Ceftazidime 1000 MG Injection

Generic Name: CEFTAZIDIME
Brand Name: Ceftazidime
  • Substance Name(s):
  • CEFTAZIDIME

WARNINGS

BEFORE THERAPY WITH CEFTAZIDIME FOR INJECTION IS INSTITUTED, CAREFUL INQUIRY SHOULD BE MADE TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE PATIENT HAS HAD PREVIOUS HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS TO CEFTAZIDIME, CEPHALOSPORINS, PENICILLINS, OR OTHER DRUGS.

IF THIS PRODUCT IS TO BE GIVEN TO PENICILLIN-SENSITIVE PATIENTS, CAUTION SHOULD BE EXERCISED BECAUSE CROSS-HYPERSENSITIVITY AMONG BETA-LACTAM ANTIBACTERIAL DRUGS HAS BEEN CLEARLY DOCUMENTED AND MAY OCCUR IN UP TO 10% OF PATIENTS WITH A HISTORY OF PENICILLIN ALLERGY.

IF AN ALLERGIC REACTION TO CEFTAZIDIME FOR INJECTION OCCURS, DISCONTINUE THE DRUG.

SERIOUS ACUTE HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS MAY REQUIRE TREATMENT WITH EPINEPHRINE AND OTHER EMERGENCY MEASURES, INCLUDING OXYGEN, IV FLUIDS, IV ANTIHISTAMINES, CORTICOSTEROIDS, PRESSOR AMINES, AND AIRWAY MANAGEMENT, AS CLINICALLY INDICATED.

Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD) has been reported with use of nearly all antibacterial agents, including ceftazidime for injection, and may range in severity from mild diarrhea to fatal colitis.

Treatment with antibacterial agents alters the normal flora of the colon leading to overgrowth of C.

difficile .

C.

difficile produces toxins A and B which contribute to the development of CDAD.

Hypertoxin producing strains of C.

difficile cause increased morbidity and mortality, as these infections can be refractory to antimicrobial therapy and may require colectomy.

CDAD must be considered in all patients who present with diarrhea following antibacterial drug use.

Careful medical history is necessary since CDAD has been reported to occur over two months after the administration of antibacterial agents.

If CDAD is suspected or confirmed, ongoing antibacterial drug use not directed against C.

difficile may need to be discontinued.

Appropriate fluid and electrolyte management, protein supplementation, antibacterial drug treatment of C.

difficile , and surgical evaluation should be instituted as clinically indicated.

Elevated levels of ceftazidime in patients with renal insufficiency can lead to seizures, nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), encephalopathy, coma, asterixis, neuromuscular excitability, and myoclonia (see PRECAUTIONS ).

DRUG INTERACTIONS

Drug Interactions Nephrotoxicity has been reported following concomitant administration of cephalosporins with aminoglycoside antibacterial drugs or potent diuretics such as furosemide.

Renal function should be carefully monitored, especially if higher dosages of the aminoglycosides are to be administered or if therapy is prolonged, because of the potential nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity of aminoglycoside antibacterial drugs.

Nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity were not noted when ceftazidime was given alone in clinical trials.

Chloramphenicol has been shown to be antagonistic to beta-lactam antibacterial drugs, including ceftazidime, based on in vitro studies and time kill curves with enteric gram-negative bacilli.

Due to the possibility of antagonism in vivo , particularly when bactericidal activity is desired, this drug combination should be avoided.

OVERDOSAGE

Ceftazidime overdosage has occurred in patients with renal failure.

Reactions have included seizure activity, encephalopathy, asterixis, neuromuscular excitability, and coma.

Patients who receive an acute overdosage should be carefully observed and given supportive treatment.

In the presence of renal insufficiency, hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis may aid in the removal of ceftazidime from the body.

DESCRIPTION

Ceftazidime is a semisynthetic, broad-spectrum, beta-lactam antibacterial drug for parenteral administration.

It is the pentahydrate of pyridinium, 1-[[7-[[(2-amino-4-thiazolyl)[(1-carboxy-1-methylethoxy)imino]acetyl]amino]-2-carboxy-8-oxo-5-thia-1-azabicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-en-3-yl]methyl]-, hydroxide, inner salt, [6R-[6α,7β(Z)]].

It has the following structural formula: The molecular formula is C 22 H 22 N 6 O 7 S 2 •5H 2 O, representing a molecular weight of 636.65.

Ceftazidime for injection, USP is a sterile, dry-powdered mixture of ceftazidime pentahydrate and sodium carbonate.

The sodium carbonate at a concentration of 118 mg/g of ceftazidime activity has been admixed to facilitate dissolution.

The total sodium content of the mixture is approximately 54 mg (2.3 mEq)/g of ceftazidime activity.

Ceftazidime for injection, USP in sterile crystalline form is supplied in single-dose vials equivalent to 1 g or 2 g of anhydrous ceftazidime.

Ceftazidime for injection, USP is a white to cream-colored crystalline powder.

Solutions of ceftazidime for injection, USP range in color from light yellow to amber, depending on the diluent and volume used.

The pH of freshly constituted solutions usually ranges from 5 to 8.

Structural Formula

HOW SUPPLIED

Ceftazidime for injection, USP in the dry state should be stored at 20°C to 25°C (68°F to 77°F) [See USP Controlled Room Temperature] and protected from light.

Ceftazidime for injection, USP is a white to cream-colored crystalline powder supplied in vials as follows: NDC Ceftazidime for Injection, USP Package Factor 25021-127-20 1 g* Single-Dose Vial 25 vials per carton 25021-128-50 2 g* Single-Dose Vial 10 vials per carton *Equivalent to anhydrous ceftazidime.

Sterile, Nonpyrogenic, Preservative-free.

The container closure is not made with natural rubber latex.

GERIATRIC USE

Geriatric Use Of the 2,221 subjects who received ceftazidime in 11 clinical studies, 824 (37%) were 65 and older while 391 (18%) were 75 and older.

No overall differences in safety or effectiveness were observed between these subjects and younger subjects, and other reported clinical experience has not identified differences in responses between the elderly and younger patients, but greater susceptibility of some older individuals to drug effects cannot be ruled out.

This drug is known to be substantially excreted by the kidney, and the risk of toxic reactions to this drug may be greater in patients with impaired renal function.

Because elderly patients are more likely to have decreased renal function, care should be taken in dose selection, and it may be useful to monitor renal function (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ).

MECHANISM OF ACTION

Mechanism of Action Ceftazidime is a bactericidal agent that acts by inhibition of bacterial cell wall synthesis.

Ceftazidime has activity in the presence of some beta-lactamases, both penicillinases and cephalosporinases, of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria.

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

Ceftazidime for injection, USP is indicated for the treatment of patients with infections caused by susceptible strains of the designated organisms in the following diseases: Lower Respiratory Tract Infections, including pneumonia, caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other Pseudomonas spp.; Haemophilus influenzae, including ampicillin-resistant strains; Klebsiella spp.; Enterobacter spp.; Proteus mirabilis; Escherichia coli; Serratia spp.; Citrobacter spp.; Streptococcus pneumoniae; and Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-susceptible strains).

Skin and Skin-Structure Infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Klebsiella spp.; Escherichia coli; Proteus spp., including Proteus mirabilis and indole-positive Proteus; Enterobacter spp.; Serratia spp.; Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-susceptible strains); and Streptococcus pyogenes (group A beta-hemolytic streptococci).

Urinary Tract Infections, both complicated and uncomplicated, caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Enterobacter spp.; Proteus spp., including Proteus mirabilis and indole-positive Proteus; Klebsiella spp.; and Escherichia coli.

Bacterial Septicemia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella spp., Haemophilus influenzae, Escherichia coli, Serratia spp., Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-susceptible strains).

Bone and Joint Infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., and Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-susceptible strains).

Gynecologic Infections, including endometritis, pelvic cellulitis, and other infections of the female genital tract caused by Escherichia coli.

Intra-abdominal Infections, including peritonitis caused by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-susceptible strains) and polymicrobial infections caused by aerobic and anaerobic organisms and Bacteroides spp.

(many strains of Bacteroides fragilis are resistant).

Central Nervous System Infections, including meningitis, caused by Haemophilus influenzae and Neisseria meningitidis.

Ceftazidime has also been used successfully in a limited number of cases of meningitis due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Ceftazidime for injection, USP may be used alone in cases of confirmed or suspected sepsis.

Ceftazidime has been used successfully in clinical trials as empiric therapy in cases where various concomitant therapies with other antibacterial drugs have been used.

Ceftazidime for injection, USP may also be used concomitantly with other antibacterial drugs, such as aminoglycosides, vancomycin, and clindamycin; in severe and life-threatening infections; and in the immunocompromised patient.

When such concomitant treatment is appropriate, prescribing information in the labeling for the other antibacterial drugs should be followed.

The dose depends on the severity of the infection and the patient’s condition.

To reduce the development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain the effectiveness of ceftazidime for injection, USP and other antibacterial drugs, ceftazidime for injection, USP should be used only to treat infections that are proven or strongly suspected to be caused by susceptible bacteria.

When culture and susceptibility information are available, they should be considered in selecting or modifying antibacterial therapy.

In the absence of such data, local epidemiology and susceptibility patterns may contribute to the empiric selection of therapy.

PEDIATRIC USE

Pediatric Use See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION .

PREGNANCY

Pregnancy Teratogenic Effects Reproduction studies have been performed in mice and rats at doses up to 40 times the human dose and have revealed no evidence of impaired fertility or harm to the fetus due to ceftazidime for injection.

There are, however, no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women.

Because animal reproduction studies are not always predictive of human response, this drug should be used during pregnancy only if clearly needed.

NUSRING MOTHERS

Nursing Mothers Ceftazidime is excreted in human milk in low concentrations.

Caution should be exercised when ceftazidime is administered to a nursing woman.

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS

Information for Patients Patients should be counseled that antibacterial drugs, including ceftazidime for injection, should only be used to treat bacterial infections.

They do not treat viral infections (e.g., the common cold).

When ceftazidime for injection is prescribed to treat a bacterial infection, patients should be told that although it is common to feel better early in the course of therapy, the medication should be taken exactly as directed.

Skipping doses or not completing the full course of therapy may: (1) decrease the effectiveness of the immediate treatment, and (2) increase the likelihood that bacteria will develop resistance and will not be treatable by ceftazidime for injection or other antibacterial drugs in the future.

Diarrhea is a common problem caused by antibacterial drugs which usually ends when the antibacterial drug is discontinued.

Sometimes after starting treatment with antibacterial drugs, patients can develop watery and bloody stools (with or without stomach cramps and fever) even as late as 2 or more months after having taken the last dose of the antibacterial drug.

If this occurs, patients should contact their physician as soon as possible.

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

Dosage The usual adult dosage is 1 gram administered intravenously or intramuscularly every 8 to 12 hours.

The dosage and route should be determined by the susceptibility of the causative organisms, the severity of infection, and the condition and renal function of the patient.

The guidelines for dosage of ceftazidime for injection are listed in Table 3 .

The following dosage schedule is recommended.

Table 3.

Recommended Dosage Schedule *Although clinical improvement has been shown, bacteriologic cures cannot be expected in patients with chronic respiratory disease and cystic fibrosis.

**The higher dose should be reserved for immunocompromised pediatric patients or pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis or meningitis.

Dose Frequency Adult Usual recommended dosage 1 gram intravenous or intramuscular every 8 to 12 hours Uncomplicated urinary tract infection 250 mg intravenous or intramuscular every 12 hours Bone and joint infections 2 grams intravenous every 12 hours Complicated urinary tract infections 500 mg intravenous or intramuscular every 8 to 12 hours Uncomplicated pneumonia; mild skin and skin-structure infections 500 mg to 1 gram intravenous or intramuscular every 8 hours Serious gynecological and intra-abdominal infections 2 grams intravenous every 8 hours Meningitis 2 grams intravenous every 8 hours Very severe life-threatening infections, especially in immunocompromised patients 2 grams intravenous every 8 hours Lung infections caused by Pseudomonas spp.

in patients with cystic fibrosis with normal renal function* 30 to 50 mg/kg intravenous to a maximum of 6 grams per day every 8 hours Neonates (0 to 4 weeks) 30 mg/kg intravenous every 12 hours Infants and children (1 month to 12 years) 30 to 50 mg/kg intravenous to a maximum of 6 grams per day** every 8 hours Impaired Hepatic Function No adjustment in dosage is required for patients with hepatic dysfunction.

Impaired Renal Function Ceftazidime is excreted by the kidneys, almost exclusively by glomerular filtration.

Therefore, in patients with impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <50 mL/min), it is recommended that the dosage of ceftazidime be reduced to compensate for its slower excretion.

In patients with suspected renal insufficiency, an initial loading dose of 1 gram of ceftazidime may be given.

An estimate of GFR should be made to determine the appropriate maintenance dosage.

The recommended dosage is presented in Table 4 .

Table 4.

Recommended Maintenance Dosages of Ceftazidime for Injection in Renal Insufficiency NOTE: If the dose recommended in Table 3 above is lower than that recommended for patients with renal insufficiency as outlined in Table 4 , the lower dose should be used.

Creatinine Clearance (mL/min) Recommended Unit Dose of Ceftazidime for Injection Frequency of Dosing 50 to 31 1 gram every 12 hours 30 to 16 1 gram every 24 hours 15 to 6 500 mg every 24 hours less than 5 500 mg every 48 hours When only serum creatinine is available, the following formula (Cockcroft’s equation) 1 may be used to estimate creatinine clearance.

The serum creatinine should represent a steady state of renal function: Males: Creatinine clearance (mL/min) = Weight (kg) x (140 – age) 72 x serum creatinine (mg/dL) Females: 0.85 x male value In patients with severe infections who would normally receive 6 grams of ceftazidime for injection daily were it not for renal insufficiency, the unit dose given in the table above may be increased by 50% or the dosing frequency may be increased appropriately.

Further dosing should be determined by therapeutic monitoring, severity of the infection, and susceptibility of the causative organism.

In pediatric patients as for adults, the creatinine clearance should be adjusted for body surface area or lean body mass, and the dosing frequency should be reduced in cases of renal insufficiency.

In patients undergoing hemodialysis, a loading dose of 1 gram is recommended, followed by 1 gram after each hemodialysis period.

Ceftazidime for injection can also be used in patients undergoing intraperitoneal dialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

In such patients, a loading dose of 1 gram of ceftazidime for injection may be given, followed by 500 mg every 24 hours.

In addition to IV use, ceftazidime for injection can be incorporated in the dialysis fluid at a concentration of 250 mg for 2 L of dialysis fluid.

Note: Generally, ceftazidime for injection should be continued for 2 days after the signs and symptoms of infection have disappeared, but in complicated infections longer therapy may be required.

Administration Ceftazidime for injection may be given intravenously or by deep IM injection into a large muscle mass such as the upper outer quadrant of the gluteus maximus or lateral part of the thigh.

Intra-arterial administration should be avoided (see PRECAUTIONS ).

Intramuscular Administration For IM administration, ceftazidime for injection should be constituted with one of the following diluents: Sterile Water for Injection, Bacteriostatic Water for Injection, or 0.5% or 1% Lidocaine Hydrochloride Injection.

Refer to Table 5 .

Intravenous Administration The IV route is preferable for patients with bacterial septicemia, bacterial meningitis, peritonitis, or other severe or life-threatening infections, or for patients who may be poor risks because of lowered resistance resulting from such debilitating conditions as malnutrition, trauma, surgery, diabetes, heart failure, or malignancy, particularly if shock is present or pending.

For direct intermittent IV administration, constitute ceftazidime for injection as directed in Table 5 with Sterile Water for Injection.

Slowly inject directly into the vein over a period of 3 to 5 minutes or give through the tubing of an administration set while the patient is also receiving one of the compatible IV fluids (see COMPATIBILITY AND STABILITY ).

For IV infusion, constitute the 1 gram, or 2 gram vial and add an appropriate quantity of the resulting solution to an IV container with one of the compatible IV fluids listed under the COMPATIBILITY AND STABILITY section.

Intermittent IV infusion with a Y-type administration set can be accomplished with compatible solutions.

However, during infusion of a solution containing ceftazidime, it is desirable to discontinue the other solution.

Table 5.

Preparation of Solutions of Ceftazidime for Injection * To obtain a dose of 1 g, withdraw 10 mL from the vial following reconstitution.

** To obtain a dose of 2 g, withdraw 11.5 mL from the vial following reconstitution.

Size Amount of Diluent to be Added (mL) Approximate Available Volume (mL) Approximate Ceftazidime Concentration (mg/mL) Intramuscular 1 gram vial 3 3.6 280 Intravenous 1 gram vial 10 10.8* 100 2 gram vial 10 11.5** 170 Discard unused portion.

All vials of ceftazidime for injection as supplied are under reduced pressure.

When ceftazidime for injection is dissolved, carbon dioxide is released and a positive pressure develops.

For ease of use please follow the recommended techniques of constitution described on the detachable Instructions for Constitution section of this insert.

Solutions of ceftazidime for injection, like those of most beta-lactam antibacterial drugs, should not be added to solutions of aminoglycoside antibacterial drugs because of potential interaction.

However, if concurrent therapy with ceftazidime for injection and an aminoglycoside is indicated, each of these antibacterial drugs can be administered separately to the same patient.

Natazia 28 Day Pack

Generic Name: ESTRADIOL VALERATE AND ESTRADIOL VALERATE/DIENOGEST
Brand Name: Natazia

DRUG INTERACTIONS

7 Consult the labeling of all concurrently-used drugs to obtain further information about interactions with hormonal contraceptives or the potential for enzyme alterations .

Drugs or herbal products that induce certain enzymes (for example, CYP3A4) may decrease the effectiveness of COCs or increase breakthrough bleeding.

Counsel patients to use a back-up or alternative method of contraception when enzyme inducers are used with COCs.

( 7.1 ) 7.1 Effects of Other Drugs on Combined Oral Contraceptives Substances diminishing the efficacy of COCs: Dienogest is a substrate of CYP3A4.

Women who take medications that are strong CYP3A4 inducers should not choose Natazia as their oral contraceptive while using these inducers and for at least 28 days after discontinuation of these inducers due to the possibility of increased breakthrough bleeding and/or decreased contraceptive efficacy.

Drugs or herbal products that induce certain enzymes, including CYP3A4, may decrease the effectiveness of COCs or increase breakthrough bleeding.

Some drugs or herbal products that may decrease the effectiveness of hormonal contraceptives include phenytoin, barbiturates, carbamazepine, bosentan, felbamate, griseofulvin, oxcarbazepine, rifampin, topiramate and products containing St.

John’s wort.

Interactions between oral contraceptives and other drugs may lead to breakthrough bleeding and/or contraceptive failure.

Counsel women to use an alternative method of contraception or a back-up method when enzyme inducers are used with COCs, and to continue back-up contraception for 28 days after discontinuing the enzyme inducer to ensure contraceptive reliability.

Multiple dose co-administration of the strong CYP3A4 inducer rifampin with estradiol valerate/dienogest tablets in healthy postmenopausal women led to a decrease in dienogest and estradiol systemic exposure at steady state.

[See Clinical Pharmacology (12.3).] Substances Increasing the Systemic Exposure of COCs (enzyme inhibitors): Concomitant administration of moderate or strong CYP3A4 inhibitors like azole antifungals (for example, ketoconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, fluconazole), verapamil, macrolides (for example, clarithromycin, erythromycin), diltiazem, and grapefruit increase the serum concentrations of both estradiol and dienogest.

In a multiple dose study investigating the effect of CYP3A4 inhibitors (ketoconazole and erythromycin) on Natazia, steady state estradiol and dienogest exposures were increased when co-administered with ketoconazole or erythromycin [see Clinical Pharmacology ( 12.3 )] .

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)/Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Protease Inhibitors and Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors : Significant changes (increase and decrease) in plasma concentrations of estrogen and progestin have been noted in some cases of co-administration of HIV/HCV protease inhibitors or with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Antibiotics : There have been reports of pregnancy while taking hormonal contraceptives and antibiotics, but clinical pharmacokinetic studies have not shown consistent effects of antibiotics on plasma concentrations of synthetic steroids.

7.2 Effects of Combined Oral Contraceptives on Other Drugs COCs containing ethinyl estradiol may inhibit the metabolism of other compounds.

COCs have been shown to significantly decrease plasma concentrations of lamotrigine, likely due to induction of lamotrigine glucuronidation.

This may reduce seizure control; therefore, dosage adjustments of lamotrigine may be necessary.

Consult the labeling of the concurrently-used drug to obtain further information about interactions with COCs or the potential for enzyme alterations.

[See Clinical Pharmacology ( 12.3 ).] Women on thyroid hormone replacement therapy may need increased doses of thyroid hormone because serum concentrations of thyroid-binding globulin increase with use of COCs.

7.3 Interference with Laboratory Tests The use of contraceptive steroids may influence the results of certain laboratory tests, such as coagulation factors, lipids, glucose tolerance, and binding proteins [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.11 ) and Drug Interactions ( 7.2 )].

OVERDOSAGE

10 There have been no reports of serious ill effects from overdose, including ingestion by children.

Overdosage may cause withdrawal bleeding in females and nausea.

DESCRIPTION

11 Natazia (estradiol valerate and estradiol valerate/dienogest) tablets provide an oral contraceptive regimen consisting of 26 active film-coated tablets that contain the active ingredients specified for each tablet below, followed by two inert film-coated tablets: • 2 dark yellow tablets each containing 3 mg estradiol valerate • 5 medium red tablets each containing 2 mg estradiol valerate and 2 mg dienogest • 17 light yellow tablets each containing 2 mg estradiol valerate and 3 mg dienogest • 2 dark red tablets each containing 1 mg estradiol valerate • 2 white tablets (inert) Natazia also contains the excipients lactose monohydrate, maize starch, maize starch pre-gelatinized, povidone 25, magnesium stearate, hypromellose, macrogol 6000, talc, titanium dioxide, and ferric oxide pigment, yellow, or ferric oxide pigment, red.

The empirical formula of estradiol valerate is C 23 H 32 O 3 and the chemical structure is: Estradiol Valerate The chemical name of estradiol valerate is Estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17-diol(17ß)-,17-pentanoate.

The empirical formula of dienogest is C 20 H 25 NO 2 and the chemical structure is: Dienogest The chemical name of dienogest is (17α)-17-Hydroxy-3-oxo-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-21-nitrile.

Chemical Strcuture EV Dienogest Chemical Structure

CLINICAL STUDIES

14 14.1 Oral Contraceptive Clinical Trials The study conducted in North America (U.S.

and Canada) was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, unintended pregnancy study.

There were 490 healthy subjects between 18 and 35 years of age (mean age: 25.1 years) who were treated for up to 28 cycles of 28 days each.

The racial demographic of enrolled women was: Caucasian (76%), Hispanic (13%), African-American (7%), Asian (3%), and Other (1%).

The weight range for treated women was 40 to 100 kg (mean weight: 62.5 kg) and the BMI range was 14 to 30 kg/m 2 (mean BMI: 23.3 kg/m 2 ).

Of treated women, 15% discontinued the study treatment due to an adverse event, 13% were lost to follow up, 10% withdrew their consent, 8% discontinued due to other reason, 1% discontinued due to protocol deviation, and 1% discontinued due to pregnancy.

The study conducted in Europe (Germany, Austria and Spain) was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm contraceptive reliability study.

There were 1,377 healthy subjects between 18 and 50 years of age (mean age: 30.3 years) who were treated for 20 cycles of 28 days each.

The racial demographic of enrolled women was predominantly Caucasian (99.2%).

The weight range for treated women was 38 to 98 kg (mean weight: 63.8 kg) and the BMI range was 15 to 31.8 kg/m 2 (mean BMI: 22.8 kg/m 2 ).

Of treated women, 10% discontinued the study treatment due to an adverse event, 5% discontinued due to other reason, 2% were lost to follow up, 2% discontinued due to protocol deviation, 2% withdrew their consent, and 1% discontinued due to pregnancy.

The Pearl Index (PI) was the primary efficacy endpoint used to assess contraceptive reliability and was assessed in each of the two studies, assuming all subjects were at risk of pregnancy in all medication cycles unless back-up contraception was documented.

The PI is based on pregnancies that occurred after the onset of treatment and within 7 days after the last pill intake.

Cycles in which conception did not occur, but which included the use of back-up contraception, were not included in the calculation of the PI.

The PI also includes patients who did not take the drug correctly.

The estimated PI for the North American study is 1.64 and the estimated PI for the European study is 1.04.

The Kaplan-Meier method was also used to calculate the contraceptive failure rate.

The summary of the Pearl Indexes and cumulative contraceptive failure rates are provided in Table 2: Table 2: Summary of the Pearl Indexes and the Cumulative Contraceptive Failure Rates Study Age Group Relative Treatment Exposure Cycles Total treatment exposure time without back-up contraception Number of Pregnancies within 13 Cycles and 7 Days after Last Treatment Pearl Index Upper Limit of 95% CI Contraceptive Failure Rate at the End of First Year North America 18–35 3,969 5 1.64 3.82 0.016 Europe 18–35 11,275 9 1.04 1.97 0.010 14.2 Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Clinical Trials The efficacy and safety of Natazia were evaluated in two multi-regional, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

Study 308960 was performed in the United States and Canada and Study 308961 was performed in Australia and 9 European countries.

The studies were identical in design.

The studies enrolled women, 18 years of age or older, with a diagnosis of dysfunctional uterine bleeding characterized as heavy, prolonged and/or frequent bleeding without organic pathology.

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) was defined as menstrual blood loss of 80 mL or more in at least 2 bleeding episodes.

The diagnosis of HMB was documented through the collection of used sanitary protection (pads and tampons) to quantify blood loss assessed by the alkaline hematin method.

Overall, about 85% of the subjects qualified for the study because they had heavy menstrual bleeding symptoms.

A total of 421 women with a mean age of 38.2 and a mean BMI of 25.5 were randomized to the two clinical studies, for a total of 269 women in the Natazia group and 152 women in the placebo group, and treated for seven 28-day cycles.

Approximately 81% were Caucasian, 13% were Black, and 6% were Hispanic or Asian or Other.

The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of subjects who were completely relieved of symptoms, which was defined by the number of subjects with the absence of any dysfunctional bleeding symptom and who met up to 8 strictly defined criteria for success during the 90-day efficacy assessment phase.

In Study 308960, the proportion of the intent-to-treat subjects with complete symptom relief was 29.2% in the Natazia group compared to 2.9% in the placebo group.

In Study 308961, the proportion of the intent-to-treat subjects with complete symptom relief was 29.5% in the Natazia group compared to 1.2% in the placebo group.

In both studies, Natazia was effective in treating the symptoms of HMB in the subset of women who entered the study with symptoms specific to HMB.

Among patients with HMB, menstrual blood loss (MBL) was statistically significantly reduced in the group treated with Natazia compared with placebo (p<0.0001 for both studies).

Evaluating data based on 28-day cycles, the median menstrual blood volume at Cycle 7 was reduced from the baseline median by 90% in one trial and 87% in the other.

For women treated with placebo, the median menstrual blood volume at Cycle 7 was reduced from the baseline median by 14% and 32% in the two trials, respectively.

Figures 2 and 3 display the MBL volume by cycle and by study.

Figure 2: Median Menstrual Blood Loss Volume by Cycle (Study 308960) Figure 3: Median Menstrual Blood Loss Volume by Cycle (Study 308961) Figure 2 Figure 3

HOW SUPPLIED

16 /STORAGE AND HANDLING 16.1 How Supplied Natazia (estradiol valerate and estradiol valerate/dienogest) tablets are available in packages of three blister packs (NDC 50419-409-03).

The active and inert film-coated tablets are rounded with biconvex faces, one side is embossed with a regular hexagon shape with the letters DD or DJ or DH or DN or DT.

Each blister pack (28 film-coated tablets) contains in the following order: • 2 round biconvex dark yellow film-coated tablets with embossed “DD” in a regular hexagon on one side each containing 3 mg estradiol valerate • 5 round biconvex medium red film-coated tablets with embossed “DJ” in a regular hexagon on one side each containing 2 mg estradiol valerate and 2 mg dienogest • 17 round biconvex light yellow film-coated tablets with embossed “DH” in a regular hexagon on one side each containing 2 mg estradiol valerate and 3 mg dienogest • 2 round biconvex dark red film-coated tablets with embossed “DN” in a regular hexagon on one side each containing 1 mg estradiol valerate • 2 white round biconvex white film-coated tablets with embossed “DT” in a regular hexagon on one side (inert) 16.2 Storage Store at 25º C (77º F); excursions permitted to 15–30 o C (59–86 o F) [see USP Controlled Room Temperature] .

RECENT MAJOR CHANGES

Contraindications, Pregnancy (4) Removed 6/2024

GERIATRIC USE

8.5 Geriatric Use Natazia has not been studied in postmenopausal women and is not indicated in this population.

DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS

3 Natazia (estradiol valerate and estradiol valerate/dienogest) tablets are available in blister packs.

Each blister pack contains 28 round, biconvex, film-coated tablets in the following order: • 2 dark yellow tablets, with an embossed “DD” in a regular hexagon on one side, each containing 3 mg estradiol valerate • 5 medium red tablets, with an embossed “DJ” in a regular hexagon on one side, each containing 2 mg estradiol valerate and 2 mg dienogest • 17 light yellow tablets, with an embossed “DH” in a regular hexagon on one side, each containing 2 mg estradiol valerate and 3 mg dienogest • 2 dark red tablets, with an embossed “DN” in a regular hexagon on one side, each containing 1 mg estradiol valerate • 2 white tablets (inert), with an embossed “DT” in a regular hexagon on one side Natazia consists of 28 film-coated, unscored tablets in the following order ( 3 ): • 2 dark yellow tablets each containing 3 mg estradiol valerate • 5 medium red tablets each containing 2 mg estradiol valerate and 2 mg dienogest • 17 light yellow tablets each containing 2 mg estradiol valerate and 3 mg dienogest • 2 dark red tablets each containing 1 mg estradiol valerate • 2 white tablets (inert)

MECHANISM OF ACTION

12.1 Mechanism of Action COCs lower the risk of becoming pregnant primarily by suppressing ovulation.

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

1 • Natazia is a combination of dienogest , a progestin, and estradiol valerate, an estrogen, indicated for use by females of reproductive potential to prevent pregnancy.

( 1 ) • The efficacy of Natazia in females of reproductive potential with a body mass index (BMI) of >30 kg/m 2 has not been evaluated.

( 1 , 8.8 ) • Treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding in females of reproductive potential without organic pathology who choose to use an oral contraceptive as their method of contraception.

( 1.2 ) 1.1 Oral Contraception Natazia ® is indicated for use by women to prevent pregnancy.

The efficacy of Natazia in women with a body mass index (BMI) of > 30 kg/m 2 has not been evaluated.

1.2 Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Natazia is also indicated for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding in women without organic pathology who choose to use an oral contraceptive as their method of contraception [see Clinical Studies ( 14.2 )].

PEDIATRIC USE

8.4 Pediatric Use Safety and efficacy of Natazia have been established in women of reproductive age.

Efficacy is expected to be the same for postpubertal adolescents under the age of 18 and for users 18 years and older.

Use of this product before menarche is not indicated.

PREGNANCY

8.1 Pregnancy Risk Summary There is no reason to use COCs in pregnancy Discontinue Natazia if pregnancy occurs.

Epidemiologic studies and meta-analyses have not found an increased risk of genital or non-genital birth defects (including cardiac anomalies and limb-reduction defects) following exposure to COCs prior to conception or during early pregnancy.

In the U.S.

general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2 to 4 percent and 15 to 20 percent, respectively.

BOXED WARNING

WARNING: CIGARETTE SMOKING AND SERIOUS CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS Cigarette smoking increases the risk of serious cardiovascular events from combination oral contraceptives (COC) use.

This risk increases with age, particularly in women over 35 years of age, and with the number of cigarettes smoked.

For this reason, COCs should not be used by women who are over 35 years of age and smoke.

[See Contraindications ( 4 ).] WARNING: CIGARETTE SMOKING AND SERIOUS CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning.

• Women over 35 years old who smoke should not use Natazia.

( 4 ) • Cigarette smoking increases the risk of serious cardiovascular events from combination oral contraceptive (COC) use.

( 4 )

WARNING AND CAUTIONS

5 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS • Vascular risks : Stop Natazia if a thrombotic event occurs.

Stop Natazia at least 4 weeks before and through 2 weeks after major surgery.

Start Natazia no earlier than 4 weeks after delivery, in women who are not breastfeeding.

( 5.1 ) • Liver disease : Discontinue Natazia if jaundice occurs.

( 5.3 ) • High blood pressure : Do not prescribe Natazia for women with uncontrolled hypertension or hypertension with vascular disease.

( 5.4 ) • Carbohydrate and lipid metabolic effects : Monitor prediabetic and diabetic women taking Natazia.

Consider an alternate contraceptive method for women with uncontrolled dyslipidemia.

( 5.6 ) • Headache : Evaluate significant change in headaches and discontinue Natazia if indicated.

( 5.7 ) • Uterine bleeding : Evaluate irregular bleeding or amenorrhea.

( 5.8 ) • CYP3A4 induction : Women taking strong CYP3A4 inducers (for example, carbamazepine, phenytoin, rifampicin, and St.

John’s wort) should not choose Natazia as their oral contraceptive due to the possibility of decreased contraceptive efficacy.

( 5.13 , 7.1 ) 5.1 Thromboembolic Disorders and Other Vascular Problems Stop Natazia if an arterial or venous thrombotic event (VTE) occurs.

The use of COCs increases the risk of venous thromboembolism.

However, pregnancy increases the risk of venous thromboembolism as much or more than the use of COCs.

The risk of VTE in women using COCs has been estimated to be 3 to 9 per 10,000 woman-years.

The risk of VTE is highest during the first year of use.

Data from a large, prospective cohort safety study of various COCs suggest that this increased risk, as compared to that in non-COC users, is greatest during the first 6 months of COC use.

Data from this safety study indicate that the greatest risk of VTE is present after initially starting a COC or restarting (following a 4 week or greater pill-free interval) the same or a different COC.

Use of COCs also increases the risk of arterial thromboses such as strokes and myocardial infarctions, especially in women with other risk factors for these events.

The risk of thromboembolic disease due to oral contraceptives gradually disappears after COC use is discontinued.

If feasible, stop Natazia at least 4 weeks before and through 2 weeks after major surgery or other surgeries known to have an elevated risk of thromboembolism.

