania, or a mixed episode.

In Study 1, patients received double-blind monotherapy with LAMICTAL 50 mg/day (n = 50), LAMICTAL 200 mg/day (n = 124), LAMICTAL 400 mg/day (n = 47), or placebo (n = 121).

LAMICTAL (200- and 400-mg/day treatment groups combined) was superior to placebo in delaying the time to occurrence of a mood episode.

Separate analyses of the 200- and 400-mg/day dose groups revealed no added benefit from the higher dose.

In Study 2, patients received double-blind monotherapy with LAMICTAL (100 to 400 mg/day, n = 59), or placebo (n = 70).

LAMICTAL was superior to placebo in delaying time to occurrence of a mood episode.

The mean dose of LAMICTAL was about 211 mg/day.

Although these studies were not designed to separately evaluate time to the occurrence of depression or mania, a combined analysis for the 2 studies revealed a statistically significant benefit for LAMICTAL over placebo in delaying the time to occurrence of both depression and mania, although the finding was more robust for depression.

HOW SUPPLIED

16 /STORAGE AND HANDLING LAMICTAL (lamotrigine) Tablets 25 mg, white, scored, shield-shaped tablets debossed with “LAMICTAL” and “25”, bottles of 100 (NDC 0173-0633-02).

Store at 25°C (77°F); excursions permitted to 15-30°C (59-86°F) [see USP Controlled Room Temperature] in a dry place.

100 mg, peach, scored, shield-shaped tablets debossed with “LAMICTAL” and “100”, bottles of 100 (NDC 0173-0642-55).

150 mg, cream, scored, shield-shaped tablets debossed with “LAMICTAL” and “150”, bottles of 60 (NDC 0173-0643-60).

200 mg, blue, scored, shield-shaped tablets debossed with “LAMICTAL” and “200”, bottles of 60 (NDC 0173-0644-60).

Store at 25°C (77°F); excursions permitted to 15-30°C (59-86°F) [see USP Controlled Room Temperature] in a dry place and protect from light.

LAMICTAL (lamotrigine) Starter Kit for Patients Taking Valproate (Blue Kit) 25 mg, white, scored, shield-shaped tablets debossed with “LAMICTAL” and “25”, blisterpack of 35 tablets (NDC 0173-0633-10).

Store at 25°C (77°F); excursions permitted to 15-30°C (59-86°F) [see USP Controlled Room Temperature] in a dry place.

LAMICTAL (lamotrigine) Starter Kit for Patients Taking Carbamazepine, Phenytoin, Phenobarbital, or Primidone and Not Taking Valproate (Green Kit) 25 mg, white, scored, shield-shaped tablets debossed with “LAMICTAL” and “25” and 100 mg, peach, scored, shield-shaped tablets debossed with “LAMICTAL” and “100”, blisterpack of 98 tablets (84/25-mg tablets and 14/100-mg tablets) (NDC 0173-0817-28).

Store at 25°C (77°F); excursions permitted to 15-30°C (59-86°F) [see USP Controlled Room Temperature] in a dry place and protect from light.

LAMICTAL (lamotrigine) Starter Kit for Patients Not Taking Carbamazepine, Phenytoin, Phenobarbital, Primidone, or Valproate (Orange Kit) 25 mg, white, scored, shield-shaped tablets debossed with “LAMICTAL” and “25” and 100 mg, peach, scored, shield-shaped tablets debossed with “LAMICTAL” and “100”, blisterpack of 49 tablets (42/25-mg tablets and 7/100-mg tablets) (NDC 0173-0594-02).

Store at 25°C (77°F); excursions permitted to 15-30°C (59-86°F) [see USP Controlled Room Temperature] in a dry place and protect from light.

LAMICTAL (lamotrigine) Chewable Dispersible Tablets 2 mg, white to off-white, round tablets debossed with “LTG” over “2”, bottles of 30 (NDC 0173-0699-00).

ORDER DIRECTLY FROM GlaxoSmithKline 1-800-334-4153.

5 mg, white to off-white, caplet-shaped tablets debossed with “GX CL2”, bottles of 100 (NDC 0173-0526-00).

25 mg, white, super elliptical-shaped tablets debossed with “GX CL5”, bottles of 100 (NDC 0173-0527-00).

Store at 25°C (77°F); excursions permitted to 15-30°C (59-86°F) [see USP Controlled Room Temperature] in a dry place.

LAMICTAL ODT (lamotrigine) Orally Disintegrating Tablets 25 mg, white to off-white, round, flat-faced, radius edge, tablets debossed with “LMT” on one side and “25” on the other, Maintenance Packs of 30 (NDC 0173-0772-02).

50 mg, white to off-white, round, flat-faced, radius edge, tablets debossed with “LMT” on one side and “50” on the other, Maintenance Packs of 30 (NDC 0173-0774-02).

100 mg, white to off-white, round, flat-faced, radius edge, tablets debossed with “LAMICTAL” on one side and “100” on the other, Maintenance Packs of 30 (NDC 0173-0776-02).

200 mg, white to off-white, round, flat-faced, radius edge, tablets debossed with “LAMICTAL” on one side and “200” on the other, Maintenance Packs of 30 (NDC 0173-0777-02).

Store between 20°C to 25°C (68°F to 77°F); with excursions permitted between 15°C and 30°C (59°F and 86°F).

LAMICTAL ODT (lamotrigine) Patient Titration Kit for Patients Taking Valproate (Blue ODT Kit) 25 mg, white to off-white, round, flat-faced, radius edge, tablets debossed with “LMT” on one side and “25” on the other, and 50 mg, white to off-white, round, flat-faced, radius edge, tablets debossed with “LMT” on one side and “50” on the other, blisterpack of 28 tablets (21/25-mg tablets and 7/50-mg tablets) (NDC 0173-0779-00).

LAMICTAL ODT (lamotrigine) Patient Titration Kit for Patients Taking Carbamazepine, Phenytoin, Phenobarbital, or Primidone and Not Taking Valproate (Green ODT Kit) 50 mg, white to off-white, round, flat-faced, radius edge, tablets debossed with “LMT” on one side and “50” on the other, and 100 mg, white to off-white, round, flat-faced, radius edge, tablets debossed with “LAMICTAL” on one side and “100” on the other, blisterpack of 56 tablets (42/50-mg tablets and 14/100-mg tablets) (NDC 0173-0780-00).

LAMICTAL ODT (lamotrigine) Patient Titration Kit for Patients Not Taking Carbamazepine, Phenytoin, Phenobarbital, Primidone, or Valproate (Orange ODT Kit) 25 mg, white to off-white, round, flat-faced, radius edge, tablets debossed with “LMT” on one side and “25” on the other, 50 mg, white to off-white, round, flat-faced, radius edge, tablets debossed with “LMT” on one side and “50” on the other, and 100 mg, white to off-white, round, flat-faced, radius edge, tablets debossed with “LAMICTAL” on one side and “100” on the other, blisterpack of 35 (14/25-mg tablets, 14/50-mg tablets, and 7/100-mg tablets) (NDC 0173-0778-00).

Store between 20°C to 25°C (68°F to 77°F); with excursions permitted between 15°C and 30°C (59°F and 86°F).

Blisterpacks: If the product is dispensed in a blisterpack, the patient should be advised to examine the blisterpack before use and not use if blisters are torn, broken, or missing.

RECENT MAJOR CHANGES

Warnings and Precautions, Multiorgan Hypersensitivity Reactions and Organ Failure (5.2) August 2011

GERIATRIC USE

8.5 Geriatric Use Clinical studies of LAMICTAL for epilepsy and in Bipolar Disorder did not include sufficient numbers of subjects 65 years of age and over to determine whether they respond differently from younger subjects or exhibit a different safety profile than that of younger patients.

In general, dose selection for an elderly patient should be cautious, usually starting at the low end of the dosing range, reflecting the greater frequency of decreased hepatic, renal, or cardiac function, and of concomitant disease or other drug therapy.

DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS

3 Tablets: 25 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg, and 200 mg scored.

(3.1, 16) Chewable Dispersible Tablets: 2 mg, 5 mg, and 25 mg.

(3.2, 16) Orally Disintegrating Tablets : 25 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, and 200 mg.

(3.3, 16) 3.1 Tablets 25 mg, white, scored, shield-shaped tablets debossed with “LAMICTAL” and “25.” 100 mg, peach, scored, shield-shaped tablets debossed with “LAMICTAL” and “100.” 150 mg, cream, scored, shield-shaped tablets debossed with “LAMICTAL” and “150.” 200 mg, blue, scored, shield-shaped tablets debossed with “LAMICTAL” and “200.” 3.2 Chewable Dispersible Tablets 2 mg, white to off-white, round tablets debossed with “LTG” over “2.” 5 mg, white to off-white, caplet-shaped tablets debossed with “GX CL2.” 25 mg, white, super elliptical-shaped tablets debossed with “GX CL5.” 3.3 Orally Disintegrating Tablets 25 mg, white to off-white, round, flat-faced, radius edge, tablets debossed with “LMT” on one side and “25” on the other side.

50 mg, white to off-white, round, flat-faced, radius edge, tablets debossed with “LMT” on one side and “50” on the other side.

100 mg, white to off-white, round, flat-faced, radius edge, tablets debossed with “LAMICTAL” on one side and “100” on the other side.

200 mg, white to off-white, round, flat-faced, radius edge, tablets debossed with “LAMICTAL” on one side and “200” on the other side.

3.4 Potential Medication Errors Patients should be strongly advised to visually inspect their tablets to verify that they are receiving LAMICTAL as well as the correct formulation of LAMICTAL each time they fill their prescription.

Depictions of the LAMICTAL Tablets, Chewable Dispersible Tablets, and Orally Disintegrating Tablets can be found in the Medication Guide that accompanies the product.

MECHANISM OF ACTION

12.1 Mechanism of Action The precise mechanism(s) by which lamotrigine exerts its anticonvulsant action are unknown.

In animal models designed to detect anticonvulsant activity, lamotrigine was effective in preventing seizure spread in the maximum electroshock (MES) and pentylenetetrazol (scMet) tests, and prevented seizures in the visually and electrically evoked after-discharge (EEAD) tests for antiepileptic activity.

Lamotrigine also displayed inhibitory properties in the kindling model in rats both during kindling development and in the fully kindled state.

The relevance of these models to human epilepsy, however, is not known.

One proposed mechanism of action of lamotrigine, the relevance of which remains to be established in humans, involves an effect on sodium channels.

In vitro pharmacological studies suggest that lamotrigine inhibits voltage-sensitive sodium channels, thereby stabilizing neuronal membranes and consequently modulating presynaptic transmitter release of excitatory amino acids (e.g., glutamate and aspartate).

Although the relevance for human use is unknown, the following data characterize the performance of lamotrigine in receptor binding assays.

Lamotrigine had a weak inhibitory effect on the serotonin 5-HT 3 receptor (IC 50 = 18 µM).

It does not exhibit high affinity binding (IC 50 >100 µM) to the following neurotransmitter receptors: adenosine A 1 and A 2 ; adrenergic α 1 , α 2 , and β; dopamine D 1 and D 2 ; γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) A and B; histamine H 1 ; kappa opioid; muscarinic acetylcholine; and serotonin 5-HT 2 .

Studies have failed to detect an effect of lamotrigine on dihydropyridine-sensitive calcium channels.

It had weak effects at sigma opioid receptors (IC 50 = 145 µM).

Lamotrigine did not inhibit the uptake of norepinephrine, dopamine, or serotonin (IC 50 >200 µM) when tested in rat synaptosomes and/or human platelets in vitro.

Effect of Lamotrigine on N-Methyl d-Aspartate-Receptor Mediated Activity: Lamotrigine did not inhibit N-methyl d-aspartate (NMDA)-induced depolarizations in rat cortical slices or NMDA-induced cyclic GMP formation in immature rat cerebellum, nor did lamotrigine displace compounds that are either competitive or noncompetitive ligands at this glutamate receptor complex (CNQX, CGS, TCHP).

The IC 50 for lamotrigine effects on NMDA-induced currents (in the presence of 3 µM of glycine) in cultured hippocampal neurons exceeded 100 µM.

The mechanisms by which lamotrigine exerts its therapeutic action in Bipolar Disorder have not been established.

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

1 LAMICTAL is an antiepileptic drug (AED) indicated for: Epilepsy—adjunctive therapy in patients ≥2 years of age: (1.1) partial seizures.

primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures.

generalized seizures of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.

Epilepsy—monotherapy in patients ≥16 years of age: conversion to monotherapy in patients with partial seizures who are receiving treatment with carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, or valproate as the single AED.

(1.1) Bipolar Disorder in patients ≥18 years of age: maintenance treatment of Bipolar I Disorder to delay the time to occurrence of mood episodes in patients treated for acute mood episodes with standard therapy.

(1.2) 1.1 Epilepsy Adjunctive Therapy: LAMICTAL is indicated as adjunctive therapy for the following seizure types in patients ≥2 years of age: partial seizures primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures generalized seizures of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome Monotherapy: LAMICTAL is indicated for conversion to monotherapy in adults (≥16 years of age) with partial seizures who are receiving treatment with carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, primidone, or valproate as the single antiepileptic drug (AED).

Safety and effectiveness of LAMICTAL have not been established (1) as initial monotherapy; (2) for conversion to monotherapy from AEDs other than carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, primidone, or valproate; or (3) for simultaneous conversion to monotherapy from 2 or more concomitant AEDs.

1.2 Bipolar Disorder LAMICTAL is indicated for the maintenance treatment of Bipolar I Disorder to delay the time to occurrence of mood episodes (depression, mania, hypomania, mixed episodes) in adults (≥18 years of age) treated for acute mood episodes with standard therapy.

The effectiveness of LAMICTAL in the acute treatment of mood episodes has not been established.

The effectiveness of LAMICTAL as maintenance treatment was established in 2 placebo-controlled trials in patients with Bipolar I Disorder as defined by DSM-IV [see Clinical Studies (14.2)] .

The physician who elects to prescribe LAMICTAL for periods extending beyond 16 weeks should periodically re-evaluate the long-term usefulness of the drug for the individual patient.

PEDIATRIC USE

8.4 Pediatric Use LAMICTAL is indicated for adjunctive therapy in patients ≥2 years of age for partial seizures, the generalized seizures of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures.

Safety and efficacy of LAMICTAL, used as adjunctive treatment for partial seizures, were not demonstrated in a small randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, withdrawal study in very young pediatric patients (1 to 24 months of age).

LAMICTAL was associated with an increased risk for infectious adverse reactions (LAMICTAL 37%, placebo 5%), and respiratory adverse reactions (LAMICTAL 26%, placebo 5%).

Infectious adverse reactions included bronchiolitis, bronchitis, ear infection, eye infection, otitis externa, pharyngitis, urinary tract infection, and viral infection.

Respiratory adverse reactions included nasal congestion, cough, and apnea.

Safety and effectiveness in patients below the age of 18 years with Bipolar Disorder have not been established.

PREGNANCY

8.1 Pregnancy Teratogenic Effects: Pregnancy Category C.

No evidence of teratogenicity was found in mice, rats, or rabbits when lamotrigine was orally administered to pregnant animals during the period of organogenesis at doses up to 1.2, 0.5, and 1.1 times, respectively, on a mg/m 2 basis, the highest usual human maintenance dose (i.e., 500 mg/day).

However, maternal toxicity and secondary fetal toxicity producing reduced fetal weight and/or delayed ossification were seen in mice and rats, but not in rabbits at these doses.

Teratology studies were also conducted using bolus intravenous administration of the isethionate salt of lamotrigine in rats and rabbits.

In rat dams administered an intravenous dose at 0.6 times the highest usual human maintenance dose, the incidence of intrauterine death without signs of teratogenicity was increased.

A behavioral teratology study was conducted in rats dosed during the period of organogenesis.

At day 21 postpartum, offspring of dams receiving 5 mg/kg/day or higher displayed a significantly longer latent period for open field exploration and a lower frequency of rearing.

In a swimming maze test performed on days 39 to 44 postpartum, time to completion was increased in offspring of dams receiving 25 mg/kg/day.

These doses represent 0.1 and 0.5 times the clinical dose on a mg/m 2 basis, respectively.

Lamotrigine did not affect fertility, teratogenesis, or postnatal development when rats were dosed prior to and during mating, and throughout gestation and lactation at doses equivalent to 0.4 times the highest usual human maintenance dose on a mg/m 2 basis.

When pregnant rats were orally dosed at 0.1, 0.14, or 0.3 times the highest human maintenance dose (on a mg/m 2 basis) during the latter part of gestation (days 15 to 20), maternal toxicity and fetal death were seen.

In dams, food consumption and weight gain were reduced, and the gestation period was slightly prolonged (22.6 vs.

22.0 days in the control group).

Stillborn pups were found in all 3 drug-treated groups with the highest number in the high-dose group.

Postnatal death was also seen, but only in the 2 highest doses, and occurred between days 1 and 20.

Some of these deaths appear to be drug-related and not secondary to the maternal toxicity.

A no-observed-effect level (NOEL) could not be determined for this study.

Although lamotrigine was not found to be teratogenic in the above studies, lamotrigine decreases fetal folate concentrations in rats, an effect known to be associated with teratogenesis in animals and humans.

There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women.

Because animal reproduction studies are not always predictive of human response, this drug should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus.

Non-Teratogenic Effects: As with other AEDs, physiological changes during pregnancy may affect lamotrigine concentrations and/or therapeutic effect.

There have been reports of decreased lamotrigine concentrations during pregnancy and restoration of pre-partum concentrations after delivery.

Dosage adjustments may be necessary to maintain clinical response.

Pregnancy Exposure Registry: To provide information regarding the effects of in utero exposure to LAMICTAL, physicians are advised to recommend that pregnant patients taking LAMICTAL enroll in the North American Antiepileptic Drug (NAAED) Pregnancy Registry.

This can be done by calling the toll-free number 1-888-233-2334, and must be done by patients themselves.

Information on the registry can also be found at the website http://www.aedpregnancyregistry.org/.

Physicians are also encouraged to register patients in the Lamotrigine Pregnancy Registry; enrollment in this registry must be done prior to any prenatal diagnostic tests and before fetal outcome is known .

Physicians can obtain information by calling the Lamotrigine Pregnancy Registry at 1-800-336-2176 (toll-free).

NUSRING MOTHERS

8.3 Nursing Mothers Lamotrigine is present in milk from lactating women taking LAMICTAL.

Data from multiple small studies indicate that lamotrigine plasma levels in human milk-fed infants have been reported to be as high as 50% of the maternal serum levels.

Neonates and young infants are at risk for high serum levels because maternal serum and milk levels can rise to high levels postpartum if lamotrigine dosage has been increased during pregnancy but not later reduced to the pre-pregnancy dosage.

Lamotrigine exposure is further increased due to the immaturity of the infant glucuronidation capacity needed for drug clearance.

Events including apnea, drowsiness, and poor sucking have been reported in infants who have been human milk-fed by mothers using lamotrigine; whether or not these events were caused by lamotrigine is unknown.

Human milk-fed infants should be closely monitored for adverse events resulting from lamotrigine.

Measurement of infant serum levels should be performed to rule out toxicity if concerns arise.

Human milk-feeding should be discontinued in infants with lamotrigine toxicity.

Caution should be exercised when LAMICTAL is administered to a nursing woman.

BOXED WARNING

WARNING: SERIOUS SKIN RASHES LAMICTAL ® can cause serious rashes requiring hospitalization and discontinuation of treatment.

The incidence of these rashes, which have included Stevens-Johnson syndrome, is approximately 0.8% (8 per 1,000) in pediatric patients (2 to 16 years of age) receiving LAMICTAL as adjunctive therapy for epilepsy and 0.3% (3 per 1,000) in adults on adjunctive therapy for epilepsy.

In clinical trials of bipolar and other mood disorders, the rate of serious rash was 0.08% (0.8 per 1,000) in adult patients receiving LAMICTAL as initial monotherapy and 0.13% (1.3 per 1,000) in adult patients receiving LAMICTAL as adjunctive therapy.

In a prospectively followed cohort of 1,983 pediatric patients (2 to 16 years of age) with epilepsy taking adjunctive LAMICTAL, there was 1 rash-related death.

In worldwide postmarketing experience, rare cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis and/or rash-related death have been reported in adult and pediatric patients, but their numbers are too few to permit a precise estimate of the rate.

Other than age, there are as yet no factors identified that are known to predict the risk of occurrence or the severity of rash caused by LAMICTAL.

There are suggestions, yet to be proven, that the risk of rash may also be increased by (1) coadministration of LAMICTAL with valproate (includes valproic acid and divalproex sodium), (2) exceeding the recommended initial dose of LAMICTAL, or (3) exceeding the recommended dose escalation for LAMICTAL.

However, cases have occurred in the absence of these factors.

Nearly all cases of life-threatening rashes caused by LAMICTAL have occurred within 2 to 8 weeks of treatment initiation.

However, isolated cases have occurred after prolonged treatment (e.g., 6 months).

Accordingly, duration of therapy cannot be relied upon as means to predict the potential risk heralded by the first appearance of a rash.

Although benign rashes are also caused by LAMICTAL, it is not possible to predict reliably which rashes will prove to be serious or life threatening.

Accordingly, LAMICTAL should ordinarily be discontinued at the first sign of rash, unless the rash is clearly not drug related.

Discontinuation of treatment may not prevent a rash from becoming life threatening or permanently disabling or disfiguring [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)] .

WARNING: SERIOUS SKIN RASHES See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning.

Cases of life-threatening serious rashes, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, and/or rash-related death, have been caused by LAMICTAL.

The rate of serious rash is greater in pediatric patients than in adults.

Additional factors that may increase the risk of rash include (5.1): coadministration with valproate exceeding recommended initial dose of LAMICTAL exceeding recommended dose escalation of LAMICTAL Benign rashes are also caused by LAMICTAL; however, it is not possible to predict which rashes will prove to be serious or life threatening.

LAMICTAL should be discontinued at the first sign of rash, unless the rash is clearly not drug related.

(5.1)

WARNING AND CAUTIONS

5 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS Life-threatening serious rash and/or rash-related death may result.

(Boxed Warning, 5.1) Fatal or life-threatening hypersensitivity reaction: Multiorgan hypersensitivity reactions, also known as Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS), may be fatal or life threatening.

Early signs may include rash, fever, and lymphadenopathy.

These reactions may be associated with other organ involvement, such as hepatitis, hepatic failure, blood dyscrasias, or acute multiorgan failure.

LAMICTAL should be discontinued if alternate etiology for this reaction is not found.

(5.2) Blood dyscrasias (e.g., neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, pancytopenia): May occur, either with or without an associated hypersensitivity syndrome.

(5.3) Suicidal behavior and ideation.

(5.4) Clinical worsening, emergence of new symptoms, and suicidal ideation/behaviors may be associated with treatment of bipolar disorder.

Patients should be closely monitored, particularly early in treatment or during dosage changes.

(5.5) Aseptic meningitis reported in pediatric and adult patients.

(5.6) Medication errors involving LAMICTAL have occurred.

In particular the names LAMICTAL or lamotrigine can be confused with names of other commonly used medications.

Medication errors may also occur between the different formulations of LAMICTAL.

(3.4, 5.7, 16, 17.10) 5.1 Serious Skin Rashes [see Boxed Warning] Pediatric Population: The incidence of serious rash associated with hospitalization and discontinuation of LAMICTAL in a prospectively followed cohort of pediatric patients (2 to 16 years of age) with epilepsy receiving adjunctive therapy was approximately 0.8% (16 of 1,983).

When 14 of these cases were reviewed by 3 expert dermatologists, there was considerable disagreement as to their proper classification.

To illustrate, one dermatologist considered none of the cases to be Stevens-Johnson syndrome; another assigned 7 of the 14 to this diagnosis.

There was 1 rash-related death in this 1,983-patient cohort.

Additionally, there have been rare cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis with and without permanent sequelae and/or death in US and foreign postmarketing experience.

There is evidence that the inclusion of valproate in a multidrug regimen increases the risk of serious, potentially life-threatening rash in pediatric patients.

In pediatric patients who used valproate concomitantly, 1.2% (6 of 482) experienced a serious rash compared with 0.6% (6 of 952) patients not taking valproate.

Adult Population: Serious rash associated with hospitalization and discontinuation of LAMICTAL occurred in 0.3% (11 of 3,348) of adult patients who received LAMICTAL in premarketing clinical trials of epilepsy.

In the bipolar and other mood disorders clinical trials, the rate of serious rash was 0.08% (1 of 1,233) of adult patients who received LAMICTAL as initial monotherapy and 0.13% (2 of 1,538) of adult patients who received LAMICTAL as adjunctive therapy.

No fatalities occurred among these individuals.

However, in worldwide postmarketing experience, rare cases of rash-related death have been reported, but their numbers are too few to permit a precise estimate of the rate.

Among the rashes leading to hospitalization were Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, angioedema, and those associated with multiorgan hypersensitivity [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)] .

There is evidence that the inclusion of valproate in a multidrug regimen increases the risk of serious, potentially life-threatening rash in adults.

Specifically, of 584 patients administered LAMICTAL with valproate in epilepsy clinical trials, 6 (1%) were hospitalized in association with rash; in contrast, 4 (0.16%) of 2,398 clinical trial patients and volunteers administered LAMICTAL in the absence of valproate were hospitalized.

Patients With History of Allergy or Rash to Other Antiepileptic Drugs: The risk of nonserious rash may be increased when the recommended initial dose and/or the rate of dose escalation of LAMICTAL is exceeded and in patients with a history of allergy or rash to other AEDs.

5.2 Multiorgan Hypersensitivity Reactions and Organ Failure Multiorgan hypersensitivity reactions, also known as Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS), have occurred with LAMICTAL.

Some have been fatal or life threatening.

DRESS typically, although not exclusively, presents with fever, rash, and/or lymphadenopathy in association with other organ system involvement, such as hepatitis, nephritis, hematologic abnormalities, myocarditis, or myositis, sometimes resembling an acute viral infection.

Eosinophilia is often present.

This disorder is variable in its expression, and other organ systems not noted here may be involved.

Fatalities associated with acute multiorgan failure and various degrees of hepatic failure have been reported in 2 of 3,796 adult patients and 4 of 2,435 pediatric patients who received LAMICTAL in epilepsy clinical trials.

Rare fatalities from multiorgan failure have also been reported in postmarketing use.

Isolated liver failure without rash or involvement of other organs has also been reported with LAMICTAL.

It is important to note that early manifestations of hypersensitivity (e.g., fever, lymphadenopathy) may be present even though a rash is not evident.

If such signs or symptoms are present, the patient should be evaluated immediately.

LAMICTAL should be discontinued if an alternative etiology for the signs or symptoms cannot be established.

Prior to initiation of treatment with LAMICTAL, the patient should be instructed that a rash or other signs or symptoms of hypersensitivity (e.g., fever, lymphadenopathy) may herald a serious medical event and that the patient should report any such occurrence to a physician immediately.

5.3 Blood Dyscrasias There have been reports of blood dyscrasias that may or may not be associated with multiorgan hypersensitivity (also known as DRESS) [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)] .

These have included neutropenia, leukopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, pancytopenia, and, rarely, aplastic anemia and pure red cell aplasia.

5.4 Suicidal Behavior and Ideation Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), including LAMICTAL, increase the risk of suicidal thoughts or behavior in patients taking these drugs for any indication.

Patients treated with any AED for any indication should be monitored for the emergence or worsening of depression, suicidal thoughts or behavior, and/or any unusual changes in mood or behavior.

Pooled analyses of 199 placebo-controlled clinical trials (mono- and adjunctive therapy) of 11 different AEDs showed that patients randomized to one of the AEDs had approximately twice the risk (adjusted Relative Risk 1.8, 95% CI:1.2, 2.7) of suicidal thinking or behavior compared to patients randomized to placebo.

In these trials, which had a median treatment duration of 12 weeks, the estimated incidence of suicidal behavior or ideation among 27,863 AED-treated patients was 0.43%, compared to 0.24% among 16,029 placebo-treated patients, representing an increase of approximately 1 case of suicidal thinking or behavior for every 530 patients treated.

There were 4 suicides in drug-treated patients in the trials and none in placebo-treated patients, but the number of events is too small to allow any conclusion about drug effect on suicide.

The increased risk of suicidal thoughts or behavior with AEDs was observed as early as 1 week after starting treatment with AEDs and persisted for the duration of treatment assessed.

Because most trials included in the analysis did not extend beyond 24 weeks, the risk of suicidal thoughts or behavior beyond 24 weeks could not be assessed.

The risk of suicidal thoughts or behavior was generally consistent among drugs in the data analyzed.

The finding of increased risk with AEDs of varying mechanism of action and across a range of indications suggests that the risk applies to all AEDs used for any indication.

The risk did not vary substantially by age (5 to 100 years) in the clinical trials analyzed.

Table 7 shows absolute and relative risk by indication for all evaluated AEDs.

Table 7.

Risk by Indication for Antiepileptic Drugs in the Pooled Analysis Indication Placebo Patients With Events Per 1,000 Patients Drug Patients With Events Per 1,000 Patients Relative Risk: Incidence of Events in Drug Patients/Incidence in Placebo Patients Risk Difference: Additional Drug Patients With Events Per 1,000 Patients Epilepsy 1.0 3.4 3.5 2.4 Psychiatric 5.7 8.5 1.5 2.9 Other 1.0 1.8 1.9 0.9 Total 2.4 4.3 1.8 1.9 The relative risk for suicidal thoughts or behavior was higher in clinical trials for epilepsy than in clinical trials for psychiatric or other conditions, but the absolute risk differences were similar for the epilepsy and psychiatric indications.

Anyone considering prescribing LAMICTAL or any other AED must balance the risk of suicidal thoughts or behavior with the risk of untreated illness.

Epilepsy and many other illnesses for which AEDs are prescribed are themselves associated with morbidity and mortality and an increased risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior.

Should suicidal thoughts and behavior emerge during treatment, the prescriber needs to consider whether the emergence of these symptoms in any given patient may be related to the illness being treated.