Start Natazia no earlier than 4 weeks after delivery, in women who are not breastfeeding.

The risk of postpartum thromboembolism decreases after the third postpartum week, whereas the risk of ovulation increases after the third postpartum week.

COCs have been shown to increase both the relative and attributable risks of cerebrovascular events (thrombotic and hemorrhagic strokes), although, in general, the risk is greatest among older (>35 years of age), hypertensive women who also smoke.

COCs also increase the risk for stroke in women with other underlying risk factors.

Oral contraceptives must be used with caution in women with cardiovascular disease risk factors.

Stop Natazia if there is unexplained loss of vision, proptosis, diplopia, papilledema, or retinal vascular lesions.

Evaluate for retinal vein thrombosis immediately.

[See Adverse Reactions ( 6 ).] 5.2 Malignant Neoplasms Breast Cancer Natazia is contraindicated in females who currently have or have had breast cancer because breast cancer may be hormonally sensitive [see Contraindications ( 4 )].

Epidemiology studies have not found a consistent association between use of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and breast cancer risk.

Studies do not show an association between ever (current or past) use of COCs and risk of breast cancer.

However, some studies report a small increase in the risk of breast cancer among current or recent users (<6 months since last use) and current users with longer duration of COC use [see Adverse Reactions ( 6.2 )] .

Cervical Cancer Some studies suggest that COCs are associated with an increase in the risk of cervical cancer or intraepithelial neoplasia.

However, there is controversy about the extent to which these findings may be due to differences in sexual behavior and other factors.

5.3 Liver Disease Discontinue Natazia if jaundice develops.

Steroid hormones may be poorly metabolized in patients with impaired liver function.

Acute or chronic disturbances of liver function may necessitate the discontinuation of COC use until markers of liver function return to normal and COC causation has been excluded.

Hepatic adenomas are associated with COC use.

An estimate of the attributable risk is 3.3 cases/100,000 COC users.

Rupture of hepatic adenomas may cause death through intra-abdominal hemorrhage.

Studies have shown an increased risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma in long-term (> 8 years) COC users.

However, the attributable risk of liver cancers in COC users is less than one case per million users.

Oral contraceptive-related cholestasis may occur in women with a history of pregnancy-related cholestasis.

Women with a history of COC-related cholestasis may have the condition recur with subsequent COC use.

5.4 High Blood Pressure For women with well-controlled hypertension, monitor blood pressure and stop Natazia if blood pressure rises significantly.

Women with uncontrolled hypertension or hypertension with vascular disease should not use COCs.

An increase in blood pressure has been reported in women taking COCs, and this increase is more likely in older women and with extended duration of use.

The incidence of hypertension increases with increasing concentration of progestin.

5.5 Gallbladder Disease Studies suggest a small increased relative risk of developing gallbladder disease among COC users.

5.6 Carbohydrate and Lipid Metabolic Effects Carefully monitor prediabetic and diabetic women who are taking Natazia.

COCs may decrease glucose tolerance in a dose-related fashion.

Consider alternative contraception for women with uncontrolled dyslipidemia.

A small proportion of women will have adverse lipid changes while on COCs.

Women with hypertriglyceridemia, or a family history thereof, may be at an increased risk of pancreatitis when using COCs.

5.7 Headache If a woman taking Natazia develops new headaches that are recurrent, persistent, or severe, evaluate the cause and discontinue Natazia if indicated.

An increase in frequency or severity of migraine during COC use (which may be prodromal of a cerebrovascular event) may be a reason for immediate discontinuation of the COC.

5.8 Bleeding Irregularities Breakthrough bleeding and spotting sometimes occur in patients on COCs, especially during the first three months of use.

If bleeding persists or occurs after previously regular cycles, check for causes such as pregnancy or malignancy.

If pathology and pregnancy are excluded, bleeding irregularities may resolve over time or with a change to a different COC.

Women who are not pregnant and use Natazia, may experience amenorrhea.

Based on patient diaries, amenorrhea occurs in approximately 16% of cycles in women using Natazia.

Pregnancy should be ruled out in the event of amenorrhea occurring in two or more consecutive cycles.

Some women may encounter amenorrhea or oligomenorrhea after stopping COCs, especially when such a condition was pre-existent.

Based on patient diaries from three clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of Natazia for contraception, 10-23% of women experienced intracyclic bleeding per cycle.

5.9 Depression Women with a history of depression should be carefully observed and Natazia discontinued if depression recurs to a serious degree .

5.10 Interference with Laboratory Tests The use of COCs may change the results of some laboratory tests, such as coagulation factors, lipids, glucose tolerance, and binding proteins.

Women on thyroid hormone replacement therapy may need increased doses of thyroid hormone because serum concentrations of thyroid-binding globulin increase with use of COCs [see Clinical Pharmacology ( 12.3 )] .

5.11 Monitoring A woman who is taking COCs should have a yearly visit with her healthcare provider for a blood pressure check and for other indicated healthcare.

5.12 Drug Interactions Women who take medications that are strong cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inducers (for example, carbamazepine, phenytoin, rifampicin, and St.

John’s wort) should not choose Natazia as their oral contraceptive while using these inducers and for at least 28 days after discontinuation of these inducers due to the possibility of decreased contraceptive efficacy [see Drug Interactions ( 7.1 ) and Clinical Pharmacology ( 12.3 )].

5.13 Other Conditions In women with hereditary angioedema, exogenous estrogens may induce or exacerbate symptoms of angioedema.

Chloasma may occasionally occur, especially in women with a history of chloasma gravidarum.

Women with a tendency to chloasma should avoid exposure to the sun or ultraviolet radiation while taking COCs.

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS

17 PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION See “FDA-approved patient labeling (Patient Information).” • Counsel patients that cigarette smoking increases the risk of serious cardiovascular events from COC use, and that women who are over 35 years old and smoke should not use COCs.

• Counsel patients that the increased risk of VTE compared to non-users of COCs is greatest after initially starting a COC or restarting (following a 4 week or greater pill-free interval) the same or a different COC.

• Counsel patients that Natazia does not protect against HIV infection (AIDS) and other sexually transmitted diseases.

• Counsel patients on Warnings and Precautions associated with COCs.

• Inform patients that Natazia is not indicated during pregnancy.

If pregnancy occurs during treatment with Natazia, instruct the patient to stop further intake.

• Counsel patients to take one tablet daily by mouth at the same time every day in the exact order noted on the blister.

Instruct patients what to do in the event pills are missed.

See What Should I Do if I Miss any Pills section in FDA-Approved Patient Labeling.

• Counsel women who are taking strong CYP3A4 inducers (for example, carbamazepine, phenytoin, rifampicin, and St.

John’s wort) not to choose Natazia as their oral contraceptive due to the possibility of decreased contraceptive efficacy.

• Counsel patients to use a back-up or alternative method of contraception when weak or moderate enzyme inducers are used with Natazia.

• Counsel patients who are breastfeeding or who desire to breastfeed that COCs may reduce breast milk production.

This is less likely to occur if breastfeeding is well established.

• Counsel any patient who starts COCs postpartum, and who has not yet had a period, to use an additional method of contraception until she has taken Natazia for 9 consecutive days.

• Counsel patients that amenorrhea may occur.

Rule out pregnancy in the event of amenorrhea in two or more consecutive cycles.

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

2 • Take one tablet daily by mouth at the same time every day.

( 2.1 ) • Tablets must be taken in the order directed on the blister pack.

( 2.1 ) • Do not skip or delay intake by more than 12 hours.

( 2.1 ) 2.1 How to Take Natazia To achieve maximum contraceptive effectiveness, Natazia must be taken exactly as directed.

Take one tablet by mouth at the same time every day.

Tablets must be taken in the order directed on the blister pack.

Tablets should not be skipped or intake delayed by more than 12 hours.

For patient instructions for missed pills, see FDA-Approved Patient Labeling.

2.2 How to Start Natazia Instruct the patient to begin taking Natazia on Day 1 of her menstrual cycle (that is, the first day of her menstrual bleeding).

See FDA-Approved Patient Labeling .

Instruct the patient to use a non-hormonal contraceptive as back-up during the first 9 days.

For postpartum women who do not breastfeed or after a second trimester abortion, start Natazia no earlier than 4 weeks postpartum due to the increased risk of thromboembolism.

If the patient starts on Natazia postpartum and has not yet had a period, evaluate for possible pregnancy, and instruct her to use an additional method of contraception until she has taken Natazia for 9 consecutive days.

The possibility of ovulation and conception prior to initiation of medication should also be considered.

If the patient is switching from a combination hormonal method such as: • Another pill • Vaginal ring • Patch • Instruct her to take the first dark yellow pill on the first day of her withdrawal bleed.

She should not continue taking the pills from her previous birth control pack.

If she does not have a withdrawal bleed, rule out pregnancy before starting Natazia.

• If she previously used a vaginal ring or transdermal patch, she should start using Natazia on the day the ring or patch is removed.

• Instruct the patient to use a non-hormonal back-up method such as a condom or spermicide for the first 9 days.

If the patient is switching from a progestin-only method such as a: • Progestin-only pill • Implant • Intrauterine system • Injection • Instruct her to take the first dark yellow pill on the day she would have taken her next progestin-only pill or on the day of removal of her implant or intrauterine system or on the day when she would have had her next injection.

• Instruct the patient to use a non-hormonal back-up method such as a condom or spermicide for the first 9 days.

2.3 Advice in case of Gastrointestinal Disturbances In case of severe vomiting or diarrhea, absorption may not be complete and additional contraceptive measures should be taken.

If vomiting or diarrhea occurs within 3-4 hours after taking a colored tablet, this can be regarded as a missed tablet.

fluorouracil 5 % Topical Solution

Generic Name: FLUOROURACIL
Brand Name: Fluorouracil
  • Substance Name(s):
  • FLUOROURACIL

WARNINGS

Application to mucous membranes should be avoided due to the possibility of local inflammation and ulceration.

Additionally, cases of miscarriage and a birth defect (ventricular septal defect) have been reported when fluorouracil was applied to mucous membrane areas during pregnancy.

Occlusion of the skin with resultant hydration has been shown to increase percutaneous penetration of several topical preparations.

If any occlusive dressing is used in treatment of basal cell carcinoma, there may be an increase in the severity of inflammatory reactions in the adjacent normal skin.

A porous gauze dressing may be applied for cosmetic reasons without increase in reaction.

Exposure to ultraviolet rays should be minimized during and immediately following treatment with fluorouracil because the intensity of the reaction may be increased.

Patients should discontinue therapy with fluorouracil if symptoms of DPD enzyme deficiency develop (see CONTRAINDICATIONS ).

Rarely, life-threatening toxicities such as stomatitis, diarrhea, neutropenia, and neurotoxicity have been reported with intravenous administration of fluorouracil in patients with DPD enzyme deficiency.

One case of life-threatening systemic toxicity has been reported with the topical use of fluorouracil in a patient with DPD enzyme deficiency.

Symptoms included severe abdominal pain, bloody diarrhea, vomiting, fever, and chills.

Physical examination revealed stomatitis, erythematous skin rash, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, inflammation of the esophagus, stomach, and small bowel.

Although this case was observed with 5% fluorouracil cream, it is unknown whether patients with profound DPD enzyme deficiency would develop systemic toxicity with lower concentrations of topically applied fluorouracil.

OVERDOSAGE

There have been no reports of overdosage with fluorouracil.

The oral LD 50 for the 5% topical cream was 234 mg/kg in rats and 39 mg/kg in dogs.

These doses represented 11.7 and 1.95 mg/kg of fluorouracil, respectively.

Studies with a 5% topical solution yielded an oral LD 50 of 214 mg/kg in rats and 28.5 mg/kg in dogs, corresponding to 10.7 and 1.43 mg/kg of fluorouracil, respectively.

The topical application of the 5% cream to rats yielded an LD 50 of greater than 500 mg/kg.

DESCRIPTION

Fluorouracil Topical Solutions are topical preparations containing the fluorinated pyrimidine 5-fluorouracil, an antineoplastic antimetabolite.

Fluorouracil Topical Solution consists of 2% or 5% fluorouracil on a weight/weight basis, compounded with edetate disodium, hydroxypropyl cellulose, methylparaben, propylene glycol, propylparaben, purified water and tromethamine.

Chemically, fluorouracil is 5-fluoro-2,4(1 H , 3 H )-pyrimidinedione.

It is a white to practically white, crystalline powder which is sparingly soluble in water and slightly soluble in alcohol.

One gram of fluorouracil is soluble in 100 mL of propylene glycol.

The molecular weight of 5-fluorouracil is 130.08 and the structural formula is: Chemical Structure

HOW SUPPLIED

Fluorouracil Topical Solution, USP is available in 10-mL drop dispensers containing either 2% (NDC 51672-4062-1) or 5% (NDC 51672-4063-1) fluorouracil on a weight/weight basis compounded with edetate disodium, hydroxypropyl cellulose, methylparaben, propylene glycol, propylparaben, purified water and tromethamine.

Store at 20° to 25°C (68° to 77°F) [see USP Controlled Room Temperature].

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

Fluorouracil is recommended for the topical treatment of multiple actinic or solar keratoses.

In the 5% strength, it is also useful in the treatment of superficial basal cell carcinomas when conventional methods are impractical, such as with multiple lesions or difficult treatment sites.

Safety and efficacy in other indications have not been established.

The diagnosis should be established prior to treatment, since this method has not been proven effective in other types of basal cell carcinomas.

With isolated, easily accessible basal cell carcinomas, surgery is preferred since success with such lesions is almost 100%.

The success rate with fluorouracil topical solution is approximately 93%, based on 113 lesions in 54 patients.

Twenty-five lesions treated with the solution produced 1 failure.

PEDIATRIC USE

Pediatric Use Safety and effectiveness in children have not been established.

PREGNANCY

Pregnancy See CONTRAINDICATIONS .

NUSRING MOTHERS

Nursing Mothers It is not known whether fluorouracil is excreted in human milk.

Because there is some systemic absorption of fluorouracil after topical administration (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ), because many drugs are excreted in human milk, and because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants, a decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or to discontinue use of the drug, taking into account the importance of the drug to the mother.

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS

Information for Patients Patients should be forewarned that the reaction in the treated areas may be unsightly during therapy and, usually, for several weeks following cessation of therapy.

Patients should be instructed to avoid exposure to ultraviolet rays during and immediately following treatment with fluorouracil because the intensity of the reaction may be increased.

If fluorouracil is applied with the fingers, the hands should be washed immediately afterward.

Fluorouracil should not be applied on the eyelids or directly into the eyes, nose, or mouth because irritation may occur.

Fluorouracil, including fluorouracil topical solution may be fatal if ingested by pets.

Avoid allowing pets to contact the fluorouracil topical solution container or the skin where fluorouracil topical solution has been applied.

Store fluorouracil topical solution out of reach of pets.

Safely discard or clean any cloth or applicator that may retain fluorouracil topical solution and avoid leaving any residues of fluorouracil topical solution on your hands, clothing, carpeting or furniture.

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

When fluorouracil is applied to a lesion, a response occurs with the following sequence: erythema, usually followed by vesiculation, desquamation, erosion, and re-epithelialization.

Fluorouracil should be applied preferably with a nonmetal applicator or suitable glove.

If fluorouracil is applied with the fingers, the hands should be washed immediately afterward.

Actinic or Solar Keratosis Apply solution twice daily in an amount sufficient to cover the lesions.

Medication should be continued until the inflammatory response reaches the erosion stage, at which time use of the drug should be terminated.

The usual duration of therapy is from 2 to 4 weeks.

Complete healing of the lesions may not be evident for 1 to 2 months following cessation of fluorouracil therapy.

Superficial Basal Cell Carcinomas Only the 5% strength is recommended.

Apply solution twice daily in an amount sufficient to cover the lesions.

Treatment should be continued for at least 3 to 6 weeks.

Therapy may be required for as long as 10 to 12 weeks before the lesions are obliterated.

As in any neoplastic condition, the patient should be followed for a reasonable period of time to determine if a cure has been obtained.

metoclopramide HCl 10 MG Oral Tablet

WARNINGS

Mental depression has occurred in patients with and without prior history of depression.

Symptoms have ranged from mild to severe and have included suicidal ideation and suicide.

Metoclopramide should be given to patients with a prior history of depression only if the expected benefits outweigh the potential risks.

Extrapyramidal symptoms, manifested primarily as acute dystonic reactions, occur in approximately 1 in 500 patients treated with the usual adult dosages of 30 to 40 mg/day of metoclopramide.

These usually are seen during the first 24 to 48 hours of treatment with metoclopramide, occur more frequently in pediatric patients and adult patients less than 30 years of age and are even more frequent at higher doses.

These symptoms may include involuntary movements of limbs and facial grimacing, torticollis, oculogyric crisis, rhythmic protrusion of tongue, bulbar type of speech, trismus, or dystonic reactions resembling tetanus.

Rarely, dystonic reactions may present as stridor and dyspnea, possibly due to laryngospasm.

If these symptoms should occur, inject 50 mg of diphenhydramine hydrochloride intramuscularly, and they usually will subside.

Benztropine mesylate, 1 to 2 mg intramuscularly, may also be used to reverse these reactions.

Parkinsonian-like symptoms have occurred, more commonly within the first 6 months after beginning treatment with metoclopramide, but occasionally after longer periods.

These symptoms generally subside within 2 to 3 months following discontinuance of metoclopramide.

Patients with preexisting Parkinson’s disease should be given metoclopramide cautiously, if at all, since such patients may experience exacerbation of parkinsonian symptoms when taking metoclopramide.

Tardive Dyskinesia (see Boxed Warnings ) Treatment with metoclopramide can cause tardive dyskinesia (TD), a potentially irreversible and disfiguring disorder characterized by involuntary movements of the face, tongue, or extremities.

The risk of developing tardive dyskinesia increases with the duration of treatment and the total cumulative dose.

An analysis of utilization of patterns showed that about 20% of patients who used metoclopramide took it longer than 12 weeks.

Treatment with metoclopramide for longer than the recommended 12 weeks should be avoided in all but rare cases where therapeutic benefit is thought to outweigh the risk of developing TD.

Although the risk of developing TD in the general population may be increased among the elderly, women, and diabetics, it is not possible to predict which patients will develop metoclopramide-induced TD.

Both the risk of developing TD and the likelihood that TD will become irreversible increase with duration of treatment and total cumulative dose.

Metoclopramide should be discontinued in patients who develop signs and symptoms of TD.

There is no known effective treatment for established cases of TD, although in some patients, TD may remit, partially or completely, within several weeks to months after metoclopramide is withdrawn.

Metoclopramide itself may suppress, or partially suppress, the signs of TD, thereby masking the underlying disease process.

The effect of this symptomatic suppression upon the long-term course of TD is unknown.

Therefore, metoclopramide should not be used for the symptomatic control of TD.

Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome (NMS) There have been rare reports of an uncommon but potentially fatal symptom complex sometimes referred to as Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome (NMS) associated with metoclopramide.

Clinical manifestations of NMS include hyperthermia, muscle rigidity, altered consciousness, and evidence of autonomic instability (irregular pulse or blood pressure, tachycardia, diaphoresis and cardiac arrhythmias).

The diagnostic evaluation of patients with this syndrome is complicated.

In arriving at a diagnosis, it is important to identify cases where the clinical presentation includes both serious medical illness (e.g., pneumonia, systemic infection, etc.) and untreated or inadequately treated extrapyramidal signs and symptoms (EPS).

Other important considerations in the differential diagnosis include central anticholinergic toxicity, heat stroke, malignant hyperthermia, drug fever and primary central nervous system (CNS) pathology.

The management of NMS should include 1) immediate discontinuation of metoclopramide and other drugs not essential to concurrent therapy, 2) intensive symptomatic treatment and medical monitoring, and 3) treatment of any concomitant serious medical problems for which specific treatments are available.

Bromocriptine and dantrolene sodium have been used in treatment of NMS, but their effectiveness have not been established (see ADVERSE REACTIONS ).

DRUG INTERACTIONS

Drug Interactions: The effects of metoclopramide on gastrointestinal motility are antagonized by anticholinergic drugs and narcotic analgesics.

Additive sedative effects can occur when metoclopramide is given with alcohol, sedatives, hypnotics, narcotics or tranquilizers.

The finding that metoclopramide releases catecholamines in patients with essential hypertension suggests that it should be used cautiously, if at all, in patients receiving monoamine oxidase inhibitors.

Absorption of drugs from the stomach may be diminished (e.g., digoxin) by metoclopramide, whereas the rate and/or extent of absorption of drugs from the small bowel may be increased (e.g., acetaminophen, tetracycline, levodopa, ethanol, cyclosporine).

Gastroparesis (gastric stasis) may be responsible for poor diabetic control in some patients.

Exogenously administered insulin may begin to act before food has left the stomach and lead to hypoglycemia.

Because the action of metoclopramide will influence the delivery of food to the intestines and thus the rate of absorption, insulin dosage or timing of dosage may require adjustment.

OVERDOSAGE

Symptoms of overdosage may include drowsiness, disorientation and extrapyramidal reactions.

Anticholinergic or antiparkinson drugs or antihistamines with anticholinergic properties may be helpful in controlling the extrapyramidal reactions.

Symptoms are self-limiting and usually disappear within 24 hours.

Hemodialysis removes relatively little metoclopramide, probably because of the small amount of the drug in blood relative to tissues.

Similarly, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis does not remove significant amounts of drug.

It is unlikely that dosage would need to be adjusted to compensate for losses through dialysis.

Dialysis is not likely to be an effective method of drug removal in overdose situations.

Unintentional overdose due to misadministration has been reported in infants and children with the use of metoclopramide oral solution.

While there was no consistent pattern to the reports associated with these overdoses, events included seizures, extrapyramidal reactions, and lethargy.

Methemoglobinemia has occurred in premature and full-term neonates who were given overdoses of metoclopramide (1 to 4 mg/kg/day orally, intramuscularly or intravenously for 1 to 3 or more days).

Methemoglobinemia can be reversed by the intravenous administration of methylene blue.

However, methylene blue may cause hemolytic anemia in patients with G6PD deficiency, which may be fatal (see PRECAUTIONS – Other Special Populations ).

DESCRIPTION

Metoclopramide hydrochloride, USP is a white or practically white, crystalline, odorless or practically odorless powder.

It is very soluble in water, freely soluble in alcohol, sparingly soluble in chloroform, practically insoluble in ether.

Chemically, it is 4-amino-5-chloro-N-[2-(diethylamino) ethyl]-2-methoxybenzamide monohydrochloride monohydrate.

Its structural formula is as follows: Each tablet for oral administration contains metoclopramide hydrochloride, equivalent to either 5 mg or 10 mg metoclopramide.

Tablets also contain as inactive ingredients anhydrous lactose, magnesium stearate, povidone, pregelatinized starch, sodium starch glycolate and (5 mg only) D&C Yellow #10 and FD&C Blue #1.

Structural formula for metoclopramide hydrochloride

HOW SUPPLIED

Product: 63739-103 NDC: 63739-103-10 10 TABLET in a BLISTER PACK / 10 in a BOX, UNIT-DOSE Product: 63739-293 NDC: 63739-293-10 10 TABLET in a BLISTER PACK / 10 in a BOX, UNIT-DOSE

GERIATRIC USE

Geriatric Use Clinical studies of metoclopramide did not include sufficient numbers of subjects aged 65 and over to determine whether elderly subjects respond differently from younger subjects.

The risk of developing parkinsonian-like side effects increases with ascending dose.

Geriatric patients should receive the lowest dose of metoclopramide that is effective.

If parkinsonian-like symptoms develop in a geriatric patient receiving metoclopramide, metoclopramide should generally be discontinued before initiating any specific anti-parkinsonian agents (see WARNINGS and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION – For the Relief of Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux ).

The elderly may be at greater risk for tardive dyskinesia (see WARNINGS – Tardive Dyskinesia ).

Sedation has been reported in metoclopramide users.

Sedation may cause confusion and manifest as over-sedation in the elderly (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY , PRECAUTIONS – Information for Patients and ADVERSE REACTIONS – CNS Effects ).

Metoclopramide is known to be substantially excreted by the kidney, and the risk of toxic reactions to this drug may be greater in patients with impaired renal function (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION – USE IN PATIENTS WITH RENAL OR HEPATIC IMPAIRMENT ).

For these reasons, dose selection for an elderly patient should be cautious, usually starting at the low end of the dosing range, reflecting the greater frequency of decreased renal function, concomitant disease, or other drug therapy in the elderly (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION – For the Relief of Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux and Use in Patients with Renal or Hepatic Impairment ).

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

The use of metoclopramide tablets, USP is recommended for adults only.

Therapy should not exceed 12 weeks in duration.

Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux: Metoclopramide tablets, USP are indicated as short-term (4 to 12 weeks) therapy for adults with symptomatic, documented gastroesophageal reflux who fail to respond to conventional therapy.

The principal effect of metoclopramide is on symptoms of postprandial and daytime heartburn with less observed effect on nocturnal symptoms.

If symptoms are confined to particular situations, such as following the evening meal, use of metoclopramide as single doses prior to the provocative situation should be considered, rather than using the drug throughout the day.

Healing of esophageal ulcers and erosions has been endoscopically demonstrated at the end of a 12-week trial using doses of 15 mg q.i.d.

As there is no documented correlation between symptoms and healing of esophageal lesions, patients with documented lesions should be monitored endoscopically.

Diabetic Gastroparesis (Diabetic Gastric Stasis): Metoclopramide tablets, USP are indicated for the relief of symptoms associated with acute and recurrent diabetic gastric stasis.

The usual manifestations of delayed gastric emptying (e.g., nausea, vomiting, heartburn, persistent fullness after meals, and anorexia) appear to respond to metoclopramide within different time intervals.

Significant relief of nausea occurs early and continues to improve over a three-week period.

Relief of vomiting and anorexia may precede the relief of abdominal fullness by one week or more.

PEDIATRIC USE

Pediatric Use: Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients have not been established (see OVERDOSAGE ) Care should be exercised in administering metoclopramide to neonates since prolonged clearance may produce excessive serum concentrations (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY – Pharmacokinetics ).

In addition, neonates have reduced levels of NADH-cytochrome b 5 reductase which, in combination with the aforementioned pharmacokinetic factors, make neonates more susceptible to methemoglobinemia (see OVERDOSAGE ).

The safety profile of metoclopramide in adults cannot be extrapolated to pediatric patients.

Dystonias and other extrapyramidal reactions associated with metoclopramide are more common in the pediatric population than in adults.

(See WARNINGS and ADVERSE REACTIONS – Extrapyramidal Reactions.

)

NUSRING MOTHERS

Nursing Mothers: Metoclopramide is excreted in human milk.

Caution should be exercised when metoclopramide is administered to a nursing mother.

BOXED WARNING

WARNING: TARDIVE DYSKINESIA Treatment with metoclopramide can cause tardive dyskinesia, a serious movement disorder that is often irreversible.

The risk of developing tardive dyskinesia increases with duration of treatment and total cumulative dose.

Metoclopramide therapy should be discontinued in patients who develop signs or symptoms of tardive dyskinesia.

There is no known treatment for tardive dyskinesia.

In some patients, symptoms may lessen or resolve after metoclopramide treatment is stopped.

Treatment with metoclopramide for longer than 12 weeks should be avoided in all but rare cases where therapeutic benefit is thought to outweigh the risk of developing tardive dyskinesia.

See WARNINGS

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS

Information for Patients: The use of metoclopramide is recommended for adults only.

Metoclopramide may impair the mental and/or physical abilities required for the performance of hazardous tasks such as operating machinery or driving a motor vehicle.

The ambulatory patient should be cautioned accordingly.

For additional information, patients should be instructed to see the Medication Guide for metoclopramide tablets.

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

Therapy with metoclopramide tablets should not exceed 12 weeks in duration.

For the Relief of Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux: Administer from 10 mg to 15 mg metoclopramide hydrochloride, USP orally up to q.i.d.

30 minutes before each meal and at bedtime, depending upon symptoms being treated and clinical response (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY and INDICATIONS AND USAGE ).

If symptoms occur only intermittently or at specific times of the day, use of metoclopramide in single doses up to 20 mg prior to the provoking situation may be preferred rather than continuous treatment.

Occasionally, patients (such as elderly patients) who are more sensitive to the therapeutic or adverse effects of metoclopramide will require only 5 mg per dose.

Experience with esophageal erosions and ulcerations is limited, but healing has thus far been documented in one controlled trial using q.i.d.

therapy at 15 mg per dose, and this regimen should be used when lesions are present, so long as it is tolerated (see ADVERSE REACTIONS ).

Because of the poor correlation between symptoms and endoscopic appearance of the esophagus, therapy directed at esophageal lesions is best guided by endoscopic evaluation.

Therapy longer than 12 weeks has not been evaluated and cannot be recommended.

For the Relief of Symptoms Associated with Diabetic Gastroparesis (Diabetic Gastric Stasis) Administer 10 mg of metoclopramide 30 minutes before each meal and at bedtime for two to eight weeks, depending upon response and the likelihood of continued well-being upon drug discontinuation.

The initial route of administration should be determined by the severity of the presenting symptoms.

If only the earliest manifestations of diabetic gastric stasis are present, oral administration of metoclopramide may be initiated.

However, if severe symptoms are present, therapy should begin with metoclopramide injection (consult labeling of the injection prior to initiating parenteral administration).

Administration of the metoclopramide injection up to 10 days may be required before symptoms subside, at which time oral administration may be instituted.

Since diabetic gastric stasis is frequently recurrent, metoclopramide therapy should be reinstituted at the earliest manifestation.

Use in Patients with Renal or Hepatic Impairment: Since metoclopramide is excreted principally through the kidneys, in those patients whose creatinine clearance is below 40 mL/min, therapy should be initiated at approximately one-half the recommended dosage.

Depending upon clinical efficacy and safety considerations, the dosage may be increased or decreased as appropriate.

See OVERDOSAGE section for information regarding dialysis.

Metoclopramide undergoes minimal hepatic metabolism, except for simple conjugation.

Its safe use has been described in patients with advanced liver disease whose renal function was normal.

Сертралин 100 МГ В Таблетках для приема внутрь

WARNINGS

Clinical Worsening and Suicide Risk Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), both adult and pediatric, may experience worsening of their depression and/or the emergence of suicidal ideation and behavior (suicidality) or unusual changes in behavior, whether or not they are taking antidepressant medications, and this risk may persist until significant remission occurs.

Suicide is a known risk of depression and certain other psychiatric disorders, and these disorders themselves are the strongest predictors of suicide.

There has been a long-standing concern, however, that antidepressants may have a role in inducing worsening of depression and the emergence of suicidality in certain patients during the early phases of treatment.

Pooled analyses of short-term placebo-controlled trials of antidepressant drugs (SSRIs and others) showed that these drugs increase the risk of suicidal thinking and behavior (suicidality) in children, adolescents, and young adults (ages 18 to 24) with major depressive disorder (MDD) and other psychiatric disorders.

Short-term studies did not show an increase in the risk of suicidality with antidepressants compared to placebo in adults beyond age 24; there was a reduction with antidepressants compared to placebo in adults aged 65 and older.

The pooled analyses of placebo-controlled trials in children and adolescents with MDD, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), or other psychiatric disorders included a total of 24 short-term trials of 9 antidepressant drugs in over 4400 patients.

The pooled analyses of placebo-controlled trials in adults with MDD or other psychiatric disorders included a total of 295 short-term trials (median duration of 2 months) of 11 antidepressant drugs in over 77,000 patients.

There was considerable variation in risk of suicidality among drugs, but a tendency toward an increase in the younger patients for almost all drugs studied.

There were differences in absolute risk of suicidality across the different indications, with the highest incidence in MDD.

The risk differences (drug vs.

placebo), however, were relatively stable within age strata and across indications.

These risk differences (drug-placebo difference in the number of cases of suicidality per 1000 patients treated) are provided in Table 1.

Table 1 Age Range Drug – Placebo Difference in Number of Cases of Suicidality per 1000 Patients Treated Increases Compared to Placebo <18 14 additional cases 18 to 24 5 additional cases Decreases Compared to Placebo 25 to 64 1 fewer case ≥65 6 fewer cases No suicides occurred in any of the pediatric trials.

There were suicides in the adult trials, but the number was not sufficient to reach any conclusion about drug effect on suicide.

It is unknown whether the suicidality risk extends to longer-term use, i.e., beyond several months.

However, there is substantial evidence from placebo-controlled maintenance trials in adults with depression that the use of antidepressants can delay the recurrence of depression.

All patients being treated with antidepressants for any indication should be monitored appropriately and observed closely for clinical worsening, suicidality, and unusual changes in behavior, especially during the initial few months of a course of drug therapy, or at times of dose changes, either increases or decreases.

The following symptoms, anxiety, agitation, panic attacks, insomnia, irritability, hostility aggressiveness, impulsivity, akathisia (psychomotor restlessness), hypomania, and mania, have been reported in adult and pediatric patients being treated with antidepressants for major depressive disorder as well as for other indications, both psychiatric and nonpsychiatric.

Although a causal link between the emergence of such symptoms and either the worsening of depression and/or the emergence of suicidal impulses has not been established, there is concern that such symptoms may represent precursors to emerging suicidality.

Consideration should be given to changing the therapeutic regimen, including possibly discontinuing the medication, in patients whose depression is persistently worse, or who are experiencing emergent suicidality or symptoms that might be precursors to worsening depression or suicidality, especially if these symptoms are severe, abrupt in onset, or were not part of the patient’s presenting symptoms.

If the decision has been made to discontinue treatment, medication should be tapered, as rapidly as is feasible, but with recognition that abrupt discontinuation can be associated with certain symptoms (see PRECAUTIONS and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION – Discontinuation of Treatment with Sertraline , for a description of the risks of discontinuation of sertraline).

Families and caregivers of patients being treated with antidepressants for major depressive disorder or other indications, both psychiatric and nonpsychiatric, should be alerted about the need to monitor patients for the emergence of agitation, irritability, unusual changes in behavior, and the other symptoms described above, as well as the emergence of suicidality, and to report such symptoms immediately to health care providers.

Such monitoring should include daily observation by families and caregivers.

Prescriptions for sertraline should be written for the smallest quantity of tablets consistent with good patient management, in order to reduce the risk of overdose.

Screening Patients for Bipolar Disorder A major depressive episode may be the initial presentation of bipolar disorder.

It is generally believed (though not established in controlled trials) that treating such an episode with an antidepressant alone may increase the likelihood of precipitation of a mixed/manic episode in patients at risk for bipolar disorder.