Patients, their caregivers, and families should be informed that AEDs increase the risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior and should be advised of the need to be alert for the emergence or worsening of the signs and symptoms of depression, any unusual changes in mood or behavior, or the emergence of suicidal thoughts, behavior, or thoughts about self-harm.

Behaviors of concern should be reported immediately to healthcare providers.

5.5 Use in Patients With Bipolar Disorder Acute Treatment of Mood Episodes: Safety and effectiveness of LAMICTAL in the acute treatment of mood episodes have not been established.

Children and Adolescents (less than 18 years of age): Safety and effectiveness of LAMICTAL in patients below the age of 18 years with mood disorders have not been established [see Suicidal Behavior and Ideation (5.4)] .

Clinical Worsening and Suicide Risk Associated With Bipolar Disorder: Patients with bipolar disorder may experience worsening of their depressive symptoms and/or the emergence of suicidal ideation and behaviors (suicidality) whether or not they are taking medications for bipolar disorder.

Patients should be closely monitored for clinical worsening (including development of new symptoms) and suicidality, especially at the beginning of a course of treatment or at the time of dose changes.

In addition, patients with a history of suicidal behavior or thoughts, those patients exhibiting a significant degree of suicidal ideation prior to commencement of treatment, and young adults are at an increased risk of suicidal thoughts or suicide attempts, and should receive careful monitoring during treatment [see Suicidal Behavior and Ideation (5.5)] .

Consideration should be given to changing the therapeutic regimen, including possibly discontinuing the medication, in patients who experience clinical worsening (including development of new symptoms) and/or the emergence of suicidal ideation/behavior especially if these symptoms are severe, abrupt in onset, or were not part of the patient’s presenting symptoms.

Prescriptions for LAMICTAL should be written for the smallest quantity of tablets consistent with good patient management in order to reduce the risk of overdose.

Overdoses have been reported for LAMICTAL, some of which have been fatal [see Overdosage (10.1)] .

5.6 Aseptic Meningitis Therapy with LAMICTAL increases the risk of developing aseptic meningitis.

Because of the potential for serious outcomes of untreated meningitis due to other causes, patients should also be evaluated for other causes of meningitis and treated as appropriate.

Postmarketing cases of aseptic meningitis have been reported in pediatric and adult patients taking LAMICTAL for various indications.

Symptoms upon presentation have included headache, fever, nausea, vomiting, and nuchal rigidity.

Rash, photophobia, myalgia, chills, altered consciousness, and somnolence were also noted in some cases.

Symptoms have been reported to occur within 1 day to one and a half months following the initiation of treatment.

In most cases, symptoms were reported to resolve after discontinuation of LAMICTAL.

Re-exposure resulted in a rapid return of symptoms (from within 30 minutes to 1 day following re-initiation of treatment) that were frequently more severe.

Some of the patients treated with LAMICTAL who developed aseptic meningitis had underlying diagnoses of systemic lupus erythematosus or other autoimmune diseases.

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analyzed at the time of clinical presentation in reported cases was characterized by a mild-to-moderate pleocytosis, normal glucose levels, and mild-to-moderate increase in protein.

CSF white blood cell count differentials showed a predominance of neutrophils in a majority of the cases, although a predominance of lymphocytes was reported in approximately one third of the cases.

Some patients also had new onset of signs and symptoms of involvement of other organs (predominantly hepatic and renal involvement), which may suggest that in these cases the aseptic meningitis observed was part of a hypersensitivity reaction [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)] .

5.7 Potential Medication Errors Medication errors involving LAMICTAL have occurred.

In particular, the names LAMICTAL or lamotrigine can be confused with the names of other commonly used medications.

Medication errors may also occur between the different formulations of LAMICTAL.

To reduce the potential of medication errors, write and say LAMICTAL clearly.

Depictions of the LAMICTAL Tablets, Chewable Dispersible Tablets, and Orally Disintegrating Tablets can be found in the Medication Guide that accompanies the product to highlight the distinctive markings, colors, and shapes that serve to identify the different presentations of the drug and thus may help reduce the risk of medication errors.

To avoid the medication error of using the wrong drug or formulation, patients should be strongly advised to visually inspect their tablets to verify that they are LAMICTAL, as well as the correct formulation of LAMICTAL, each time they fill their prescription.

5.8 Concomitant Use With Oral Contraceptives Some estrogen-containing oral contraceptives have been shown to decrease serum concentrations of lamotrigine [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

Dosage adjustments will be necessary in most patients who start or stop estrogen-containing oral contraceptives while taking LAMICTAL [see Dosage and Administration (2.1)] .

During the week of inactive hormone preparation (“pill-free” week) of oral contraceptive therapy, plasma lamotrigine levels are expected to rise, as much as doubling at the end of the week.

Adverse reactions consistent with elevated levels of lamotrigine, such as dizziness, ataxia, and diplopia, could occur.

5.9 Withdrawal Seizures As with other AEDs, LAMICTAL should not be abruptly discontinued.

In patients with epilepsy there is a possibility of increasing seizure frequency.

In clinical trials in patients with Bipolar Disorder, 2 patients experienced seizures shortly after abrupt withdrawal of LAMICTAL; however, there were confounding factors that may have contributed to the occurrence of seizures in these bipolar patients.

Unless safety concerns require a more rapid withdrawal, the dose of LAMICTAL should be tapered over a period of at least 2 weeks (approximately 50% reduction per week) [see Dosage and Administration (2.1)] .

5.10 Status Epilepticus Valid estimates of the incidence of treatment-emergent status epilepticus among patients treated with LAMICTAL are difficult to obtain because reporters participating in clinical trials did not all employ identical rules for identifying cases.

At a minimum, 7 of 2,343 adult patients had episodes that could unequivocally be described as status epilepticus.

In addition, a number of reports of variably defined episodes of seizure exacerbation (e.g., seizure clusters, seizure flurries) were made.

5.11 Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) During the premarketing development of LAMICTAL, 20 sudden and unexplained deaths were recorded among a cohort of 4,700 patients with epilepsy (5,747 patient-years of exposure).

Some of these could represent seizure-related deaths in which the seizure was not observed, e.g., at night.

This represents an incidence of 0.0035 deaths per patient-year.

Although this rate exceeds that expected in a healthy population matched for age and sex, it is within the range of estimates for the incidence of sudden unexplained deaths in patients with epilepsy not receiving LAMICTAL (ranging from 0.0005 for the general population of patients with epilepsy, to 0.004 for a recently studied clinical trial population similar to that in the clinical development program for LAMICTAL, to 0.005 for patients with refractory epilepsy).

Consequently, whether these figures are reassuring or suggest concern depends on the comparability of the populations reported upon to the cohort receiving LAMICTAL and the accuracy of the estimates provided.

Probably most reassuring is the similarity of estimated SUDEP rates in patients receiving LAMICTAL and those receiving other AEDs, chemically unrelated to each other, that underwent clinical testing in similar populations.

Importantly, that drug is chemically unrelated to LAMICTAL.

This evidence suggests, although it certainly does not prove, that the high SUDEP rates reflect population rates, not a drug effect.

5.12 Addition of LAMICTAL to a Multidrug Regimen That Includes Valproate Because valproate reduces the clearance of lamotrigine, the dosage of lamotrigine in the presence of valproate is less than half of that required in its absence.

5.13 Binding in the Eye and Other Melanin-Containing Tissues Because lamotrigine binds to melanin, it could accumulate in melanin-rich tissues over time.

This raises the possibility that lamotrigine may cause toxicity in these tissues after extended use.

Although ophthalmological testing was performed in one controlled clinical trial, the testing was inadequate to exclude subtle effects or injury occurring after long-term exposure.

Moreover, the capacity of available tests to detect potentially adverse consequences, if any, of lamotrigine’s binding to melanin is unknown [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.2)] .

Accordingly, although there are no specific recommendations for periodic ophthalmological monitoring, prescribers should be aware of the possibility of long-term ophthalmologic effects.

5.14 Laboratory Tests The value of monitoring plasma concentrations of lamotrigine in patients treated with LAMICTAL has not been established.

Because of the possible pharmacokinetic interactions between lamotrigine and other drugs including AEDs (see Table 15), monitoring of the plasma levels of lamotrigine and concomitant drugs may be indicated, particularly during dosage adjustments.

In general, clinical judgment should be exercised regarding monitoring of plasma levels of lamotrigine and other drugs and whether or not dosage adjustments are necessary.

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS

17 PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION See FDA-approved patient labeling (Medication Guide).

17.1 Rash Prior to initiation of treatment with LAMICTAL, the patient should be instructed that a rash or other signs or symptoms of hypersensitivity (e.g., fever, lymphadenopathy) may herald a serious medical event and that the patient should report any such occurrence to a physician immediately.

17.2 Multiorgan Hypersensitivity Reactions, Blood Dyscrasias, and Organ Failure Patients should be instructed that multiorgan hypersensitivity reactions and acute multiorgan failure may occur with LAMICTAL.

Isolated organ failure or isolated blood dyscrasias without evidence of multiorgan hypersensitivity may also occur.

Patients should contact their physician immediately if they experience any signs or symptoms of these conditions [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2, 5.3)] .

17.3 Suicidal Thinking and Behavior Patients, their caregivers, and families should be counseled that AEDs, including LAMICTAL, may increase the risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior and should be advised of the need to be alert for the emergence or worsening of symptoms of depression, any unusual changes in mood or behavior, or the emergence of suicidal thoughts, behavior, or thoughts about self-harm.

Behaviors of concern should be reported immediately to healthcare providers.

17.4 Worsening of Seizures Patients should be advised to notify their physician if worsening of seizure control occurs.

17.5 Central Nervous System Adverse Effects Patients should be advised that LAMICTAL may cause dizziness, somnolence, and other symptoms and signs of CNS depression.

Accordingly, they should be advised neither to drive a car nor to operate other complex machinery until they have gained sufficient experience on LAMICTAL to gauge whether or not it adversely affects their mental and/or motor performance.

17.6 Pregnancy and Nursing Patients should be advised to notify their physicians if they become pregnant or intend to become pregnant during therapy.

Patients should be advised to notify their physicians if they intend to breastfeed or are breastfeeding an infant.

Patients should also be encouraged to enroll in the NAAED Pregnancy Registry if they become pregnant.

This registry is collecting information about the safety of antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy.

To enroll, patients can call the toll-free number 1-888-233-2334 [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1)] .

Patients who intend to breastfeed should be informed that LAMICTAL is present in breast milk and that they should monitor their child for potential adverse effects of this drug.

Benefits and risks of continuing breastfeeding should be discussed with the patient.

17.7 Oral Contraceptive Use Women should be advised to notify their physician if they plan to start or stop use of oral contraceptives or other female hormonal preparations.

Starting estrogen-containing oral contraceptives may significantly decrease lamotrigine plasma levels and stopping estrogen-containing oral contraceptives (including the “pill-free” week) may significantly increase lamotrigine plasma levels [see Warnings and Precautions (5.8), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

Women should also be advised to promptly notify their physician if they experience adverse reactions or changes in menstrual pattern (e.g., break-through bleeding) while receiving LAMICTAL in combination with these medications.

17.8 Discontinuing LAMICTAL Patients should be advised to notify their physician if they stop taking LAMICTAL for any reason and not to resume LAMICTAL without consulting their physician.

17.9 Aseptic Meningitis Patients should be advised that LAMICTAL may cause aseptic meningitis.

Patients should be advised to notify their physician immediately if they develop signs and symptoms of meningitis such as headache, fever, nausea, vomiting, stiff neck, rash, abnormal sensitivity to light, myalgia, chills, confusion, or drowsiness while taking LAMICTAL.

17.10 Potential Medication Errors Medication errors involving LAMICTAL have occurred.

In particular the names LAMICTAL or lamotrigine can be confused with the names of other commonly used medications.

Medication errors may also occur between the different formulations of LAMICTAL.

To reduce the potential of medication errors, write and say LAMICTAL clearly.

Depictions of the LAMICTAL Tablets, Chewable Dispersible Tablets, and Orally Disintegrating Tablets can be found in the Medication Guide that accompanies the product to highlight the distinctive markings, colors, and shapes that serve to identify the different presentations of the drug and thus may help reduce the risk of medication errors.

To avoid a medication error of using the wrong drug or formulation, patients should be strongly advised to visually inspect their tablets to verify that they are LAMICTAL, as well as the correct formulation of LAMICTAL, each time they fill their prescription [see Dosage Forms and Strengths (3.1, 3.2, 3.3), How Supplied/Storage and Handling (16)] .

LAMICTAL is a registered trademark of GlaxoSmithKline.

Microcaps and AdvaTab are registered trademarks of Eurand, Inc.

GlaxoSmithKline Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 LAMICTAL Tablets and Chewable Dispersible Tablets are manufactured by DSM Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Greenville, NC 27834 or GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 LAMICTAL Orally Disintegrating Tablets are manufactured by Eurand, Inc., Vandalia, OH 45377 ©2011, GlaxoSmithKline.

All rights reserved.

November 2011 LMT:7PI

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

2 Dosing is based on concomitant medications, indication, and patient age.

(2.2, 2.4) To avoid an increased risk of rash, the recommended initial dose and subsequent dose escalations should not be exceeded.

LAMICTAL Starter Kits and LAMICTAL ODT Patient Titration Kits are available for the first 5 weeks of treatment.

(2.1, 16) Do not restart LAMICTAL in patients who discontinued due to rash unless the potential benefits clearly outweigh the risks.

(2.1) Adjustments to maintenance doses will in most cases be required in patients starting or stopping estrogen-containing oral contraceptives.

(2.1, 5.8) LAMICTAL should be discontinued over a period of at least 2 weeks (approximately 50% reduction per week).

(2.1, 5.9) Epilepsy Adjunctive therapy—See Table 1 for patients >12 years of age and Tables 2 and 3 for patients 2 to 12 years.

(2.2) Conversion to monotherapy—See Table 4.

(2.3) Bipolar Disorder: See Tables 5 and 6.

(2.4) 2.1 General Dosing Considerations Rash: There are suggestions, yet to be proven, that the risk of severe, potentially life-threatening rash may be increased by (1) coadministration of LAMICTAL with valproate, (2) exceeding the recommended initial dose of LAMICTAL, or (3) exceeding the recommended dose escalation for LAMICTAL.

However, cases have occurred in the absence of these factors [see Boxed Warning] .

Therefore, it is important that the dosing recommendations be followed closely.

The risk of nonserious rash may be increased when the recommended initial dose and/or the rate of dose escalation of LAMICTAL is exceeded and in patients with a history of allergy or rash to other AEDs.

LAMICTAL Starter Kits and LAMICTAL ® ODT ™ Patient Titration Kits provide LAMICTAL at doses consistent with the recommended titration schedule for the first 5 weeks of treatment, based upon concomitant medications for patients with epilepsy (>12 years of age) and Bipolar I Disorder (≥18 years of age) and are intended to help reduce the potential for rash.

The use of LAMICTAL Starter Kits and LAMICTAL ODT Patient Titration Kits is recommended for appropriate patients who are starting or restarting LAMICTAL [see How Supplied/Storage and Handling (16)] .