Whether any of the symptoms described above represent such a conversion is unknown.

However, prior to initiating treatment with an antidepressant, patients with depressive symptoms should be adequately screened to determine if they are at risk for bipolar disorder; such screening should include a detailed psychiatric history, including a family history of suicide, bipolar disorder, and depression.

It should be noted that sertraline is not approved for use in treating bipolar depression.

Serotonin Syndrome The development of a potentially life-threatening serotonin syndrome has been reported with SNRIs and SSRIs, including sertraline, alone but particularly with concomitant use of other serotonergic drugs (including triptans, tricyclic antidepressants, fentanyl, lithium, tramadol, tryptophan, buspirone, and St.

John’s Wort) and with drugs that impair metabolism of serotonin (in particular, MAOIs, both those intended to treat psychiatric disorders and also others, such as linezolid and intravenous methylene blue).

Serotonin syndrome symptoms may include mental status changes (e.g., agitation, hallucinations, delirium, and coma), autonomic instability (e.g., tachycardia, labile blood pressure, dizziness, diaphoresis, flushing, hyperthermia), neuromuscular symptoms (e.g., tremor, rigidity, myoclonus, hyperreflexia, incoordination), seizures, and/or gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g., nausea, vomiting, diarrhea).

Patients should be monitored for the emergence of serotonin syndrome.

The concomitant use of sertraline with MAOIs intended to treat psychiatric disorders is contraindicated.

Sertraline should also not be started in a patient who is being treated with MAOIs such as linezolid or intravenous methylene blue.

All reports with methylene blue that provided information on the route of administration involved intravenous administration in the dose range of 1 mg/kg to 8 mg/kg.

No reports involved the administration of methylene blue by other routes (such as oral tablets or local tissue injection) or at lower doses.

There may be circumstances when it is necessary to initiate treatment with a MAOI such as linezolid or intravenous methylene blue in a patient taking sertraline.

Sertraline should be discontinued before initiating treatment with the MAOI (see CONTRAINDICATIONS and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ).

If concomitant use of sertraline with other serotonergic drugs including triptans, tricyclic antidepressants, fentanyl, lithium, tramadol, buspirone, tryptophan, and St.

John’s Wort is clinically warranted, patients should be made aware of a potential increased risk for serotonin syndrome, particularly during treatment initiation and dose increases.

Treatment with sertraline and any concomitant serotonergic agents should be discontinued immediately if the above events occur and supportive symptomatic treatment should be initiated.

Angle-Closure Glaucoma The pupillary dilation that occurs following use of many antidepressant drugs including sertraline may trigger an angle closure attack in a patient with anatomically narrow angles who does not have a patent iridectomy.

DRUG INTERACTIONS

Drug Interactions Potential Effects of Coadministration of Drugs Highly Bound to Plasma Proteins Because sertraline is tightly bound to plasma protein, the administration of sertraline hydrochloride to a patient taking another drug which is tightly bound to protein (e.g., warfarin, digitoxin) may cause a shift in plasma concentrations potentially resulting in an adverse effect.

Conversely, adverse effects may result from displacement of protein bound sertraline by other tightly bound drugs.

In a study comparing prothrombin time AUC (0 to 120 hr) following dosing with warfarin (0.75 mg/kg) before and after 21 days of dosing with either sertraline (50 to 200 mg/day) or placebo, there was a mean increase in prothrombin time of 8% relative to baseline for sertraline compared to a 1% decrease for placebo (p<0.02).

The normalization of prothrombin time for the sertraline group was delayed compared to the placebo group.

The clinical significance of this change is unknown.

Accordingly, prothrombin time should be carefully monitored when sertraline therapy is initiated or stopped.

Cimetidine In a study assessing disposition of sertraline (100 mg) on the second of 8 days of cimetidine administration (800 mg daily), there were significant increases in sertraline mean AUC (50%), C max (24%) and half-life (26%) compared to the placebo group.

The clinical significance of these changes is unknown.

CNS Active Drugs In a study comparing the disposition of intravenously administered diazepam before and after 21 days of dosing with either sertraline (50 to 200 mg/day escalating dose) or placebo, there was a 32% decrease relative to baseline in diazepam clearance for the sertraline group compared to a 19% decrease relative to baseline for the placebo group (p<0.03).

There was a 23% increase in T max for desmethyldiazepam in the sertraline group compared to a 20% decrease in the placebo group (p<0.03).

The clinical significance of these changes is unknown.

In a placebo-controlled trial in normal volunteers, the administration of two doses of sertraline did not significantly alter steady-state lithium levels or the renal clearance of lithium.

Nonetheless, at this time, it is recommended that plasma lithium levels be monitored following initiation of sertraline therapy with appropriate adjustments to the lithium dose.

In a controlled study of a single dose (2 mg) of pimozide, 200 mg sertraline (q.d.) co- administration to steady state was associated with a mean increase in pimozide AUC and C max of about 40%, but was not associated with any changes in EKG.

Since the highest recommended pimozide dose (10 mg) has not been evaluated in combination with sertraline, the effect on QT interval and PK parameters at doses higher than 2 mg at this time are not known.

While the mechanism of this interaction is unknown, due to the narrow therapeutic index of pimozide and due to the interaction noted at a low dose of pimozide, concomitant administration of sertraline and pimozide should be contraindicated (see CONTRAINDICATIONS ).

Results of a placebo-controlled trial in normal volunteers suggest that chronic administration of sertraline 200 mg/day does not produce clinically important inhibition of phenytoin metabolism.

Nonetheless, at this time, it is recommended that plasma phenytoin concentrations be monitored following initiation of sertraline therapy with appropriate adjustments to the phenytoin dose, particularly in patients with multiple underlying medical conditions and/or those receiving multiple concomitant medications.

The effect of sertraline on valproate levels has not been evaluated in clinical trials.

In the absence of such data, it is recommended that plasma valproate levels be monitored following initiation of sertraline therapy with appropriate adjustments to the valproate dose.

The risk of using sertraline in combination with other CNS active drugs has not been systematically evaluated.

Consequently, caution is advised if the concomitant administration of sertraline and such drugs is required.

There is limited controlled experience regarding the optimal timing of switching from other drugs effective in the treatment of major depressive disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, premenstrual dysphoric disorder and social anxiety disorder to sertraline.

Care and prudent medical judgment should be exercised when switching, particularly from long-acting agents.

The duration of an appropriate washout period which should intervene before switching from one selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) to another has not been established.

Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors See CONTRAINDICATIONS , WARNINGS , and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION .

Drugs Metabolized by P450 3A4 In three separate in vivo interaction studies, sertraline was co-administered with cytochrome P450 3A4 substrates, terfenadine, carbamazepine, or cisapride under steady-state conditions.

The results of these studies indicated that sertraline did not increase plasma concentrations of terfenadine, carbamazepine, or cisapride.

These data indicate that sertraline’s extent of inhibition of P450 3A4 activity is not likely to be of clinical significance.

Results of the interaction study with cisapride indicate that sertraline 200 mg (q.d.) induces the metabolism of cisapride (cisapride AUC and Cmax were reduced by about 35%).

Drugs Metabolized by P450 2D6 Many drugs effective in the treatment of major depressive disorder, e.g., the SSRIs, including sertraline, and most tricyclic antidepressant drugs effective in the treatment of major depressive disorder inhibit the biochemical activity of the drug metabolizing isozyme cytochrome P450 2D6 (debrisoquin hydroxylase), and, thus, may increase the plasma concentrations of co-administered drugs that are metabolized by P450 2D6.

The drugs for which this potential interaction is of greatest concern are those metabolized primarily by 2D6 and which have a narrow therapeutic index, e.g., the tricyclic antidepressant drugs effective in the treatment of major depressive disorder and the Type 1C antiarrhythmics propafenone and flecainide.

The extent to which this interaction is an important clinical problem depends on the extent of the inhibition of P450 2D6 by the antidepressant and the therapeutic index of the co-administered drug.

There is variability among the drugs effective in the treatment of major depressive disorder in the extent of clinically important 2D6 inhibition, and in fact sertraline at lower doses has a less prominent inhibitory effect on 2D6 than some others in the class.

Nevertheless, even sertraline has the potential for clinically important 2D6 inhibition.

Consequently, concomitant use of a drug metabolized by P450 2D6 with sertraline may require lower doses than usually prescribed for the other drug.

Furthermore, whenever sertraline is withdrawn from co-therapy, an increased dose of the co-administered drug may be required (see Tricyclic Antidepressant Drugs Effective in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder under PRECAUTIONS ).

Serotonergic Drugs See CONTRAINDICATIONS , WARNINGS , and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION .

Triptans There have been rare post marketing reports of serotonin syndrome with use of an SNRI or an SSRI and a triptan.

If concomitant treatment of SNRIs and SSRIs, including sertraline, with a triptan is clinically warranted, careful observation of the patient is advised, particularly during treatment initiation and dose increases (see WARNINGS – Serotonin Syndrome ).

Sumatriptan There have been rare post marketing reports describing patients with weakness, hyperreflexia, and incoordination following the use of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and sumatriptan.

If concomitant treatment with sumatriptan and an SSRI (e.g., citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline) is clinically warranted, appropriate observation of the patient is advised.

Tricyclic Antidepressant Drugs Effective in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (TCAs) The extent to which SSRI-TCA interactions may pose clinical problems will depend on the degree of inhibition and the pharmacokinetics of the SSRI involved.

Nevertheless, caution is indicated in the co-administration of TCAs with sertraline, because sertraline may inhibit TCA metabolism.

Plasma TCA concentrations may need to be monitored, and the dose of TCA may need to be reduced, if a TCA is co-administered with sertraline (see Drugs Metabolized by P450 2D6 under PRECAUTIONS ).

Hypoglycemic Drugs In a placebo-controlled trial in normal volunteers, administration of sertraline for 22 days (including 200 mg/day for the final 13 days) caused a statistically significant 16% decrease from baseline in the clearance of tolbutamide following an intravenous 1000 mg dose.

Sertraline administration did not noticeably change either the plasma protein binding or the apparent volume of distribution of tolbutamide, suggesting that the decreased clearance was due to a change in the metabolism of the drug.

The clinical significance of this decrease in tolbutamide clearance is unknown.

Atenolol Sertraline (100 mg) when administered to 10 healthy male subjects had no effect on the beta-adrenergic blocking ability of atenolol.

Digoxin In a placebo-controlled trial in normal volunteers, administration of sertraline for 17 days (including 200 mg/day for the last 10 days) did not change serum digoxin levels or digoxin renal clearance.

Microsomal Enzyme Induction Preclinical studies have shown sertraline to induce hepatic microsomal enzymes.

In clinical studies, sertraline was shown to induce hepatic enzymes minimally as determined by a small (5%) but statistically significant decrease in antipyrine half-life following administration of 200 mg/day for 21 days.

This small change in antipyrine half-life reflects a clinically insignificant change in hepatic metabolism.

Drugs That Interfere With Hemostasis (Non-selective NSAIDs, Aspirin, Warfarin, etc.) Serotonin release by platelets plays an important role in hemostasis.

Epidemiological studies of the case-control and cohort design that have demonstrated an association between use of psychotropic drugs that interfere with serotonin reuptake and the occurrence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding have also shown that concurrent use of an NSAID or aspirin may potentiate this risk of bleeding.

Altered anticoagulant effects, including increased bleeding, have been reported when SSRIs or SNRIs are coadministered with warfarin.

Patients receiving warfarin therapy should be carefully monitored when sertraline is initiated or discontinued.

Electroconvulsive Therapy There are no clinical studies establishing the risks or benefits of the combined use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and sertraline.

Alcohol Although sertraline did not potentiate the cognitive and psychomotor effects of alcohol in experiments with normal subjects, the concomitant use of sertraline and alcohol is not recommended.

Carcinogenesis Lifetime carcinogenicity studies were carried out in CD-1 mice and Long-Evans rats at doses up to 40 mg/kg/day.

These doses correspond to 1 times (mice) and 2 times (rats) the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) on a mg/m 2 basis.

There was a dose-related increase of liver adenomas in male mice receiving sertraline at 10 to 40 mg/kg (0.25 to 1 times the MRHD on a mg/m 2 basis).

No increase was seen in female mice or in rats of either sex receiving the same treatments, nor was there an increase in hepatocellular carcinomas.

Liver adenomas have a variable rate of spontaneous occurrence in the CD-1 mouse and are of unknown significance to humans.

There was an increase in follicular adenomas of the thyroid in female rats receiving sertraline at 40 mg/kg (2 times the MRHD on a mg/m 2 basis); this was not accompanied by thyroid hyperplasia.

While there was an increase in uterine adenocarcinomas in rats receiving sertraline at 10 to 40 mg/kg (0.5 to 2 times the MRHD on a mg/m 2 basis) compared to placebo controls, this effect was not clearly drug related.

Mutagenesis Sertraline had no genotoxic effects, with or without metabolic activation, based on the following assays: bacterial mutation assay; mouse lymphoma mutation assay; and tests for cytogenetic aberrations in vivo in mouse bone marrow and in vitro in human lymphocytes.

Impairment of Fertility A decrease in fertility was seen in one of two rat studies at a dose of 80 mg/kg (4 times the maximum recommended human dose on a mg/m 2 basis).

Pregnancy-Pregnancy Category C Reproduction studies have been performed in rats and rabbits at doses up to 80 mg/kg/day and 40 mg/kg/day, respectively.

These doses correspond to approximately 4 times the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) on a mg/m 2 basis.

There was no evidence of teratogenicity at any dose level.

When pregnant rats and rabbits were given sertraline during the period of organogenesis, delayed ossification was observed in fetuses at doses of 10 mg/kg (0.5 times the MRHD on a mg/m 2 basis) in rats and 40 mg/kg (4 times the MRHD on a mg/m 2 basis) in rabbits.

When female rats received sertraline during the last third of gestation and throughout lactation, there was an increase in the number of stillborn pups and in the number of pups dying during the first 4 days after birth.

Pup body weights were also decreased during the first four days after birth.

These effects occurred at a dose of 20 mg/kg (1 times the MRHD on a mg/m 2 basis).

The no effect dose for rat pup mortality was 10 mg/kg (0.5 times the MRHD on a mg/m 2 basis).

The decrease in pup survival was shown to be due to in utero exposure to sertraline.

The clinical significance of these effects is unknown.

There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women.

Sertraline hydrochloride should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus.

Pregnancy-Nonteratogenic Effects Neonates exposed to sertraline and other SSRIs or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), late in the third trimester have developed complications requiring prolonged hospitalization, respiratory support, and tube feeding.

Such complications can arise immediately upon delivery.

Reported clinical findings have included respiratory distress, cyanosis, apnea, seizures, temperature instability, feeding difficulty, vomiting, hypoglycemia, hypotonia, hypertonia, hyperreflexia, tremor, jitteriness, irritability, and constant crying.

These features are consistent with either a direct toxic effect of SSRIs and SNRIs or, possibly, a drug discontinuation syndrome.

It should be noted that, in some cases, the clinical picture is consistent with serotonin syndrome (see WARNINGS : Serotonin Syndrome ).

Infants exposed to SSRIs in pregnancy may have an increased risk for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN).

PPHN occurs in 1 to 2 per 1,000 live births in the general population and is associated with substantial neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Several recent epidemiologic studies suggest a positive statistical association between SSRI use (including sertraline) in pregnancy and PPHN.

Other studies do not show a significant statistical association.

Physicians should also note the results of a prospective longitudinal study of 201 pregnant women with a history of major depression, who were either on antidepressants or had received antidepressants less than 12 weeks prior to their last menstrual period, and were in remission.

Women who discontinued antidepressant medication during pregnancy showed a significant increase in relapse of their major depression compared to those women who remained on antidepressant medication throughout pregnancy.

When treating a pregnant woman with sertraline, the physician should carefully consider both the potential risks of taking an SSRI, along with the established benefits of treating depression with an antidepressant.

This decision can only be made on a case by case basis (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ).

Labor and Delivery The effect of sertraline on labor and delivery in humans is unknown.

Nursing Mothers It is not known whether, and if so in what amount, sertraline or its metabolites are excreted in human milk.

Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when sertraline is administered to a nursing woman.

Pediatric Use The efficacy of sertraline for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder was demonstrated in a 12-week, multicenter, placebo-controlled study with 187 outpatients ages 6 to 17 (see Clinical Trials under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ).

Safety and effectiveness in the pediatric population other than pediatric patients with OCD have not been established (see BOX WARNING and WARNINGS – Clinical Worsening and Suicide Risk ).

Two placebo controlled trials (n=373) in pediatric patients with MDD have been conducted with sertraline, and the data were not sufficient to support a claim for use in pediatric patients.

Anyone considering the use of sertraline in a child or adolescent must balance the potential risks with the clinical need.

The safety of sertraline use in children and adolescents with OCD, ages 6 to 18, was evaluated in a 12-week, multicenter, placebo-controlled study with 187 outpatients, ages 6 to 17, and in a flexible dose, 52 week open extension study of 137 patients, ages 6 to 18, who had completed the initial 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Sertraline was administered at doses of either 25 mg/day (children, ages 6 to 12) or 50 mg/day (adolescents, ages 13 to 18) and then titrated in weekly 25 mg/day or 50 mg/day increments, respectively, to a maximum dose of 200 mg/day based upon clinical response.

The mean dose for completers was 157 mg/day.

In the acute 12 week pediatric study and in the 52 week study, sertraline had an adverse event profile generally similar to that observed in adults.

Sertraline pharmacokinetics were evaluated in 61 pediatric patients between 6 and 17 years of age with major depressive disorder or OCD and revealed similar drug exposures to those of adults when plasma concentration was adjusted for weight (see Pharmacokinetics under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ).

Approximately 600 patients with major depressive disorder or OCD between 6 and 17 years of age have received sertraline in clinical trials, both controlled and uncontrolled.

The adverse event profile observed in these patients was generally similar to that observed in adult studies with sertraline (see ADVERSE REACTIONS ).

As with other SSRIs, decreased appetite and weight loss have been observed in association with the use of sertraline.

In a pooled analysis of two 10-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible dose (50 to 200 mg) outpatient trials for major depressive disorder (n=373), there was a difference in weight change between sertraline and placebo of roughly 1 kilogram, for both children (ages 6 to 11) and adolescents (ages 12 to 17), in both cases representing a slight weight loss for sertraline compared to a slight gain for placebo.

At baseline the mean weight for children was 39 kg for sertraline and 38.5 kg for placebo.

At baseline the mean weight for adolescents was 61.4 kg for sertraline and 62.5 kg for placebo.

There was a bigger difference between sertraline and placebo in the proportion of outliers for clinically important weight loss in children than in adolescents.

For children, about 7% had a weight loss > 7% of body weight compared to none of the placebo patients; for adolescents, about 2% had a weight loss > 7% of body weight compared to about 1% of the placebo patients.

A subset of these patients who completed the randomized controlled trials (sertraline n=99, placebo n=122) were continued into a 24-week, flexible-dose, open-label, extension study.

A mean weight loss of approximately 0.5 kg was seen during the first eight weeks of treatment for subjects with first exposure to sertraline during the open-label extension study, similar to mean weight loss observed among sertraline treated subjects during the first eight weeks of the randomized controlled trials.

The subjects continuing in the open label study began gaining weight compared to baseline by week 12 of sertraline treatment.

Those subjects who completed 34 weeks of sertraline treatment (10 weeks in a placebo controlled trial + 24 weeks open label, n=68) had weight gain that was similar to that expected using data from age-adjusted peers.

Regular monitoring of weight and growth is recommended if treatment of a pediatric patient with an SSRI is to be continued long term.

Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients below the age of 6 have not been established.

The risks, if any, that may be associated with sertraline’s use beyond 1 year in children and adolescents with OCD or major depressive disorder have not been systematically assessed.

The prescriber should be mindful that the evidence relied upon to conclude that sertraline is safe for use in children and adolescents derives from clinical studies that were 10 to 52 weeks in duration and from the extrapolation of experience gained with adult patients.

In particular, there are no studies that directly evaluate the effects of long-term sertraline use on the growth, development, and maturation of children and adolescents.

Although there is no affirmative finding to suggest that sertraline possesses a capacity to adversely affect growth, development or maturation, the absence of such findings is not compelling evidence of the absence of the potential of sertraline to have adverse effects in chronic use (see WARNINGS – Clinical Worsening and Suicide Risk ).

Geriatric Use U.S.

geriatric clinical studies of sertraline in major depressive disorder included 663 sertraline-treated subjects ≥ 65 years of age, of those, 180 were ≥ 75 years of age.

No overall differences in the pattern of adverse reactions were observed in the geriatric clinical trial subjects relative to those reported in younger subjects (see ADVERSE REACTIONS ), and other reported experience has not identified differences in safety patterns between the elderly and younger subjects.

As with all medications, greater sensitivity of some older individuals cannot be ruled out.

There were 947 subjects in placebo-controlled geriatric clinical studies of sertraline in major depressive disorder.

No overall differences in the pattern of efficacy were observed in the geriatric clinical trial subjects relative to those reported in younger subjects.

Other Adverse Events in Geriatric Patients.

In 354 geriatric subjects treated with sertraline in placebo-controlled trials, the overall profile of adverse events was generally similar to that shown in Tables 2 and 3.

Urinary tract infection was the only adverse event not appearing in Tables 2 and 3 and reported at an incidence of at least 2% and at a rate greater than placebo in placebo-controlled trials.

SSRIS and SNRIs, including sertraline, have been associated with cases of clinically significant hyponatremia in elderly patients, who may be at greater risk for this adverse event (see PRECAUTIONS , Hyponatremia ).

OVERDOSAGE

Human Experience Of 1,027 cases of overdose involving sertraline hydrochloride worldwide, alone or with other drugs, there were 72 deaths (circa 1999).

Among 634 overdoses in which sertraline hydrochloride was the only drug ingested, 8 resulted in fatal outcome, 75 completely recovered, and 27 patients experienced sequelae after overdosage to include alopecia, decreased libido, diarrhea, ejaculation disorder, fatigue, insomnia, somnolence and serotonin syndrome.

The remaining 524 cases had an unknown outcome.

The most common signs and symptoms associated with non-fatal sertraline hydrochloride overdosage were somnolence, vomiting, tachycardia, nausea, dizziness, agitation and tremor.

The largest known ingestion was 13.5 grams in a patient who took sertraline hydrochloride alone and subsequently recovered.

However, another patient who took 2.5 grams of sertraline hydrochloride alone experienced a fatal outcome.

Other important adverse events reported with sertraline hydrochloride overdose (single or multiple drugs) include bradycardia, bundle branch block, coma, convulsions, delirium, hallucinations, hypertension, hypotension, manic reaction, pancreatitis, QT-interval prolongation, serotonin syndrome, stupor, syncope and Torsade de Pointes.

Overdose Management Treatment should consist of those general measures employed in the management of overdosage with any antidepressant.

Ensure an adequate airway, oxygenation and ventilation.

Monitor cardiac rhythm and vital signs.

General supportive and symptomatic measures are also recommended.

Induction of emesis is not recommended.

Gastric lavage with a large-bore orogastric tube with appropriate airway protection, if needed, may be indicated if performed soon after ingestion, or in symptomatic patients.

Activated charcoal should be administered.

Due to large volume of distribution of this drug, forced diuresis, dialysis, hemoperfusion and exchange transfusion are unlikely to be of benefit.

No specific antidotes for sertraline are known.

In managing overdosage, consider the possibility of multiple drug involvement.

The physician should consider contacting a poison control center on the treatment of any overdose.

Telephone numbers for certified poison control centers are listed in the Physicians’ Desk Reference ® (PDR ® ).

DESCRIPTION

Sertraline hydrochloride is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) for oral administration.

It has a molecular weight of 342.7.

Sertraline hydrochloride has the following chemical name: (1S-cis)-4-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-N-methyl-1-naphthalenamine hydrochloride.

The empirical formula C 17 H 17 NCl 2 •HCl is represented by the following structural formula: Sertraline hydrochloride is a white to off white crystalline powder that is sparingly soluble in methanol and dimethyl formamide.

Sertraline hydrochloride is supplied for oral administration as film-coated tablets containing sertraline hydrochloride equivalent to 25, 50 and 100 mg of sertraline and the following inactive ingredients: D&C Yellow #10 (in 25 mg tablet), dibasic calcium phosphate anhydrous, FD&C Blue #1 (in 25 mg tablet), FD&C Blue #2 (in 50 mg tablet), FD&C Red #40 (in 25 mg tablet), hydroxypropyl cellulose, hypromellose, iron oxide yellow (in 100 mg tablet), magnesium stearate, microcrystalline cellulose, polyethylene glycol, polysorbate 80, sodium starch glycolate and titanium dioxide.

Image 1

HOW SUPPLIED

Sertraline capsule-shaped, film-coated tablets, containing sertraline hydrochloride equivalent to 25, 50 and 100 mg of sertraline, are packaged in bottles as well as unit dose blisters.

Sertraline Hydrochloride Tablets USP, 25 mg: green colored, capsule shaped, biconvex, film-coated tablets, debossed with ‘L’ and ‘U’ on either side of the breakline on one side and ‘D01’ on the other side.

NDC 68180-351-06 Bottles of 30 NDC 68180-351-08 Bottles of 50 NDC 68180-351-09 Bottles of 90 NDC 68180-351-01 Bottles of 100 NDC 68180-351-03 Bottles of 1000 Sertraline Hydrochloride Tablets USP, 50 mg: blue colored, capsule shaped, biconvex, film-coated tablets, debossed with ‘L’ and ‘U’ on either side of the breakline on one side and ‘D02’ on the other side.

NDC 68180-352-06 Bottles of 30 NDC 68180-352-09 Bottles of 90 NDC 68180-352-01 Bottles of 100 NDC 68180-352-02 Bottles of 500 NDC 68180-352-03 Bottles of 1000 NDC 68180-352-05 Bottles of 5000 NDC 68180-352-11 Box containing 10 x 10’s unit dose blisters Sertraline Hydrochloride Tablets USP, 100 mg: yellow colored, capsule shaped, biconvex, film-coated tablets, debossed with ‘L’ and ‘U’ on either side of the breakline on one side and ‘D03’ on the other side.

NDC 68180-353-06 Bottles of 30 NDC 68180-353-09 Bottles of 90 NDC 68180-353-01 Bottles of 100 NDC 68180-353-02 Bottles of 500 NDC 68180-353-03 Bottles of 1000 NDC 68180-353-05 Bottles of 5000 NDC 68180-353-11 Box containing 10 x 10’s unit dose blisters Store at 20° to 25°C (68° to 77°F) [see USP Controlled Room Temperature].

Manufactured for: Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Baltimore, Maryland 21202 United States MADE IN INDIA Revised: December 2014 ID#: 239380

GERIATRIC USE

Geriatric Use U.S.

geriatric clinical studies of sertraline in major depressive disorder included 663 sertraline-treated subjects ≥ 65 years of age, of those, 180 were ≥ 75 years of age.

No overall differences in the pattern of adverse reactions were observed in the geriatric clinical trial subjects relative to those reported in younger subjects (see ADVERSE REACTIONS ), and other reported experience has not identified differences in safety patterns between the elderly and younger subjects.

As with all medications, greater sensitivity of some older individuals cannot be ruled out.

There were 947 subjects in placebo-controlled geriatric clinical studies of sertraline in major depressive disorder.

No overall differences in the pattern of efficacy were observed in the geriatric clinical trial subjects relative to those reported in younger subjects.

Other Adverse Events in Geriatric Patients.

In 354 geriatric subjects treated with sertraline in placebo-controlled trials, the overall profile of adverse events was generally similar to that shown in Tables 2 and 3.

Urinary tract infection was the only adverse event not appearing in Tables 2 and 3 and reported at an incidence of at least 2% and at a rate greater than placebo in placebo-controlled trials.

SSRIS and SNRIs, including sertraline, have been associated with cases of clinically significant hyponatremia in elderly patients, who may be at greater risk for this adverse event (see PRECAUTIONS , Hyponatremia ).

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

Major Depressive Disorder Sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP are indicated for the treatment of major depressive disorder in adults.

The efficacy of sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP in the treatment of a major depressive episode was established in six to eight week controlled trials of adult outpatients whose diagnoses corresponded most closely to the DSM-III category of major depressive disorder (see Clinical Trials under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ).

A major depressive episode implies a prominent and relatively persistent depressed or dysphoric mood that usually interferes with daily functioning (nearly every day for at least 2 weeks); it should include at least 4 of the following 8 symptoms: change in appetite, change in sleep, psychomotor agitation or retardation, loss of interest in usual activities or decrease in sexual drive, increased fatigue, feelings of guilt or worthlessness, slowed thinking or impaired concentration, and a suicide attempt or suicidal ideation.

The antidepressant action of sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP in hospitalized depressed patients has not been adequately studied.

The efficacy of sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP in maintaining an antidepressant response for up to 44 weeks following 8 weeks of open-label acute treatment (52 weeks total) was demonstrated in a placebo-controlled trial.

The usefulness of the drug in patients receiving sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP for extended periods should be reevaluated periodically (see Clinical Trials under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ).

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP are indicated for the treatment of obsessions and compulsions in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), as defined in the DSM-III-R; i.e., the obsessions or compulsions cause marked distress, are time-consuming, or significantly interfere with social or occupational functioning.

The efficacy of sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP were established in 12-week trials with obsessive-compulsive outpatients having diagnoses of obsessive-compulsive disorder as defined according to DSM-III or DSM-III-R criteria (see Clinical Trials under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ).

Obsessive-compulsive disorder is characterized by recurrent and persistent ideas, thoughts, impulses, or images (obsessions) that are ego-dystonic and/or repetitive, purposeful, and intentional behaviors (compulsions) that are recognized by the person as excessive or unreasonable.

The efficacy of sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP in maintaining a response, in patients with OCD who responded during a 52-week treatment phase while taking sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP and were then observed for relapse during a period of up to 28 weeks, was demonstrated in a placebo-controlled trial (see Clinical Trials under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ).

Nevertheless, the physician who elects to use sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP for extended periods should periodically re-evaluate the long-term usefulness of the drug for the individual patient (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ).

Panic Disorder Sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP are indicated for the treatment of panic disorder in adults, with or without agoraphobia, as defined in DSM-IV.

Panic disorder is characterized by the occurrence of unexpected panic attacks and associated concern about having additional attacks, worry about the implications or consequences of the attacks, and/or a significant change in behavior related to the attacks.

The efficacy of sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP were established in three 10 to 12 week trials in adult panic disorder patients whose diagnoses corresponded to the DSM-III-R category of panic disorder (see Clinical Trials under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ).

Panic disorder (DSM-IV) is characterized by recurrent unexpected panic attacks, i.e., a discrete period of intense fear or discomfort in which four (or more) of the following symptoms develop abruptly and reach a peak within 10 minutes: (1) palpitations, pounding heart, or accelerated heart rate; (2) sweating; (3) trembling or shaking; (4) sensations of shortness of breath or smothering; (5) feeling of choking; (6) chest pain or discomfort; (7) nausea or abdominal distress; (8) feeling dizzy, unsteady, lightheaded, or faint; (9) derealization (feelings of unreality) or depersonalization (being detached from oneself); (10) fear of losing control; (11) fear of dying; (12) paresthesias (numbness or tingling sensations); (13) chills or hot flushes.

The efficacy of sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP in maintaining a response, in adult patients with panic disorder who responded during a 52-week treatment phase while taking sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP and were then observed for relapse during a period of up to 28 weeks, was demonstrated in a placebo-controlled trial (see Clinical Trials under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ).

Nevertheless, the physician who elects to use sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP for extended periods should periodically re-evaluate the long-term usefulness of the drug for the individual patient (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ).

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP are indicated for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in adults.

The efficacy of sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP in the treatment of PTSD was established in two 12-week placebo-controlled trials of adult outpatients whose diagnosis met criteria for the DSM-III-R category of PTSD (see Clinical Trials under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ).

PTSD, as defined by DSM-III-R/IV, requires exposure to a traumatic event that involved actual or threatened death or serious injury, or threat to the physical integrity of self or others, and a response which involves intense fear, helplessness, or horror.

Symptoms that occur as a result of exposure to the traumatic event include reexperiencing of the event in the form of intrusive thoughts, flashbacks or dreams, and intense psychological distress and physiological reactivity on exposure to cues to the event; avoidance of situations reminiscent of the traumatic event, inability to recall details of the event, and/or numbing of general responsiveness manifested as diminished interest in significant activities, estrangement from others, restricted range of affect, or sense of foreshortened future; and symptoms of autonomic arousal including hypervigilance, exaggerated startle response, sleep disturbance, impaired concentration, and irritability or outbursts of anger.

A PTSD diagnosis requires that the symptoms are present for at least a month and that they cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.

The efficacy of sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP in maintaining a response in adult patients with PTSD for up to 28 weeks following 24 weeks of open-label treatment was demonstrated in a placebo-controlled trial.

Nevertheless, the physician who elects to use sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP for extended periods should periodically re-evaluate the long-term usefulness of the drug for the individual patient (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ).

Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD) Sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP are indicated for the treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) in adults.

The efficacy of sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP in the treatment of PMDD was established in 2 placebo-controlled trials of female adult outpatients treated for 3 menstrual cycles who met criteria for the DSM-III-R/IV category of PMDD (see Clinical Trials under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ).

The essential features of PMDD include markedly depressed mood, anxiety or tension, affective lability, and persistent anger or irritability.

Other features include decreased interest in activities, difficulty concentrating, lack of energy, change in appetite or sleep, and feeling out of control.

Physical symptoms associated with PMDD include breast tenderness, headache, joint and muscle pain, bloating and weight gain.

These symptoms occur regularly during the luteal phase and remit within a few days following onset of menses; the disturbance markedly interferes with work or school or with usual social activities and relationships with others.

In making the diagnosis, care should be taken to rule out other cyclical mood disorders that may be exacerbated by treatment with an antidepressant.

The effectiveness of sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP in long-term use, that is, for more than 3 menstrual cycles, has not been systematically evaluated in controlled trials.

Therefore, the physician who elects to use sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP for extended periods should periodically re-evaluate the long-term usefulness of the drug for the individual patient (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ).

Social Anxiety Disorder Sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP are indicated for the treatment of social anxiety disorder, also known as social phobia in adults.

The efficacy of sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP in the treatment of social anxiety disorder was established in two placebo-controlled trials of adult outpatients with a diagnosis of social anxiety disorder as defined by DSM-IV criteria (see Clinical Trials under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ).