It is recommended that LAMICTAL not be restarted in patients who discontinued due to rash associated with prior treatment with lamotrigine, unless the potential benefits clearly outweigh the risks.

If the decision is made to restart a patient who has discontinued lamotrigine, the need to restart with the initial dosing recommendations should be assessed.

The greater the interval of time since the previous dose, the greater consideration should be given to restarting with the initial dosing recommendations.

If a patient has discontinued lamotrigine for a period of more than 5 half-lives, it is recommended that initial dosing recommendations and guidelines be followed.

The half-life of lamotrigine is affected by other concomitant medications [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

LAMICTAL Added to Drugs Known to Induce or Inhibit Glucuronidation: Drugs other than those listed in the Clinical Pharmacology section [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] have not been systematically evaluated in combination with lamotrigine.

Because lamotrigine is metabolized predominantly by glucuronic acid conjugation, drugs that are known to induce or inhibit glucuronidation may affect the apparent clearance of lamotrigine and doses of LAMICTAL may require adjustment based on clinical response.

Target Plasma Levels for Patients With Epilepsy or Bipolar Disorder: A therapeutic plasma concentration range has not been established for lamotrigine.

Dosing of LAMICTAL should be based on therapeutic response [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

Women Taking Estrogen-Containing Oral Contraceptives: Starting LAMICTAL in Women Taking Estrogen-Containing Oral Contraceptives: Although estrogen-containing oral contraceptives have been shown to increase the clearance of lamotrigine [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] , no adjustments to the recommended dose-escalation guidelines for LAMICTAL should be necessary solely based on the use of estrogen-containing oral contraceptives.

Therefore, dose escalation should follow the recommended guidelines for initiating adjunctive therapy with LAMICTAL based on the concomitant AED or other concomitant medications (see Table 1 or Table 5).

See below for adjustments to maintenance doses of LAMICTAL in women taking estrogen-containing oral contraceptives.

Adjustments to the Maintenance Dose of LAMICTAL in Women Taking Estrogen-Containing Oral Contraceptives: (1) Taking Estrogen-Containing Oral Contraceptives: For women not taking carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, primidone, or other drugs such as rifampin that induce lamotrigine glucuronidation [see Drug Interactions (7), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] , the maintenance dose of LAMICTAL will in most cases need to be increased, by as much as 2-fold over the recommended target maintenance dose, in order to maintain a consistent lamotrigine plasma level [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

(2) Starting Estrogen-Containing Oral Contraceptives: In women taking a stable dose of LAMICTAL and not taking carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, primidone, or other drugs such as rifampin that induce lamotrigine glucuronidation [see Drug Interactions (7), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] , the maintenance dose will in most cases need to be increased by as much as 2-fold in order to maintain a consistent lamotrigine plasma level.

The dose increases should begin at the same time that the oral contraceptive is introduced and continue, based on clinical response, no more rapidly than 50 to 100 mg/day every week.

Dose increases should not exceed the recommended rate (see Table 1 or Table 5) unless lamotrigine plasma levels or clinical response support larger increases.

Gradual transient increases in lamotrigine plasma levels may occur during the week of inactive hormonal preparation (“pill-free” week), and these increases will be greater if dose increases are made in the days before or during the week of inactive hormonal preparation.

Increased lamotrigine plasma levels could result in additional adverse reactions, such as dizziness, ataxia, and diplopia.

If adverse reactions attributable to LAMICTAL consistently occur during the “pill-free” week, dose adjustments to the overall maintenance dose may be necessary.

Dose adjustments limited to the “pill-free” week are not recommended.

For women taking LAMICTAL in addition to carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, primidone, or other drugs such as rifampin that induce lamotrigine glucuronidation [see Drug Interactions (7), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] , no adjustment to the dose of LAMICTAL should be necessary.

(3) Stopping Estrogen-Containing Oral Contraceptives: For women not taking carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, primidone, or other drugs such as rifampin that induce lamotrigine glucuronidation [see Drug Interactions (7), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] , the maintenance dose of LAMICTAL will in most cases need to be decreased by as much as 50% in order to maintain a consistent lamotrigine plasma level.

The decrease in dose of LAMICTAL should not exceed 25% of the total daily dose per week over a 2-week period, unless clinical response or lamotrigine plasma levels indicate otherwise [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

For women taking LAMICTAL in addition to carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, primidone, or other drugs such as rifampin that induce lamotrigine glucuronidation [see Drug Interactions (7), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] , no adjustment to the dose of LAMICTAL should be necessary.

Women and Other Hormonal Contraceptive Preparations or Hormone Replacement Therapy: The effect of other hormonal contraceptive preparations or hormone replacement therapy on the pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine has not been systematically evaluated.

It has been reported that ethinylestradiol, not progestogens, increased the clearance of lamotrigine up to 2-fold, and the progestin-only pills had no effect on lamotrigine plasma levels.

Therefore, adjustments to the dosage of LAMICTAL in the presence of progestogens alone will likely not be needed.

Patients With Hepatic Impairment: Experience in patients with hepatic impairment is limited.

Based on a clinical pharmacology study in 24 patients with mild, moderate, and severe liver impairment [see Use in Specific Populations (8.6), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] , the following general recommendations can be made.

No dosage adjustment is needed in patients with mild liver impairment.

Initial, escalation, and maintenance doses should generally be reduced by approximately 25% in patients with moderate and severe liver impairment without ascites and 50% in patients with severe liver impairment with ascites.

Escalation and maintenance doses may be adjusted according to clinical response.

Patients With Renal Impairment: Initial doses of LAMICTAL should be based on patients’ concomitant medications (see Tables 1-3 or Table 5); reduced maintenance doses may be effective for patients with significant renal impairment [see Use in Specific Populations (8.7), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

Few patients with severe renal impairment have been evaluated during chronic treatment with LAMICTAL.

Because there is inadequate experience in this population, LAMICTAL should be used with caution in these patients.

Discontinuation Strategy: Epilepsy: For patients receiving LAMICTAL in combination with other AEDs, a reevaluation of all AEDs in the regimen should be considered if a change in seizure control or an appearance or worsening of adverse reactions is observed.

If a decision is made to discontinue therapy with LAMICTAL, a step-wise reduction of dose over at least 2 weeks (approximately 50% per week) is recommended unless safety concerns require a more rapid withdrawal [see Warnings and Precautions (5.9)] .

Discontinuing carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, primidone, or other drugs such as rifampin that induce lamotrigine glucuronidation should prolong the half-life of lamotrigine; discontinuing valproate should shorten the half-life of lamotrigine.

Bipolar Disorder: In the controlled clinical trials, there was no increase in the incidence, type, or severity of adverse reactions following abrupt termination of LAMICTAL.

In clinical trials in patients with Bipolar Disorder, 2 patients experienced seizures shortly after abrupt withdrawal of LAMICTAL.

However, there were confounding factors that may have contributed to the occurrence of seizures in these bipolar patients.

Discontinuation of LAMICTAL should involve a step-wise reduction of dose over at least 2 weeks (approximately 50% per week) unless safety concerns require a more rapid withdrawal [see Warnings and Precautions (5.9)] .

2.2 Epilepsy – Adjunctive Therapy This section provides specific dosing recommendations for patients greater than 12 years of age and patients 2 to 12 years of age.

Within each of these age-groups, specific dosing recommendations are provided depending upon concomitant AED or other concomitant medications (Table 1 for patients greater than 12 years of age and Table 2 for patients 2 to 12 years of age).

A weight-based dosing guide for patients 2 to 12 years of age on concomitant valproate is provided in Table 3.

Patients Over 12 Years of Age: Recommended dosing guidelines are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Escalation Regimen for LAMICTAL in Patients Over 12 Years of Age With Epilepsy For Patients TAKING Valproate a For Patients NOT TAKING Carbamazepine, Phenytoin, Phenobarbital, Primidone, b or Valproate a For Patients TAKING Carbamazepine, Phenytoin, Phenobarbital, or Primidone b and NOT TAKING Valproate a Weeks 1 and 2 25 mg every other day 25 mg every day 50 mg/day Weeks 3 and 4 25 mg every day 50 mg/day 100 mg/day (in 2 divided doses) Week 5 onwards to maintenance Increase by 25 to 50 mg/day every 1 to 2 weeks Increase by 50 mg/day every 1 to 2 weeks Increase by 100 mg/day every 1 to 2 weeks.

Usual maintenance dose 100 to 200 mg/day with valproate alone 100 to 400 mg/day with valproate and other drugs that induce glucuronidation (in 1 or 2 divided doses) 225 to 375 mg/day (in 2 divided doses) 300 to 500 mg/day (in 2 divided doses) a Valproate has been shown to inhibit glucuronidation and decrease the apparent clearance of lamotrigine [see Drug Interactions (7), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

b These drugs induce lamotrigine glucuronidation and increase clearance [see Drug Interactions (7), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

Other drugs that have similar effects include estrogen-containing oral contraceptives [see Drug Interactions (7), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

Dosing recommendations for oral contraceptives can be found in General Dosing Considerations [see Dosage and Administration (2.1)] .

Patients on rifampin, or other drugs that induce lamotrigine glucuronidation and increase clearance, should follow the same dosing titration/maintenance regimen as that used with anticonvulsants that have this effect.

Patients 2 to 12 Years of Age: Recommended dosing guidelines are summarized in Table 2.

Smaller starting doses and slower dose escalations than those used in clinical trials are recommended because of the suggestion that the risk of rash may be decreased by smaller starting doses and slower dose escalations.

Therefore, maintenance doses will take longer to reach in clinical practice than in clinical trials.

It may take several weeks to months to achieve an individualized maintenance dose.

Maintenance doses in patients weighing less than 30 kg, regardless of age or concomitant AED, may need to be increased as much as 50%, based on clinical response.

The smallest available strength of LAMICTAL Chewable Dispersible Tablets is 2 mg, and only whole tablets should be administered.

If the calculated dose cannot be achieved using whole tablets, the dose should be rounded down to the nearest whole tablet [see How Supplied/Storage and Handling (16) and Medication Guide] .

Table 2.

Escalation Regimen for LAMICTAL in Patients 2 to 12 Years of Age With Epilepsy For Patients TAKING Valproate a For Patients NOT TAKING Carbamazepine, Phenytoin, Phenobarbital, Primidone, b or Valproate a For Patients TAKING Carbamazepine, Phenytoin, Phenobarbital, or Primidone b and NOT TAKING Valproate a Weeks 1 and 2 0.15 mg/kg/day in 1 or 2 divided doses, rounded down to the nearest whole tablet (see Table 3 for weight-based dosing guide) 0.3 mg/kg/day in 1 or 2 divided doses, rounded down to the nearest whole tablet 0.6 mg/kg/day in 2 divided doses, rounded down to the nearest whole tablet Weeks 3 and 4 0.3 mg/kg/day in 1 or 2 divided doses, rounded down to the nearest whole tablet (see Table 3 for weight-based dosing guide) 0.6 mg/kg/day in 2 divided doses, rounded down to the nearest whole tablet 1.2 mg/kg/day in 2 divided doses, rounded down to the nearest whole tablet Week 5 onwards to maintenance The dose should be increased every 1 to 2 weeks as follows: calculate 0.3 mg/kg/day, round this amount down to the nearest whole tablet, and add this amount to the previously administered daily dose The dose should be increased every 1 to 2 weeks as follows: calculate 0.6 mg/kg/day, round this amount down to the nearest whole tablet, and add this amount to the previously administered daily dose The dose should be increased every 1 to 2 weeks as follows: calculate 1.2 mg/kg/day, round this amount down to the nearest whole tablet, and add this amount to the previously administered daily dose Usual maintenance dose 1 to 5 mg/kg/day (maximum 200 mg/day in 1 or 2 divided doses) 1 to 3 mg/kg/day with valproate alone 4.5 to 7.5 mg/kg/day (maximum 300 mg/day in 2 divided doses) 5 to 15 mg/kg/day (maximum 400 mg/day in 2 divided doses) Maintenance dose in patients less than 30 kg May need to be increased by as much as 50%, based on clinical response May need to be increased by as much as 50%, based on clinical response May need to be increased by as much as 50%, based on clinical response Note: Only whole tablets should be used for dosing.

a Valproate has been shown to inhibit glucuronidation and decrease the apparent clearance of lamotrigine [see Drug Interactions (7), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

b These drugs induce lamotrigine glucuronidation and increase clearance [see Drug Interactions (7), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

Other drugs that have similar effects include estrogen-containing oral contraceptives [see Drug Interactions (7), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

Dosing recommendations for oral contraceptives can be found in General Dosing Considerations [see Dosage and Administration (2.1)] .

Patients on rifampin, or other drugs that induce lamotrigine glucuronidation and increase clearance, should follow the same dosing titration/maintenance regimen as that used with anticonvulsants that have this effect.

Table 3.

The Initial Weight-Based Dosing Guide for Patients 2 to 12 Years of Age Taking Valproate (Weeks 1 to 4) With Epilepsy If the patient’s weight is Give this daily dose, using the most appropriate combination of LAMICTAL 2-mg and 5-mg tablets Greater than And less than Weeks 1 and 2 Weeks 3 and 4 6.7 kg 14 kg 2 mg every other day 2 mg every day 14.1 kg 27 kg 2 mg every day 4 mg every day 27.1 kg 34 kg 4 mg every day 8 mg every day 34.1 kg 40 kg 5 mg every day 10 mg every day Usual Adjunctive Maintenance Dose for Epilepsy: The usual maintenance doses identified in Tables 1 and 2 are derived from dosing regimens employed in the placebo-controlled adjunctive studies in which the efficacy of LAMICTAL was established.

In patients receiving multidrug regimens employing carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, or primidone without valproate , maintenance doses of adjunctive LAMICTAL as high as 700 mg/day have been used.

In patients receiving valproate alone , maintenance doses of adjunctive LAMICTAL as high as 200 mg/day have been used.

The advantage of using doses above those recommended in Tables 1 through 4 has not been established in controlled trials.

2.3 Epilepsy – Conversion From Adjunctive Therapy to Monotherapy The goal of the transition regimen is to effect the conversion to monotherapy with LAMICTAL under conditions that ensure adequate seizure control while mitigating the risk of serious rash associated with the rapid titration of LAMICTAL.

The recommended maintenance dose of LAMICTAL as monotherapy is 500 mg/day given in 2 divided doses.

To avoid an increased risk of rash, the recommended initial dose and subsequent dose escalations of LAMICTAL should not be exceeded [see Boxed Warning] .

Conversion From Adjunctive Therapy With Carbamazepine, Phenytoin, Phenobarbital, or Primidone to Monotherapy With LAMICTAL: After achieving a dose of 500 mg/day of LAMICTAL according to the guidelines in Table 1, the concomitant AED should be withdrawn by 20% decrements each week over a 4-week period.

The regimen for the withdrawal of the concomitant AED is based on experience gained in the controlled monotherapy clinical trial.

Conversion From Adjunctive Therapy With Valproate to Monotherapy With LAMICTAL: The conversion regimen involves 4 steps outlined in Table 4.