Social anxiety disorder, as defined by DSM-IV, is characterized by marked and persistent fear of social or performance situations involving exposure to unfamiliar people or possible scrutiny by others and by fears of acting in a humiliating or embarrassing way.

Exposure to the feared social situation almost always provokes anxiety and feared social or performance situations are avoided or else are endured with intense anxiety or distress.

In addition, patients recognize that the fear is excessive or unreasonable and the avoidance and anticipatory anxiety of the feared situation is associated with functional impairment or marked distress.

The efficacy of sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP in maintaining a response in adult patients with social anxiety disorder for up to 24 weeks following 20 weeks of sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP treatment was demonstrated in a placebo-controlled trial.

Physicians who prescribe sertraline hydrochloride tablets USP for extended periods should periodically re-evaluate the long-term usefulness of the drug for the individual patient (see Clinical Trials under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ).

PEDIATRIC USE

Pediatric Use The efficacy of sertraline for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder was demonstrated in a 12-week, multicenter, placebo-controlled study with 187 outpatients ages 6 to 17 (see Clinical Trials under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ).

Safety and effectiveness in the pediatric population other than pediatric patients with OCD have not been established (see BOX WARNING and WARNINGS – Clinical Worsening and Suicide Risk ).

Two placebo controlled trials (n=373) in pediatric patients with MDD have been conducted with sertraline, and the data were not sufficient to support a claim for use in pediatric patients.

Anyone considering the use of sertraline in a child or adolescent must balance the potential risks with the clinical need.

The safety of sertraline use in children and adolescents with OCD, ages 6 to 18, was evaluated in a 12-week, multicenter, placebo-controlled study with 187 outpatients, ages 6 to 17, and in a flexible dose, 52 week open extension study of 137 patients, ages 6 to 18, who had completed the initial 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Sertraline was administered at doses of either 25 mg/day (children, ages 6 to 12) or 50 mg/day (adolescents, ages 13 to 18) and then titrated in weekly 25 mg/day or 50 mg/day increments, respectively, to a maximum dose of 200 mg/day based upon clinical response.

The mean dose for completers was 157 mg/day.

In the acute 12 week pediatric study and in the 52 week study, sertraline had an adverse event profile generally similar to that observed in adults.

Sertraline pharmacokinetics were evaluated in 61 pediatric patients between 6 and 17 years of age with major depressive disorder or OCD and revealed similar drug exposures to those of adults when plasma concentration was adjusted for weight (see Pharmacokinetics under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ).

Approximately 600 patients with major depressive disorder or OCD between 6 and 17 years of age have received sertraline in clinical trials, both controlled and uncontrolled.

The adverse event profile observed in these patients was generally similar to that observed in adult studies with sertraline (see ADVERSE REACTIONS ).

As with other SSRIs, decreased appetite and weight loss have been observed in association with the use of sertraline.

In a pooled analysis of two 10-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible dose (50 to 200 mg) outpatient trials for major depressive disorder (n=373), there was a difference in weight change between sertraline and placebo of roughly 1 kilogram, for both children (ages 6 to 11) and adolescents (ages 12 to 17), in both cases representing a slight weight loss for sertraline compared to a slight gain for placebo.

At baseline the mean weight for children was 39 kg for sertraline and 38.5 kg for placebo.

At baseline the mean weight for adolescents was 61.4 kg for sertraline and 62.5 kg for placebo.

There was a bigger difference between sertraline and placebo in the proportion of outliers for clinically important weight loss in children than in adolescents.

For children, about 7% had a weight loss > 7% of body weight compared to none of the placebo patients; for adolescents, about 2% had a weight loss > 7% of body weight compared to about 1% of the placebo patients.

A subset of these patients who completed the randomized controlled trials (sertraline n=99, placebo n=122) were continued into a 24-week, flexible-dose, open-label, extension study.

A mean weight loss of approximately 0.5 kg was seen during the first eight weeks of treatment for subjects with first exposure to sertraline during the open-label extension study, similar to mean weight loss observed among sertraline treated subjects during the first eight weeks of the randomized controlled trials.

The subjects continuing in the open label study began gaining weight compared to baseline by week 12 of sertraline treatment.

Those subjects who completed 34 weeks of sertraline treatment (10 weeks in a placebo controlled trial + 24 weeks open label, n=68) had weight gain that was similar to that expected using data from age-adjusted peers.

Regular monitoring of weight and growth is recommended if treatment of a pediatric patient with an SSRI is to be continued long term.

Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients below the age of 6 have not been established.

The risks, if any, that may be associated with sertraline’s use beyond 1 year in children and adolescents with OCD or major depressive disorder have not been systematically assessed.

The prescriber should be mindful that the evidence relied upon to conclude that sertraline is safe for use in children and adolescents derives from clinical studies that were 10 to 52 weeks in duration and from the extrapolation of experience gained with adult patients.

In particular, there are no studies that directly evaluate the effects of long-term sertraline use on the growth, development, and maturation of children and adolescents.

Although there is no affirmative finding to suggest that sertraline possesses a capacity to adversely affect growth, development or maturation, the absence of such findings is not compelling evidence of the absence of the potential of sertraline to have adverse effects in chronic use (see WARNINGS – Clinical Worsening and Suicide Risk ).

NUSRING MOTHERS

Nursing Mothers It is not known whether, and if so in what amount, sertraline or its metabolites are excreted in human milk.

Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when sertraline is administered to a nursing woman.

BOXED WARNING

Suicidality and Antidepressant Drugs Antidepressants increased the risk compared to placebo of suicidal thinking and behavior (suicidality) in children, adolescents, and young adults in short-term studies of major depressive disorder (MDD) and other psychiatric disorders.

Anyone considering the use of sertraline or any other antidepressant in a child, adolescent, or young adult must balance this risk with the clinical need.

Short-term studies did not show an increase in the risk of suicidality with antidepressants compared to placebo in adults beyond age 24; there was a reduction in risk with antidepressants compared to placebo in adults aged 65 and older.

Depression and certain other psychiatric disorders are themselves associated with increases in the risk of suicide.

Patients of all ages who are started on antidepressant therapy should be monitored appropriately and observed closely for clinical worsening, suicidality, or unusual changes in behavior.

Families and caregivers should be advised of the need for close observation and communication with the prescriber.

Sertraline is not approved for use in pediatric patients except for patients with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD).

(See WARNINGS : Clinical Worsening and Suicide Risk , PRECAUTIONS : Information for Patients , and PRECAUTIONS : Pediatric Use )

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS

Information for Patients Prescribers or other health professionals should inform patients, their families, and their caregivers about the benefits and risks associated with treatment with sertraline and should counsel them in its appropriate use.

A patient Medication Guide about “Antidepressant Medicines, Depression and other Serious Mental Illness, and Suicidal Thoughts or Actions: is available for sertraline.

The prescriber or health professional should instruct patients, their families, and their caregivers to read the Medication Guide and should assist them in understanding its contents.

Patients should be given the opportunity to discuss the contents of the Medication Guide and to obtain answers to any questions they may have.

The complete text of the Medication Guide is reprinted at the end of this document.

Patients should be advised of the following issues and asked to alert their prescriber if these occur while taking sertraline.

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

Initial Treatment Dosage for Adults Major Depressive Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Sertraline treatment should be administered at a dose of 50 mg once daily.

Panic Disorder, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Social Anxiety Disorder: Sertraline treatment should be initiated with a dose of 25 mg once daily.

After one week, the dose should be increased to 50 mg once daily.

While a relationship between dose and effect has not been established for major depressive disorder, OCD, panic disorder, PTSD or social anxiety disorder, patients were dosed in a range of 50 to 200 mg/day in the clinical trials demonstrating the effectiveness of sertraline for the treatment of these indications.

Consequently, a dose of 50 mg, administered once daily, is recommended as the initial therapeutic dose.

Patients not responding to a 50 mg dose may benefit from dose increases up to a maximum of 200 mg/day.

Given the 24 hour elimination half-life of sertraline, dose changes should not occur at intervals of less than 1 week.

Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder: Sertraline treatment should be initiated with a dose of 50 mg/day, either daily throughout the menstrual cycle or limited to the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, depending on physician assessment.

While a relationship between dose and effect has not been established for PMDD, patients were dosed in the range of 50 to 150 mg/day with dose increases at the onset of each new menstrual cycle (see Clinical Trials under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ).

Patients not responding to a 50 mg/day dose may benefit from dose increases (at 50 mg increments/menstrual cycle) up to 150 mg/day when dosing daily throughout the menstrual cycle, or 100 mg/day when dosing during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle.

If a 100 mg/day dose has been established with luteal phase dosing, a 50 mg/day titration step for three days should be utilized at the beginning of each luteal phase dosing period.

Sertraline should be administered once daily, either in the morning or evening.

Dosage for Pediatric Population (Children and Adolescents) Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Sertraline treatment should be initiated with a dose of 25 mg once daily in children (ages 6 to 12) and at a dose of 50 mg once daily in adolescents (ages 13 to 17).

While a relationship between dose and effect has not been established for OCD, patients were dosed in a range of 25 to 200 mg/day in the clinical trials demonstrating the effectiveness of sertraline for pediatric patients (6 to 17 years) with OCD.

Patients not responding to an initial dose of 25 or 50 mg/day may benefit from dose increases up to a maximum of 200 mg/day.

For children with OCD, their generally lower body weights compared to adults should be taken into consideration in advancing the dose, in order to avoid excess dosing.

Given the 24 hour elimination half-life of sertraline, dose changes should not occur at intervals of less than 1 week.

Sertraline should be administered once daily, either in the morning or evening.

Maintenance/Continuation/Extended Treatment Major Depressive Disorder It is generally agreed that acute episodes of major depressive disorder require several months or longer of sustained pharmacologic therapy beyond response to the acute episode.

Systematic evaluation of sertraline has demonstrated that its antidepressant efficacy is maintained for periods of up to 44 weeks following 8 weeks of initial treatment at a dose of 50 to 200 mg/day (mean dose of 70 mg/day) (see Clinical Trials under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ).

It is not known whether the dose of sertraline needed for maintenance treatment is identical to the dose needed to achieve an initial response.

Patients should be periodically reassessed to determine the need for maintenance treatment.

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder It is generally agreed that PTSD requires several months or longer of sustained pharmacological therapy beyond response to initial treatment.

Systematic evaluation of sertraline has demonstrated that its efficacy in PTSD is maintained for periods of up to 28 weeks following 24 weeks of treatment at a dose of 50 to 200 mg/day (see Clinical Trials under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ).

It is not known whether the dose of sertraline needed for maintenance treatment is identical to the dose needed to achieve an initial response.

Patients should be periodically reassessed to determine the need for maintenance treatment.

Social Anxiety Disorder Social anxiety disorder is a chronic condition that may require several months or longer of sustained pharmacological therapy beyond response to initial treatment.

Systematic evaluation of sertraline has demonstrated that its efficacy in social anxiety disorder is maintained for periods of up to 24 weeks following 20 weeks of treatment at a dose of 50 to 200 mg/day (see Clinical Trials under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ).

Dosage adjustments should be made to maintain patients on the lowest effective dose and patients should be periodically reassessed to determine the need for long-term treatment.

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Panic Disorder It is generally agreed that OCD and Panic Disorder require several months or longer of sustained pharmacological therapy beyond response to initial treatment.

Systematic evaluation of continuing sertraline for periods of up to 28 weeks in patients with OCD and Panic Disorder who have responded while taking sertraline during initial treatment phases of 24 to 52 weeks of treatment at a dose range of 50 to 200 mg/day has demonstrated a benefit of such maintenance treatment (see Clinical Trials under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ).

It is not known whether the dose of sertraline needed for maintenance treatment is identical to the dose needed to achieve an initial response.

Nevertheless, patients should be periodically reassessed to determine the need for maintenance treatment.

Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder The effectiveness of sertraline in long-term use, that is, for more than 3 menstrual cycles, has not been systematically evaluated in controlled trials.

However, as women commonly report that symptoms worsen with age until relieved by the onset of menopause, it is reasonable to consider continuation of a responding patient.

Dosage adjustments, which may include changes between dosage regimens (e.g., daily throughout the menstrual cycle versus during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle), may be needed to maintain the patient on the lowest effective dosage and patients should be periodically reassessed to determine the need for continued treatment.

Switching a Patient to or from a Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitor (MAOI) Intended to Treat Psychiatric Disorders At least 14 days should elapse between discontinuation of an MAOI intended to treat psychiatric disorders and initiation of therapy with sertraline.

Conversely, at least 14 days should be allowed after stopping sertraline before starting an MAOI intended to treat psychiatric disorders (see CONTRAINDICATIONS ).

Use of Sertraline with other MAOIs such as Linezolid or Methylene Blue Do not start sertraline in a patient who is being treated with linezolid or intravenous methylene blue because there is increased risk of serotonin syndrome.

In a patient who requires more urgent treatment of a psychiatric condition, other interventions, including hospitalization, should be considered (see CONTRAINDICATIONS ).

In some cases, a patient already receiving sertraline therapy may require urgent treatment with linezolid or intravenous methylene blue.

If acceptable alternatives to linezolid or intravenous methylene blue treatment are not available and the potential benefits of linezolid or intravenous methylene blue treatment are judged to outweigh the risks of serotonin syndrome in a particular patient, sertraline should be stopped promptly, and linezolid or intravenous methylene blue can be administered.

The patient should be monitored for symptoms of serotonin syndrome for 2 weeks or until 24 hours after the last dose of linezolid or intravenous methylene blue, whichever comes first.

Therapy with sertraline hydrochloride tablets may be resumed 24 hours after the last dose of linezolid or intravenous methylene blue (see WARNINGS ).

The risk of administering methylene blue by non-intravenous routes (such as oral tablets or by local injection) or in intravenous doses much lower than 1 mg/kg with sertraline is unclear.

The clinician should, nevertheless, be aware of the possibility of emergent symptoms of serotonin syndrome with such use (see WARNINGS ).

Special Populations Dosage for Hepatically Impaired Patients The use of sertraline in patients with liver disease should be approached with caution.

The effects of sertraline in patients with moderate and severe hepatic impairment have not been studied.

If sertraline is administered to patients with liver impairment, a lower or less frequent dose should be used (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY and PRECAUTIONS ).

Treatment of Pregnant Women During the Third Trimester Neonates exposed to sertraline and other SSRIs or SNRIs, late in the third trimester have developed complications requiring prolonged hospitalization, respiratory support, and tube feeding (see PRECAUTIONS ).

When treating pregnant women with sertraline during the third trimester, the physician should carefully consider the potential risks and benefits of treatment.

Discontinuation of Treatment with Sertraline Symptoms associated with discontinuation of sertraline and other SSRIs and SNRIs, have been reported (see PRECAUTIONS ).

Patients should be monitored for these symptoms when discontinuing treatment.

A gradual reduction in the dose rather than abrupt cessation is recommended whenever possible.

If intolerable symptoms occur following a decrease in the dose or upon discontinuation of treatment, then resuming the previously prescribed dose may be considered.

Subsequently, the physician may continue decreasing the dose but at a more gradual rate.

butorphanol tartrate 1 MG in 1 ML Injection

WARNINGS

Patients Dependent on Narcotics Because of its opioid antagonist properties, butorphanol is not recommended for use in patients dependent on narcotics.

Such patients should have an adequate period of withdrawal from opioid drugs prior to beginning butorphanol therapy.

In patients taking opioid analgesics chronically, butorphanol has precipitated withdrawal symptoms such as anxiety, agitation, mood changes, hallucinations, dysphoria, weakness and diarrhea.

Because of the difficulty in assessing opioid tolerance in patients who have recently received repeated doses of narcotic analgesic medication, caution should be used in the administration of butorphanol to such patients.

Drug Abuse and Dependence Drug Abuse Butorphanol tartrate, by all routes of administration, has been associated with episodes of abuse.

Of the cases received, there were more reports of abuse with the nasal spray formulation than with the injectable formulation.

Physical Dependence, Tolerance and Withdrawal Prolonged, continuous use of butorphanol tartrate may result in physical dependence or tolerance (a decrease in response to a given dose).

Abrupt cessation of use by patients with physical dependence may result in symptoms of withdrawal.

Note —Proper patient selection, dose and prescribing limitations, appropriate directions for use, and frequent monitoring are important to minimize the risk of abuse and physical dependence.

(See DRUG ABUSE AND DEPENDENCE section below.)

DRUG INTERACTIONS

Drug Interactions Concurrent use of butorphanol with central nervous system depressants (e.g., alcohol, barbiturates, tranquilizers, and antihistamines) may result in increased central nervous system depressant effects.

When used concurrently with such drugs, the dose of butorphanol should be the smallest effective dose and the frequency of dosing reduced as much as possible when administered concomitantly with drugs that potentiate the action of opioids.

It is not known if the effects of butorphanol are altered by concomitant medications that affect hepatic metabolism of drugs (erythromycin, theophylline, etc.), but physicians should be alert to the possibility that a smaller initial dose and longer intervals between doses may be needed.

No information is available about the use of butorphanol concurrently with MAO inhibitors.

OVERDOSAGE

Clinical Manifestations The clinical manifestations of butorphanol overdose are those of opioid drugs in general.

Consequences of overdose vary with the amount of butorphanol ingested and individual response to the effects of opiates.

The most serious symptoms are hypoventilation, cardiovascular insufficiency, coma and death.

Butorphanol overdose may be associated with ingestion of multiple drugs (see ADVERSE REACTIONS : Postmarketing Experience section).

Overdosage can occur due to accidental or intentional misuse of butorphanol, especially in young children who may gain access to the drug in the home.

Treatment The management of suspected butorphanol overdosage includes maintenance of adequate ventilation, peripheral perfusion, normal body temperature, and protection of the airway.

Patients should be under continuous observation with adequate serial measures of mental state, responsiveness and vital signs.

Oxygen and ventilatory assistance should be available with continual monitoring by pulse oximetry if indicated.

In the presence of coma, placement of an artificial airway may be required.

An adequate intravenous portal should be maintained to facilitate treatment of hypotension associated with vasodilation.

The use of a specific opioid antagonist such as naloxone should be considered.

As the duration of butorphanol action usually exceeds the duration of action of naloxone, repeated dosing with naloxone may be required.

In managing cases of suspected butorphanol overdosage, the possibility of multiple drug ingestion should always be considered.

DESCRIPTION

Butorphanol tartrate is a synthetically derived opioid agonist-antagonist analgesic of the phenanthrene series.

The chemical name is (-)-17-(Cyclobutylmethyl)morphinan-3,14-diol D-(-)-tartrate(1:1)(salt).

The molecular formula is C 21 H 29 NO 2 •C 4 H 6 O 6 , which corresponds to a molecular weight of 477.56 and the following structural formula: Butorphanol tartrate is a white crystalline substance.

The dose is expressed as the tartrate salt.

One milligram of the salt is equivalent to 0.68 mg of the free base.

The n-octanol/aqueous buffer partition coefficient of butorphanol is 180:1 at pH 7.5.

Butorphanol tartrate injection USP is a sterile, parenteral, aqueous solution of butorphanol tartrate for intravenous or intramuscular administration.

In addition to 1 or 2 mg of butorphanol tartrate, each mL of solution contains 3.3 mg of citric acid, 7.29 mg sodium citrate, and 6.4 mg sodium chloride, and 0.1 mg benzethonium chloride (in multiple dose vial only) as a preservative.

The pH range is 3.5 to 5.0.

structural formula

CLINICAL STUDIES

Clinical Trials The effectiveness of opioid analgesics varies in different pain syndromes.

Studies with butorphanol tatrate injection have been performed in postoperative (primarily abdominal and orthopedic) pain and pain during labor and delivery, as preoperative and preanesthetic medication, and as a supplement to balanced anesthesia (see below).

HOW SUPPLIED

Butorphanol Tartrate Injection USP for IM or IV use is available as follows: NDC 55390-183-01 – 1 mg/mL, 1 mL vial, carton of 10.

NDC 55390-184-01 – 2 mg/mL, 1 mL vial, carton of 10.

NDC 55390-184-02 – 4 mg/2 mL, 2 mL vial, carton of 10.

NDC 55390-185-10 – 2 mg/mL, 10 mL multiple dose vial, individually boxed.

Store at room temperature, 15° to 30°C (59° to 86°F).

See USP.

Parenteral drug products should be inspected visually for particulate matter and discoloration prior to administration, whenever solution and container permit.

Protect from light.

GERIATRIC USE

Geriatric Use Of the approximately 1500 patients treated with butorphanol tartrate injection in clinical studies, 15% were 61 years of age or older and 1% were 76 years or older.

Due to changes in clearance, the mean half-life of butorphanol is increased by 25% in patients over the age of 65 years (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY , Pharmacokinetics section).

Elderly patients may be more sensitive to the side effects of butorphanol.

There are insufficient efficacy data for patients ≥65 years to determine whether they respond differently from younger patients.

The initial dose of butorphanol tartrate injection recommended for elderly patients should generally be half the recommended adult dose (0.5 mg IV and 1 mg IM).

Repeat dose should be determined by the patient’s response rather than at fixed intervals, but will generally be no less than 6 hours apart (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY , Individualization of Dosage section).

Butorphanol and its metabolites are known to be substantially excreted by the kidney, and the risk of toxic reactions to this drug may be greater in patients with impaired renal functions.

Because elderly patients are more likely to have decreased renal function, care should be taken in dosage selection.

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

Butorphanol tartrate injection is indicated for the management of pain when the use of an opioid analgesic is appropriate.

Butorphanol tartrate injection is also indicated as preoperative or preanesthetic medication, as a supplement to balanced anesthesia, and for the relief of pain during labor.

PEDIATRIC USE

Pediatric Use Butorphanol is not recommended for use in patients below 18 years of age because safety and efficacy have not been established in this population.

PREGNANCY

Pregnancy Teratogenic Effects: Pregnancy Category C Reproduction studies in mice, rats and rabbits during organogenesis did not reveal any teratogenic potential to butorphanol.

However, pregnant rats treated subcutaneously with butorphanol at 1 mg/kg (5.9 mg/m 2 ) had a higher frequency of stillbirths than controls.

Butorphanol at 30 mg/kg/oral (360 mg/m 2 ) and 60 mg/kg/oral(720 mg/m 2 ) also showed higher incidences of post-implantation loss in rabbits.

There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of butorphanol tartrate in pregnant women before 37 weeks of gestation.

Butorphanol tartrate injection should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the infant.

NUSRING MOTHERS

Nursing Mothers Butorphanol has been detected in milk following administration of butorphanol tartrate injection to nursing mothers.

The amount an infant would receive is probably clinically insignificant (estimated 4 mcg/L of milk in a mother receiving 2 mg IM four times a day).

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS

Information for Patients (see PRECAUTIONS : Use in Ambulatory Patients ).

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

Factors to be considered in determining the dose are age, body weight, physical status, underlying pathological condition, use of other drugs, type of anesthesia to be used, and surgical procedure involved.

Use in the elderly, patients with hepatic or renal disease, or in labor requires extra caution (see PRECAUTIONS section and CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY : Individualization of Dosage section).

The following doses are for patients who do not have impaired hepatic or renal function and who are not on CNS active agents.

Use for Pain Intravenous: The usual recommended single dose for IV administration is 1 mg repeated every three to four hours, as necessary.

The effective dosage range, depending on the severity of pain, is 0.5 mg to 2 mg repeated every 3 to 4 hours.

Intramuscular: The usual recommended single dose for IM administration is 2 mg in patients who will be able to remain recumbent, in the event drowsiness or dizziness occurs.

This may be repeated every 3 to 4 hours as necessary.

The effective dosage range depending on the severity of pain is 1 mg to 4 mg repeated every 3 to 4 hours.

There are insufficient clinical data to recommend single doses above 4 mg.

Use as Preoperative/Preanesthetic Medication The preoperative medication dosage of butorphanol tartrate injection should be individualized (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY , Individualization of Dosage section).

The usual adult dose is 2 mg IM, administered 60 to 90 minutes before surgery.

This is approximately equivalent in sedative effect to 10 mg morphine or 80 mg meperidine.

Use in Balanced Anesthesia The usual dose of butorphanol tartrate injection is 2 mg IV shortly before induction and/or 0.5 mg to 1 mg IV in increments during anesthesia.

The increment may be higher, up to 0.06 mg/kg (4 mg/70 kg), depending on previous sedative, analgesic, and hypnotic drugs administered.

The total dose of butorphanol tartrate will vary; however, patients seldom require less than 4 mg or more than 12.5 mg (approximately 0.06 to 0.18 mg/kg).

Labor In patients at full term in early labor a 1 to 2 mg dose of butorphanol tartrate IV or IM may be administered and repeated after 4 hours.

Alternative analgesia should be used for pain associated with delivery or if delivery is expected to occur within 4 hours.

If concomitant use of butorphanol tartrate with drugs that may potentiate its effects is deemed necessary (see PRECAUTIONS : Drug Interactions section) the lowest effective dose should be employed.

Safety and Handling Butorphanol tartrate injection is supplied in sealed delivery systems that have a low risk of accidental exposure to health care workers.

Ordinary care should be taken to avoid aerosol generation while preparing a syringe for use.

Following skin contact, rinsing with cool water is recommended.

The disposal of Schedule IV controlled substances must be consistent with State and Federal Regulations.

SUMAtriptan succinate 25 MG Oral Tablet

WARNINGS

IMITREX Tablets should only be used where a clear diagnosis of migraine headache has been established.

Risk of Myocardial Ischemia and/or Infarction and Other Adverse Cardiac Events Sumatriptan should not be given to patients with documented ischemic or vasospastic coronary artery disease (CAD) (see CONTRAINDICATIONS).

It is strongly recommended that sumatriptan not be given to patients in whom unrecognized CAD is predicted by the presence of risk factors (e.g., hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, smoker, obesity, diabetes, strong family history of CAD, female with surgical or physiological menopause, male over 40 years of age) unless a cardiovascular evaluation provides satisfactory clinical evidence that the patient is reasonably free of coronary artery and ischemic myocardial disease or other significant underlying cardiovascular disease.

The sensitivity of cardiac diagnostic procedures to detect cardiovascular disease or predisposition to coronary artery vasospasm is modest, at best.

If, during the cardiovascular evaluation, the patient’s medical history or electrocardiographic investigations reveal findings indicative of, or consistent with, coronary artery vasospasm or myocardial ischemia, sumatriptan should not be administered (see CONTRAINDICATIONS).

For patients with risk factors predictive of CAD, who are determined to have a satisfactory cardiovascular evaluation, it is strongly recommended that administration of the first dose of sumatriptan tablets take place in the setting of a physician’s office or similar medically staffed and equipped facility unless the patient has previously received sumatriptan .

Because cardiac ischemia can occur in the absence of clinical symptoms, consideration should be given to obtaining on the first occasion of use an electrocardiogram (ECG) during the interval immediately following IMITREX Tablets in these patients with risk factors.

It is recommended that patients who are intermittent long-term users of sumatriptan and who have or acquire risk factors predictive of CAD, as described above, undergo periodic interval cardiovascular evaluation as they continue to use sumatriptan .

The systematic approach described above is intended to reduce the likelihood that patients with unrecognized cardiovascular disease will be inadvertently exposed to sumatriptan .

Drug-Associated Cardiac Events and Fatalities Serious adverse cardiac events, including acute myocardial infarction, life-threatening disturbances of cardiac rhythm, and death have been reported within a few hours following the administration of IMITREX ® (sumatriptan succinate) Injection or IMITREX Tablets.

Considering the extent of use of sumatriptan in patients with migraine, the incidence of these events is extremely low.

The fact that sumatriptan can cause coronary vasospasm, that some of these events have occurred in patients with no prior cardiac disease history and with documented absence of CAD, and the close proximity of the events to sumatriptan use support the conclusion that some of these cases were caused by the drug.

In many cases, however, where there has been known underlying coronary artery disease, the relationship is uncertain.

Premarketing Experience With Sumatriptan : Of 6,348 patients with migraine who participated in premarketing controlled and uncontrolled clinical trials of oral sumatriptan, 2 experienced clinical adverse events shortly after receiving oral sumatriptan that may have reflected coronary vasospasm.

Neither of these adverse events was associated with a serious clinical outcome.

Among the more than 1,900 patients with migraine who participated in premarketing controlled clinical trials of subcutaneous sumatriptan, there were 8 patients who sustained clinical events during or shortly after receiving sumatriptan that may have reflected coronary artery vasospasm.

Six of these 8 patients had ECG changes consistent with transient ischemia, but without accompanying clinical symptoms or signs.

Of these 8 patients, 4 had either findings suggestive of CAD or risk factors predictive of CAD prior to study enrollment.

Among approximately 4,000 patients with migraine who participated in premarketing controlled and uncontrolled clinical trials of sumatriptan nasal spray, 1 patient experienced an asymptomatic subendocardial infarction possibly subsequent to a coronary vasospastic event.

Postmarketing Experience With Sumatriptan : Serious cardiovascular events, some resulting in death, have been reported in association with the use of IMITREX Injection or IMITREX Tablets.

The uncontrolled nature of postmarketing surveillance, however, makes it impossible to determine definitively the proportion of the reported cases that were actually caused by sumatriptan or to reliably assess causation in individual cases.

On clinical grounds, the longer the latency between the administration of IMITREX and the onset of the clinical event, the less likely the association is to be causative.

Accordingly, interest has focused on events beginning within 1 hour of the administration of IMITREX.

Cardiac events that have been observed to have onset within 1 hour of sumatriptan administration include: coronary artery vasospasm, transient ischemia, myocardial infarction, ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, cardiac arrest, and death.

Some of these events occurred in patients who had no findings of CAD and appear to represent consequences of coronary artery vasospasm.

However, among domestic reports of serious cardiac events within 1 hour of sumatriptan administration, almost all of the patients had risk factors predictive of CAD and the presence of significant underlying CAD was established in most cases (see CONTRAINDICATIONS).

Drug-Associated Cerebrovascular Events and Fatalities Cerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, stroke, and other cerebrovascular events have been reported in patients treated with oral or subcutaneous sumatriptan, and some have resulted in fatalities.

The relationship of sumatriptan to these events is uncertain.

In a number of cases, it appears possible that the cerebrovascular events were primary, sumatriptan having been administered in the incorrect belief that the symptoms experienced were a consequence of migraine when they were not.

As with other acute migraine therapies, before treating headaches in patients not previously diagnosed as migraineurs, and in migraineurs who present with atypical symptoms, care should be taken to exclude other potentially serious neurological conditions.

It should also be noted that patients with migraine may be at increased risk of certain cerebrovascular events (e.g., cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack).

Other Vasospasm-Related Events Sumatriptan may cause vasospastic reactions other than coronary artery vasospasm.

Both peripheral vascular ischemia and colonic ischemia with abdominal pain and bloody diarrhea have been reported.

Very rare reports of transient and permanent blindness and significant partial vision loss have been reported with the use of sumatriptan.

Visual disorders may also be part of a migraine attack.

Serotonin Syndrome Serotonin syndrome may occur with triptans, including IMITREX, particularly during combined use with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs).

Serotonin syndrome symptoms may include mental status changes (e.g., agitation, hallucinations, coma), autonomic instability (e.g., tachycardia, labile blood pressure, hyperthermia), neuromuscular aberrations (e.g., hyperreflexia, incoordination), and/or gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g., nausea, vomiting, diarrhea).

The onset of symptoms can occur within minutes to hours of receiving a new or a greater dose of a serotonergic medication.

Treatment with IMITREX should be discontinued if serotonin syndrome is suspected.

Increase in Blood Pressure Significant elevation in blood pressure, including hypertensive crisis, has been reported on rare occasions in patients with and without a history of hypertension.

Sumatriptan is contraindicated in patients with uncontrolled hypertension (see CONTRAINDICATIONS).

Sumatriptan should be administered with caution to patients with controlled hypertension as transient increases in blood pressure and peripheral vascular resistance have been observed in a small proportion of patients.

Concomitant Drug Use In patients taking MAO-A inhibitors, sumatriptan plasma levels attained after treatment with recommended doses are 7-fold higher following oral administration than those obtained under other conditions.

Accordingly, the coadministration of IMITREX Tablets and an MAO-A inhibitor is contraindicated (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY and CONTRAINDICATIONS).

Hypersensitivity Hypersensitivity (anaphylaxis/anaphylactoid) reactions have occurred on rare occasions in patients receiving sumatriptan.

Such reactions can be life threatening or fatal.

In general, hypersensitivity reactions to drugs are more likely to occur in individuals with a history of sensitivity to multiple allergens (see CONTRAINDICATIONS).

DRUG INTERACTIONS

Drug Interactions Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors: Treatment with MAO-A inhibitors generally leads to an increase of sumatriptan plasma levels (see CONTRAINDICATIONS and PRECAUTIONS).

Due to gut and hepatic metabolic first-pass effects, the increase of systemic exposure after coadministration of an MAO-A inhibitor with oral sumatriptan is greater than after coadministration of the monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI) with subcutaneous sumatriptan.

In a study of 14 healthy females, pretreatment with an MAO-A inhibitor decreased the clearance of subcutaneous sumatriptan.

Under the conditions of this experiment, the result was a 2-fold increase in the area under the sumatriptan plasma concentration × time curve (AUC), corresponding to a 40% increase in elimination half-life.

This interaction was not evident with an MAO-B inhibitor.

A small study evaluating the effect of pretreatment with an MAO-A inhibitor on the bioavailability from a 25-mg oral sumatriptan tablet resulted in an approximately 7-fold increase in systemic exposure.

Alcohol: Alcohol consumed 30 minutes prior to sumatriptan ingestion had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan.

OVERDOSAGE

Patients (N = 670) have received single oral doses of 140 to 300 mg without significant adverse effects.

Volunteers (N = 174) have received single oral doses of 140 to 400 mg without serious adverse events.

Overdose in animals has been fatal and has been heralded by convulsions, tremor, paralysis, inactivity, ptosis, erythema of the extremities, abnormal respiration, cyanosis, ataxia, mydriasis, salivation, and lacrimation.

The elimination half-life of sumatriptan is approximately 2.5 hours (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY), and therefore monitoring of patients after overdose with IMITREX Tablets should continue for at least 12 hours or while symptoms or signs persist.

It is unknown what effect hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis has on the serum concentrations of sumatriptan.

DESCRIPTION

IMITREX Tablets contain sumatriptan (as the succinate), a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine 1 receptor subtype agonist.

Sumatriptan succinate is chemically designated as 3-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-N-methyl-indole-5-methanesulfonamide succinate (1:1), and it has the following structure: The empirical formula is C 14 H 21 N 3 O 2 S•C 4 H 6 O 4 , representing a molecular weight of 413.5.

Sumatriptan succinate is a white to off-white powder that is readily soluble in water and in saline.

Each IMITREX Tablet for oral administration contains 35, 70, or 140 mg of sumatriptan succinate equivalent to 25, 50, or 100 mg of sumatriptan, respectively.

Each tablet also contains the inactive ingredients croscarmellose sodium, dibasic calcium phosphate, magnesium stearate, microcrystalline cellulose, and sodium bicarbonate.

Each 100-mg tablet also contains hypromellose, iron oxide, titanium dioxide, and triacetin.

Imitrex Tablets Chemical Structure

CLINICAL STUDIES

The efficacy of IMITREX Tablets in the acute treatment of migraine headaches was demonstrated in 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.

Patients enrolled in these 3 studies were predominately female (87%) and Caucasian (97%), with a mean age of 40 years (range, 18 to 65 years).

Patients were instructed to treat a moderate to severe headache.

Headache response, defined as a reduction in headache severity from moderate or severe pain to mild or no pain, was assessed up to 4 hours after dosing.

Associated symptoms such as nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia were also assessed.

Maintenance of response was assessed for up to 24 hours postdose.

A second dose of IMITREX Tablets or other medication was allowed 4 to 24 hours after the initial treatment for recurrent headache.

Acetaminophen was offered to patients in Studies 2 and 3 beginning at 2 hours after initial treatment if the migraine pain had not improved or worsened.

Additional medications were allowed 4 to 24 hours after the initial treatment for recurrent headache or as rescue in all 3 studies.

The frequency and time to use of these additional treatments were also determined.

In all studies, doses of 25, 50, and 100 mg were compared to placebo in the treatment of migraine attacks.

In 1 study, doses of 25, 50, and 100 mg were also compared to each other.

In all 3 trials, the percentage of patients achieving headache response 2 and 4 hours after treatment was significantly greater among patients receiving IMITREX Tablets at all doses compared to those who received placebo.

In 1 of the 3 studies, there was a statistically significant greater percentage of patients with headache response at 2 and 4 hours in the 50- or 100-mg group when compared to the 25-mg dose groups.

There were no statistically significant differences between the 50- and 100-mg dose groups in any study.

The results from the 3 controlled clinical trials are summarized in Table 1.

Comparisons of drug performance based upon results obtained in different clinical trials are never reliable.

Because studies are conducted at different times, with different samples of patients, by different investigators, employing different criteria and/or different interpretations of the same criteria, under different conditions (dose, dosing regimen, etc.), quantitative estimates of treatment response and the timing of response may be expected to vary considerably from study to study.

Table 1.

Percentage of Patients With Headache Response (No or Mild Pain) 2 and 4 Hours Following Treatment Placebo 2 hr 4 hr IMITREX Tablets 25 mg 2 hr 4 hr IMITREX Tablets 50 mg 2 hr 4 hr IMITREX Tablets 100 mg 2 hr 4 hr Study 1 27% 38% 52% a 67% a 61% ab 78% ab 62% ab 79% ab (N = 94) (N = 298) (N = 296) (N = 296) Study 2 26% 38% 52% a 70% a 50% a 68% a 56% a 71% a (N = 65) (N = 66) (N = 62) (N = 66) Study 3 17% 19% 52% a 65% a 54% a 72% a 57% a 78% a (N = 47) (N = 48) (N = 46) (N = 46) a P <0.05 in comparison with placebo.

b P <0.05 in comparison with 25 mg.

The estimated probability of achieving an initial headache response over the 4 hours following treatment is depicted in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Estimated Probability of Achieving Initial Headache Response Within 240 Minutes a a The figure shows the probability over time of obtaining headache response (no or mild pain) following treatment with sumatriptan.

The averages displayed are based on pooled data from the 3 clinical controlled trials providing evidence of efficacy.

Kaplan-Meier plot with patients not achieving response and/or taking rescue within 240 minutes censored to 240 minutes.

For patients with migraine-associated nausea, photophobia, and/or phonophobia at baseline, there was a lower incidence of these symptoms at 2 hours (Study 1) and at 4 hours (Studies 1, 2, and 3) following administration of IMITREX Tablets compared to placebo.

As early as 2 hours in Studies 2 and 3 or 4 hours in Study 1, through 24 hours following the initial dose of study treatment, patients were allowed to use additional treatment for pain relief in the form of a second dose of study treatment or other medication.

The estimated probability of patients taking a second dose or other medication for migraine over the 24 hours following the initial dose of study treatment is summarized in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The Estimated Probability of Patients Taking a Second Dose or Other Medication for Migraine Over the 24 Hours Following the Initial Dose of Study Treatment a a Kaplan-Meier plot based on data obtained in the 3 clinical controlled trials providing evidence of efficacy with patients not using additional treatments censored to 24 hours.

Plot also includes patients who had no response to the initial dose.

No remedication was allowed within 2 hours postdose.

There is evidence that doses above 50 mg do not provide a greater effect than 50 mg.

There was no evidence to suggest that treatment with sumatriptan was associated with an increase in the severity of recurrent headaches.

The efficacy of IMITREX Tablets was unaffected by presence of aura; duration of headache prior to treatment; gender, age, or weight of the patient; relationship to menses; or concomitant use of common migraine prophylactic drugs (e.g., beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, tricyclic antidepressants).

There were insufficient data to assess the impact of race on efficacy.

Figure 1.

Estimated Probability of Achieving Initial Headache Response Within 240 Minutes* Figure 2.

The Estimated Probability of Patients Taking a Second Dose or Other Medication for Migraine Over the 24 Hours Following the Initial Dose of Study Treatment*

HOW SUPPLIED

IMITREX Tablets, 100 mg of sumatriptan (base) as the succinate.

IMITREX Tablets, 100 mg, are pink, triangular-shaped, film-coated tablets debossed with “IMITREX 100” on one side and a chevron shape (^) on the other in blister packs of 9 tablets (NDC 54868-5118-0).

Store between 36° and 86°F (2° and 30°C).

GERIATRIC USE

Geriatric Use The use of sumatriptan in elderly patients is not recommended because elderly patients are more likely to have decreased hepatic function, they are at higher risk for CAD, and blood pressure increases may be more pronounced in the elderly (see WARNINGS).

MECHANISM OF ACTION

Mechanism of Action Sumatriptan is an agonist for a vascular 5‑hydroxytryptamine 1 receptor subtype (probably a member of the 5‑HT 1D family) having only a weak affinity for 5‑HT 1A , 5‑HT 5A , and 5‑HT 7 receptors and no significant affinity (as measured using standard radioligand binding assays) or pharmacological activity at 5‑HT 2 , 5‑HT 3, or 5‑HT 4 receptor subtypes or at alpha 1 ‑, alpha 2 ‑, or beta‑adrenergic; dopamine 1 ; dopamine 2 ; muscarinic; or benzodiazepine receptors.

The vascular 5‑HT 1 receptor subtype that sumatriptan activates is present on cranial arteries in both dog and primate, on the human basilar artery, and in the vasculature of human dura mater and mediates vasoconstriction.

This action in humans correlates with the relief of migraine headache.

In addition to causing vasoconstriction, experimental data from animal studies show that sumatriptan also activates 5‑HT 1 receptors on peripheral terminals of the trigeminal nerve innervating cranial blood vessels.

Such an action may also contribute to the antimigrainous effect of sumatriptan in humans.

In the anesthetized dog, sumatriptan selectively reduces the carotid arterial blood flow with little or no effect on arterial blood pressure or total peripheral resistance.

In the cat, sumatriptan selectively constricts the carotid arteriovenous anastomoses while having little effect on blood flow or resistance in cerebral or extracerebral tissues.

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

IMITREX Tablets are indicated for the acute treatment of migraine attacks with or without aura in adults.

IMITREX Tablets are not intended for the prophylactic therapy of migraine or for use in the management of hemiplegic or basilar migraine (see CONTRAINDICATIONS).

Safety and effectiveness of IMITREX Tablets have not been established for cluster headache, which is present in an older, predominantly male population.

PEDIATRIC USE

Pediatric Use Safety and effectiveness of IMITREX Tablets in pediatric patients under 18 years of age have not been established; therefore, IMITREX Tablets are not recommended for use in patients under 18 years of age.

Two controlled clinical trials evaluating sumatriptan nasal spray (5 to 20 mg) in pediatric patients aged 12 to 17 years enrolled a total of 1,248 adolescent migraineurs who treated a single attack.

The studies did not establish the efficacy of sumatriptan nasal spray compared to placebo in the treatment of migraine in adolescents.

Adverse events observed in these clinical trials were similar in nature to those reported in clinical trials in adults.

Five controlled clinical trials (2 single attack studies, 3 multiple attack studies) evaluating oral sumatriptan (25 to 100 mg) in pediatric patients aged 12 to 17 years enrolled a total of 701 adolescent migraineurs.

These studies did not establish the efficacy of oral sumatriptan compared to placebo in the treatment of migraine in adolescents.

Adverse events observed in these clinical trials were similar in nature to those reported in clinical trials in adults.

The frequency of all adverse events in these patients appeared to be both dose- and age-dependent, with younger patients reporting events more commonly than older adolescents.

Postmarketing experience documents that serious adverse events have occurred in the pediatric population after use of subcutaneous, oral, and/or intranasal sumatriptan.

These reports include events similar in nature to those reported rarely in adults, including stroke, visual loss, and death.

A myocardial infarction has been reported in a 14-year-old male following the use of oral sumatriptan; clinical signs occurred within 1 day of drug administration.

Since clinical data to determine the frequency of serious adverse events in pediatric patients who might receive injectable, oral, or intranasal sumatriptan are not presently available, the use of sumatriptan in patients aged younger than 18 years is not recommended.

PREGNANCY

Pregnancy Pregnancy Category C.

In reproductive toxicity studies in rats and rabbits, oral treatment with sumatriptan was associated with embryolethality, fetal abnormalities, and pup mortality.

When administered by the intravenous route to rabbits, sumatriptan has been shown to be embryolethal.

There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women.

Therefore, IMITREX should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus.

In assessing this information, the following findings should be considered.

Embryolethality : When given orally or intravenously to pregnant rabbits daily throughout the period of organogenesis, sumatriptan caused embryolethality at doses at or close to those producing maternal toxicity.

In the oral studies this dose was 100 mg/kg/day, and in the intravenous studies this dose was 2.0 mg/kg/day.

The mechanism of the embryolethality is not known.

The highest no-effect dose for embryolethality by the oral route was 50 mg/kg/day, which is approximately 9 times the maximum single recommended human oral dose of 100 mg on a mg/m 2 basis.

By the intravenous route, the highest no-effect dose was 0.75 mg/kg/day, or approximately one tenth of the maximum single recommended human oral dose of 100 mg on a mg/m 2 basis.

The intravenous administration of sumatriptan to pregnant rats throughout organogenesis at 12.5 mg/kg/day, the maximum dose tested, did not cause embryolethality.

This dose is equivalent to the maximum single recommended human oral dose of 100 mg on a mg/m 2 basis.

Additionally, in a study in rats given subcutaneous sumatriptan daily prior to and throughout pregnancy at 60 mg/kg/day, the maximum dose tested, there was no evidence of increased embryo/fetal lethality.

This dose is equivalent to approximately 6 times the maximum recommended single human oral dose of 100 mg on a mg/m 2 basis.

Teratogenicity : Oral treatment of pregnant rats with sumatriptan during the period of organogenesis resulted in an increased incidence of blood vessel abnormalities (cervicothoracic and umbilical) at doses of approximately 250 mg/kg/day or higher.

The highest no-effect dose was approximately 60 mg/kg/day, which is approximately 6 times the maximum single recommended human oral dose of 100 mg on a mg/m 2 basis.

Oral treatment of pregnant rabbits with sumatriptan during the period of organogenesis resulted in an increased incidence of cervicothoracic vascular and skeletal abnormalities.

The highest no-effect dose for these effects was 15 mg/kg/day, or approximately 3 times the maximum single recommended human oral dose of 100 mg on a mg/m 2 basis.

A study in which rats were dosed daily with oral sumatriptan prior to and throughout gestation demonstrated embryo/fetal toxicity (decreased body weight, decreased ossification, increased incidence of rib variations) and an increased incidence of a syndrome of malformations (short tail/short body and vertebral disorganization) at 500 mg/kg/day.

The highest no-effect dose was 50 mg/kg/day, or approximately 5 times the maximum single recommended human oral dose of 100 mg on a mg/m 2 basis.

In a study in rats dosed daily with subcutaneous sumatriptan prior to and throughout pregnancy, at a dose of 60 mg/kg/day, the maximum dose tested, there was no evidence of teratogenicity.

This dose is equivalent to approximately 6 times the maximum recommended single human oral dose of 100 mg on a mg/m 2 basis.

Pup Deaths: Oral treatment of pregnant rats with sumatriptan during the period of organogenesis resulted in a decrease in pup survival between birth and postnatal day 4 at doses of approximately 250 mg/kg/day or higher.

The highest no-effect dose for this effect was approximately 60 mg/kg/day, or 6 times the maximum single recommended human oral dose of 100 mg on a mg/m 2 basis.

Oral treatment of pregnant rats with sumatriptan from gestational day 17 through postnatal day 21 demonstrated a decrease in pup survival measured at postnatal days 2, 4, and 20 at the dose of 1,000 mg/kg/day.

The highest no-effect dose for this finding was 100 mg/kg/day, approximately 10 times the maximum single recommended human oral dose of 100 mg on a mg/m 2 basis.

In a similar study in rats by the subcutaneous route there was no increase in pup death at 81 mg/kg/day, the highest dose tested, which is equivalent to 8 times the maximum single recommended human oral dose of 100 mg on a mg/m 2 basis.

NUSRING MOTHERS

Nursing Mothers Sumatriptan is excreted in human breast milk following subcutaneous administration.

Infant exposure to sumatriptan can be minimized by avoiding breastfeeding for 12 hours after treatment with IMITREX Tablets.

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS

Information for Patients See PATIENT INFORMATION at the end of this labeling for the text of the separate leaflet provided for patients.

Patients should be cautioned about the risk of serotonin syndrome with the use of sumatriptan or other triptans, especially during combined use with SSRIs or SNRIs.

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

In controlled clinical trials, single doses of 25, 50, or 100 mg of IMITREX Tablets were effective for the acute treatment of migraine in adults.

There is evidence that doses of 50 and 100 mg may provide a greater effect than 25 mg (see CLINICAL TRIALS).

There is also evidence that doses of 100 mg do not provide a greater effect than 50 mg.

Individuals may vary in response to doses of IMITREX Tablets.

The choice of dose should therefore be made on an individual basis, weighing the possible benefit of a higher dose with the potential for a greater risk of adverse events.

If the headache returns or the patient has a partial response to the initial dose, the dose may be repeated after 2 hours, not to exceed a total daily dose of 200 mg.

If a headache returns following an initial treatment with IMITREX Injection, additional single IMITREX Tablets (up to 100 mg/day) may be given with an interval of at least 2 hours between tablet doses.

The safety of treating an average of more than 4 headaches in a 30-day period has not been established.

Because of the potential of MAO-A inhibitors to cause unpredictable elevations in the bioavailability of oral sumatriptan, their combined use is contraindicated (see CONTRAINDICATIONS).

Hepatic disease/functional impairment may also cause unpredictable elevations in the bioavailability of orally administered sumatriptan.

Consequently, if treatment is deemed advisable in the presence of liver disease, the maximum single dose should in general not exceed 50 mg (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY for the basis of this recommendation).

imatinib 100 MG Oral Tablet [Gleevec]

Generic Name: IMATINIB MESYLATE
Brand Name: Gleevec
  • Substance Name(s):
  • IMATINIB MESYLATE

DRUG INTERACTIONS

7 CYP3A4 inducers may decrease Gleevec C max and area under curve (AUC).

( 2.12 , 7.1 , 12.3 ) CYP3A4 inhibitors may increase Gleevec C max and AUC.

( 7.2 , 12.3 ) Gleevec is an inhibitor of CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 which may increase the C max and AUC of other drugs.

( 7.3 , 7.4 , 12.3 ) Patients who require anticoagulation should receive low-molecular weight or standard heparin and not warfarin.

( 7.3 ) 7.1 Agents Inducing CYP3A Metabolism Concomitant administration of Gleevec and strong CYP3A4 inducers may reduce total exposure of imatinib; consider alternative agents [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

7.2 Agents Inhibiting CYP3A Metabolism Concomitant administration of Gleevec and strong CYP3A4 inhibitors may result in a significant imatinib exposure increase.

Grapefruit juice may also increase plasma concentrations of imatinib; avoid grapefruit juice [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

7.3 Interactions With Drugs Metabolized by CYP3A4 Gleevec will increase plasma concentration of CYP3A4 metabolized drugs (e.g., triazolo-benzodiazepines, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, certain HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, etc.).

Use caution when administering Gleevec with CYP3A4 substrates that have a narrow therapeutic window.

Because warfarin is metabolized by CYP2C9 and CYP3A4, use low-molecular weight or standard heparin instead of warfarin in patients who require anticoagulation [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

7.4 Interactions With Drugs Metabolized by CYP2D6 Use caution when administering Gleevec with CYP2D6 substrates that have a narrow therapeutic window.

OVERDOSAGE

10 Experience with doses greater than 800 mg is limited.

Isolated cases of Gleevec overdose have been reported.

In the event of overdosage, observe the patient and give appropriate supportive treatment.

Adult Overdose 1,200 to 1,600 mg (duration varying between 1 to 10 days): Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, rash erythema, edema, swelling, fatigue, muscle spasms, thrombocytopenia, pancytopenia, abdominal pain, headache, decreased appetite.

1,800 to 3,200 mg (as high as 3,200 mg daily for 6 days): Weakness, myalgia, increased CPK, increased bilirubin, GI pain.

6,400 mg (single dose): One case in the literature reported one patient who experienced nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, pyrexia, facial swelling, neutrophil count decreased, increase transaminases.

8 to 10 g (single dose): Vomiting and GI pain have been reported.

A patient with myeloid blast crisis experienced Grade 1 elevations of serum creatinine, Grade 2 ascites and elevated liver transaminase levels, and Grade 3 elevations of bilirubin after inadvertently taking 1,200 mg of Gleevec daily for 6 days.

Therapy was temporarily interrupted and complete reversal of all abnormalities occurred within 1 week.

Treatment was resumed at a dose of 400 mg daily without recurrence of adverse reactions.

Another patient developed severe muscle cramps after taking 1,600 mg of Gleevec daily for 6 days.

Complete resolution of muscle cramps occurred following interruption of therapy and treatment was subsequently resumed.

Another patient that was prescribed 400 mg daily, took 800 mg of Gleevec on Day 1 and 1,200 mg on Day 2.

Therapy was interrupted, no adverse reactions occurred and the patient resumed therapy.

Pediatric Overdose One 3 year old male exposed to a single dose of 400 mg experienced vomiting, diarrhea, and anorexia; and another 3 year old male exposed to a single dose of 980 mg experienced decreased white blood cell (WBC) count and diarrhea.

DESCRIPTION

11 Imatinib is a small molecule kinase inhibitor.

Gleevec film-coated tablets are supplied as 100 mg and 400 mg tablets for oral administration.

Each 100 mg tablet contains 119.5 mg of imatinib mesylate equivalent to 100 mg of imatinib free base.

Each 400 mg tablet contains 478 mg of imatinib mesylate equivalent to 400 mg of imatinib free base.

Imatinib mesylate is designated chemically as 4-[(4-Methyl-1-piperazinyl)methyl]-N-[4-methyl-3-[[4-(3-pyridinyl)-2-pyrimidinyl]amino]-phenyl]benzamide methanesulfonate and its structural formula is: Imatinib mesylate is a white to off-white to brownish or yellowish tinged crystalline powder.

Its molecular formula is C 29 H 31 N 7 O • CH 4 SO 3 and its molecular weight is 589.7 g/mol.

Imatinib mesylate is soluble in aqueous buffers less than or equal to pH 5.5 but is very slightly soluble to insoluble in neutral/alkaline aqueous buffers.

In non-aqueous solvents, the drug substance is freely soluble to very slightly soluble in dimethyl sulfoxide, methanol, and ethanol, but is insoluble in n-octanol, acetone, and acetonitrile.

Inactive Ingredients: colloidal silicon dioxide (NF); crospovidone (NF); hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (USP); magnesium stearate (NF); and microcrystalline cellulose (NF).

Tablet coating: ferric oxide, red (NF); ferric oxide, yellow (NF); hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (USP); polyethylene glycol (NF), and talc (USP).

Imatinib structural formula

CLINICAL STUDIES

14 Figure 1 Progression Free Survival (ITT Principle) Figure 2 Time to Progression to AP or BC (ITT Principle) Figure 3: Study 1 Recurrence-Free Survival (ITT Population) Figure 4: Study 2 Recurrence-Free Survival (ITT Population) Figure 5: Study 2 Overall Survival (ITT Population) 14.1 Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Chronic Phase, Newly Diagnosed: An open-label, multicenter, international randomized Phase 3 study (Gleevec versus IFN+Ara-C) has been conducted in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase.

This study compared treatment with either single-agent Gleevec or a combination of interferon-alpha (IFN) plus cytarabine (Ara-C).

Patients were allowed to cross over to the alternative treatment arm if they failed to show a complete hematologic response (CHR) at 6 months, a major cytogenetic response (MCyR) at 12 months, or if they lost a CHR or MCyR.

Patients with increasing WBC or severe intolerance to treatment were also allowed to cross over to the alternative treatment arm with the permission of the study monitoring committee (SMC).

In the Gleevec arm, patients were treated initially with 400 mg daily.

Dose escalations were allowed from 400 mg daily to 600 mg daily, then from 600 mg daily to 800 mg daily.

In the IFN arm, patients were treated with a target dose of IFN of 5 MIU/m 2 /day subcutaneously in combination with subcutaneous Ara-C 20 mg/m 2 /day for 10 days/month.

A total of 1106 patients were randomized from 177 centers in 16 countries, 553 to each arm.

Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two arms.

Median age was 51 years (range, 18 to 70 years), with 21.9% of patients greater than or equal to 60 years of age.

There were 59% males and 41% females; 89.9% Caucasian and 4.7% black patients.

At the cut-off for this analysis (7 years after last patient had been recruited), the median duration of first-line treatment was 82 and 8 months in the Gleevec and IFN arm, respectively.

The median duration of second-line treatment with Gleevec was 64 months.

Sixty percent of patients randomized to Gleevec are still receiving first-line treatment.

In these patients, the average dose of Gleevec was 403 mg ± 57 mg.

Overall, in patients receiving first line Gleevec, the average daily dose delivered was 406 mg ± 76 mg.

Due to discontinuations and cross-overs, only 2% of patients randomized to IFN were still on first-line treatment.

In the IFN arm, withdrawal of consent (14%) was the most frequent reason for discontinuation of first-line therapy, and the most frequent reason for cross over to the Gleevec arm was severe intolerance to treatment (26%) and progression (14%).

The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS).

Progression was defined as any of the following events: progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis (AP/BC), death, loss of CHR or MCyR, or in patients not achieving a CHR an increasing WBC despite appropriate therapeutic management.

The protocol specified that the progression analysis would compare the intent to treat (ITT) population: patients randomized to receive Gleevec were compared with patients randomized to receive IFN.

Patients that crossed over prior to progression were not censored at the time of cross-over, and events that occurred in these patients following cross-over were attributed to the original randomized treatment.

The estimated rate of progression-free survival at 84 months in the ITT population was 81.2% [95% CI: 78, 85] in the Gleevec arm and 60.6% [56, 65] in the IFN arm (p less than 0.0001, log-rank test), (Figure 1).

With 7 years follow up there were 93 (16.8%) progression events in the Gleevec arm: 37 (6.7%) progression to AP/BC, 31 (5.6%) loss of MCyR, 15 (2.7%) loss of CHR or increase in WBC and 10 (1.8%) CML unrelated deaths.

In contrast, there were 165 (29.8%) events in the IFN+Ara-C arm of which 130 occurred during first-line treatment with IFN-Ara-C.

The estimated rate of patients free of progression to accelerated phase (AP) or blast crisis (BC) at 84 months was 92.5% [90, 95] in the Gleevec arm compared to the 85.1%, [82, 89] (p less than or equal to 0.001) in the IFN arm, (Figure 2).

The annual rates of any progression events have decreased with time on therapy.

The probability of remaining progression free at 60 months was 95% for patients who were in complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) with molecular response (greater than or equal to 3 log reduction in BCR-ABL transcripts as measured by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction) at 12 months, compared to 89% for patients in CCyR but without a major molecular response and 70% in patients who were not in CCyR at this time point (p less than 0.001).

Figure 1: Progression Free Survival (ITT Principle) Figure 2: Time to Progression to AP or BC (ITT Principle) A total of 71 (12.8%) and 85 (15.4%) patients died in the Gleevec and IFN+Ara-C group, respectively.

At 84 months the estimated overall survival is 86.4% (83, 90) vs 83.3% (80, 87) in the randomized Gleevec and the IFN+Ara-C group, respectively (p = 0.073 log-rank test).

The hazard ratio is 0.750 with 95% CI 0.547-1.028.

This time-to-event endpoint may be affected by the high crossover rate from IFN+Ara-C to Gleevec.

Major cytogenetic response, hematologic response, evaluation of minimal residual disease (molecular response), time to accelerated phase or blast crisis and survival were main secondary endpoints.

Response data are shown in Table 18.

Complete hematologic response, major cytogenetic response and CCyR were also statistically significantly higher in the Gleevec arm compared to the IFN + Ara-C arm (no cross-over data considered for evaluation of responses).

Median time to CCyR in the 454 responders was 6 months (range, 2 to 64 months, 25 th to 75 th percentiles = 3 to 11 months) with 10% of responses seen only after 22 months of therapy.

Table 18: Response in Newly Diagnosed CML Study (84-Month Data) *p less than 0.001, Fischer’s exact test.

1 Hematologic response criteria (all responses to be confirmed after greater than or equal to 4 weeks): WBC less than 10 x 10 9 /L, platelet less than 450 x 10 9 /L, myelocyte + metamyelocyte less than 5% in blood, no blasts and promyelocytes in blood, no extramedullary involvement.

2 Cytogenetic response criteria (confirmed after greater than or equal to 4 weeks): complete (0% Ph+ metaphases) or partial (1%-35%).

A major response (0%-35%) combines both complete and partial responses.

3 Unconfirmed cytogenetic response is based on a single bone marrow cytogenetic evaluation, therefore unconfirmed complete or partial cytogenetic responses might have had a lesser cytogenetic response on a subsequent bone marrow evaluation.

Best response rate Gleevec n = 553 IFN+Ara−C n = 553 Hematologic response 1 CHR rate n (%) 534 (96.6%)* 313 (56.6%)* [95% CI] [94.7%, 97.9%] [52.4%, 60.8%] Cytogenetic response 2 Major cytogenetic response n (%) 472 (85.4%)* 93 (16.8%)* [95% CI] [82.1%, 88.2%] [13.8%, 20.2%] Unconfirmed 3 88.6%* 23.3%* Complete cytogenetic response n (%) 413 (74.7%)* 36 (6.5%)* [95% CI] [70.8, 78.3] [4.6, 8.9] Unconfirmed 3 82.5%* 11.6%* Molecular response was defined as follows: in the peripheral blood, after 12 months of therapy, reduction of greater than or equal to 3 logarithms in the amount of BCR-ABL transcripts (measured by real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR assay) over a standardized baseline.

Molecular response was only evaluated in a subset of patients who had a CCyR by 12 months or later (N = 333).

The molecular response rate in patients who had a CCyR in the Gleevec arm was 59% at 12 months and 72% at 24 months.

Physical, functional, and treatment-specific biologic response modifier scales from the FACT-BRM (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Biologic Response Modifier) instrument were used to assess patient-reported general effects of interferon toxicity in 1,067 patients with CML in chronic phase.

After one month of therapy to 6 months of therapy, there was a 13% to 21% decrease in median index from baseline in patients treated with IFN, consistent with increased symptoms of IFN toxicity.

There was no apparent change from baseline in median index for patients treated with Gleevec.

An open-label, multicenter, randomized trial (Gleevec versus nilotinib) was conducted to determine the efficacy of Gleevec versus nilotinib in adult patients with cytogenetically confirmed, newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP.

Patients were within 6 months of diagnosis and were previously untreated for CML-CP, except for hydroxyurea and/or anagrelide.

Efficacy was based on a total of 846 patients: 283 patients in the Gleevec 400 mg once daily group, 282 patients in the nilotinib 300 mg twice daily group, 281 patients in the nilotinib 400 mg twice daily group.

Median age was 46 years in the Gleevec group and 47 years in both nilotinib groups, with 12%, 13%, and 10% of patients greater than or equal to 65 years of age in Gleevec 400 mg once daily, nilotinib 300 mg twice daily and nilotinib 400 mg twice daily treatment groups, respectively.

There were slightly more male than female patients in all groups (56%, 56%, and 62% in Gleevec 400 mg once daily, nilotinib 300 mg twice daily and nilotinib 400 mg twice-daily treatment groups, respectively).

More than 60% of all patients were Caucasian, and 25% were Asian.

The primary data analysis was performed when all 846 patients completed 12 months of treatment or discontinued earlier.

Subsequent analyses were done when patients completed 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of treatment or discontinued earlier.

The median time on treatment was approximately 61 months in all three treatment groups.

The primary efficacy endpoint was major molecular response (MMR) at 12 months after the start of study medication.

MMR was defined as less than or equal to 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale measured by RQ-PCR, which corresponds to a greater than or equal to 3 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcript from standardized baseline.

Efficacy endpoints are summarized in Table 19.

Twelve patients in the Gleevec arm progressed to either accelerated phase or blast crises (7 patients within first 6 months, 2 patients within 6 to 12 months, 2 patients within 12 to 18 months and 1 patient within 18 to 24 months) while two patients on the nilotinib arm progressed to either accelerated phase or blast crisis (both within the first 6 months of treatment).

Table 19: Efficacy (MMR and CCyR) of Gleevec Compared to Nilotinib in Newly Diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP Abbreviations: CCyR, complete cytogenetic response; MMR, major molecular response; Ph+ CML-CP, Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukemia-chronic phase.

a CMH test stratified by Sokal risk group.

b CCyR: 0% Ph+ metaphases.

Cytogenetic responses were based on the percentage of Ph-positive metaphases among greater than or equal to 20 metaphase cells in each bone marrow sample.

Gleevec 400 mg once daily Nilotinib 300 mg twice daily N = 283 N = 282 MMR at 12 months (95% CI) 22% (17.6, 27.6) 44% (38.4, 50.3) P-Value a < 0.0001 CCyR b by 12 months (95% CI) 65% (59.2, 70.6) 80% (75.0, 84.6) MMR at 24 months (95% CI) 38% (31.8, 43.4) 62% (55.8, 67.4) CCyR b by 24 months (95% CI) 77% (71.7, 81.8) 87% (82.4, 90.6) By 60 months, MMR was achieved by 60% of patients on Gleevec and 77% of patients on nilotinib.

Median overall survival was not reached in either arm.

At the time of the 60-month final analysis, the estimated survival rate was 91.7% for patients on Gleevec and 93.7% for patients on nilotinib.

Late Chronic Phase CML and Advanced Stage CML : Three international, open-label, single-arm Phase 2 studies were conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of Gleevec in patients with Ph+ CML: 1) in the chronic phase after failure of IFN therapy, 2) in accelerated phase disease, or 3) in myeloid blast crisis.

About 45% of patients were women and 6% were black.

In clinical studies, 38% to 40% of patients were greater than or equal to 60 years of age and 10% to 12% of patients were greater than or equal to 70 years of age.

Chronic Phase, Prior Interferon-Alpha Treatment: 532 patients were treated at a starting dose of 400 mg; dose escalation to 600 mg was allowed.

The patients were distributed in three main categories according to their response to prior interferon: failure to achieve (within 6 months), or loss of a complete hematologic response (29%), failure to achieve (within 1 year) or loss of a major cytogenetic response (35%), or intolerance to interferon (36%).

Patients had received a median of 14 months of prior IFN therapy at doses greater than or equal to 25 x 10 6 units/week and were all in late chronic phase, with a median time from diagnosis of 32 months.

Effectiveness was evaluated on the basis of the rate of hematologic response and by bone marrow exams to assess the rate of major cytogenetic response (up to 35% Ph+ metaphases) or CCyR (0% Ph+ metaphases).

Median duration of treatment was 29 months with 81% of patients treated for greater than or equal to 24 months (maximum = 31.5 months).

Efficacy results are reported in Table 20.

Confirmed major cytogenetic response rates were higher in patients with IFN intolerance (66%) and cytogenetic failure (64%), than in patients with hematologic failure (47%).

Hematologic response was achieved in 98% of patients with cytogenetic failure, 94% of patients with hematologic failure, and 92% of IFN-intolerant patients.

Accelerated Phase: 235 patients with accelerated phase disease were enrolled.

These patients met one or more of the following criteria: greater than or equal to 15% – less than 30% blasts in PB or BM; greater than or equal to 30% blasts + promyelocytes in PB or BM; greater than or equal to 20% basophils in PB; and less than 100 x 10 9 /L platelets.

The first 77 patients were started at 400 mg, with the remaining 158 patients starting at 600 mg.

Effectiveness was evaluated primarily on the basis of the rate of hematologic response, reported as either complete hematologic response, no evidence of leukemia (i.e., clearance of blasts from the marrow and the blood, but without a full peripheral blood recovery as for complete responses), or return to chronic phase CML.

Cytogenetic responses were also evaluated.

Median duration of treatment was 18 months with 45% of patients treated for greater than or equal to 24 months (maximum = 35 months).

Efficacy results are reported in Table 20.

Response rates in accelerated phase CML were higher for the 600 mg dose group than for the 400 mg group: hematologic response (75% vs 64%), confirmed and unconfirmed major cytogenetic response (31% vs 19%).

Myeloid Blast Crisis: 260 patients with myeloid blast crisis were enrolled.

These patients had greater than or equal to 30% blasts in PB or BM and/or extramedullary involvement other than spleen or liver; 95 (37%) had received prior chemotherapy for treatment of either accelerated phase or blast crisis (“pretreated patients”) whereas 165 (63%) had not (“untreated patients”).

The first 37 patients were started at 400 mg; the remaining 223 patients were started at 600 mg.

Effectiveness was evaluated primarily on the basis of rate of hematologic response, reported as either complete hematologic response, no evidence of leukemia, or return to chronic phase CML using the same criteria as for the study in accelerated phase.