Table 4.

Conversion From Adjunctive Therapy With Valproate to Monotherapy With LAMICTAL in Patients ≥16 Years of Age With Epilepsy LAMICTAL Valproate Step 1 Achieve a dose of 200 mg/day according to guidelines in Table 1 (if not already on 200 mg/day).

Maintain previous stable dose.

Step 2 Maintain at 200 mg/day.

Decrease to 500 mg/day by decrements no greater than 500 mg/day/week and then maintain the dose of 500 mg/day for 1 week.

Step 3 Increase to 300 mg/day and maintain for 1 week.

Simultaneously decrease to 250 mg/day and maintain for 1 week.

Step 4 Increase by 100 mg/day every week to achieve maintenance dose of 500 mg/day.

Discontinue.

Conversion From Adjunctive Therapy With Antiepileptic Drugs Other Than Carbamazepine, Phenytoin, Phenobarbital, Primidone, or Valproate to Monotherapy With LAMICTAL: No specific dosing guidelines can be provided for conversion to monotherapy with LAMICTAL with AEDs other than carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, or valproate.

2.4 Bipolar Disorder The goal of maintenance treatment with LAMICTAL is to delay the time to occurrence of mood episodes (depression, mania, hypomania, mixed episodes) in patients treated for acute mood episodes with standard therapy.

The target dose of LAMICTAL is 200 mg/day (100 mg/day in patients taking valproate, which decreases the apparent clearance of lamotrigine, and 400 mg/day in patients not taking valproate and taking either carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, primidone, or other drugs such as rifampin that increase the apparent clearance of lamotrigine).

In the clinical trials, doses up to 400 mg/day as monotherapy were evaluated; however, no additional benefit was seen at 400 mg/day compared with 200 mg/day [see Clinical Studies (14.2)] .

Accordingly, doses above 200 mg/day are not recommended.

Treatment with LAMICTAL is introduced, based on concurrent medications, according to the regimen outlined in Table 5.

If other psychotropic medications are withdrawn following stabilization, the dose of LAMICTAL should be adjusted.

For patients discontinuing valproate, the dose of LAMICTAL should be doubled over a 2-week period in equal weekly increments (see Table 6).

For patients discontinuing carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, primidone, or other drugs such as rifampin that induce lamotrigine glucuronidation, the dose of LAMICTAL should remain constant for the first week and then should be decreased by half over a 2-week period in equal weekly decrements (see Table 6).

The dose of LAMICTAL may then be further adjusted to the target dose (200 mg) as clinically indicated.

If other drugs are subsequently introduced, the dose of LAMICTAL may need to be adjusted.

In particular, the introduction of valproate requires reduction in the dose of LAMICTAL [see Drug Interactions (7), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

To avoid an increased risk of rash, the recommended initial dose and subsequent dose escalations of LAMICTAL should not be exceeded [see Boxed Warning] .

Table 5.

Escalation Regimen for LAMICTAL for Patients With Bipolar Disorder For Patients TAKING Valproate a For Patients NOT TAKING Carbamazepine, Phenytoin, Phenobarbital, Primidone, b or Valproate a For Patients TAKING Carbamazepine, Phenytoin, Phenobarbital, or Primidone b and NOT TAKING Valproate a Weeks 1 and 2 25 mg every other day 25 mg daily 50 mg daily Weeks 3 and 4 25 mg daily 50 mg daily 100 mg daily, in divided doses Week 5 50 mg daily 100 mg daily 200 mg daily, in divided doses Week 6 100 mg daily 200 mg daily 300 mg daily, in divided doses Week 7 100 mg daily 200 mg daily up to 400 mg daily, in divided doses a Valproate has been shown to inhibit glucuronidation and decrease the apparent clearance of lamotrigine [see Drug Interactions (7), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

b These drugs induce lamotrigine glucuronidation and increase clearance [see Drug Interactions (7), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

Other drugs that have similar effects include estrogen-containing oral contraceptives [see Drug Interactions (7), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

Dosing recommendations for oral contraceptives can be found in General Dosing Considerations [see Dosage and Administration (2.1)] .

Patients on rifampin, or other drugs that induce lamotrigine glucuronidation and increase clearance, should follow the same dosing titration/maintenance regimen as that used with anticonvulsants that have this effect.

Table 6.

Dosage Adjustments to LAMICTAL for Patients With Bipolar Disorder Following Discontinuation of Psychotropic Medications Discontinuation of Psychotropic Drugs (excluding Carbamazepine, Phenytoin, Phenobarbital, Primidone, b or Valproate a ) After Discontinuation of Valproate a After Discontinuation of Carbamazepine, Phenytoin, Phenobarbital, or Primidone b Current dose of LAMICTAL (mg/day) 100 Current dose of LAMICTAL (mg/day) 400 Week 1 Maintain current dose of LAMICTAL 150 400 Week 2 Maintain current dose of LAMICTAL 200 300 Week 3 onward Maintain current dose of LAMICTAL 200 200 a Valproate has been shown to inhibit glucuronidation and decrease the apparent clearance of lamotrigine [see Drug Interactions (7), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

b These drugs induce lamotrigine glucuronidation and increase clearance [see Drug Interactions (7), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

Other drugs that have similar effects include estrogen-containing oral contraceptives [see Drug Interactions (7), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

Dosing recommendations for oral contraceptives can be found in General Dosing Considerations [see Dosage and Administration (2.1)] .

Patients on rifampin, or other drugs that induce lamotrigine glucuronidation and increase clearance, should follow the same dosing titration/maintenance regimen as that used with anticonvulsants that have this effect.

The benefit of continuing treatment in patients who had been stabilized in an 8- to 16-week open-label phase with LAMICTAL was established in 2 randomized, placebo-controlled clinical maintenance trials [see Clinical Studies (14.2)] .

However, the optimal duration of treatment with LAMICTAL has not been established.

Thus, patients should be periodically reassessed to determine the need for maintenance treatment.

2.5 Administration of LAMICTAL Chewable Dispersible Tablets LAMICTAL Chewable Dispersible Tablets may be swallowed whole, chewed, or dispersed in water or diluted fruit juice.

If the tablets are chewed, consume a small amount of water or diluted fruit juice to aid in swallowing.

To disperse LAMICTAL Chewable Dispersible Tablets, add the tablets to a small amount of liquid (1 teaspoon, or enough to cover the medication).

Approximately 1 minute later, when the tablets are completely dispersed, swirl the solution and consume the entire quantity immediately.

No attempt should be made to administer partial quantities of the dispersed tablets.

2.6 Administration of LAMICTAL ODT Orally Disintegrating Tablets LAMICTAL ODT Orally Disintegrating Tablets should be placed onto the tongue and moved around in the mouth.

The tablet will disintegrate rapidly, can be swallowed with or without water, and can be taken with or without food.

Triamcinolone Acetonide 0.25 MG/ML Topical Cream

OVERDOSAGE

Topically applied corticosteroids can be absorbed in sufficient amounts to produce systemic effects (See PRECAUTIONS ).

DESCRIPTION

Triamcinolone Acetonide Cream USP contains Triamcinolone Acetonide [Pregna-1,4-diene-3,20-dione, 9-fluoro-11,21-dihydroxy-16,17-[(1-methylethylidene)bis- (oxy)]-, (11β,16α)-], with the empirical formula C 24 H 31 FO 6 and molecular weight 434.50.

CAS 76-25-5.

Triamcinolone Acetonide Cream USP, 0.025% contains: 0.25 mg of Triamcinolone Acetonide per gram in a base containing Emulsifying Wax, Cetyl Alcohol, Isopropyl Palmitate, Sorbitol Solution, Glycerin, Lactic Acid, Benzyl Alcohol and Purified Water.

Triamcinolone Acetonide Cream USP, 0.1% contains: 1 mg of Triamcinolone Acetonide per gram in a base containing Emulsifying Wax, Cetyl Alcohol, Isopropyl Palmitate, Sorbitol Solution, Glycerin, Lactic Acid, Benzyl Alcohol and Purified Water.

Triamcinolone Acetonide Cream USP, 0.5% contains: 5 mg of Triamcinolone Acetonide per gram in a base containing Emulsifying Wax, Cetyl Alcohol, Isopropyl Palmitate, Sorbitol Solution, Glycerin, Lactic Acid, Benzyl Alcohol and Purified Water.

Chemical Structure

HOW SUPPLIED

Triamcinolone Acetonide Cream USP, 0.025% Triamcinolone Acetonide Cream USP, 0.1% 15 gram tubes NDC 21695-501-15 15 gram tubes NDC 21695-504-15 80 gram tubes NDC 21695-501-80 80 gram tubes NDC 21695-504-80 Triamcinolone Acetonide Cream USP, 0.5% 15 gram tubes NDC 21695-502-15 Store at controlled room temperature 15°-30°C (59°-86°F).

Avoid excessive heat.

Protect from freezing.

E.

FOUGERA & CO.

a division of Altana Inc.

MELVILLE, NEW YORK 11747 Repackaged by: REBEL DISTRIBUTORS CORP Thousand Oaks, CA 91320

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

Topical corticosteroids are indicated for the relief of the inflammatory and pruritic manifestations of corticosteroid-responsive dermatoses.

PEDIATRIC USE

Pediatric Use: Pediatric patients may demonstrate greater susceptibility to topical corticosteroid-induced HPA axis suppression and Cushing’s syndrome than mature patients because of a larger skin surface area to body weight ratio.

Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis suppression, Cushing’s syndrome, and intracranial hypertension have been reported in children receiving topical corticosteroids.

Manifestations of adrenal suppression in children include linear growth retardation, delayed weight gain, low plasma cortisol levels, and absence of response to ACTH stimulation.

Manifestations of intracranial hypertension include bulging fontanelles, headaches, and bilateral papilledema.

Administration of topical corticosteroids to children should be limited to the least amount compatible with an effective therapeutic regimen.

Chronic corticosteroid therapy may interfere with the growth and development of children.

PREGNANCY

Pregnancy Category C: Corticosteroids are generally teratogenic in laboratory animals when administered systemically at relatively low dosage levels.

The more potent corticosteroids have been shown to be teratogenic after dermal application in laboratory animals.

There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women on teratogenic effects from topically applied corticosteroids.

Therefore, topical corticosteroids should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus.

Drugs of this class should not be used extensively on pregnant patients, in large amounts, or for prolonged periods of time.

NUSRING MOTHERS

Nursing Mothers: It is not known whether topical administration of corticosteroids could result in sufficient systemic absorption to produce detectable quantities in breast milk.

Systemically administered corticosteroids are secreted into breast milk in quantities not likely to have a deleterious effect on the infant.

Nevertheless, caution should be exercised when topical corticosteroids are administered to a nursing woman.

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS

Information for the Patient: Patients using topical corticosteroids should receive the following information and instructions.

This medication is to be used as directed by the physician.

It is for external use only.

Avoid contact with the eyes.

Patients should be advised not to use this medication for any disorder other than for which it was prescribed.

The treated skin area should not be bandaged or otherwise covered or wrapped as to be occlusive unless directed by the physician.

Patients should report any signs of local adverse reactions especially under occlusive dressing.

Parents of pediatric patients should be advised not to use tight fitting diapers or plastic pants on a child being treated in the diaper area, as these garments may constitute occlusive dressings.

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

Apply to the affected area as a thin film as follows: Triamcinolone Acetonide Cream USP, 0.025% two to four times daily; Triamcinolone Acetonide Cream USP, 0.1% and 0.5% two or three times daily depending on the severity of the condition.

Occlusive dressings may be used for the management of psoriasis or recalcitrant conditions.

If an infection develops, the use of occlusive dressings should be discontinued and appropriate antimicrobial therapy instituted.

Arthrotec (diclofenac sodium (enteric coated core) 75 MG / misoprostol (non-enteric coated mantle) 200 MCG) Delayed Release Oral Tablet

WARNINGS

Regarding misoprostol: See boxed CONTRAINDICATIONS AND .

Regarding diclofenac: See boxed CONTRAINDICATIONS AND .

CARDIOVASCULAR EFFECTS Cardiovascular Thrombotic Events Clinical trials of several COX-2 selective and nonselective NSAIDs of up to three years duration have shown an increased risk of serious cardiovascular (CV) thrombotic events, myocardial infarction, and stroke, which can be fatal.

All NSAIDs, both COX-2 selective and nonselective, may have a similar risk.

Patients with known CV disease or risk factors for CV disease may be at greater risk.

To minimize the potential risk for an adverse CV event in patients treated with an NSAID, the lowest effective dose should be used for the shortest duration possible.

Physicians and patients should remain alert for the development of such events, even in the absence of previous CV symptoms.

Patients should be informed about the signs and/or symptoms of serious CV events and the steps to take if they occur.

There is no consistent evidence that concurrent use of aspirin mitigates the increased risk of serious CV thrombotic events associated with NSAID use.

The concurrent use of aspirin and an NSAID does increase the risk of serious GI events (see , Gastrointestinal Effects – Risk of Ulceration, Bleeding and Perforation ).

Two large, controlled clinical trials of a COX-2 selective NSAID for the treatment of pain in the first 10–14 days following CABG surgery found an increased incidence of myocardial infarction and stroke (see CONTRAINDICATIONS ).

Hypertension NSAIDs, including ARTHROTEC, can lead to onset of new hypertension or worsening of preexisting hypertension, either of which may contribute to the increased incidence of CV events.

Patients taking thiazides or loop diuretics may have impaired response to these therapies when taking NSAIDs.

NSAIDs, including ARTHROTEC, should be used with caution in patients with hypertension.

Blood pressure (BP) should be monitored closely during the initiation of NSAID treatment and throughout the course of therapy.

Congestive Heart Failure and Edema Fluid retention and edema have been observed in some patients taking NSAIDs.

ARTHROTEC should be used with caution in patients with fluid retention or heart failure.

Gastrointestinal Effects – Risk of Ulceration, Bleeding and Perforation NSAIDs, including ARTHROTEC, can cause serious gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events including inflammation, bleeding, ulceration, and perforation of the stomach, small intestine, or large intestine, which can be fatal.

These serious adverse events can occur at any time, with or without warning symptoms, in patients treated with NSAIDs.

Only one in five patients, who develop a serious upper GI adverse event on NSAID therapy, is symptomatic.

Upper GI ulcers, gross bleeding, or perforation caused by NSAIDs occur in approximately 1% of patients treated for 3–6 months, and in about 2–4% of patients treated for one year.

These trends continue with longer duration of use, increasing the likelihood of developing a serious GI event at some time during the course of therapy.

However, even short-term therapy is not without risk.

NSAIDs should be prescribed with extreme caution in those with a prior history of ulcer disease or gastrointestinal bleeding.

Patients with a prior history of peptic ulcer disease and/or gastrointestinal bleeding who use NSAIDs have a greater than 10-fold increased risk for developing a GI bleed compared to patients treated with neither of these risk factors.

Other factors that increase the risk of GI bleeding in patients treated with NSAIDs include concomitant use of oral corticosteroids or anticoagulants, longer duration of NSAID therapy, smoking, use of alcohol, older age, and poor general health status.