Cytogenetic responses were also assessed.

Median duration of treatment was 4 months with 21% of patients treated for greater than or equal to 12 months and 10% for greater than or equal to 24 months (maximum = 35 months).

Efficacy results are reported in Table 20.

The hematologic response rate was higher in untreated patients than in treated patients (36% vs 22%, respectively) and in the group receiving an initial dose of 600 mg rather than 400 mg (33% vs 16%).

The confirmed and unconfirmed major cytogenetic response rate was also higher for the 600-mg dose group than for the 400-mg dose group (17% vs 8%).

Table 20: Response in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Studies Abbreviations: BM, bone marrow; PB, peripheral blood.

1 Hematologic response criteria (all responses to be confirmed after greater than or equal to 4 weeks): CHR: Chronic phase study [WBC less than 10 x 10 9 /L, platelet less than 450 x 10 9 /L, myelocytes + metamyelocytes less than 5% in blood, no blasts and promyelocytes in blood, basophils less than 20%, no extramedullary involvement] and in the accelerated and blast crisis studies [absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 1.5 x 10 9 /L, platelets greater than or equal to 100 x 10 9 /L, no blood blasts, BM blasts less than 5% and no extramedullary disease].

NEL: Same criteria as for CHR but ANC greater than or equal to 1 x 10 9 /L and platelets greater than or equal to 20 x 10 9 /L (accelerated and blast crisis studies).

RTC: less than 15% blasts BM and PB, less than 30% blasts + promyelocytes in BM and PB, less than 20% basophils in PB, no extramedullary disease other than spleen and liver (accelerated and blast crisis studies).

2 Cytogenetic response criteria (confirmed after greater than or equal to 4 weeks): complete (0% Ph+ metaphases) or partial (1%-35%).

A major response (0%-35%) combines both complete and partial responses.

3 Unconfirmed cytogenetic response is based on a single bone marrow cytogenetic evaluation, therefore unconfirmed complete or partial cytogenetic responses might have had a lesser cytogenetic response on a subsequent bone marrow evaluation.

4 Complete cytogenetic response confirmed by a second bone marrow cytogenetic evaluation performed at least 1 month after the initial bone marrow study.

Chronic phase IFN failure (n = 532) Accelerated phase (n = 235) Myeloid blast crisis (n = 260) 600 mg n = 158 600 mg n = 223 400 mg 400 mg n = 77 400 mg n = 37 % of patients [CI 95% ] Hematologic response 1 95% [92.3−96.3] 71% [64.8−76.8] 31% [25.2−36.8] Complete hematologic response (CHR) 95% 38% 7% No evidence of leukemia (NEL) Not applicable 13% 5% Return to chronic phase (RTC) Not applicable 20% 18% Major cytogenetic response 2 60% [55.3−63.8] 21% [16.2−27.1] 7% [4.5−11.2] (Unconfirmed 3 ) (65%) (27%) (15%) Complete 4 (Unconfirmed 3 ) 39% (47%) 16% (20%) 2% (7%) The median time to hematologic response was 1 month.

In late chronic phase CML, with a median time from diagnosis of 32 months, an estimated 87.8% of patients who achieved MCyR maintained their response 2 years after achieving their initial response.

After 2 years of treatment, an estimated 85.4% of patients were free of progression to AP or BC, and estimated overall survival was 90.8% [88.3, 93.2].

In accelerated phase, median duration of hematologic response was 28.8 months for patients with an initial dose of 600 mg (16.5 months for 400 mg).

An estimated 63.8% of patients who achieved MCyR were still in response 2 years after achieving initial response.

The median survival was 20.9 [13.1, 34.4] months for the 400 mg group and was not yet reached for the 600 mg group (p = 0.0097).

An estimated 46.2% [34.7, 57.7] vs 65.8% [58.4, 73.3] of patients were still alive after 2 years of treatment in the 400 mg vs 600 mg dose groups, respectively.

In blast crisis, the estimated median duration of hematologic response is 10 months.

An estimated 27.2% [16.8, 37.7] of hematologic responders maintained their response 2 years after achieving their initial response.

Median survival was 6.9 [5.8, 8.6] months, and an estimated 18.3% [13.4, 23.3] of all patients with blast crisis were alive 2 years after start of study.

Efficacy results were similar in men and women and in patients younger and older than age 65.

Responses were seen in black patients, but there were too few black patients to allow a quantitative comparison.

14.2 Pediatric CML A total of 51 pediatric patients with newly diagnosed and untreated CML in chronic phase were enrolled in an open-label, multicenter, single-arm Phase 2 trial.

Patients were treated with Gleevec 340 mg/m 2 /day, with no interruptions in the absence of dose limiting toxicity.

Complete hematologic response (CHR) was observed in 78% of patients after 8 weeks of therapy.

The complete cytogenetic response rate (CCyR) was 65%, comparable to the results observed in adults.

Additionally, partial cytogenetic response (PCyR) was observed in 16%.

The majority of patients who achieved a CCyR developed the CCyR between Months 3 and 10 with a median time to response based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate of 6.74 months.

Patients were allowed to be removed from protocol therapy to undergo alternative therapy, including hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Thirty-one children received stem cell transplantation.

Of the 31 children, 5 were transplanted after disease progression on study and 1 withdrew from study during first week treatment and received transplant approximately 4 months after withdrawal.

Twenty-five children withdrew from protocol therapy to undergo stem cell transplant after receiving a median of 9 twenty-eight day courses (range, 4 to 24).

Of the 25 patients 13 (52%) had CCyR and 5 (20%) had PCyR at the end of protocol therapy.

One open-label, single-arm study enrolled 14 pediatric patients with Ph+ chronic phase CML recurrent after stem cell transplant or resistant to interferon-alpha therapy.

These patients had not previously received Gleevec and ranged in age from 3 to 20 years old; 3 were 3 to 11 years old, 9 were 12 to 18 years old, and 2 were greater than 18 years old.

Patients were treated at doses of 260 mg/m 2 /day (n = 3), 340 mg/m 2 /day (n = 4), 440 mg/m 2 /day (n = 5) and 570 mg/m 2 /day (n = 2).

In the 13 patients for whom cytogenetic data are available, 4 achieved a major cytogenetic response, 7 achieved a CCyR, and 2 had a minimal cytogenetic response.

In a second study, 2 of 3 patients with Ph+ chronic phase CML resistant to interferon-alpha therapy achieved a CCyR at doses of 242 and 257 mg/m 2 /day.

14.3 Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia A total of 48 Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) patients with relapsed/refractory disease were studied, 43 of whom received the recommended Gleevec dose of 600 mg/day.

In addition 2 patients with relapsed/refractory Ph+ ALL received Gleevec 600 mg/day in a Phase 1 study.

Confirmed and unconfirmed hematologic and cytogenetic response rates for the 43 relapsed/refractory Ph+ ALL Phase 2 study patients and for the 2 Phase 1 patients are shown in Table 21.

The median duration of hematologic response was 3.4 months and the median duration of MCyR was 2.3 months.

Table 21: Effect of Gleevec on Relapsed/Refractory Ph+ ALL Abbreviations: CCyR, complete cytogenetic response; CHR, complete hematologic response; MCyR, major cytogenetic response; NEL, no evidence of leukemia; PCyR, partial cytogenic response; Ph+ ALL, Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia; PHR, partial hematologic response; RTC, return to chronic phase.

Phase 2 study (N = 43) n (%) Phase 1 study (N = 2) n (%) CHR 8 (19) 2 (100) NEL 5 (12) RTC/PHR 11 (26) MCyR 15 (35) CCyR 9 (21) PCyR 6 (14) 14.4 Pediatric ALL Pediatric and young adult patients with very high risk ALL, defined as those with an expected 5-year event-free survival (EFS) less than 45%, were enrolled after induction therapy on a multicenter, non-randomized cooperative group pilot protocol.

The safety and effectiveness of Gleevec (340 mg/m 2 /day) in combination with intensive chemotherapy was evaluated in a subgroup of patients with Ph+ ALL.

The protocol included intensive chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplant after 2 courses of chemotherapy for patients with an appropriate HLA-matched family donor.

There were 92 eligible patients with Ph+ ALL enrolled.

The median age was 9.5 years (1 to 21 years: 2.2% between 1 and less than 2 years, 56.5% between 2 and less than 12 years, 34.8% between 12 and less than 18 years, and 6.5% between 18 and 21 years).

Sixty-four percent were male, 75% were white, 9% were Asian/Pacific Islander, and 5% were black.

In 5 successive cohorts of patients, Gleevec exposure was systematically increased by earlier introduction and prolonged duration.

Cohort 1 received the lowest intensity and cohort 5 received the highest intensity of Gleevec exposure.

There were 50 patients with Ph+ ALL assigned to cohort 5 all of whom received Gleevec plus chemotherapy; 30 were treated exclusively with chemotherapy and Gleevec and 20 received chemotherapy plus Gleevec and then underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplant, followed by further Gleevec treatment.

Patients in cohort 5 treated with chemotherapy received continuous daily exposure to Gleevec beginning in the first course of post induction chemotherapy continuing through maintenance cycles 1 through 4 chemotherapy.

During maintenance cycles 5 through 12, Gleevec was administered 28 days out of the 56 day cycle.

Patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplant received 42 days of Gleevec prior to HSCT, and 28 weeks (196 days) of Gleevec after the immediate post transplant period.

The estimated 4-year EFS of patients in cohort 5 was 70% (95% CI: 54, 81).

The median follow-up time for EFS at data cutoff in cohort 5 was 40.5 months.

14.5 Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Diseases An open-label, multicenter, Phase 2 clinical trial was conducted testing Gleevec in diverse populations of patients suffering from life-threatening diseases associated with Abl, Kit or PDGFR protein tyrosine kinases.

This study included 7 patients with MDS/MPD.

These patients were treated with Gleevec 400 mg daily.

The ages of the enrolled patients ranged from 20 to 86 years.

A further 24 patients with MDS/MPD aged 2 to 79 years were reported in 12 published case reports and a clinical study.

These patients also received Gleevec at a dose of 400 mg daily with the exception of three patients who received lower doses.

Of the total population of 31 patients treated for MDS/MPD, 14 (45%) achieved a complete hematological response and 12 (39%) a major cytogenetic response (including 10 with a CCyR).

Sixteen patients had a translocation, involving chromosome 5q33 or 4q12, resulting in a PDGFR gene re-arrangement.

All of these patients responded hematologically (13 completely).

Cytogenetic response was evaluated in 12 out of 14 patients, all of whom responded (10 patients completely).

Only 1 (7%) out of the 14 patients without a translocation associated with PDGFR gene re-arrangement achieved a complete hematological response and none achieved a major cytogenetic response.

A further patient with a PDGFR gene re-arrangement in molecular relapse after bone marrow transplant responded molecularly.

Median duration of therapy was 12.9 months (0.8 to 26.7) in the 7 patients treated within the Phase 2 study and ranged between 1 week and more than 18 months in responding patients in the published literature.

Results are provided in Table 22.

Response durations of Phase 2 study patients ranged from 141+ days to 457+ days.

Table 22: Response in MDS/MPD Abbreviations: NE, not evaluable; MDS/MPD, myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative disease.

Number of patients Complete hematologic response Major cytogenetic response N N (%) N (%) Overall population 31 14 (45) 12 (39) Chromosome 5 translocation 14 11 (79) 11 (79) Chromosome 4 translocation 2 2 (100) 1 (50) Others/no translocation 14 1 (7) 0 Molecular relapse 1 NE NE 14.6 Aggressive Systemic Mastocytosis One open-label, multicenter, Phase 2 study was conducted testing Gleevec in diverse populations of patients with life-threatening diseases associated with Abl, Kit or PDGFR protein tyrosine kinases.

This study included 5 patients with ASM treated with 100 mg to 400 mg of Gleevec daily.

These 5 patients ranged from 49 to 74 years of age.

In addition to these 5 patients, 10 published case reports and case series describe the use of Gleevec in 23 additional patients with ASM aged 26 to 85 years who also received 100 mg to 400 mg of Gleevec daily.

Cytogenetic abnormalities were evaluated in 20 of the 28 ASM patients treated with Gleevec from the published reports and in the Phase 2 study.

Seven of these 20 patients had the FIP1L1-PDGFRα fusion kinase (or CHIC2 deletion).

Patients with this cytogenetic abnormality were predominantly males and had eosinophilia associated with their systemic mast cell disease.

Two patients had a Kit mutation in the juxtamembrane region (one Phe522Cys and one K509I) and four patients had a D816V c-Kit mutation (not considered sensitive to Gleevec), one with concomitant CML.

Of the 28 patients treated for ASM, 8 (29%) achieved a complete hematologic response and 9 (32%) a partial hematologic response (PHR) (61% overall response rate).

Median duration of Gleevec therapy for the 5 ASM patients in the Phase 2 study was 13 months (range, 1.4 to 22.3 months) and between 1 month and more than 30 months in the responding patients described in the published medical literature.

A summary of the response rates to Gleevec in ASM is provided in Table 23.

Response durations of literature patients ranged from 1+ to 30+ months.

Table 23: Response in ASM Abbreviations: ASM, aggressive systemic mastocytosis; PDGFR, platelet-derived growth factor receptor.

*Patient had concomitant chronic myeloid leukemia CML and ASM.

Cytogenetic abnormality Number of patients N Complete hematologic response N (%) Partial hematologic response N (%) FIP1L1-PDGFRα fusion kinase (or CHIC2 deletion) 7 7 (100) 0 Juxtamembrane mutation 2 0 2 (100) Unknown or no cytogenetic abnormality detected 15 0 7 (44) D816V mutation 4 1* (25) 0 Total 28 8 (29) 9 (32) Gleevec has not been shown to be effective in patients with less aggressive forms of systemic mastocytosis (SM).

Gleevec is therefore not recommended for use in patients with cutaneous mastocytosis, indolent systemic mastocytosis (smoldering SM or isolated bone marrow mastocytosis), SM with an associated clonal hematological non-mast cell lineage disease, mast cell leukemia, mast cell sarcoma or extracutaneous mastocytoma.

Patients that harbor the D816V mutation of c-Kit are not sensitive to Gleevec and should not receive Gleevec.

14.7 Hypereosinophilic Syndrome/Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia One open-label, multicenter, Phase 2 study was conducted testing Gleevec in diverse populations of patients with life-threatening diseases associated with Abl, Kit or PDGFR protein tyrosine kinases.

This study included 14 patients with Hypereosinophilic Syndrome/Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia (HES/CEL).

HES patients were treated with 100 mg to 1,000 mg of Gleevec daily.

The ages of these patients ranged from 16 to 64 years.

A further 162 patients with HES/CEL aged 11 to 78 years were reported in 35 published case reports and case series.

These patients received Gleevec at doses of 75 mg to 800 mg daily.

Hematologic response rates are summarized in Table 24.

Response durations for literature patients ranged from 6+ weeks to 44 months.

Table 24: Response in HES/CEL Abbreviations: CEL, chronic eosinophilic leukemia; HES, hypereosinophilic syndrome; PDGFR, platelet-derived growth factor receptor.

Cytogenetic abnormality Number of patients Complete hematological response N (%) Partial hematological response N (%) Positive FIP1L1-PDGFRα fusion kinase 61 61 (100) 0 Negative FIP1L1-PDGFRα fusion kinase 56 12 (21) 9 (16) Unknown cytogenetic abnormality 59 34 (58) 7 (12) Total 176 107 (61) 23 (13) 14.8 Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans (DFSP) is a cutaneous soft tissue sarcoma.

It is characterized by a translocation of chromosomes 17 and 22 that results in the fusion of the collagen type 1 alpha 1 gene and the PDGF B gene.

An open-label, multicenter, Phase 2 study was conducted testing Gleevec in a diverse population of patients with life-threatening diseases associated with Abl, Kit or PDGFR protein tyrosine kinases.

This study included 12 patients with DFSP who were treated with Gleevec 800 mg daily (age range, 23 to 75 years).

DFSP was metastatic, locally recurrent following initial surgical resection and not considered amenable to further surgery at the time of study entry.

A further 6 DFSP patients treated with Gleevec are reported in 5 published case reports, their ages ranging from 18 months to 49 years.

The total population treated for DFSP therefore comprises 18 patients, 8 of them with metastatic disease.

The adult patients reported in the published literature were treated with either 400 mg (4 cases) or 800 mg (1 case) Gleevec daily.

A single pediatric patient received 400 mg/m 2 /daily, subsequently increased to 520 mg/m 2 /daily.

Ten patients had the PDGF B gene rearrangement, 5 had no available cytogenetics and 3 had complex cytogenetic abnormalities.

Responses to treatment are described in Table 25.

Table 25: Response in DFSP Number of patients (n = 18) % Complete response 7 39 Partial response* 8 44 Total responders 15 83 *5 patients made disease free by surgery.

Twelve of these 18 patients either achieved a complete response (7 patients) or were made disease free by surgery after a partial response (5 patients, including one child) for a total complete response rate of 67%.

A further 3 patients achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate of 83%.

Of the 8 patients with metastatic disease, five responded (62%), three of them completely (37%).

For the 10 study patients with the PDGF B gene rearrangement, there were 4 complete and 6 partial responses.

The median duration of response in the Phase 2 study was 6.2 months, with a maximum duration of 24.3 months, while in the published literature it ranged between 4 weeks and more than 20 months.

14.9 Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Unresectable and/or Malignant Metastatic GIST Two open-label, randomized, multinational Phase 3 studies were conducted in patients with unresectable or metastatic malignant GIST.

The two study designs were similar allowing a predefined combined analysis of safety and efficacy.

A total of 1640 patients were enrolled into the two studies and randomized 1:1 to receive either 400 mg or 800 mg orally daily continuously until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Patients in the 400 mg daily treatment group who experienced disease progression were permitted to crossover to receive treatment with 800 mg daily.

The studies were designed to compare response rates, progression-free survival and overall survival between the dose groups.

Median age at patient entry was 60 years.

Males comprised 58% of the patients enrolled.

All patients had a pathologic diagnosis of CD117 positive unresectable and/or metastatic malignant GIST.

The primary objective of the two studies was to evaluate either progression-free survival (PFS) with a secondary objective of overall survival (OS) in one study or overall survival with a secondary objective of PFS in the other study.

A planned analysis of both OS and PFS from the combined datasets from these two studies was conducted.

Results from this combined analysis are shown in Table 26.

Table 26: Overall Survival, Progression-Free Survival and Tumor Response Rates in the Phase 3 GIST Trials Abbreviation: GIST, gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Gleevec 400 mg N = 818 Gleevec 800 mg N = 822 Progression-free survival (months) Median 18.9 23.2 95% CI 17.4–21.2 20.8–24.9 Overall survival (months) 49.0 48.7 95% CI 45.3–60.0 45.3–51.6 Best overall tumor response Complete response Partial response 43 (5.3%) 377 (46.1%) 41 (5.0%) 402 (48.9%) Median follow up for the combined studies was 37.5 months.

There were no observed differences in overall survival between the treatment groups (p = 0.98).

Patients who crossed over following disease progression from the 400 mg/day treatment group to the 800 mg/day treatment group (n = 347) had a 3.4 month median and a 7.7 month mean exposure to Gleevec following crossover.

One open-label, multinational Phase 2 study was conducted in patients with Kit (CD117) positive unresectable or metastatic malignant GIST.

In this study, 147 patients were enrolled and randomized to receive either 400 mg or 600 mg orally every day for up to 36 months.

The primary outcome of the study was objective response rate.

Tumors were required to be measurable at entry in at least one site of disease, and response characterization was based on Southwestern Oncology Group (SWOG) criteria.

There were no differences in response rates between the 2 dose groups.

The response rate was 68.5% for the 400 mg group and 67.6% for the 600 mg group.

The median time to response was 12 weeks (range was 3 to 98 weeks) and the estimated median duration of response is 118 weeks (95% CI: 86, not reached).

Adjuvant Treatment of GIST In the adjuvant setting, Gleevec was investigated in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial involving 713 patients (Study 1).

Patients were randomized one to one to Gleevec at 400 mg/day or matching placebo for 12 months.

The ages of these patients ranged from 18 to 91 years.

Patients were included who had a histologic diagnosis of primary GIST, expressing KIT protein by immunochemistry and a tumor size greater than or equal to 3 cm in maximum dimension with complete gross resection of primary GIST within 14 to 70 days prior to registration.

Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of recurrence or death from any cause.

In a planned interim analysis, the median follow up was 15 months in patients without a RFS event; there were 30 RFS events in the 12-month Gleevec arm compared to 70 RFS events in the placebo arm with a hazard ratio of 0.398 (95% CI: 0.259, 0.610), p less than 0.0001.

After the interim analysis of RFS, 79 of the 354 patients initially randomized to the placebo arm were eligible to cross over to the 12-month Gleevec arm.

Seventy-two of these 79 patients subsequently crossed over to Gleevec therapy.

In an updated analysis, the median follow-up for patients without a RFS event was 50 months.

There were 74 (21%) RFS events in the 12-month Gleevec arm compared to 98 (28%) events in the placebo arm with a hazard ratio of 0.718 (95% CI: 0.531-0.971) (Figure 3).

The median follow-up for OS in patients still living was 61 months.

There were 26 (7%) and 33 (9%) deaths in the 12-month Gleevec and placebo arms, respectively with a hazard ratio of 0.816 (95% CI: 0.488-1.365).

Figure 3: Study 1 Recurrence-Free Survival (ITT Population) A second randomized, multicenter, open-label, Phase 3 trial in the adjuvant setting (Study 2) compared 12 months of Gleevec treatment to 36 months of Gleevec treatment at 400 mg/day in adult patients with KIT (CD117) positive GIST after surgical resection with one of the following: tumor diameter greater than 5 cm and mitotic count greater than 5/50 high power fields (HPF), or tumor diameter greater than 10 cm and any mitotic count, or tumor of any size with mitotic count greater than 10/50 HPF, or tumors ruptured into the peritoneal cavity.

There were a total of 397 patients randomized in the trial with 199 patients on the 12-month treatment arm and 198 patients on the 36-month treatment arm.

The median age was 61 years (range, 22 to 84 years).

RFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of recurrence or death from any cause.

The median follow-up for patients without a RFS event was 42 months.

There were 84 (42%) RFS events in the 12-month treatment arm and 50 (25%) RFS events in the 36-month treatment arm.

Thirty-six months of Gleevec treatment significantly prolonged RFS compared to 12 months of Gleevec treatment with a hazard ratio of 0.46 (95% CI: 0.32, 0.65), p less than 0.0001 (Figure 4).

The median follow-up for overall survival (OS) in patients still living was 48 months.

There were 25 (13%) deaths in the 12-month treatment arm and 12 (6%) deaths in the 36-month treatment arm.

Thirty-six months of Gleevec treatment significantly prolonged OS compared to 12 months of Gleevec treatment with a hazard ratio of 0.45 (95% CI: 0.22, 0.89), p = 0.0187 (Figure 5).

Figure 4: Study 2 Recurrence-Free Survival (ITT Population) Figure 5: Study 2 Overall Survival (ITT Population)

HOW SUPPLIED

16 /STORAGE AND HANDLING Gleevec film-coated tablets are supplied as 100 mg and 400 mg tablets for oral administration.

Each 100 mg tablet contains 119.5 mg of imatinib mesylate equivalent to 100 mg of imatinib free base.

Each 400 mg tablet contains 478 mg of imatinib mesylate equivalent to 400 mg of imatinib free base.

100-mg tablets Very dark yellow to brownish orange, film-coated tablets, round, biconvex with bevelled edges, debossed with “NVR” on one side, and “SA” with score on the other side.

Bottles of 90 tablets…………………………………NDC 0078-0401-34 400-mg tablets Very dark yellow to brownish orange, film-coated tablets, ovaloid, biconvex with bevelled edges, debossed with “gleevec” on one side and score on the other side.

Unit Dose (blister pack of 30) ………………………NDC 0078-0649-30 Unit Dose (carton box including 3 blister packs of 10)…………NDC 0078-0649-13 Storage and Handling Store at 20°C to 25°C (68°F to 77°F); excursions permitted between 15°C and 30°C (59°F and 86°F) [see USP Controlled Room Temperature].

Protect from moisture.

Dispense in a tight container, USP.

Do not crush Gleevec tablets.

Avoid direct contact of crushed tablets with the skin or mucous membranes.

If such contact occurs, wash thoroughly as outlined in the references.

Avoid exposure to crushed tablets.

GERIATRIC USE

8.5 Geriatric Use In the CML clinical studies, approximately 20% of patients were older than 65 years.

In the study of patients with newly diagnosed CML, 6% of patients were older than 65 years.

The frequency of edema was higher in patients older than 65 years as compared to younger patients; no other difference in the safety profile was observed [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)] .

The efficacy of Gleevec was similar in older and younger patients.

In the unresectable or metastatic GIST study, 16% of patients were older than 65 years.

No obvious differences in the safety or efficacy profile were noted in patients older than 65 years as compared to younger patients, but the small number of patients does not allow a formal analysis.

In the adjuvant GIST study, 221 patients (31%) were older than 65 years.

No difference was observed in the safety profile in patients older than 65 years as compared to younger patients, with the exception of a higher frequency of edema.

The efficacy of Gleevec was similar in patients older than 65 years and younger patients.

DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS

3 100 mg film coated tablets Very dark yellow to brownish orange, film-coated tablets, round, biconvex with bevelled edges, debossed with “NVR” on one side, and “SA” with score on the other side 400 mg film coated tablets Very dark yellow to brownish orange, film-coated tablets, ovaloid, biconvex with bevelled edges, debossed with “gleevec” on one side and score on the other side.

Tablets (scored): 100 mg and 400 mg

MECHANISM OF ACTION

12.1 Mechanism of Action Imatinib mesylate is a protein-tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase, the constitutive abnormal tyrosine kinase created by the Philadelphia chromosome abnormality in CML.

Imatinib inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in BCR-ABL positive cell lines as well as fresh leukemic cells from Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukemia.

Imatinib inhibits colony formation in assays using ex vivo peripheral blood and bone marrow samples from CML patients.

In vivo, imatinib inhibits tumor growth of BCR-ABL transfected murine myeloid cells as well as BCR-ABL positive leukemia lines derived from CML patients in blast crisis.

Imatinib is also an inhibitor of the receptor tyrosine kinases for platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and stem cell factor (SCF), c-Kit, and inhibits PDGF- and SCF-mediated cellular events.

In vitro, imatinib inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in GIST cells, which express an activating c-Kit mutation.

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

1 Gleevec is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of: Newly diagnosed adult and pediatric patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukemia (Ph+ CML) in chronic phase.

( 1.1 ) Patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukemia (Ph+ CML) in blast crisis (BC), accelerated phase (AP), or in chronic phase (CP) after failure of interferon-alpha therapy.

( 1.2 ) Adult patients with relapsed or refractory Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL).

( 1.3 ) Pediatric patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) in combination with chemotherapy.

( 1.4 ) Adult patients with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative diseases (MDS/MPD) associated with platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) gene re-arrangements.

( 1.5 ) Adult patients with aggressive systemic mastocytosis (ASM) without the D816V c-Kit mutation or with c-Kit mutational status unknown.

( 1.6 ) Adult patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) and/or chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL) who have the FIP1L1-PDGFRα fusion kinase (mutational analysis or fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH] demonstration of CHIC2 allele deletion) and for patients with HES and/or CEL who are FIP1L1-PDGFRα fusion kinase negative or unknown.

( 1.7 ) Adult patients with unresectable, recurrent and/or metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP).

( 1.8 ) Patients with Kit (CD117) positive unresectable and/or metastatic malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).

( 1.9 ) Adjuvant treatment of adult patients following resection of Kit (CD117) positive GIST.

( 1.10 ) 1.1 Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (Ph+ CML) Newly diagnosed adult and pediatric patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukemia (Ph+ CML) in chronic phase.

1.2 Ph+ CML in Blast Crisis (BC), Accelerated Phase (AP) or Chronic Phase (CP) After Interferon-alpha (IFN) Therapy Patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukemia in blast crisis, accelerated phase, or in chronic phase after failure of interferon-alpha therapy.

1.3 Adult Patients With Ph+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Adult patients with relapsed or refractory Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL).

1.4 Pediatric Patients With Ph+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Pediatric patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) in combination with chemotherapy.

1.5 Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Diseases (MDS/MPD) Adult patients with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative diseases associated with platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) gene re-arrangements.

1.6 Aggressive Systemic Mastocytosis (ASM) Adult patients with aggressive systemic mastocytosis without the D816V c-Kit mutation or with c-Kit mutational status unknown.

1.7 Hypereosinophilic Syndrome (HES) and/or Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia (CEL) Adult patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome and/or chronic eosinophilic leukemia who have the FIP1L1-PDGFRα fusion kinase (mutational analysis or fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH] demonstration of CHIC2 allele deletion) and for patients with HES and/or CEL who are FIP1L1-PDGFRα fusion kinase negative or unknown.

1.8 Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans (DFSP) Adult patients with unresectable, recurrent and/or metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.

1.9 Kit+ Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) Patients with Kit (CD117) positive unresectable and/or metastatic malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

1.10 Adjuvant Treatment of GIST Adjuvant treatment of adult patients following complete gross resection of Kit (CD117) positive GIST.

PEDIATRIC USE

8.4 Pediatric Use The safety and effectiveness of Gleevec have been demonstrated in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ chronic phase CML and Ph+ ALL [see Clinical Studies (14.2, 14.4)].

There are no data in children under 1 year of age.

PREGNANCY

8.1 Pregnancy Risk Summary Gleevec can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman based on human and animal data.

There are no clinical studies regarding use of Gleevec in pregnant women.

There have been postmarket reports of spontaneous abortions and congenital anomalies from women who have been exposed to Gleevec during pregnancy.

Reproductive studies in rats have demonstrated that imatinib mesylate induced teratogenicity and increased incidence of congenital abnormalities following prenatal exposure to imatinib mesylate at doses equal to the highest recommended human dose of 800 mg/day based on BSA.

Advise women to avoid pregnancy when taking Gleevec.

If this drug is used during pregnancy, or if the patient becomes pregnant while taking this drug, apprise the patient of the potential hazard to the fetus.

The background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is not known; however, in the U.S.

general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects of clinically recognized pregnancies is 2% to 4% and of miscarriage is 15% to 20%.

Data Animal Data In embryo-fetal development studies in rats and rabbits, pregnant animals received oral doses of imatinib mesylate up to 100 mg/kg/day and 60 mg/kg/day, respectively, during the period of organogenesis.

In rats, imatinib mesylate was teratogenic at 100 mg/kg/day (approximately equal to the maximum human dose of 800 mg/day based on BSA), the number of fetuses with encephalocoele and exencephaly was higher than historical control values and these findings were associated with missing or underdeveloped cranial bones.

Lower mean fetal body weights were associated with retarded skeletal ossifications.

In rabbits, at doses 1.5 times higher than the maximum human dose of 800 mg/day based on BSA, no effects on the reproductive parameters with respect to implantation sites, number of live fetuses, sex ratio or fetal weight were observed.

The examinations of the fetuses did not reveal any drug related morphological changes.

In a pre- and postnatal development study in rats, pregnant rats received oral doses of imatinib mesylate during gestation (organogenesis) and lactation up to 45 mg/kg/day.

Five animals developed a red vaginal discharge in the 45 mg/kg/day group on Days 14 or 15 of gestation, the significance of which is unknown since all females produced viable litters and none had increased post-implantation loss.

Other maternal effects noted only at the dose of 45 mg/kg/day (approximately one-half the maximum human dose of 800 mg/day based on BSA) included an increased number of stillborn pups and pups dying between postpartum Days 0 and 4.

In the F1 offspring at this same dose level, mean body weights were reduced from birth until terminal sacrifice and the number of litters achieving criterion for preputial separation was slightly decreased.

There were no other significant effects in developmental parameters or behavioral testing.

F1 fertility was not affected but reproductive effects were noted at 45 mg/kg/day, including an increased number of resorptions and a decreased number of viable fetuses.

The no-observed-effect level (NOEL) for both maternal animals and the F1 generation was 15 mg/kg/day.

WARNING AND CAUTIONS

5 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS Edema and severe fluid retention have occurred.

Weigh patients regularly and manage unexpected rapid weight gain by drug interruption and diuretics.

( 5.1 , 6.1 ) Cytopenias, particularly anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia, have occurred.

Manage with dose reduction, dose interruption, or discontinuation of treatment.

Perform complete blood counts weekly for the first month, biweekly for the second month, and periodically thereafter.

( 5.2 ) Severe congestive heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction have been reported, particularly in patients with comorbidities and risk factors.

Monitor and treat patients with cardiac disease or risk factors for cardiac failure.

( 5.3) Severe hepatotoxicity, including fatalities may occur.

Assess liver function before initiation of treatment and monthly thereafter or as clinically indicated.

Monitor liver function when combined with chemotherapy known to be associated with liver dysfunction.

( 5.4 ) Grade 3/4 hemorrhage has been reported in clinical studies in patients with newly diagnosed CML and with GIST.

GI tumor sites may be the source of GI bleeds in GIST.

( 5.5 ) Gastrointestinal (GI) perforations, some fatal, have been reported.

( 5.6 ) Cardiogenic shock/left ventricular dysfunction has been associated with the initiation of Gleevec in patients with conditions associated with high eosinophil levels (e.g., HES, MDS/MPD, and ASM).

( 5.7 ) Bullous dermatologic reactions (e.g., erythema multiforme and Stevens-Johnson syndrome) have been reported with the use of Gleevec.

( 5.8 ) Hypothyroidism has been reported in thyroidectomy patients undergoing levothyroxine replacement.

Closely monitor TSH levels in such patients.

( 5.9 ) Fetal harm can occur when administered to a pregnant woman.

Apprise women of the potential harm to the fetus, and to use effective contraception.

( 5.10 , 8.1 ) Growth retardation occurring in children and pre-adolescents receiving Gleevec has been reported.

Close monitoring of growth in children under Gleevec treatment is recommended.

( 5.11 , 6.2 ) Tumor Lysis Syndrome.

Close monitoring is recommended.

( 5.12 ) Reports of motor vehicle accidents have been received in patients receiving Gleevec.

Caution patients about driving a car or operating machinery.

( 5.13 ) Renal Toxicity.

A decline in renal function may occur in patients receiving Gleevec.

Evaluate renal function at baseline and during therapy, with attention to risk factors for renal dysfunction.