Most spontaneous reports of fatal GI events are in elderly or debilitated patients and therefore, special care should be taken in treating this population.

To minimize the potential risk for an adverse GI event in patients treated with an NSAID, the lowest effective dose should be used for the shortest possible duration.

Patients and physicians should remain alert for signs and symptoms of GI ulcerations and bleeding during NSAID therapy and promptly initiate additional evaluation and treatment if a serious GI event is suspected.

This should include discontinuation of the NSAID until a serious GI adverse event is ruled out.

For high risk patients, alternate therapies that do not involve NSAIDs should be considered.

Renal Effects Long-term administration of NSAIDs has resulted in renal papillary necrosis and other renal injury.

Renal toxicity has also been seen in patients in whom renal prostaglandins have a compensatory role in the maintenance of renal perfusion.

In these patients, administration of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug may cause a dose-dependent reduction in prostaglandin formation and, secondarily, in renal blood flow, which may precipitate overt renal decompensation.

Patients at greatest risk of this reaction are those with impaired renal function, heart failure, liver dysfunction, those taking diuretics and ACE-inhibitors, and the elderly.

Discontinuation of NSAID therapy is usually followed by recovery to the pretreatment state.

Advanced Renal Disease ARTHROTEC contains diclofenac.

Diclofenac metabolites are eliminated primarily by the kidneys.

The extent to which the metabolites may accumulate in patients with renal failure has not been studied.

Therefore, treatment with ARTHROTEC is not recommended in these patients with advanced renal disease.

If ARTHROTEC therapy must be initiated, close monitoring of the patient’s renal function is advisable.

Hepatic effects In clinical trials with ARTHROTEC, meaningful elevation of ALT (SGPT, more than 3 times the ULN) occurred in 1.6% of 2,184 patients treated with ARTHROTEC and in 1.4% of 1,691 patients treated with diclofenac sodium.

These increases were generally transient, and enzyme levels returned to within the normal range upon discontinuation of therapy with ARTHROTEC.

The misoprostol component of ARTHROTEC does not appear to exacerbate the hepatic effects caused by the diclofenac sodium component.

Elevations of one or more liver tests may occur during therapy with diclofenac, a component of ARTHROTEC.

These laboratory abnormalities may progress, may remain unchanged, or may be transient with continued therapy.

Borderline elevations (i.e., less than 3 times the ULN [ULN = the upper limit of the normal range]), or greater elevations of transaminases occurred in about 15% of diclofenac-treated patients.

Of the markers of hepatic function, ALT (SGPT) is recommended for the monitoring of liver injury.

In clinical trials, meaningful elevations (i.e., more than 3 times the ULN) of AST (SGOT) (ALT was not measured in all studies) occurred in about 2% of approximately 5,700 patients at some time during diclofenac treatment.

In a large, open-label, controlled trial of 3,700 patients treated for 2–6 months, patients were monitored first at 8 weeks and 1,200 patients were monitored again at 24 weeks.

Meaningful elevations of ALT and/or AST occurred in about 4% of patients and included marked elevations (i.e., more than 8 times the ULN) in about 1% of the 3,700 patients.

In that open-label study, a higher incidence of borderline (less than 3 times the ULN), moderate (3–8 times the ULN), and marked (>8 times the ULN) elevations of ALT or AST was observed in patients receiving diclofenac when compared to other NSAIDs.

Elevations in transaminases were seen more frequently in patients with osteoarthritis than in those with rheumatoid arthritis.

Almost all meaningful elevations in transaminases were detected before patients became symptomatic.

Abnormal tests occurred during the first 2 months of therapy with diclofenac in 42 of the 51 patients in all trials who developed marked transaminase elevations.

In postmarketing reports, cases of drug-induced hepatotoxicity have been reported in the first month, and in some cases, the first 2 months of therapy, but can occur at any time during treatment with diclofenac.

Postmarketing surveillance has reported cases of severe hepatic reactions, including liver necrosis, jaundice, fulminant hepatitis with and without jaundice, and liver failure.

Some of these reported cases resulted in fatalities or liver transplantation.

Physicians should measure transaminases periodically in patients receiving long-term therapy with diclofenac, because severe hepatotoxicity may develop without a prodrome of distinguishing symptoms.

The optimum times for making the first and subsequent transaminase measurements are not known.

Based on clinical trial data and postmarketing experiences, transaminases should be monitored within 4 to 8 weeks after initiating treatment with diclofenac.

However, severe hepatic reactions can occur at any time during treatment with diclofenac.

If abnormal liver tests persist or worsen, if clinical signs and/or symptoms consistent with liver disease develop, or if systemic manifestations occur (e.g., eosinophilia, rash, abdominal pain, diarrhea, dark urine, etc.), ARTHROTEC should be discontinued immediately.

To minimize the possibility that hepatic injury will become severe between transaminase measurements, physicians should inform patients of the warning signs and symptoms of hepatotoxicity (e.g., nausea, fatigue, lethargy, pruritus, jaundice, right upper quadrant tenderness, and “flu-like” symptoms), and the appropriate action patients should take if these signs and symptoms appear.

To minimize the potential risk for an adverse liver related event in patients treated with ARTHROTEC, the lowest effective dose should be used for the shortest duration possible.

Caution should be exercised in prescribing ARTHROTEC with concomitant drugs that are known to be potentially hepatotoxic (e.g., antibiotics, anti-epileptics).

Anaphylactic reactions As with other NSAIDs, anaphylactic reactions may occur in patients without known prior exposure to ARTHROTEC.

ARTHROTEC should not be given to patients with the aspirin triad.

This symptom complex typically occurs in asthmatic patients who experience rhinitis with or without nasal polyps, or who exhibit severe, potentially fatal bronchospasm after taking aspirin or other NSAIDs (see CONTRAINDICATIONS and PRECAUTIONS—Preexisting asthma ).

Anaphylactic reactions may also occur to the misoprostol component of ARTHROTEC.

Emergency help should be sought in cases where an anaphylactic reaction occurs.

Allergic reactions have been reported by less than 0.1% of patients who received ARTHROTEC in clinical trials, and there have been rare reports of anaphylaxis in the marketed use of ARTHROTEC outside of the United States.

Skin Reactions NSAIDs, including ARTHROTEC, can cause serious skin adverse events such as exfoliative dermatitis, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), which can be fatal.

These serious events may occur without warning.

Patients should be informed about the signs and symptoms of serious skin manifestations and use of drug should be discontinued at the first appearance of skin rash or any other sign of hypersensitivity.

Pregnancy In late pregnancy, as with other NSAIDs, ARTHROTEC should be avoided because it may cause premature closure of the ductus arteriosus.

DRUG INTERACTIONS

Drug interactions ACE-Inhibitors Reports suggest that NSAIDs may diminish the antihypertensive effect of ACE-inhibitors.

This interaction should be given consideration in patients taking NSAIDs concomitantly with ACE-inhibitors.

Aspirin When ARTHROTEC is administered with aspirin, the protein binding of diclofenac is reduced, although the clearance of the free ARTHROTEC is not altered.

The clinical significance of this interaction is not known; however, as with other NSAIDs, concomitant administration of diclofenac sodium and aspirin is not generally recommended because of the potential risk of increased adverse effects.

Digoxin Elevated digoxin levels have been reported in patients receiving digoxin and diclofenac sodium.

Patients receiving digoxin and ARTHROTEC should be monitored for possible digoxin toxicity.

Warfarin The effects of warfarin and NSAIDs on GI bleeding are synergistic, such that users of both drugs together have a risk of serious bleeding greater than users of either drug alone.

Oral hypoglycemics Diclofenac sodium does not alter glucose metabolism in healthy people nor does it alter the effects of oral hypoglycemic agents.

There are rare reports, however, from marketing experience, of changes in effects of insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents in the presence of diclofenac sodium that necessitated change in the doses of such agents.

Both hypo- and hyperglycemic effects have been reported.

A direct causal relationship has not been established, but physicians should consider the possibility that diclofenac sodium may alter a diabetic patient’s response to insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents.

Methotrexate NSAIDs have been reported to competitively inhibit methotrexate accumulation in rabbit kidney slices.

This may indicate that they could enhance the toxicity of methotrexate.

Caution should be used when NSAIDs are administered concomitantly with methotrexate.

Cyclosporine ARTHROTEC, like other NSAID containing products, may affect renal prostaglandins and increase the toxicity of certain drugs.

Ingestion of ARTHROTEC may increase cyclosporine nephrotoxicity.

Patients who begin taking ARTHROTEC or who increase their dose of ARTHROTEC while taking cyclosporine may develop toxicity characteristic for clyclosporine.

They should be observed closely, particularly if renal function is impaired.

Lithium NSAIDs have produced an elevation of plasma lithium levels and a reduction in renal lithium clearance.

The mean minimum lithium concentration increased 15% and the renal clearance was decreased by approximately 20%.

These effects have been attributed to inhibition of renal prostaglandin synthesis by the NSAID.

Thus, when NSAIDs and lithium are administered concurrently, subjects should be observed carefully for signs of lithium toxicity.

Antacids Antacids reduce the bioavailability of misoprostol acid.

Antacids may also delay absorption of diclofenac sodium.

Magnesium-containing antacids exacerbate misoprostol-associated diarrhea.

Thus, it is not recommended that ARTHROTEC be coadministered with magnesium-containing antacids.

Diuretics Clinical studies, as well as post marketing observations, have shown that ARTHROTEC can reduce the natriuretic effect of furosemide and thiazides in some patients.

This response has been attributed to inhibition of renal prostaglandin synthesis.

During concomitant therapy with NSAIDs, the patient should be observed closely for signs of renal failure (see WARNINGS, Renal Effects ), as well as to assure diuretic efficacy.

Concomitant therapy with potassium-sparing diuretics may be associated with increased serum potassium levels.

Other drugs In small groups of patients (7–10 patients/interaction study), the concomitant administration of azathioprine, gold, chloroquine, D-penicillamine, prednisolone, doxycycline or digitoxin did not significantly affect the peak levels and AUC levels of diclofenac sodium.

Phenobarbital toxicity has been reported to have occurred in a patient on chronic phenobarbital treatment following the initiation of diclofenac therapy.

In vitro, diclofenac interferes minimally with the protein binding of prednisolone (10% decrease in binding).

Benzylpenicillin, ampicillin, oxacillin, chlortetracycline, doxycycline, cephalothin, erythromycin, and sulfamethoxazole have no influence, in vitro, on the protein binding of diclofenac in human serum.

OVERDOSAGE

The toxic dose of ARTHROTEC has not been determined.

However, signs of overdosage from the components of the product have been described.

Diclofenac sodium Clinical signs that may suggest diclofenac sodium overdose include GI complaints, confusion, drowsiness or general hypotonia.

Reports of overdosage with diclofenac cover 66 cases.

In approximately one-half of these reports of overdosage, concomitant medications were also taken.

The highest dose of diclofenac was 5.0 g in a 17-year-old man who suffered loss of consciousness, increased intracranial pressure, and aspiration pneumonitis, and died 2 days after overdose.

A 24-year-old woman who took 4.0 g and the 28- and 42-year-old women, each of whom took 3.75 g, did not develop any clinically significant signs or symptoms.

However, there was a report of a 17-year-old female who experienced vomiting and drowsiness after an overdose of 2.37 g of diclofenac.

Animal studies show a wide range of susceptibilities to acute overdosage, with primates being more resistant to acute toxicity than rodents (LD 50 in mg/kg: rats, 55; dogs, 500; monkeys, 3200).

Misoprostol The toxic dose of misoprostol in humans has not been determined.

Cumulative total daily doses of 1600 mcg have been tolerated, with only symptoms of GI discomfort being reported.

In animals, the acute toxic effects are diarrhea, GI lesions, focal cardiac necrosis, hepatic necrosis, renal tubular necrosis, testicular atrophy, respiratory difficulties, and depression of the central nervous system.

Clinical signs that may indicate an overdose are sedation, tremor, convulsions, dyspnea, abdominal pain, diarrhea, fever, palpitations, hypotension, or bradycardia.

ARTHROTEC Symptoms of overdosage with ARTHROTEC should be treated with supportive therapy.

In case of acute overdosage, gastric lavage is recommended.

Induced diuresis may be beneficial because diclofenac sodium and misoprostol metabolites are excreted in the urine.

The effect of dialysis or hemoperfusion on the elimination of diclofenac sodium (99% protein bound) and misoprostol acid remains unproven.

The use of oral activated charcoal may help to reduce the absorption of diclofenac sodium and misoprostol.

DESCRIPTION

ARTHROTEC (diclofenac sodium/misoprostol) is a combination product containing diclofenac sodium, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) with analgesic properties, and misoprostol, a gastrointestinal (GI) mucosal protective prostaglandin E 1 analog.

ARTHROTEC oral tablets are white to off-white, round, biconvex and approximately 11 mm in diameter.

Each tablet consists of an enteric-coated core containing 50 mg (ARTHROTEC 50) or 75 mg (ARTHROTEC 75) diclofenac sodium surrounded by an outer mantle containing 200 mcg misoprostol.

Diclofenac sodium is a phenylacetic acid derivative that is a white to off-white, virtually odorless, crystalline powder.

Diclofenac sodium is freely soluble in methanol, soluble in ethanol and practically insoluble in chloroform and in dilute acid.

Diclofenac sodium is sparingly soluble in water.

Its chemical formula and name are: C 14 H 10 Cl 2 NO 2 Na [M.W.

= 318.14] 2-[(2,6-dichlorophenyl) amino] benzeneacetic acid, monosodium salt.

Misoprostol is a water-soluble, viscous liquid that contains approximately equal amounts of two diastereomers.

Its chemical formula and name are: C 22 H 38 O 5 [M.W.

= 382.54] (±) methyl 11α,16-dihydroxy-16-methyl-9-oxoprost-13E-en-1-oate.

Inactive ingredients in ARTHROTEC include: colloidal silicon dioxide; crospovidone; hydrogenated castor oil; hypromellose; lactose; magnesium stearate; methacrylic acid copolymer; microcrystalline cellulose; povidone (polyvidone) K-30; sodium hydroxide; starch (corn); talc; triethyl citrate.

CLINICAL STUDIES

Osteoarthritis Diclofenac sodium, as a single ingredient or in combination with misoprostol, has been shown to be effective in the management of the signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis Diclofenac sodium, as a single ingredient or in combination with misoprostol, has been shown to be effective in the management of the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis.

Upper gastrointestinal safety Diclofenac, and other NSAIDs, have caused serious gastrointestinal toxicity, such as bleeding, ulceration and perforation of the stomach, small intestine or large intestine.

Misoprostol has been shown to reduce the incidence of endoscopically diagnosed NSAID-induced gastric and duodenal ulcers.

In a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, dose-response study, misoprostol 200 mcg administered qid, tid or bid, was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing the incidence of gastric ulcer in OA and RA patients using a variety of NSAIDs.

The tid regimen was therapeutically equivalent to misoprostol 200 mcg qid with respect to the prevention of gastric ulcers.

Misoprostol 200 mcg given bid was less effective than 200 mcg given tid or qid.

The incidence of NSAID-induced duodenal ulcer was also significantly reduced with all three regimens of misoprostol compared to placebo (see Table 2 ).