( 5.14 ) 5.1 Fluid Retention and Edema Gleevec is often associated with edema and occasionally serious fluid retention [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)] .

Weigh and monitor patients regularly for signs and symptoms of fluid retention.

Investigate unexpected rapid weight gain carefully and provide appropriate treatment.

The probability of edema was increased with higher Gleevec dose and age greater than 65 years in the CML studies.

Severe superficial edema was reported in 1.5% of newly diagnosed CML patients taking Gleevec, and in 2% to 6% of other adult CML patients taking Gleevec.

In addition, other severe fluid retention (e.g., pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, pulmonary edema, and ascites) reactions were reported in 1.3% of newly diagnosed CML patients taking Gleevec, and in 2% to 6% of other adult CML patients taking Gleevec.

Severe fluid retention was reported in 9% to 13.1% of patients taking Gleevec for GIST [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)] .

In a randomized trial in patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML in chronic phase comparing Gleevec and nilotinib, severe (Grade 3 or 4) fluid retention occurred in 2.5% of patients receiving Gleevec and in 3.9% of patients receiving nilotinib 300 mg twice daily.

Effusions (including pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, ascites) or pulmonary edema were observed in 2.1% (none were Grade 3 or 4) of patients in the Gleevec arm and 2.2% (0.7% Grade 3 or 4) of patients in the nilotinib 300 mg twice daily arm.

5.2 Hematologic Toxicity Treatment with Gleevec is associated with anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia.

Perform complete blood counts weekly for the first month, biweekly for the second month, and periodically thereafter as clinically indicated (for example, every 2 to 3 months).

In CML, the occurrence of these cytopenias is dependent on the stage of disease and is more frequent in patients with accelerated phase CML or blast crisis than in patients with chronic phase CML.

In pediatric CML patients the most frequent toxicities observed were Grade 3 or 4 cytopenias, including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia.

These generally occur within the first several months of therapy [see Dosage and Administration (2.14)] .

5.3 Congestive Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Dysfunction Congestive heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction have been reported in patients taking Gleevec.

Cardiac adverse reactions were more frequent in patients with advanced age or co-morbidities, including previous medical history of cardiac disease.

In an international randomized Phase 3 study in 1106 patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML in chronic phase, severe cardiac failure and left ventricular dysfunction were observed in 0.7% of patients taking Gleevec compared to 0.9% of patients taking IFN + Ara-C.

In another randomized trial with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML patients in chronic phase that compared Gleevec and nilotinib, cardiac failure was observed in 1.1% of patients in the Gleevec arm and 2.2% of patients in the nilotinib 300 mg twice daily arm and severe (Grade 3 or 4) cardiac failure occurred in 0.7% of patients in each group.

Carefully monitor patients with cardiac disease or risk factors for cardiac or history of renal failure.

Evaluate and treat any patient with signs or symptoms consistent with cardiac or renal failure.

5.4 Hepatotoxicity Hepatotoxicity, occasionally severe, may occur with Gleevec [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)] .

Cases of fatal liver failure and severe liver injury requiring liver transplants have been reported with both short-term and long-term use of Gleevec.

Monitor liver function (transaminases, bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase) before initiation of treatment and monthly, or as clinically indicated.

Manage laboratory abnormalities with Gleevec interruption and/or dose reduction [see Dosage and Administration (2.13)] .

When Gleevec is combined with chemotherapy, liver toxicity in the form of transaminase elevation and hyperbilirubinemia has been observed.

Additionally, there have been reports of acute liver failure.

Monitoring of hepatic function is recommended.

5.5 Hemorrhage In a trial of Gleevec versus IFN+Ara-C in patients with the newly diagnosed CML, 1.8% of patients had Grade 3/4 hemorrhage.

In the Phase 3 unresectable or metastatic GIST studies, 211 patients (12.9%) reported Grade 3/4 hemorrhage at any site.

In the Phase 2 unresectable or metastatic GIST study, 7 patients (5%) had a total of 8 CTC Grade 3/4 hemorrhages; gastrointestinal (GI) (3 patients), intra-tumoral (3 patients) or both (1 patient).

Gastrointestinal tumor sites may have been the source of GI hemorrhages.

In a randomized trial in patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML in chronic phase comparing Gleevec and nilotinib, GI hemorrhage occurred in 1.4% of patients in the Gleevec arm, and in 2.9% of patients in the nilotinib 300 mg twice daily arm.

None of these events were Grade 3 or 4 in the Gleevec arm; 0.7% were Grade 3 or 4 in the nilotinib 300 mg twice daily arm.

In addition, gastric antral vascular ectasia has been reported in postmarketing experience.

5.6 Gastrointestinal Disorders Gleevec is sometimes associated with GI irritation.

Gleevec should be taken with food and a large glass of water to minimize this problem.

There have been rare reports, including fatalities, of GI perforation.

5.7 Hypereosinophilic Cardiac Toxicity In patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome with occult infiltration of HES cells within the myocardium, cases of cardiogenic shock/left ventricular dysfunction have been associated with HES cell degranulation upon the initiation of Gleevec therapy.

The condition was reported to be reversible with the administration of systemic steroids, circulatory support measures and temporarily withholding Gleevec.

Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative disease and systemic mastocytosis may be associated with high eosinophil levels.

Consider performing an echocardiogram and determining serum troponin in patients with HES/CEL, and in patients with MDS/MPD or ASM associated with high eosinophil levels.

If either is abnormal, consider prophylactic use of systemic steroids (1-2 mg/kg) for one to two weeks concomitantly with Gleevec at the initiation of therapy.

5.8 Dermatologic Toxicities Bullous dermatologic reactions, including erythema multiforme and Stevens-Johnson syndrome, have been reported with use of Gleevec.

In some cases of bullous dermatologic reactions, including erythema multiforme and Stevens-Johnson syndrome reported during postmarketing surveillance, a recurrent dermatologic reaction was observed upon rechallenge.

Several foreign postmarketing reports have described cases in which patients tolerated the reintroduction of Gleevec therapy after resolution or improvement of the bullous reaction.

In these instances, Gleevec was resumed at a dose lower than that at which the reaction occurred and some patients also received concomitant treatment with corticosteroids or antihistamines.

5.9 Hypothyroidism Clinical cases of hypothyroidism have been reported in thyroidectomy patients undergoing levothyroxine replacement during treatment with Gleevec.

Monitor TSH levels in such patients.

5.10 Embryo-Fetal Toxicity Gleevec can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman.

Imatinib mesylate was teratogenic in rats when administered during organogenesis at doses approximately equal to the maximum human dose of 800 mg/day based on body surface area (BSA).

Significant post-implantation loss was seen in female rats administered imatinib mesylate at doses approximately one-half the maximum human dose of 800 mg/day based on BSA.

Advise sexually active female patients of reproductive potential to use effective contraception (methods that result in less than 1% pregnancy rates) when using Gleevec and for 14 days after stopping Gleevec.

If this drug is used during pregnancy or if the patient becomes pregnant while taking this drug, apprise the patient of the potential hazard to a fetus [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1)] .

5.11 Growth Retardation in Children and Adolescents Growth retardation has been reported in children and pre-adolescents receiving Gleevec.

The long-term effects of prolonged treatment with Gleevec on growth in children are unknown.

Therefore, monitor growth in children under Gleevec treatment [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)].

5.12 Tumor Lysis Syndrome Cases of Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS), including fatal cases, have been reported in patients with CML, GIST, ALL, and eosinophilic leukemia receiving Gleevec.

The patients at risk of TLS are those with tumors having a high proliferative rate or high tumor burden prior to treatment.

Monitor these patients closely and take appropriate precautions.

Due to possible occurrence of TLS, correct clinically significant dehydration and treat high uric acid levels prior to initiation of Gleevec.

5.13 Impairments Related to Driving and Using Machinery Motor vehicle accidents have been reported in patients receiving Gleevec.

Advise patients that they may experience side effects, such as dizziness, blurred vision, or somnolence during treatment with Gleevec.

Recommend caution when driving a car or operating machinery.

5.14 Renal Toxicity A decline in renal function may occur in patients receiving Gleevec.

Median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values in patients on Gleevec 400 mg daily for newly-diagnosed CML (four randomized trials) and malignant GIST (one single-arm trial) declined from a baseline value of 85 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (N = 1190) to 75 mL/min/1.73 m 2 at 12 months (N = 1082) and 69 mL/min/1.73 m 2 at 60 months (N = 549).

Evaluate renal function prior to initiating Gleevec and monitor during therapy, with attention to risk factors for renal dysfunction, such as preexisting renal impairment, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and congestive heart failure.

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS

17 PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION Dosing and Administration Advise patients to take Gleevec exactly as prescribed, not to change their dose or to stop taking Gleevec unless they are told to do so by their doctor.

If the patient missed a dose of Gleevec, the patient should take the next scheduled dose at its regular time.

The patient should not take two doses at the same time.

Advise patients to take Gleevec with a meal and a large glass of water [see Dosage and Administration (2.1)] .

Fluid Retention and Edema Inform patients of the possibility of developing edema and fluid retention.

Advise patients to contact their health care provider if unexpected rapid weight gain occurs [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)] .

Hepatotoxicity Inform patients of the possibility of developing liver function abnormalities and serious hepatic toxicity.

Advise patients to immediately contact their health care provider if signs of liver failure occur, including jaundice, anorexia, bleeding, or bruising [see Warnings and Precautions (5.4)] .

Pregnancy and Breastfeeding Advise patients to inform their doctor if they are or think they may be pregnant.

Advise women of reproductive potential to avoid becoming pregnant while taking Gleevec.

Female patients of reproductive potential taking Gleevec should use highly effective contraception during treatment and for fourteen days after stopping treatment with Gleevec [see Use in Specific Populations (8.3)] .

Avoid breastfeeding during treatment and for 1 month after the last dose [see Use in Specific Populations (8.2)] .

Drug Interactions Gleevec and certain other medicines, such as warfarin, erythromycin, and phenytoin, including over-the-counter medications, such as herbal products, can interact with each other.

Advise patients to tell their doctor if they are taking or plan to take iron supplements.

Avoid grapefruit juice and other foods known to inhibit CYP3A4 while taking Gleevec [see Drug Interactions (7)] .

Pediatric Advise patients that growth retardation has been reported in children and pre-adolescents receiving Gleevec.

The long term effects of prolonged treatment with Gleevec on growth in children are unknown.

Therefore, closely monitor growth in children under Gleevec treatment [see Warnings and Precautions (5.11)] .

Driving and Using Machines Advise patients that they may experience side effects, such as dizziness, blurred vision, or somnolence during treatment with Gleevec.

Therefore, caution patients about driving a car or operating machinery [see Warnings and Precautions (5.13)] .

Distributed by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation East Hanover, New Jersey 07936 © Novartis T2024-18

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

2 Adults with Ph+ CML CP ( 2.2 ): 400 mg/day Adults with Ph+ CML AP or BC ( 2.2 ): 600 mg/day Pediatrics with Ph+ CML CP ( 2.3 ): 340 mg/m 2 /day Adults with Ph+ ALL ( 2.4 ): 600 mg/day Pediatrics with Ph+ ALL ( 2.5 ): 340 mg/m 2 /day Adults with MDS/MPD ( 2.6 ): 400 mg/day Adults with ASM ( 2.7 ): 100 mg/day or 400 mg/day Adults with HES/CEL ( 2.8 ): 100 mg/day or 400 mg/day Adults with DFSP ( 2.9 ): 800 mg/day Adults with metastatic and/or unresectable GIST ( 2.10 ): 400 mg/day Adjuvant treatment of adults with GIST ( 2.11 ): 400 mg/day Patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment ( 2.12 ): 400 mg/day Patients with severe hepatic impairment ( 2.12 ): 300 mg/day All doses of Gleevec should be taken with a meal and a large glass of water.

Doses of 400 mg or 600 mg should be administered once daily, whereas a dose of 800 mg should be administered as 400 mg twice a day.

Gleevec can be dissolved in water or apple juice for patients having difficulty swallowing.

Daily dosing of 800 mg and above should be accomplished using the 400-mg tablet to reduce exposure to iron.

2.1 Drug Administration The prescribed dose should be administered orally, with a meal and a large glass of water.

Doses of 400 mg or 600 mg should be administered once daily, whereas a dose of 800 mg should be administered as 400 mg twice a day.

For patients unable to swallow the film-coated tablets, the tablets may be dispersed in a glass of water or apple juice.

The required number of tablets should be placed in the appropriate volume of beverage (approximately 50 mL for a 100-mg tablet, and 200 mL for a 400-mg tablet) and stirred with a spoon.

The suspension should be administered immediately after complete disintegration of the tablet(s).

For daily dosing of 800 mg and above, dosing should be accomplished using the 400-mg tablet to reduce exposure to iron.

Treatment may be continued as long as there is no evidence of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.

2.2 Adult Patients With Ph+ CML CP, AP, or BC The recommended dose of Gleevec is 400 mg/day for adult patients in chronic phase CML and 600 mg/day for adult patients in accelerated phase or blast crisis.

In CML, a dose increase from 400 mg to 600 mg in adult patients with chronic phase disease, or from 600 mg to 800 mg (given as 400 mg twice daily) in adult patients in accelerated phase or blast crisis may be considered in the absence of severe adverse drug reaction and severe non-leukemia related neutropenia or thrombocytopenia in the following circumstances: disease progression (at any time), failure to achieve a satisfactory hematologic response after at least 3 months of treatment, failure to achieve a cytogenetic response after 6 to 12 months of treatment, or loss of a previously achieved hematologic or cytogenetic response.

2.3 Pediatric Patients With Ph+ CML CP The recommended dose of Gleevec for children with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML is 340 mg/m 2 /day (not to exceed 600 mg).

Gleevec treatment can be given as a once daily dose or the daily dose may be split into two–one portion dosed in the morning and one portion in the evening.

There is no experience with Gleevec treatment in children under 1 year of age.

2.4 Adult Patients With Ph+ ALL The recommended dose of Gleevec is 600 mg/day for adult patients with relapsed/refractory Ph+ ALL.

2.5 Pediatric Patients With Ph+ ALL The recommended dose of Gleevec to be given in combination with chemotherapy to children with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL is 340 mg/m 2 /day (not to exceed 600 mg).

Gleevec treatment can be given as a once daily dose.

2.6 Adult Patients With MDS/MPD Determine PDGFRb gene rearrangements status prior to initiating treatment.

The recommended dose of Gleevec is 400 mg/day for adult patients with MDS/MPD.

2.7 Adult Patients With ASM Determine D816V c-Kit mutation status prior to initiating treatment.

The recommended dose of Gleevec is 400 mg/day for adult patients with ASM without the D816V c-Kit mutation.

If c-Kit mutational status is not known or unavailable, treatment with Gleevec 400 mg/day may be considered for patients with ASM not responding satisfactorily to other therapies.

For patients with ASM associated with eosinophilia, a clonal hematological disease related to the fusion kinase FIP1L1-PDGFRα, a starting dose of 100 mg/day is recommended.

Dose increase from 100 mg to 400 mg for these patients may be considered in the absence of adverse drug reactions if assessments demonstrate an insufficient response to therapy.

2.8 Adult Patients With HES/CEL The recommended dose of Gleevec is 400 mg/day for adult patients with HES/CEL.

For HES/CEL patients with demonstrated FIP1L1-PDGFRα fusion kinase, a starting dose of 100 mg/day is recommended.

Dose increase from 100 mg to 400 mg for these patients may be considered in the absence of adverse drug reactions if assessments demonstrate an insufficient response to therapy.

2.9 Adult Patients With DFSP The recommended dose of Gleevec is 800 mg/day for adult patients with DFSP.

2.10 Adult Patients With Metastatic and/or Unresectable GIST The recommended dose of Gleevec is 400 mg/day for adult patients with unresectable and/or metastatic, malignant GIST.

A dose increase up to 800 mg daily (given as 400 mg twice daily) may be considered, as clinically indicated, in patients showing clear signs or symptoms of disease progression at a lower dose and in the absence of severe adverse drug reactions.

2.11 Adult Patients With Adjuvant GIST The recommended dose of Gleevec is 400 mg/day for the adjuvant treatment of adult patients following complete gross resection of GIST.

In clinical trials, one year of Gleevec and three years of Gleevec were studied.

In the patient population defined in Study 2, three years of Gleevec is recommended [see Clinical Studies (14.8)] .

The optimal treatment duration with Gleevec is not known.

2.12 Dose Modification Guidelines Concomitant Strong CYP3A4 inducers: The use of concomitant strong CYP3A4 inducers should be avoided (e.g., dexamethasone, phenytoin, carbamazepine, rifampin, rifabutin, rifampacin, phenobarbital).

If patients must be coadministered a strong CYP3A4 inducer, based on pharmacokinetic studies, the dosage of Gleevec should be increased by at least 50%, and clinical response should be carefully monitored [see Drug Interactions (7.1)].

Hepatic Impairment: Patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment do not require a dose adjustment and should be treated per the recommended dose.

A 25% decrease in the recommended dose should be used for patients with severe hepatic impairment [see Use in Specific Populations (8.6)] .

Renal Impairment: Patients with moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance [CrCL] = 20-39 mL/min) should receive a 50% decrease in the recommended starting dose and future doses can be increased as tolerated.

Doses greater than 600 mg are not recommended in patients with mild renal impairment (CrCL = 40-59 mL/min).

For patients with moderate renal impairment doses greater than 400 mg are not recommended.

Imatinib should be used with caution in patients with severe renal impairment.

A dose of 100 mg/day was tolerated in two patients with severe renal impairment [see Warnings and Precautions (5.3), Use in Specific Populations (8.7)].

2.13 Dose Adjustment for Hepatotoxicity and Non-Hematologic Adverse Reactions If elevations in bilirubin greater than 3 times the institutional upper limit of normal (IULN) or in liver transaminases greater than 5 times the IULN occur, Gleevec should be withheld until bilirubin levels have returned to a less than 1.5 times the IULN and transaminase levels to less than 2.5 times the IULN.

In adults, treatment with Gleevec may then be continued at a reduced daily dose (i.e., 400 mg to 300 mg, 600 mg to 400 mg, or 800 mg to 600 mg).

In children, daily doses can be reduced under the same circumstances from 340 mg/m 2 /day to 260 mg/m 2 /day.

If a severe non-hematologic adverse reaction develops (such as severe hepatotoxicity or severe fluid retention), Gleevec should be withheld until the event has resolved.

Thereafter, treatment can be resumed as appropriate depending on the initial severity of the event.

2.14 Dose Adjustment for Hematologic Adverse Reactions Dose reduction or treatment interruptions for severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia are recommended as indicated in Table 1.

Table 1: Dose Adjustments for Neutropenia and Thrombocytopenia Abbreviations: ANC, absolute neutrophil count; ASM, aggressive systemic mastocytosis; CEL, chronic eosinophilic leukemia; CML, chronic myeloid leukemia; DFSP, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans; HES, hypereosinophilic syndrome; MDS/MPD, myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative diseases; PDGFR, platelet-derived growth factor receptor; Ph+ CML, Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukemia; Ph+ ALL, Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

ASM associated with eosinophilia (starting dose 100 mg) ANC less than 1 x 10 9 /L and/or platelets less than 50 x 10 9 /L Stop Gleevec until ANC greater than or equal to 1.5 x 10 9 /L and platelets greater than or equal to 75 x 10 9 /L Resume treatment with Gleevec at previous dose (i.e., dose before severe adverse reaction) HES/CEL with FIP1L1-PDGFRα fusion kinase (starting dose 100 mg) ANC less than 1 x 10 9 /L and/or platelets less than 50 x 10 9 /L Stop Gleevec until ANC greater than or equal to 1.5 x 10 9 /L and platelets greater than or equal to 75 x 10 9 /L Resume treatment with Gleevec at previous dose (i.e., dose before severe adverse reaction) Chronic Phase CML (starting dose 400 mg) MDS/MPD, ASM and HES/CEL (starting dose 400 mg) GIST (starting dose 400 mg) ANC less than 1 x 10 9 /L and/or platelets less than 50 x 10 9 /L Stop Gleevec until ANC greater than or equal to 1.5 x 10 9 /L and platelets greater than or equal to 75 x 10 9 /L Resume treatment with Gleevec at the original starting dose of 400 mg If recurrence of ANC less than 1 x 10 9 /L and/or platelets less than 50 x 10 9 /L, repeat step 1 and resume Gleevec at a reduced dose of 300 mg Ph+ CML: Accelerated Phase and Blast Crisis (starting dose 600 mg) Ph+ ALL (starting dose 600 mg) ANC less than 0.5 x 10 9 /L and/or platelets less than 10 x 10 9 /L Check if cytopenia is related to leukemia (marrow aspirate or biopsy) If cytopenia is unrelated to leukemia, reduce dose of Gleevec to 400 mg If cytopenia persists 2 weeks, reduce further to 300 mg If cytopenia persists 4 weeks and is still unrelated to leukemia, stop Gleevec until ANC greater than or equal to 1 x 10 9 /L and platelets greater than or equal to 20 x 10 9 /L and then resume treatment at 300 mg DFSP (starting dose 800 mg) ANC less than 1 x 10 9 /L and/or platelets less than 50 x 10 9 /L Stop Gleevec until ANC greater than or equal to 1.5 x 10 9 /L and platelets greater than or equal to 75 x 10 9 /L Resume treatment with Gleevec at 600 mg In the event of recurrence of ANC less than 1 x 10 9 /L and/or platelets less than 50 x 10 9 /L, repeat step 1 and resume Gleevec at reduced dose of 400 mg Pediatric newly diagnosed chronic phase CML (starting dose 340 mg/m 2 ) ANC less than 1 x 10 9 /L and/or platelets less than 50 x 10 9 /L Stop Gleevec until ANC greater than or equal to 1.5 x 10 9 /L and platelets greater than or equal to 75 x 10 9 /L Resume treatment with Gleevec at previous dose (i.e., dose before severe adverse reaction) In the event of recurrence of ANC less than 1 x 10 9 /L and/or platelets less than 50 x 10 9 /L, repeat step 1 and resume Gleevec at reduced dose of 260 mg/m 2

Breo Ellipta 200/25 MCG/INHAL Dry Powder Inhaler, 14 Blisters

DRUG INTERACTIONS

7 • Strong cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors (e.g., ketoconazole): Use with caution.

May cause systemic corticosteroid and cardiovascular effects.

( 7.1 ) • Monoamine oxidase inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants: Use with extreme caution.

May potentiate effect of vilanterol on vascular system.

( 7.2 ) • Beta-blockers: Use with caution.

May block bronchodilatory effects of beta-agonists and produce severe bronchospasm.

( 7.3 ) • Diuretics: Use with caution.

Electrocardiographic changes and/or hypokalemia associated with non–potassium-sparing diuretics may worsen with concomitant beta-agonists.

( 7.4 ) 7.1 Inhibitors of Cytochrome P450 3A4 Fluticasone furoate and vilanterol, the individual components of BREO ELLIPTA, are both substrates of CYP3A4.

Concomitant administration of the strong CYP3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole increases the systemic exposure to fluticasone furoate and vilanterol.

Caution should be exercised when considering the coadministration of BREO ELLIPTA with long-term ketoconazole and other known strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (e.g., ritonavir, clarithromycin, conivaptan, indinavir, itraconazole, lopinavir, nefazodone, nelfinavir, saquinavir, telithromycin, troleandomycin, voriconazole) [see Warnings and Precautions (5.9), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] .

7.2 Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors and Tricyclic Antidepressants Vilanterol, like other beta 2 -agonists, should be administered with extreme caution to patients being treated with monoamine oxidase inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, or drugs known to prolong the QTc interval or within 2 weeks of discontinuation of such agents, because the effect of adrenergic agonists on the cardiovascular system may be potentiated by these agents.

Drugs that are known to prolong the QTc interval have an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias.

7.3 Beta-adrenergic Receptor Blocking Agents Beta-blockers not only block the pulmonary effect of beta-agonists, such as vilanterol, a component of BREO ELLIPTA, but may also produce severe bronchospasm in patients with COPD or asthma.

Therefore, patients with COPD or asthma should not normally be treated with beta-blockers.

However, under certain circumstances, there may be no acceptable alternatives to the use of beta-adrenergic blocking agents for these patients; cardioselective beta-blockers could be considered, although they should be administered with caution.

7.4 Non–Potassium-Sparing Diuretics The electrocardiographic changes and/or hypokalemia that may result from the administration of non‑potassium-sparing diuretics (such as loop or thiazide diuretics) can be acutely worsened by beta-agonists, especially when the recommended dose of the beta-agonist is exceeded.

Although the clinical significance of these effects is not known, caution is advised in the coadministration of beta-agonists with non–potassium-sparing diuretics.

OVERDOSAGE

10 No human overdosage data has been reported for BREO ELLIPTA.

BREO ELLIPTA contains both fluticasone furoate and vilanterol; therefore, the risks associated with overdosage for the individual components described below apply to BREO ELLIPTA.

Treatment of overdosage consists of discontinuation of BREO ELLIPTA together with institution of appropriate symptomatic and/or supportive therapy.

The judicious use of a cardioselective beta‑receptor blocker may be considered, bearing in mind that such medicine can produce bronchospasm.

Cardiac monitoring is recommended in cases of overdosage.

10.1 Fluticasone Furoate Because of low systemic bioavailability (15.2%) and an absence of acute drug-related systemic findings in clinical trials, overdosage of fluticasone furoate is unlikely to require any treatment other than observation.

If used at excessive doses for prolonged periods, systemic effects such as hypercorticism may occur [see Warnings and Precautions (5.8)] .

Single- and repeat-dose trials of fluticasone furoate at doses of 50 to 4,000 mcg have been studied in human subjects.

Decreases in mean serum cortisol were observed at dosages of 500 mcg or higher given once daily for 14 days.

10.2 Vilanterol The expected signs and symptoms with overdosage of vilanterol are those of excessive beta-adrenergic stimulation and/or occurrence or exaggeration of any of the signs and symptoms of beta-adrenergic stimulation (e.g., seizures, angina, hypertension or hypotension, tachycardia with rates up to 200 beats/min, arrhythmias, nervousness, headache, tremor, muscle cramps, dry mouth, palpitation, nausea, dizziness, fatigue, malaise, insomnia, hyperglycemia, hypokalemia, metabolic acidosis).

As with all inhaled sympathomimetic medicines, cardiac arrest and even death may be associated with an overdose of vilanterol.

DESCRIPTION

11 BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 and BREO ELLIPTA 200/25 are inhalation powders for oral inhalation that contain a combination of fluticasone furoate (an ICS) and vilanterol (a LABA).

One active component of BREO ELLIPTA is fluticasone furoate, a synthetic trifluorinated corticosteroid having the chemical name (6α,11β,16α,17α)-6,9-difluoro-17-{[(fluoro-methyl)thio]carbonyl}-11-hydroxy-16-methyl-3-oxoandrosta-1,4-dien-17-yl 2-furancarboxylate and the following chemical structure: Fluticasone furoate is a white powder with a molecular weight of 538.6, and the empirical formula is C 27 H 29 F 3 O 6 S.

It is practically insoluble in water.

The other active component of BREO ELLIPTA is vilanterol trifenatate, a LABA with the chemical name triphenylacetic acid-4-{(1R)-2-[(6-{2-[2,6-dicholorobenzyl)oxy]ethoxy}hexyl)amino]-1-hydroxyethyl}-2-(hydroxymethyl)phenol (1:1) and the following chemical structure: Vilanterol trifenatate is a white powder with a molecular weight of 774.8, and the empirical formula is C 24 H 33 Cl 2 NO 5 •C 20 H 16 O 2 .

It is practically insoluble in water.

BREO ELLIPTA is a light grey and pale blue plastic inhaler containing 2 foil blister strips.

Each blister on one strip contains a white powder mix of micronized fluticasone furoate (100 or 200 mcg) and lactose monohydrate (12.4 mg), and each blister on the other strip contains a white powder mix of micronized vilanterol trifenatate (40 mcg equivalent to 25 mcg of vilanterol), magnesium stearate (125 mcg), and lactose monohydrate (12.34 mg).

The lactose monohydrate contains milk proteins.

After the inhaler is activated, the powder within both blisters is exposed and ready for dispersion into the airstream created by the patient inhaling through the mouthpiece.

Under standardized in vitro test conditions, BREO ELLIPTA delivers 92 and 184 mcg of fluticasone furoate and 22 mcg of vilanterol per blister when tested at a flow rate of 60 L/min for 4 seconds.

In adult subjects with obstructive lung disease and severely compromised lung function (COPD with FEV 1 /FVC less than 70% and FEV 1 less than 30% predicted or FEV 1 less than 50% predicted plus chronic respiratory failure), mean peak inspiratory flow through the ELLIPTA inhaler was 66.5 L/min (range: 43.5 to 81.0 L/min).

In adult subjects with severe asthma, mean peak inspiratory flow through the ELLIPTA inhaler was 96.6 L/min (range: 72.4 to 124.6 L/min).

The actual amount of drug delivered to the lung will depend on patient factors, such as inspiratory flow profile.

fluticasone furoate chemical structure vilanterol trifenatate chemical structure

CLINICAL STUDIES

14 14.1 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease The safety and efficacy of BREO ELLIPTA were evaluated in 7,700 subjects with COPD.

The development program included 4 confirmatory trials of 6 and 12 months’ duration, three 12-week active comparator trials with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250 mcg/50 mcg, and dose-ranging trials of shorter duration.

The efficacy of BREO ELLIPTA is based primarily on the dose-ranging trials and the 4 confirmatory trials described below.

Dose Selection for Vilanterol Dose selection for vilanterol in COPD was supported by a 28-day, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial evaluating 5 doses of vilanterol (3 to 50 mcg) or placebo dosed in the morning in 602 subjects with COPD.

Results demonstrated dose-related increases from baseline in FEV 1 at Day 1 and Day 28 (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Least Squares (LS) Mean Change from Baseline in Postdose Serial FEV 1 (0-24 h) (mL) on Days 1 and 28 Day 1 Day 28 The differences in trough FEV 1 on Day 28 from placebo for the 3-, 6.25-, 12.5-, 25-, and 50-mcg doses were 92 mL (95% CI: 39, 144), 98 mL (95% CI: 46, 150), 110 mL (95% CI: 57, 162), 137 mL (95% CI: 85, 190), and 165 mL (95% CI: 112, 217), respectively.

These results supported the evaluation of vilanterol 25 mcg once daily in the confirmatory trials for COPD.

Dose Selection for Fluticasone Furoate Dose selection of fluticasone furoate for Phase III trials in subjects with COPD was based on dose-ranging trials conducted in subjects with asthma; these trials are described in detail below [see Clinical Studies (14.2)] .

Confirmatory Trials The 4 confirmatory trials evaluated the efficacy of BREO ELLIPTA on lung function (Trials 1 and 2) and exacerbations (Trials 3 and 4).

Lung Function: Trials 1 and 2 were 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials designed to evaluate the efficacy of BREO ELLIPTA on lung function in subjects with COPD.

In Trial 1, subjects were randomized to BREO ELLIPTA 100/25, BREO ELLIPTA 200/25, fluticasone furoate 100 mcg, fluticasone furoate 200 mcg, vilanterol 25 mcg, and placebo.

In Trial 2, subjects were randomized to BREO ELLIPTA 100/25, fluticasone furoate/vilanterol 50 mcg/25 mcg, fluticasone furoate 100 mcg, vilanterol 25 mcg, and placebo.

All treatments were administered as 1 inhalation once daily.

Of the 2,254 patients, 70% were male and 84% were white.

They had a mean age of 62 years and an average smoking history of 44 pack years, with 54% identified as current smokers.

At screening, the mean postbronchodilator percent predicted FEV 1 was 48% (range: 14% to 87%), mean postbronchodilator FEV 1 /FVC ratio was 47% (range: 17% to 88%), and the mean percent reversibility was 14% (range: -41% to 152%).

The co-primary efficacy variables in both trials were weighted mean FEV 1 (0 to 4 hours) postdose on Day 168 and change from baseline in trough FEV 1 on Day 169 (the mean of the FEV 1 values obtained 23 and 24 hours after the final dose on Day 168).

The weighted mean comparison of the fluticasone furoate/vilanterol combination with fluticasone furoate was assessed to evaluate the contribution of vilanterol to BREO ELLIPTA.

The trough FEV 1 comparison of the fluticasone furoate/vilanterol combination with vilanterol was assessed to evaluate the contribution of fluticasone furoate to BREO ELLIPTA.

BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 demonstrated a larger increase in the weighted mean FEV 1 (0 to 4 hours) relative to placebo and fluticasone furoate 100 mcg at Day 168 (Table 4).

Table 4.

Least Squares Mean Change from Baseline in Weighted Mean FEV 1 (0-4 h) and Trough FEV 1 at 6 Months Treatment n Weighted Mean FEV 1 (0-4 h) a (mL) Trough FEV 1 b (mL) Difference from Difference from Placebo (95% CI) Fluticasone Furoate 100 mcg (95% CI) Fluticasone Furoate 200 mcg (95% CI) Placebo (95% CI) Vilanterol 25 mcg (95% CI) Trial 1 BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 204 214 (161, 266) 168 (116, 220) –– 144 (91, 197) 45 (-8, 97) BREO ELLIPTA 200/25 205 209 (157, 261) –– 168 (117, 219) 131 (80, 183) 32 (-19, 83) Trial 2 BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 206 173 (123, 224) 120 (70, 170) –– 115 (60, 169) 48 (-6, 102) a At Day 168.

b At Day 169.

Serial spirometric evaluations were performed predose and up to 4 hours after dosing.

Results from Trial 1 at Day 1 and Day 168 are shown in Figure 4.

Similar results were seen in Trial 2 (not shown).

Figure 4.

Raw Mean Change from Baseline in Postdose Serial FEV 1 (0-4 h) (mL) on Days 1 and 168 Day 1 Day 168 The second co-primary variable was change from baseline in trough FEV 1 following the final treatment day.

At Day 169, both Trials 1 and 2 demonstrated significant increases in trough FEV 1 for all strengths of the fluticasone furoate/vilanterol combination compared with placebo (Table 4).

The comparison of BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 with vilanterol did not achieve statistical significance (Table 4).

Trials 1 and 2 evaluated FEV 1 as a secondary endpoint.

Peak FEV 1 was defined as the maximum postdose FEV 1 recorded within 4 hours after the first dose of trial medicine on Day 1 (measurements recorded at 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1, 2, and 4 hours).

In both trials, differences in mean change from baseline in peak FEV 1 were observed for the groups receiving BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 compared with placebo (152 and 139 mL, respectively).

The median time to onset, defined as a 100-mL increase from baseline in FEV 1 , was 16 minutes in subjects receiving BREO ELLIPTA 100/25.

Exacerbations: Trials 3 and 4 were randomized, double-blind, 52-week trials designed to evaluate the effect of BREO ELLIPTA on the rate of moderate and severe COPD exacerbations.

All subjects were treated with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250 mcg/50 mcg twice daily during a 4-week run-in period prior to being randomly assigned to 1 of the following treatment groups: BREO ELLIPTA 100/25, BREO ELLIPTA 200/25, fluticasone furoate/vilanterol 50 mcg/25 mcg, or vilanterol 25 mcg.

The primary efficacy variable in both trials was the annual rate of moderate/severe exacerbations.

The comparison of the fluticasone furoate/vilanterol combination with vilanterol was assessed to evaluate the contribution of fluticasone furoate to BREO ELLIPTA.

In these 2 trials, exacerbations were defined as worsening of 2 or more major symptoms (dyspnea, sputum volume, and sputum purulence) or worsening of any 1 major symptom together with any 1 of the following minor symptoms: sore throat, colds (nasal discharge and/or nasal congestion), fever without other cause, and increased cough or wheeze for at least 2 consecutive days.

COPD exacerbations were considered to be of moderate severity if treatment with systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics was required and were considered to be severe if hospitalization was required.

Trials 3 and 4 included 3,255 subjects, of which 57% were male and 85% were white.

They had a mean age of 64 years and an average smoking history of 46 pack years, with 44% identified as current smokers.

At screening, the mean postbronchodilator percent predicted FEV 1 was 45% (range: 12% to 91%), and mean postbronchodilator FEV 1 /FVC ratio was 46% (range: 17% to 81%), indicating that the subject population had moderate to very severely impaired airflow obstruction.

The mean percent reversibility was 15% (range: -65% to 313%).

Subjects treated with BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 had a lower annual rate of moderate/severe COPD exacerbations compared with vilanterol in both trials (Table 5).

Table 5.

Moderate and Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations Treatment n Mean Annual Rate (exacerbations/year) Ratio vs.

Vilanterol 95% CI Trial 3 BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 403 0.90 0.79 0.64, 0.97 BREO ELLIPTA 200/25 409 0.79 0.69 0.56, 0.85 Fluticasone furoate/vilanterol 50 mcg/25 mcg 412 0.92 0.81 0.66, 0.99 Vilanterol 25 mcg 409 1.14 –– –– Trial 4 BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 403 0.70 0.66 0.54, 0.81 BREO ELLIPTA 200/25 402 0.90 0.85 0.70, 1.04 Fluticasone furoate/vilanterol 50 mcg/25 mcg 408 0.92 0.87 0.72, 1.06 Vilanterol 25 mcg 409 1.05 –– –– Comparator Trials Three 12-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trials were conducted with BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 once daily versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250 mcg/50 mcg twice daily to evaluate the efficacy of serial lung function of BREO ELLIPTA in subjects with COPD.

The primary endpoint of each study was change from baseline in weighted mean FEV 1 (0 to 24 hours) on Day 84.

Of the 519 patients in Trial 5, 64% were male and 97% were white; mean age was 61 years; average smoking history was 40 pack years, with 55% identified as current smokers.

At screening in the treatment group using BREO ELLIPTA 100/25, the mean postbronchodilator percent predicted FEV 1 was 48% (range: 19% to 70%), the mean (SD) FEV 1 /FVC ratio was 0.51 (0.11), and the mean percent reversibility was 11% (range: -12% to 83%).

At screening in the treatment group using fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250 mcg/50 mcg, the mean postbronchodilator percent predicted FEV 1 was 47% (range: 14% to 71%), the mean (SD) FEV 1 /FVC ratio was 0.49 (0.10), and the mean percent reversibility was 11% (range: -13% to 50%).

Of the 511 patients in Trial 6, 68% were male and 94% were white; mean age was 62 years; average smoking history was 35 pack years, with 52% identified as current smokers.

At screening in the treatment group using BREO ELLIPTA 100/25, the mean postbronchodilator percent predicted FEV 1 was 48% (range: 18% to 70%), the mean (SD) FEV 1 /FVC ratio was 0.51 (0.10), and the mean percent reversibility was 12% (range: -56% to 77%).

At screening in the treatment group using fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250 mcg/50 mcg, the mean postbronchodilator percent predicted FEV 1 was 49% (range: 15% to 70%), the mean (SD) FEV 1 /FVC ratio was 0.50 (0.10), and the mean percent reversibility was 12% (range: -66% to 72%).

Of the 828 patients in Trial 7, 72% were male and 98% were white; mean age was 61 years; average smoking history was 38 pack years, with 60% identified as current smokers.

At screening in the treatment group using BREO ELLIPTA 100/25, the mean postbronchodilator percent predicted FEV 1 was 48% (range: 18% to 70%), the mean (SD) FEV 1 /FVC ratio was 0.52 (0.10), and the mean percent reversibility was 12% (range: -26% to 84%).

At screening in the treatment group using fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250 mcg/50 mcg, the mean postbronchodilator percent predicted FEV 1 was 48% (range: 16% to 70%), the mean (SD) FEV 1 /FVC ratio was 0.51 (0.10), and the mean percent reversibility was 12% (range: -15% to 67%).

In Trial 5, the mean (SE) change from baseline in weighted mean FEV 1 (0 to 24 hours) with BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 was 174 (15) mL compared with 94 (16) mL with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250 mcg/50 mcg (treatment difference 80 mL; 95% CI: 37, 124; P <0.001).

In Trials 6 and 7, the mean (SE) change from baseline in weighted mean FEV 1 (0 to 24 hours)with BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 was 142 (18) mL and 168 (12) mL, respectively, compared with 114 (18) mL and 142 (12) mL, respectively, for fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250 mcg/50 mcg (Trial 6 treatment difference 29 mL; 95% CI: -22, 80; P = 0.267; Trial 7 treatment difference 25 mL; 95% CI: -8, 59; P = 0.137).

Figure 3.

Least Squares (LS) Mean Change from Baseline in Postdose Serial FEV1 (0-24 h) (mL) on Days 1 and 28, Day 1 Figure 3.

Least Squares (LS) Mean Change from Baseline in Postdose Serial FEV1 (0-24 h) (mL) on Days 1 and 28, Day 28 Figure 4.

Raw Mean Change from Baseline in Postdose Serial FEV1 (0-4 h) (mL) on Days 1 and 168, Day 1 Figure 4.

Raw Mean Change from Baseline in Postdose Serial FEV1 (0-4 h) (mL) on Days 1 and 168, Day 168 14.2 Asthma The safety and efficacy of BREO ELLIPTA were evaluated in 9,969 subjects with asthma.

The development program included 4 confirmatory trials (2 of 12 weeks’ duration, 1 of 24 weeks’ duration, 1 exacerbation trial of 24 to 76 weeks’ duration), one 24-week active comparator trial with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250 mcg/50 mcg, and dose-ranging trials of shorter duration.

The efficacy of BREO ELLIPTA is based primarily on the dose-ranging trials and the 4 confirmatory trials described below.

Dose Selection for Vilanterol Dose selection for vilanterol in asthma was supported by a 28-day, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial evaluating 5 doses of vilanterol (3 to 50 mcg) or placebo dosed in the evening in 607 subjects with asthma.

Results demonstrated dose-related increases from baseline in FEV 1 at Day 1 and Day 28 (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Least Squares (LS) Mean Change from Baseline in Postdose Serial FEV 1 (0-24 h) (mL) on Days 1 and 28 Day 1 Day 28 The differences in trough FEV 1 on Day 28 from placebo for the 3-, 6.25-, 12.5-, 25-, and 50-mcg doses were 64 mL (95% CI: -36, 164), 69 mL (95% CI: -29, 168), 130 mL (95% CI: 30, 230), 121 mL (95% CI: 23, 220), and 162 mL (95% CI: 62, 261), respectively.

These results and results of the secondary endpoints supported the evaluation of vilanterol 25 mcg once daily in the confirmatory trials for asthma.

Dose Selection for Fluticasone Furoate Eight doses of fluticasone furoate ranging from 25 to 800 mcg once daily were evaluated in 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week trials in subjects with asthma.

A dose-related increase in trough FEV 1 at Week 8 was seen for doses from 25 to 200 mcg with no consistent additional benefit for doses above 200 mcg.

To evaluate dosing frequency, a separate trial compared fluticasone furoate 200 mcg once daily and fluticasone furoate 100 mcg twice daily.

The results supported the selection of the once-daily dosing frequency (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Fluticasone Furoate Dose-Ranging and Dose-Frequency Trials FF = fluticasone furoate, FP = fluticasone propionate, QD = once daily, BID = twice daily.

Confirmatory Trials The efficacy of BREO ELLIPTA was evaluated in 4 randomized, double‑blind, parallel-group clinical trials in adolescent and adult subjects with asthma.

Three trials were designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BREO ELLIPTA given once daily in subjects who were not controlled on their current treatments of inhaled corticosteroid or combination therapy consisting of an inhaled corticosteroid plus a LABA (Trials 1, 2, and 3).

A 24- to 76-week exacerbation trial was designed to demonstrate that treatment with BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 significantly decreased the risk of asthma exacerbations as measured by time to first asthma exacerbation when compared with fluticasone furoate 100 mcg (Trial 5).

This trial enrolled subjects who had one or more asthma exacerbations in the year prior to trial entry.

The demographics of these 4 trials and the comparator trial (Trial 6) are provided in Table 6.

While subjects aged 12 to 17 years were included in these trials, BREO ELLIPTA is not approved for use in this age-group [see Indications (1.2), Adverse Reactions (6.2), Use in Specific Populations (8.4)] .

Table 6.

Demography of Asthma Trials 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 Parameter Trial 1 n = 609 Trial 2 n = 1,039 Trial 3 n = 586 Trial 5 n = 2,019 Trial 6 n = 806 Mean age (years) (range) 40 (12, 84) 46 (12, 82) 46 (12, 76) 42 (12, 82) 43 (12, 80) Female (%) 58 60 59 67 61 White (%) 84 88 84 73 59 Duration of asthma (years) 12 18 16 16 21 Never smoked a (%) N/A 84 N/A 86 81 Predose FEV 1 (L) at baseline 2.32 1.97 2.15 2.20 2.03 Mean percent predicted FEV 1 at baseline (%) 70 62 67 72 68 % Reversibility 29 30 29 24 28 Absolute reversibility (mL) 614 563 571 500 512 N/A = Data not collected.

a Trials did not include current smokers; past smokers had less than 10 packs per year history.

Trials 1, 2, and 3 were 12- or 24-week trials that evaluated the efficacy of BREO ELLIPTA on lung function in subjects with asthma.

In Trial 1, subjects were randomized to BREO ELLIPTA 100/25, fluticasone furoate 100 mcg, or placebo.

In Trial 2, subjects were randomized to BREO ELLIPTA 100/25, BREO ELLIPTA 200/25, or fluticasone furoate 100 mcg.

In Trial 3, subjects were randomized to BREO ELLIPTA 200/25, fluticasone furoate 200 mcg, or fluticasone propionate 500 mcg.

All inhalations were administered once daily, with the exception of fluticasone propionate, which was administered twice daily.

Subjects receiving an inhaled corticosteroid or an inhaled corticosteroid plus a LABA (doses of inhaled corticosteroid varied by trial and asthma severity) entered a 4-week run-in period during which LABA treatment was stopped.

Subjects reporting symptoms and/or rescue beta 2 -agonist medication use during the run-in period were continued in the trial.

In Trials 1 and 3, change from baseline in weighted mean FEV 1 (0 to 24 hours) and change from baseline in trough FEV 1 at approximately 24 hours after the last dose at study endpoint (12 and 24 weeks, respectively) were co-primary efficacy endpoints.

In Trial 2, change from baseline in weighted mean FEV 1 (0 to 24 hours) at Week 12 was the primary efficacy endpoint; change from baseline in trough FEV 1 at approximately 24 hours after the last dose at Week 12 was a secondary endpoint.

(See Table 7.) Weighted mean FEV 1 (0 to 24 hours) was derived from serial measurements taken within 30 minutes prior to dosing and postdose assessments at 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, 16, 20, 23, and 24 hours after the final dose.

Other secondary endpoints included change from baseline in percentage of rescue‑free 24-hour periods and percentage of symptom‑free 24-hour periods over the treatment period.

Table 7.

Change from Baseline in Weighted Mean FEV 1 (0-24 h) (mL) and Trough FEV 1 (mL) at Study Endpoint (Trials 1, 2, and 3) Study (Duration) Background Treatment n Weighted Mean FEV 1 (0-24 h) (mL) Difference from Placebo (95% CI) Fluticasone Furoate 100 mcg (95% CI) Fluticasone Furoate 200 mcg (95% CI) Treatment Trial 1 (12 Weeks) Low- to mid-dose ICS or low-dose ICS + LABA BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 108 302 (178, 426) 116 (-5, 236) –– Trial 2 (12 Weeks) Mid- to high-dose ICS or mid-dose ICS + LABA BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 312 –– 108 (45, 171) –– Trial 3 (24 Weeks) High-dose ICS or mid-dose ICS + LABA BREO ELLIPTA 200/25 89 –– –– 136 (1, 270) Study (Duration) Background Treatment n Trough FEV 1 (mL) Difference from Placebo (95% CI) Fluticasone Furoate 100 mcg (95% CI) Fluticasone Furoate 200 mcg (95% CI) Treatment Trial 1 (12 Weeks) Low- to mid-dose ICS or low-dose ICS + LABA BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 200 172 (87, 258) 36 (-48, 120) –– Trial 2 (12 Weeks) Mid- to high-dose ICS or mid-dose ICS + LABA BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 334 –– 77 (16, 138) –– Trial 3 (24 Weeks) High-dose ICS or mid-dose ICS + LABA BREO ELLIPTA 200/25 187 –– –– 193 (108, 277) ICS = inhaled corticosteroid, LABA = long-acting beta 2 -adrenergic agonist.

In Trial 1, weighted mean FEV 1 (0 to 24 hours) was assessed in a subset of subjects (n = 309).

At Week 12, change from baseline in weighted mean FEV 1 (0 to 24 hours) was significantly greater for BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 compared with placebo (302 mL; 95% CI: 178, 426; P <0.001) (Table 7); change from baseline in weighted mean FEV 1 (0 to 24 hours) for BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 was numerically greater than fluticasone furoate 100 mcg, but not statistically significant (116 mL; 95% CI: -5, 236).

At Week 12, change from baseline in trough FEV 1 was significantly greater for BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 compared with placebo (172 mL; 95% CI: 87, 258; P <0.001) (Table 7); change from baseline in trough FEV 1 for BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 was numerically greater than fluticasone furoate 100 mcg, but not statistically significant (36 mL; 95% CI: -48, 120).

In Trial 2, the change from baseline in weighted mean FEV 1 (0 to 24 hours) was significantly greater for BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 compared with fluticasone furoate 100 mcg (108 mL; 95% CI: 45, 171; P <0.001) at Week 12 (Table 7).

In a descriptive analysis, the change from baseline in weighted mean FEV 1 (0 to 24 hours) for BREO ELLIPTA 200/25 was numerically greater than BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 (24 mL; 95% CI: -37, 86) at Week 12.

The change from baseline in trough FEV 1 was significantly greater for BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 compared with fluticasone furoate 100 mcg (77 mL, 95% CI: 16, 138; P = 0.014) at Week 12 (Table 7).

In a descriptive analysis, the change from baseline in trough FEV 1 for BREO ELLIPTA 200/25 was numerically greater than BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 (16 mL; 95% CI: -46, 77) at Week 12.

In Trial 3, the change from baseline in weighted mean FEV 1 (0 to 24 hours) was significantly greater for BREO ELLIPTA 200/25 compared with fluticasone furoate 200 mcg (136 mL; 95% CI: 1, 270; P = 0.048) at Week 24 (Table 7).

The change from baseline in trough FEV 1 was significantly greater for BREO ELLIPTA 200/25 compared with fluticasone furoate 200 mcg (193 mL, 95% CI: 108, 277; P <0.001) at Week 24.

Lung function improvements were demonstrated through weighted mean FEV 1 (0 to 24 hours) over the 24-hour period following the final dose of BREO ELLIPTA in Trials 2 and 3.

Serial FEV 1 measurements were taken within 30 minutes prior to dosing and postdose assessments at 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, 16, 20, 23, and 24 hours in Trials 1, 2, and 3.

A representative figure is shown from Trial 2 in Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Least Squares (LS) Mean Change from Baseline in Individual Serial FEV 1 (mL) Assessments over 24 Hours after 12 Weeks of Treatment (Trial 2) Subjects receiving BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 (Trial 2) or BREO ELLIPTA 200/25 (Trial 3) had significantly greater improvements from baseline in percentage of 24-hour periods without need of beta 2 -agonist rescue medication use and percentage of 24-hour periods without asthma symptoms compared with subjects receiving fluticasone furoate 100 mcg or fluticasone furoate 200 mcg, respectively.

In a descriptive analysis (Trial 2), subjects receiving BREO ELLIPTA 200/25 had numerical improvements from baseline in percentage of 24-hour periods without need of beta 2 -agonist rescue medication use and percentage of 24-hour periods without asthma symptoms compared with subjects receiving BREO ELLIPTA 100/25.

Trial 5 was a 24- to 76-week event-driven exacerbation trial that evaluated whether BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 significantly decreased the risk of asthma exacerbations as measured by time to first asthma exacerbation when compared with fluticasone furoate 100 mcg in subjects with asthma.

Subjects receiving low- to high-dose inhaled corticosteroid (fluticasone propionate 100 mcg to 500 mcg twice daily or equivalent) or low- to mid-dose inhaled corticosteroid plus a LABA (fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 100 mcg/50 mcg to 250 mcg/50 mcg twice daily or equivalent) and a history of 1 or more asthma exacerbations that required treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroid or emergency department visit or in-patient hospitalization for the treatment of asthma in the year prior to trial entry, entered a 2-week run-in period during which LABA treatment was stopped.

Subjects reporting symptoms and/or rescue beta 2 -agonist medication use during the run-in period were continued in the trial.

The primary endpoint was time to first asthma exacerbation.

Asthma exacerbation was defined as deterioration of asthma requiring the use of systemic corticosteroid for at least 3 days or an in‑patient hospitalization or emergency department visit due to asthma that required systemic corticosteroid.

Rate of asthma exacerbation was a secondary endpoint.

The hazard ratio from the Cox Model for the analysis of time to first asthma exacerbation for BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 compared with fluticasone furoate 100 mcg was 0.795 (95% CI: 0.642, 0.985).

This represents a 20% reduction in the risk of experiencing an asthma exacerbation for subjects treated with BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 compared with fluticasone furoate 100 mcg ( P = 0.036).

Mean yearly rates of asthma exacerbations of 0.14 and 0.19 in subjects treated with BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 compared with fluticasone furoate 100 mcg, respectively, were observed (25% reduction in rate; 95% CI: 5%, 40%).

Comparator Trial Trial 6 was a 24-week trial that compared the efficacy of BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 once daily with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250 mcg/50 mcg twice daily (N = 806).

Subjects receiving mid-dose inhaled corticosteroid (fluticasone propionate 250 mcg twice daily or equivalent) entered a 4-week run-in period during which all subjects received fluticasone propionate 250 mcg twice daily.

The primary endpoint was change from baseline in weighted mean FEV 1 (0 to 24 hours) at Week 24.

The mean change (SE) from baseline in weighted mean FEV 1 (0 to 24 hours) for BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 was 341 (18.4) mL compared with 377 (18.5) mL for fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250 mcg/50 mcg (treatment difference -37 mL; 95% CI: -88, 15; P = 0.162).

Figure 5.

Least Squares (LS) Mean Change from Baseline in Postdose Serial FEV1 (0-24 h) (mL) on Days 1 and 28, Day 1 Figure 5.

Least Squares (LS) Mean Change from Baseline in Postdose Serial FEV1 (0-24 h) (mL) on Days 1 and 28, Day 28 Figure 6: Fluticasone Furoate Dose-Ranging and Dose-Frequency Trials Figure 7.

Least Squares (LS) Mean Change from Baseline in Individual Serial FEV1 (mL) Assessments over 24 Hours at Day 1 (Trial 1)

HOW SUPPLIED

16 /STORAGE AND HANDLING Product: 50090-2404 NDC: 50090-2404-0 1 POWDER in a TRAY

GERIATRIC USE

8.5 Geriatric Use Based on available data, no adjustment of the dosage of BREO ELLIPTA in geriatric patients is necessary, but greater sensitivity in some older individuals cannot be ruled out.

Clinical trials of BREO ELLIPTA for COPD included 2,508 subjects aged 65 and older and 564 subjects aged 75 and older.

Clinical trials of BREO ELLIPTA for asthma included 854 subjects aged 65 years and older.

No overall differences in safety or effectiveness were observed between these subjects and younger subjects, and other reported clinical experience has not identified differences in responses between the elderly and younger subjects.

DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS

3 Inhalation powder: Disposable light grey and pale blue plastic inhaler containing 2 foil blister strips of powder intended for oral inhalation only.

One strip contains fluticasone furoate (100 or 200 mcg per blister), and the other strip contains vilanterol (25 mcg per blister).

Inhalation Powder.

Inhaler containing 2 foil blister strips of powder formulation for oral inhalation.

One strip contains fluticasone furoate 100 or 200 mcg per blister and the other contains vilanterol 25 mcg per blister.

( 3)

MECHANISM OF ACTION

12.1 Mechanism of Action BREO ELLIPTA Since BREO ELLIPTA contains both fluticasone furoate and vilanterol, the mechanisms of action described below for the individual components apply to BREO ELLIPTA.

These drugs represent 2 different classes of medications (a synthetic corticosteroid and a LABA) that have different effects on clinical and physiological indices.

Fluticasone Furoate Fluticasone furoate is a synthetic trifluorinated corticosteroid with anti-inflammatory activity.

Fluticasone furoate has been shown in vitro to exhibit a binding affinity for the human glucocorticoid receptor that is approximately 29.9 times that of dexamethasone and 1.7 times that of fluticasone propionate.

The clinical relevance of these findings is unknown.

The precise mechanism through which fluticasone furoate affects COPD and asthma symptoms is not known.

Inflammation is an important component in the pathogenesis of COPD and asthma.

Corticosteroids have been shown to have a wide range of actions on multiple cell types (e.g., mast cells, eosinophils, neutrophils, macrophages, lymphocytes) and mediators (e.g., histamine, eicosanoids, leukotrienes, cytokines) involved in inflammation.

Specific effects of fluticasone furoate demonstrated in in vitro and in vivo models included activation of the glucocorticoid response element, inhibition of pro-inflammatory transcription factors such as NFkB, and inhibition of antigen-induced lung eosinophilia in sensitized rats.

These anti-inflammatory actions of corticosteroids may contribute to their efficacy.

Vilanterol Vilanterol is a LABA.

In vitro tests have shown the functional selectivity of vilanterol was similar to salmeterol.

The clinical relevance of this in vitro finding is unknown.

Although beta 2 -receptors are the predominant adrenergic receptors in bronchial smooth muscle and beta 1 -receptors are the predominant receptors in the heart, there are also beta 2 -receptors in the human heart comprising 10% to 50% of the total beta-adrenergic receptors.

The precise function of these receptors has not been established, but they raise the possibility that even highly selective beta 2 -agonists may have cardiac effects.

The pharmacologic effects of beta 2 -adrenoceptor agonist drugs, including vilanterol, are at least in part attributable to stimulation of intracellular adenyl cyclase, the enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to cyclic-3’,5’-adenosine monophosphate (cyclic AMP).

Increased cyclic AMP levels cause relaxation of bronchial smooth muscle and inhibition of release of mediators of immediate hypersensitivity from cells, especially from mast cells.

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

1 BREO ELLIPTA is a combination of fluticasone furoate, an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), and vilanterol, a long-acting beta 2 ‑adrenergic agonist (LABA), indicated for: • Long-term, once-daily, maintenance treatment of airflow obstruction and reducing exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

(1.1) • Once-daily treatment of asthma in patients aged 18 years and older.

( 1.2 ) Important limitation: Not indicated for relief of acute bronchospasm.

( 1.1 , 1.2 , 5.2 ) 1.1 Maintenance Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease BREO ® ELLIPTA ® 100/25 is a combination inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta 2 -adrenergic agonist (ICS/LABA) indicated for the long-term, once-daily, maintenance treatment of airflow obstruction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including chronic bronchitis and/or emphysema.

BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 is also indicated to reduce exacerbations of COPD in patients with a history of exacerbations.

BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 once daily is the only strength indicated for the treatment of COPD.

Important Limitation of Use BREO ELLIPTA is NOT indicated for the relief of acute bronchospasm.

1.2 Treatment of Asthma BREO ELLIPTA is a combination ICS/LABA indicated for the once-daily treatment of asthma in patients aged 18 years and older.

LABA, such as vilanterol, one of the active ingredients in BREO ELLIPTA, increase the risk of asthma-related death.

Available data from controlled clinical trials suggest that LABA increase the risk of asthma-related hospitalization in pediatric and adolescent patients [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1), Adverse Reactions (6.2), Use in Specific Populations (8.4)] .

Therefore, when treating patients with asthma, physicians should only prescribe BREO ELLIPTA for patients not adequately controlled on a long-term asthma control medication, such as an inhaled corticosteroid, or whose disease severity clearly warrants initiation of treatment with both an inhaled corticosteroid and a LABA.

Once asthma control is achieved and maintained, assess the patient at regular intervals and step down therapy (e.g., discontinue BREO ELLIPTA) if possible without loss of asthma control and maintain the patient on a long-term asthma control medication, such as an inhaled corticosteroid.

Do not use BREO ELLIPTA for patients whose asthma is adequately controlled on low- or medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids.

Important Limitation of Use BREO ELLIPTA is NOT indicated for the relief of acute bronchospasm.

PEDIATRIC USE

8.4 Pediatric Use BREO ELLIPTA is not indicated for use in children and adolescents.

The safety and efficacy in pediatric patients (aged 17 years and younger) have not been established.

In a 24- to 76-week exacerbation trial, subjects received BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 (n = 1,009) or fluticasone furoate 100 mcg (n = 1,010).

Subjects had a mean age of 42 years and a history of one or more asthma exacerbations that required treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids or emergency department visit or in-patient hospitalization for the treatment of asthma in the year prior to study entry.

[See Clinical Studies (14.2).] Adolescents aged 12 to 17 years made up 14% of the study population (n = 281), with a mean exposure of 352 days for subjects in this age group treated with BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 (n = 151) and 355 days for subjects in this age group treated with fluticasone furoate 100 mcg (n = 130).

In this age group, 10% of subjects treated with BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 reported an asthma exacerbation compared with 7% for subjects treated with fluticasone furoate 100 mcg.

Among the adolescents, asthma-related hospitalizations occurred in 4 subjects (2.6%) treated with BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 compared with 0 subjects treated with fluticasone furoate 100 mcg.

There were no asthma-related deaths or asthma-related intubations observed in the adolescent age group.

Effects on Growth Orally inhaled corticosteroids may cause a reduction in growth velocity when administered to children and adolescents.

A reduction of growth velocity in children and adolescents may occur as a result of poorly controlled asthma or from use of corticosteroids, including inhaled corticosteroids.

The effects of long-term treatment of children and adolescents with inhaled corticosteroids, including fluticasone furoate, on final adult height are not known.

Controlled clinical trials have shown that inhaled corticosteroids may cause a reduction in growth in children.

In these trials, the mean reduction in growth velocity was approximately 1 cm/year (range: 0.3 to 1.8 cm/year) and appears to be related to dose and duration of exposure.

This effect has been observed in the absence of laboratory evidence of HPA axis suppression, suggesting that growth velocity is a more sensitive indicator of systemic corticosteroid exposure in children than some commonly used tests of HPA axis function.

The long-term effects of this reduction in growth velocity associated with orally inhaled corticosteroids, including the impact on final adult height, are unknown.

The potential for “catch-up” growth following discontinuation of treatment with orally inhaled corticosteroids has not been adequately studied.

The growth of children and adolescents receiving orally inhaled corticosteroids, including BREO ELLIPTA, should be monitored routinely (e.g., via stadiometry).

The potential growth effects of prolonged treatment should be weighed against the clinical benefits obtained and the risks associated with alternative therapies.

To minimize the systemic effects of orally inhaled corticosteroids, including BREO ELLIPTA, each patient should be titrated to the lowest dose that effectively controls his/her symptoms.

A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, 1-year, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the effect of once-daily treatment with 110 mcg of fluticasone furoate in the nasal spray formulation on growth velocity assessed by stadiometry.

The subjects were 474 prepubescent children (girls aged 5 to 7.5 years and boys aged 5 to 8.5 years).

Mean growth velocity over the 52-week treatment period was lower in the subjects receiving fluticasone furoate nasal spray (5.19 cm/year) compared with placebo (5.46 cm/year).

The mean reduction in growth velocity was 0.27 cm/year (95% CI: 0.06 to 0.48) [see Warnings and Precautions (5.17)] .

PREGNANCY

8.1 Pregnancy Teratogenic Effects Pregnancy Category C.

There are no adequate and well-controlled trials with BREO ELLIPTA in pregnant women.

Corticosteroids and beta 2 -agonists have been shown to be teratogenic in laboratory animals when administered systemically at relatively low dosage levels.

Because animal reproduction studies are not always predictive of human response, BREO ELLIPTA should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus.

Women should be advised to contact their physicians if they become pregnant while taking BREO ELLIPTA.

Fluticasone Furoate and Vilanterol: There was no evidence of teratogenic interactions between fluticasone furoate and vilanterol in rats at approximately 5 and 40 times, respectively, the maximum recommended human daily inhalation dose (MRHDID) in adults (on a mcg/m 2 basis at maternal inhaled doses of fluticasone furoate and vilanterol, alone or in combination, up to approximately 95 mcg/kg/day).

Fluticasone Furoate: There were no teratogenic effects in rats and rabbits at approximately 4 and 1 times, respectively, the MRHDID in adults (on a mcg/m 2 basis at maternal inhaled doses up to 91 and 8 mcg/kg/day in rats and rabbits, respectively).

There were no effects on perinatal and postnatal development in rats at approximately 1 time the MRHDID in adults (on a mcg/m 2 basis at maternal doses up to 27 mcg/kg/day).

Vilanterol: There were no teratogenic effects in rats and rabbits at approximately 13,000 and 160 times, respectively, the MRHDID in adults (on a mcg/m 2 basis at maternal inhaled doses up to 33,700 mcg/kg/day in rats and on an AUC basis at maternal inhaled doses up to 591 mcg/kg/day in rabbits).

However, fetal skeletal variations were observed in rabbits at approximately 1,000 times the MRHDID in adults (on an AUC basis at maternal inhaled or subcutaneous doses of 5,740 or 300 mcg/kg/day, respectively).

The skeletal variations included decreased or absent ossification in cervical vertebral centrum and metacarpals.

There were no effects on perinatal and postnatal development in rats at approximately 3,900 times the MRHDID in adults (on a mcg/m 2 basis at maternal oral doses up to 10,000 mcg/kg/day).

Nonteratogenic Effects Hypoadrenalism may occur in infants born of mothers receiving corticosteroids during pregnancy.

Such infants should be carefully monitored.

NUSRING MOTHERS

8.3 Nursing Mothers It is not known whether fluticasone furoate or vilanterol are excreted in human breast milk.

However, other corticosteroids and beta 2 -agonists have been detected in human milk.

Since there are no data from controlled trials on the use of BREO ELLIPTA by nursing mothers, caution should be exercised when it is administered to a nursing woman.

BOXED WARNING

WARNING: ASTHMA-RELATED DEATH Long-acting beta 2 -adrenergic agonists (LABA), such as vilanterol, one of the active ingredients in BREO ELLIPTA, increase the risk of asthma-related death.

Data from a large placebo-controlled US trial that compared the safety of another LABA (salmeterol) with placebo added to usual asthma therapy showed an increase in asthma-related deaths in subjects receiving salmeterol.

This finding with salmeterol is considered a class effect of LABA.

Currently available data are inadequate to determine whether concurrent use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or other long-term asthma control drugs mitigates the increased risk of asthma-related death from LABA.

Available data from controlled clinical trials suggest that LABA increase the risk of asthma-related hospitalization in pediatric and adolescent patients.

Therefore, when treating patients with asthma, physicians should only prescribe BREO ELLIPTA for patients not adequately controlled on a long-term asthma control medication, such as an inhaled corticosteroid, or whose disease severity clearly warrants initiation of treatment with both an inhaled corticosteroid and a LABA.

Once asthma control is achieved and maintained, assess the patient at regular intervals and step down therapy (e.g., discontinue BREO ELLIPTA) if possible without loss of asthma control and maintain the patient on a long-term asthma control medication, such as an inhaled corticosteroid.

Do not use BREO ELLIPTA for patients whose asthma is adequately controlled on low- or medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)] .

WARNING: ASTHMA-RELATED DEATH See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning.

• Long-acting beta 2 -adrenergic agonists (LABA), such as vilanterol, increase the risk of asthma-related death.

A placebo-controlled trial with another LABA (salmeterol) showed an increase in asthma-related deaths.

This finding with salmeterol is considered a class effect of all LABA.

Currently available data are inadequate to determine whether concurrent use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or other long-term asthma control drugs mitigates the increased risk of asthma-related death from LABA.

Available data from controlled clinical trials suggest that LABA increase the risk of asthma-related hospitalization in pediatric and adolescent patients.

( 5.1 ) • When treating patients with asthma, only prescribe BREO ELLIPTA for patients not adequately controlled on a long-term asthma control medication, such as an ICS, or whose disease severity clearly warrants initiation of treatment with both an ICS and a LABA.

Once asthma control is achieved and maintained, assess the patient at regular intervals and step down therapy (e.g., discontinue BREO ELLIPTA) if possible without loss of asthma control and maintain the patient on a long-term asthma control medication, such as an ICS.

Do not use BREO ELLIPTA for patients whose asthma is adequately controlled on low- or medium-dose ICS.( 1.2 , 5.1 )

WARNING AND CAUTIONS

5 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS • LABA increase the risk of asthma-related death and asthma-related hospitalizations.

Prescribe only for recommended patient populations.

( 5.1 ) • Do not initiate