Table 2 Misoprostol 200 mcg Dosage Regimen Placebo bid tid qid N=1623; 12 weeks Gastric ulcer 11% 6% Misoprostol significantly different from placebo (p<0.05) 3% 3% Duodenal ulcer 6% 2% 3% 1% Results of a study in 572 patients with osteoarthritis demonstrate that patients receiving ARTHROTEC have a lower incidence of endoscopically defined gastric ulcers compared to patients receiving diclofenac sodium (see Table 3 ).

Table 3 Osteoarthritis patients with history of ulcer or erosive disease (N=572), 6 weeks Incidence of ulcers Gastric Duodenal ARTHROTEC 50 tid 3% Statistically significantly different from diclofenac (p<0.05) 6% ARTHROTEC 75 bid 4% 3% diclofenac sodium 75 mg bid 11% 7% placebo 3% 1%

HOW SUPPLIED

ARTHROTEC (diclofenac sodium/misoprostol) is supplied as a film-coated tablet in dosage strengths of either 50 mg diclofenac sodium/200 mcg misoprostol or 75 mg diclofenac sodium/200 mcg misoprostol.

The 50 mg/200 mcg dosage strength is a round, biconvex, white to off-white tablet imprinted with four “A’s” encircling a “50” in the middle on one side and “SEARLE” and “1411” on the other.

The 75 mg/200 mcg dosage strength is a round, biconvex, white to off-white tablet imprinted with four “A’s” encircling a “75” in the middle on one side and “SEARLE” and “1421” on the other.

The dosage strengths are supplied in: Strength NDC Number Size 75/200 21695-425-60 bottle of 60 Store at or below 25°C (77°F), in a dry area.

GERIATRIC USE

Geriatric use As with any NSAIDs, caution should be exercised in treating the elderly (65 years and older).

Of the more than 2,100 subjects in clinical studies with ARTHROTEC, 25% were 65 and over, while 6% were 75 and over.

In studies with diclofenac, 31% of subjects were 65 and over.

No overall differences in safety or effectiveness were observed between these subjects and younger subjects, and other reported clinical experience has not identified differences in responses between the elderly and younger patients, but greater sensitivity of some older individuals cannot be ruled out.

Diclofenac is known to be substantially excreted by the kidney, and the risk of toxic reactions to ARTHROTEC may be greater in patients with impaired renal function.

Because elderly patients are more likely to have decreased renal function, care should be taken in dose selection, and it may be useful to monitor renal function (see WARNINGS—Renal effects ).

Based on studies in the elderly, no adjustment of the dose of ARTHROTEC is necessary in the elderly for pharmacokinetic reasons (see Pharmacokinetics of ARTHROTEC—Special populations ), although many elderly may need to receive a reduced dose because of low body weight or disorders associated with aging.

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

Carefully consider the potential benefits and risks of ARTHROTEC and other treatment options before deciding to use ARTHROTEC.

Use the lowest effective dose for the shortest duration consistent with individual patient treatment goals (see WARNINGS ).

ARTHROTEC is indicated for treatment of the signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis in patients at high risk of developing NSAID-induced gastric and duodenal ulcers and their complications.

See WARNINGS, Gastrointestinal Effects – Risk of Ulceration, Bleeding and Perforation for a list of factors that may increase the risk of NSAID-induced gastric and duodenal ulcers and their complications.

PEDIATRIC USE

Pediatric use Safety and effectiveness of ARTHROTEC in pediatric patients have not been established.

PREGNANCY

Pregnancy Pregnancy category X: See boxed CONTRAINDICATIONS AND WARNINGS regarding misoprostol.

Non-teratogenic effects See boxed CONTRAINDICATIONS AND WARNINGS .

Misoprostol may endanger pregnancy (may cause abortion) and thereby cause harm to the fetus when administered to a pregnant woman.

Misoprostol may produce uterine contractions, uterine bleeding, and expulsion of the products of conception.

Misoprostol has been used to ripen the cervix, to induce labor, and to treat postpartum hemorrhage, outside of its approved indication.

A major adverse effect of these uses is hyperstimulation of the uterus.

Uterine rupture, amniotic fluid embolism, severe genital bleeding, shock, fetal bradycardia, and fetal and material death have been reported.

Higher doses of misoprostol, including the 100 mcg tablet, may increase the risk of complications from uterine hyperstimulation.

ARTHROTEC, which contains 200 mcg of misoprostol, is likely to have a greater risk of uterine hyperstimulation than the 100 mcg tablet of misoprostol.

Abortions caused by misoprostol may be incomplete.

If a woman is or becomes pregnant while taking this drug, the drug should be discontinued and the patient apprised of the potential hazard to the fetus.

Cases of amniotic fluid embolism, which resulted in maternal and fetal death, have been reported with use of misoprostol during pregnancy.

Severe vaginal bleeding, retained placenta, shock, fetal bradycardia, and pelvic pain have also been reported.

These women were administered misoprostol vaginally and/or orally over a range of doses.

Additionally, because of the known effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs including the diclofenac sodium component of ARTHROTEC, on the fetal cardiovascular system (closure of ductus arteriosus), use during pregnancy (particularly late pregnancy) should be avoided.

Teratogenic effects See boxed CONTRAINDICATIONS and WARNINGS.

Congenital anomalies sometimes associated with fetal death have been reported subsequent to the unsuccessful use of misoprostol as an abortifacient, but the drug’s teratogenic mechanism has not been demonstrated.

Several reports in the literature associate the use of misoprostol during the first trimester of pregnancy with skull defects, cranial nerve palsies, facial malformations, and limb defects.

An oral teratology study has been performed in pregnant rabbits at dose combinations (250:1 ratio) up to 10 mg/kg/day diclofenac sodium (120 mg/m 2 /day, 0.8 times the recommended maximum human dose based on body surface area) and 0.04 mg/kg/day misoprostol (0.48 mg/m 2 /day, 0.8 times the recommended maximum human dose based on body surface area) and has revealed no evidence of teratogenic potential for ARTHROTEC.

Oral teratology studies have been performed in pregnant rats at doses up to 1.6 mg/kg/day (9.6 mg/m 2 /day, 16 times the recommended maximum human dose based on body surface area) and pregnant rabbits at doses up to 1.0 mg/kg/day (12 mg/m 2 /day, 20 times the recommended maximum human dose based on body surface area) and have revealed no evidence of teratogenic potential for misoprostol.

Oral teratology studies have been performed in pregnant mice at doses up to 20 mg/kg/day (60 mg/m 2 /day, 0.4 times the recommended maximum human dose based on body surface area), pregnant rats at doses up to 10 mg/kg/day (60 mg/m 2 /day, 0.4 times the recommended maximum human dose based on body surface area) and pregnant rabbits at doses up to 10 mg/kg/day (120 mg/m 2 /day, 0.8 times the recommended maximum human dose based on body surface area) and have revealed no evidence of teratogenic potential for diclofenac sodium.

However, animal reproduction studies are not always predictive of human response.

There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women.

NUSRING MOTHERS

Nursing mothers Diclofenac sodium has been found in the milk of nursing mothers.

Misoprostol is rapidly metabolised in the mother to misoprostol acid, which is biologically active and is excreted in breast milk.

There are no published reports of adverse effects of misoprostol in breast-feeding infants of mothers taking misoprostol.

Caution should be exercised when ARTHROTEC is administered to a nursing woman.

BOXED WARNING

CONTRAINDICATIONS AND WARNINGS ARTHROTEC ® CONTAINS DICLOFENAC SODIUM AND MISOPROSTOL.

ADMINISTRATION OF MISOPROSTOL TO WOMEN WHO ARE PREGNANT CAN CAUSE ABORTION, PREMATURE BIRTH, OR BIRTH DEFECTS.

UTERINE RUPTURE HAS BEEN REPORTED WHEN MISOPROSTOL WAS ADMINISTERED IN PREGNANT WOMEN TO INDUCE LABOR OR TO INDUCE ABORTION BEYOND THE EIGHTH WEEK OF PREGNANCY (see also PRECAUTIONS ).

ARTHROTEC SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN BY PREGNANT WOMEN (see CONTRAINDICATIONS , WARNINGS and PRECAUTIONS ).

PATIENTS MUST BE ADVISED OF THE ABORTIFACIENT PROPERTY AND WARNED NOT TO GIVE THE DRUG TO OTHERS.ARTHROTEC should not be used in women of childbearing potential unless the patient requires nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy and is at high risk of developing gastric or duodenal ulceration or for developing complications from gastric or duodenal ulcers associated with the use of the NSAID (see WARNINGS ).

In such patients, ARTHROTEC may be prescribed if the patient: has had a negative serum pregnancy test within 2 weeks prior to beginning therapy.

is capable of complying with effective contraceptive measures.

has received both oral and written warnings of the hazards of misoprostol, the risk of possible contraception failure, and the danger to other women of childbearing potential should the drug be taken by mistake.

will begin ARTHROTEC only on the second or third day of the next normal menstrual period.

Cardiovascular Risk NSAIDs may cause an increased risk of serious cardiovascular thrombotic events, myocardial infarction, and stroke, which can be fatal.

This risk may increase with duration of use.

Patients with cardiovascular disease or risk factors for cardiovascular disease may be at greater risk (see WARNINGS ).

ARTHROTEC is contraindicated for treatment of peri-operative pain in the setting of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery (see WARNINGS ).

Gastrointestinal Risk NSAIDs cause an increased risk of serious gastrointestinal adverse events including bleeding, ulceration, and perforation of the stomach or intestines, which can be fatal.

These events can occur at any time during use and without warning symptoms.

Elderly patients are at greater risk for serious gastrointestinal events (see WARNINGS ).

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS

Information for patients Women of childbearing potential using ARTHROTEC to treat arthritis should be told that they must not be pregnant when therapy with ARTHROTEC is initiated, and that they must use an effective contraception method while taking ARTHROTEC.

See boxed CONTRAINDICATIONS AND WARNINGS .

THE PATIENT SHOULD NOT GIVE ARTHROTEC TO ANYONE ELSE.

ARTHROTEC has been prescribed for the patient’s specific condition, may not be the correct treatment for another person, and may be dangerous to the other person if she were to become pregnant.

SPECIAL NOTE FOR WOMEN: ARTHROTEC contains diclofenac sodium and misoprostol.

Misoprostol may cause abortion (sometimes incomplete), premature labor, or birth defects if given to pregnant women.

Patients should be informed of the following information before initiating therapy with an NSAID and periodically during the course of ongoing therapy.

Patients should also be encouraged to read the NSAID Medication Guide that accompanies each prescription dispensed.

ARTHROTEC, like other NSAIDs, may cause serious side effects, such as MI or stroke, which may result in hospitalization and even death.

Although serious CV events can occur without warning symptoms, patients should be alert for the signs and symptoms of chest pain, shortness of breath, weakness, slurring of speech, and should ask for medical advice when observing any indicative sign or symptoms.

Patients should be apprised of the importance of this follow-up (see WARNINGS, CARDIOVASCULAR EFFECTS ).

ARTHROTEC, like other NSAIDs, can cause GI discomfort and, rarely, serious GI side effects, such as ulcers and bleeding, which may result in hospitalizations and even death.

Although serious GI tract ulcerations and bleeding can occur without warning symptoms, patients should be alert for the signs and symptoms of ulceration and bleeding, and should ask for medical advice when observing any indicative sign or symptoms, including epigastric pain, dyspepsia, melena, and hematemesis.

Patients should be apprised of the importance of this follow-up (see WARNINGS, Gastrointestinal Effects – Risk of Ulceration, Bleeding and Perforation ).

ARTHROTEC, like other NSAIDs, can cause serious skin side effects, such as exfoliative dermatitis, SJS and TEN, which may result in hospitalization and even death.

Although serious skin reactions may occur without warning, patients should be alert for the signs and symptoms of skin rash and blisters, fever, or other signs of hypersensitivity such as itching, and should ask for medical advice when observing any indicative sign or symptoms.

Patients should be advised to stop the drug immediately if they develop any type of rash and contact their physicians as soon as possible.

Patients should promptly report signs or symptoms of unexplained weight gain or edema to their physicians.

Patients should be informed of the warning signs and symptoms of hepatotoxicity (e.g., nausea, fatigue, lethargy, pruritus, jaundice, right upper quadrant tenderness and “flu-like” symptoms).

If these occur, patients should be instructed to stop therapy and seek immediate medical attention.

Patients should be informed of the signs of an anaphylactic reaction (e.g.

difficulty breathing, swelling of the face or throat).

If these occur, patients should be instructed to seek immediate emergency help (see WARNINGS, Anaphylactic reactions ).

In late pregnancy, as with other NSAIDs, ARTHROTEC should be avoided because it may cause premature closure of the ductus arteriosus.

Arthrotec should not be taken by nursing mothers.

See PATIENT INFORMATION at the end of this labeling for important information to discuss with the patient.

ARTHROTEC is available only as a unit-of-use package that includes a leaflet containing patient information.

The patient should read the leaflet before taking ARTHROTEC and each time the prescription is renewed because the leaflet may have been revised.

Keep ARTHROTEC out of the reach of children.

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

Carefully consider the potential benefits and risks of ARTHROTEC and other treatment options before deciding to use ARTHROTEC.

Use the lowest effective dose for the shortest duration consistent with individual patient treatment goals (see WARNINGS ).

After observing the response to initial therapy with ARTHROTEC, the dose and frequency should be adjusted to suit an individual patient’s needs.

For the relief of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis the recommended dose is given below.

ARTHROTEC is administered as ARTHROTEC 50 (50 mg diclofenac sodium/200 mcg misoprostol) or as ARTHROTEC 75 (75 mg diclofenac sodium/200 mcg misoprostol).

Note: See SPECIAL DOSING CONSIDERATIONS section, below.

Osteoarthritis The recommended dosage for maximal GI mucosal protection is ARTHROTEC 50 tid.

For patients who experience intolerance, ARTHROTEC 75 bid or ARTHROTEC 50 bid can be used, but are less effective in preventing ulcers.

This fixed combination product, ARTHROTEC, is not appropriate for patients who would not receive the appropriate dose of both ingredients.

Doses of the components delivered with these regimens are as follows: OA regimen Diclofenac sodium (mg/day) Misoprostol (mcg/day) ARTHROTEC 50 tid 150 600 bid 100 400 ARTHROTEC 75 bid 150 400 Rheumatoid Arthritis The recommended dosage is ARTHROTEC 50 tid or qid.

For patients who experience intolerance, ARTHROTEC 75 bid or ARTHROTEC 50 bid can be used, but are less effective in preventing ulcers.

This fixed combination product, ARTHROTEC, is not appropriate for patients who would not receive the appropriate dose of both ingredients.

Doses of the components delivered with these regimens are as follows: RA regimen Diclofenac sodium (mg/day) Misoprostol (mcg/day) ARTHROTEC 50 qid 200 800 tid 150 600 bid 100 400 ARTHROTEC 75 bid 150 400 SPECIAL DOSING CONSIDERATIONS ARTHROTEC contains misoprostol, which provides protection against gastric and duodenal ulcers (see CLINICAL STUDIES ).

For gastric ulcer prevention, the 200 mcg qid and tid regimens are therapeutically equivalent, but more protective than the bid regimen.

For duodenal ulcer prevention, the qid regimen is more protective than the tid or bid regimens.

However, the qid regimen is less well tolerated than the tid regimen because of usually self-limited diarrhea related to the misoprostol dose (see ADVERSE REACTIONS—Gastrointestinal ), and the bid regimen may be better tolerated than tid in some patients.

Dosages may be individualized using the separate products (misoprostol and diclofenac), after which the patient may be changed to the appropriate dose of ARTHROTEC.

If clinically indicated, misoprostol co-therapy with ARTHROTEC, or use of the individual components to optimize the misoprostol dose and/or frequency of administration, may be appropriate.

The total dose of misoprostol should not exceed 800 mcg/day, and no more than 200 mcg of misoprostol should be administered at any one time.

Doses of diclofenac higher than 150 mg/day in osteoarthritis or higher than 225 mg/day in rheumatoid arthritis are not recommended.

For additional information, it may be helpful to refer to the package inserts for Cytotec ® tablets and Voltaren ® tablets.

desloratadine 5 MG Oral Tablet

Generic Name: DESLORATADINE
Brand Name: Desloratadine
  • Substance Name(s):
  • DESLORATADINE

DRUG INTERACTIONS

7 7.1 Inhibitors of Cytochrome P450 3A4 In controlled clinical studies co-administration of desloratadine with ketoconazole, erythromycin, or azithromycin resulted in increased plasma concentrations of desloratadine and 3 hydroxydesloratadine, but there were no clinically relevant changes in the safety profile of desloratadine.

[ See Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) .] 7.2 Fluoxetine In controlled clinical studies co-administration of desloratadine with fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), resulted in increased plasma concentrations of desloratadine and 3 hydroxydesloratadine, but there were no clinically relevant changes in the safety profile of desloratadine.

[ See Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) .] 7.3 Cimetidine In controlled clinical studies co-administration of desloratadine with cimetidine, a histamine H 2 -receptor antagonist, resulted in increased plasma concentrations of desloratadine and 3 hydroxydesloratadine, but there were no clinically relevant changes in the safety profile of desloratadine.

[ See Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) .

]

OVERDOSAGE

10 In the event of overdose, consider standard measures to remove any unabsorbed drug.

Symptomatic and supportive treatment is recommended.

Desloratadine and 3-hydroxydesloratadine are not eliminated by hemodialysis.

Information regarding acute overdosage is limited to experience from post-marketing adverse event reports and from clinical trials conducted during the development of the Desloratadine product.

In a dose-ranging trial, at doses of 10 mg and 20 mg/day somnolence was reported.

In another study, no clinically relevant adverse events were reported in normal male and female volunteers who were given single daily doses of Desloratadine 45 mg for 10 days [ see Clinical Pharmacology (12.2) ].

Lethality occurred in rats at oral doses of 250 mg/kg or greater (estimated desloratadine and desloratadine metabolite exposures were approximately 120 times the AUC in humans at the recommended daily oral dose).

The oral median lethal dose in mice was 353 mg/kg (estimated desloratadine exposures were approximately 290 times the human daily oral dose on a mg/m 2 basis).

No deaths occurred at oral doses up to 250 mg/kg in monkeys (estimated desloratadine exposures were approximately 810 times the human daily oral dose on a mg/m 2 basis).

DESCRIPTION

11 Desloratadine Tablets are light blue, round, tablets containing 5 mg desloratadine, an antihistamine, to be administered orally.

Desloratadine Tablets also contain the following inactive ingredients: microcrystalline cellulose NF, pregelatinized starch NF, croscarmellose sodium NF, talc USP, zinc stearate, USP and FD&C Blue #2 HT 11-14%.

Desloratadine is a white to off-white powder that is slightly soluble in water, but very soluble in ethanol and propylene glycol.

It has an empirical formula: C 19 H 19 ClN 2 and a molecular weight of 310.8.

The chemical name is 8-chloro-6,11-dihydro-11-(4-piperdinylidene)-5 H -benzo[5,6]cyclohepta[1,2-b]pyridine and has the following structure: Chemical Structure

CLINICAL STUDIES

14 14.1 Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis The clinical efficacy and safety of Desloratadine Tablets were evaluated in over 2,300 patients 12 to 75 years of age with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

A total of 1,838 patients received 2.5 to 20 mg/day of Desloratadine in 4 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials of 2 to 4 weeks’ duration conducted in the United States.

The results of these studies demonstrated the efficacy and safety of Desloratadine 5 mg in the treatment of adult and adolescent patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

In a dose-ranging trial, Desloratadine 2.5 to 20 mg/day was studied.

Doses of 5, 7.5, 10, and 20 mg/day were superior to placebo; and no additional benefit was seen at doses above 5.0 mg.

In the same study, an increase in the incidence of somnolence was observed at doses of 10 mg/day and 20 mg/day (5.2% and 7.6%, respectively), compared to placebo (2.3%).

In two 4-week studies of 924 patients (aged 15 to 75 years) with seasonal allergic rhinitis and concomitant asthma, Desloratadine Tablets 5 mg once daily improved rhinitis symptoms, with no decrease in pulmonary function.

This supports the safety of administering Desloratadine Tablets to adult patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis with mild to moderate asthma.

Desloratadine Tablets 5 mg once daily significantly reduced the Total Symptom Score (the sum of individual scores of nasal and non-nasal symptoms) in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

See Table 3 .

Table 3 TOTAL SYMPTOM SCORE (TSS) Changes in a 2 Week Clinical Trial in Patients with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Treatment Group (n) Mean Baseline At baseline, a total nasal symptom score (sum of 4 individual symptoms) of at least 6 and a total non-nasal symptom score (sum of 4 individual symptoms) of at least 5 (each symptom scored 0 to 3 where 0=no symptom and 3=severe symptoms) was required for trial eligibility.

TSS ranges from 0=no symptoms to 24=maximal symptoms.

(SEM) Change from Baseline Mean reduction in TSS averaged over the 2-week treatment period.

(SEM) Placebo Comparison ( P -value) SEM = Standard Error of the Mean Desloratadine 5.0 mg (171) 14.2 (0.3) -4.3 (0.3) P <0.01 Placebo (173) 13.7 (0.3) -2.5 (0.3) There were no significant differences in the effectiveness of Desloratadine Tablets 5 mg across subgroups of patients defined by gender, age, or race.

14.2 Perennial Allergic Rhinitis The clinical efficacy and safety of Desloratadine Tablets 5 mg were evaluated in over 1,300 patients 12 to 80 years of age with perennial allergic rhinitis.

A total of 685 patients received 5 mg/day of Desloratadine in two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials of 4 weeks’ duration conducted in the United States and internationally.

In one of these studies Desloratadine Tablets 5 mg once daily was shown to significantly reduce the Total Symptom Score in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis (Table 4).

Table 4 TOTAL SYMPTOM SCORE (TSS) Changes in a 4 Week Clinical Trial in Patients with Perennial Allergic Rhinitis Treatment Group (n) Mean Baseline At baseline, average of total symptom score (sum of 5 individual nasal symptoms and 3 non-nasal symptoms, each symptom scored 0 to 3 where 0=no symptom and 3=severe symptoms) of at least 10 was required for trial eligibility.

TSS ranges from 0=no symptoms to 24=maximal symptoms.

(SEM) Change from Baseline Mean reduction in TSS averaged over the 4 week treatment period.

(SEM) Placebo Comparison ( P -value) SEM = Standard Error of the Mean Desloratadine 5.0 mg (337) 12.37 (0.18) -4.06 (0.21) P =0.01 Placebo (337) 12.30 (0.18) -3.27 (0.21) 14.3 Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria The efficacy and safety of Desloratadine Tablets 5 mg once daily was studied in 416 chronic idiopathic urticaria patients 12 to 84 years of age, of whom 211 received Desloratadine.

In two double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials of six weeks duration, at the pre-specified one-week primary time point evaluation, Desloratadine Tablets significantly reduced the severity of pruritus when compared to placebo (Table 5).

Secondary endpoints were also evaluated, and during the first week of therapy Desloratadine Tablets 5 mg reduced the secondary endpoints, “Number of Hives” and the “Size of the Largest Hive,” when compared to placebo.

Table 5 PRURITUS SYMPTOM SCORE Changes in the First Week of a Clinical Trial in Patients with Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria Treatment Group (n) Mean Baseline (SEM) Change from Baseline Mean reduction in pruritus averaged over the first week of treatment.

(SEM) Placebo Comparison ( P -value) Pruritus scored 0 to 3 where 0=no symptom to 3=maximal symptom SEM = Standard Error of the Mean Desloratadine 5.0 mg (115) 2.19 (0.04) -1.05 (0.07) P <0.01 Placebo (110) 2.21 (0.04) -0.52 (0.07)

HOW SUPPLIED

16 /STORAGE AND HANDLING Desloratadine Tablets: Debossed “5”, light blue, round tablets that are packaged in high-density polyethylene plastic bottles of 30 (NDC 69543-107-30), 100 (NDC 69543-107-10), and 500 (NDC 69543-107-50).

Storage • Desloratadine Tablets: Store at 25° C (77° F); excursions permitted to 15° C – 30° C (59° F – 86° F) [see USP Controlled Room Temperature].

Heat sensitive.

Avoid exposure at or above 30° C (86° F).

Dispense in a tight, light-resistant container as defined in the USP using a child-resistant closure.

GERIATRIC USE

8.5 Geriatric Use Clinical studies of desloratadine did not include sufficient numbers of subjects aged 65 and over to determine whether they respond differently from younger subjects.

Other reported clinical experience has not identified differences between the elderly and younger patients.

In general, dose selection for an elderly patient should be cautious, reflecting the greater frequency of decreased hepatic, renal, or cardiac function, and of concomitant disease or other drug therapy.

[ See Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) .

]

DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS

3 Desloratadine Tablets are light blue round tablets debossed with “5” containing 5 mg desloratadine.

• Desloratadine Tablets – 5 mg ( 3 )

MECHANISM OF ACTION

12.1 Mechanism of Action Desloratadine is a long-acting tricyclic histamine antagonist with selective H 1 -receptor histamine antagonist activity.

Receptor binding data indicates that at a concentration of 2-3 ng/mL (7 nanomolar), desloratadine shows significant interaction with the human histamine H 1 -receptor.

Desloratadine inhibited histamine release from human mast cells in vitro .

Results of a radiolabeled tissue distribution study in rats and a radioligand H 1 -receptor binding study in guinea pigs showed that desloratadine did not readily cross the blood brain barrier.

The clinical significance of this finding is unknown.

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

1 Desloratadine Tablets are an H 1 – receptor antagonist indicated for: • Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis: relief of nasal and non-nasal symptoms in patients 12 years of age and older.

( 1.1 ) • Perennial Allergic Rhinitis: relief of nasal and non-nasal symptoms in patients 12 years of age and older.

( 1.2 ) • Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria: symptomatic relief of pruritus, reduction in the number of hives, and size of hives in patients 12 years of age and older.

( 1.3 ) 1.1 Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Desloratadine Tablets are indicated for the relief of the nasal and non-nasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis in patients 12 years of age and older.

1.2 Perennial Allergic Rhinitis Desloratadine Tablets are indicated for the relief of the nasal and non-nasal symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis in patients 12 years of age and older.

1.3 Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria Desloratadine Tablets are indicated for the symptomatic relief of pruritus, reduction in the number of hives, and size of hives, in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria 12 years of age and older.

PEDIATRIC USE

8.4 Pediatric Use The recommended dose of Desloratadine Oral Solution in the pediatric population is based on cross-study comparison of the plasma concentration of Desloratadine in adults and pediatric subjects.

The safety of Desloratadine Oral Solution has been established in 246 pediatric subjects aged 6 months to 11 years in three placebo-controlled clinical studies.

Since the course of seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria and the effects of Desloratadine are sufficiently similar in the pediatric and adult populations, it allows extrapolation from the adult efficacy data to pediatric patients.

The effectiveness of Desloratadine Oral Solution in these age groups is supported by evidence from adequate and well-controlled studies of Desloratadine Tablets in adults.

The safety and effectiveness of Desloratadine Tablets or Desloratadine Oral Solution have not been demonstrated in pediatric patients less than 6 months of age.

[ See Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) .

]

PREGNANCY

8.1 Pregnancy Pregnancy Category C: There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women.

Because animal reproduction studies are not always predictive of human response, desloratadine should be used during pregnancy only if clearly needed.

Desloratadine was not teratogenic in rats or rabbits at approximately 210 and 230 times, respectively, the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) in humans at the recommended daily oral dose.

An increase in pre-implantation loss and a decreased number of implantations and fetuses were noted, however, in a separate study in female rats at approximately 120 times the AUC in humans at the recommended daily oral dose.

Reduced body weight and slow righting reflex were reported in pups at approximately 50 times or greater than the AUC in humans at the recommended daily oral dose.

Desloratadine had no effect on pup development at approximately 7 times the AUC in humans at the recommended daily oral dose.

The AUCs in comparison referred to the desloratadine exposure in rabbits and the sum of desloratadine and its metabolites exposures in rats, respectively.

[ See Nonclinical Toxicology (13.2) .

]

NUSRING MOTHERS

8.3 Nursing Mothers Desloratadine passes into breast milk; therefore, a decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or to discontinue desloratadine, taking into account the benefit of the drug to the nursing mother and the possible risk to the child.

WARNING AND CAUTIONS

5 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS • Hypersensitivity reactions including rash, pruritus, urticaria, edema, dyspnea, and anaphylaxis have been reported.

In such cases, stop Desloratadine Tablets at once and consider alternative treatments.

( 5.1 ) 5.1 Hypersensitivity Reactions Hypersensitivity reactions including rash, pruritus, urticaria, edema, dyspnea, and anaphylaxis have been reported after administration of desloratadine.

If such a reaction occurs, therapy with Desloratadine Tablets should be stopped and alternative treatment should be considered.

[ See Adverse Reactions (6.2) .]

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS

17 PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION Advise the patient to read the FDA-approved patient labeling (Patient Information).

17.1 Information for Patients • Patients should be instructed to use Desloratadine Tablets as directed.

• As there are no food effects on bioavailability, patients can be instructed that Desloratadine Tablets may be taken without regard to meals.

• Patients should be advised not to increase the dose or dosing frequency as studies have not demonstrated increased effectiveness at higher doses and somnolence may occur.

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

2 Desloratadine Tablets may be taken without regard to meals.

Dosage (by age): Adults and Adolescents 12 Years of Age and Over: • Desloratadine Tablets – one 5 mg tablet once daily ( 2 ) 2.1 Adults and Adolescents 12 Years of Age and Over The recommended dose of Desloratadine Tablets is one 5-mg tablet once daily.

2.5 Adults with Hepatic or Renal Impairment In adult patients with liver or renal impairment, a starting dose of one 5 mg tablet every other day is recommended based on pharmacokinetic data.

Dosing recommendation for children with liver or renal impairment cannot be made due to lack of data [ see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ].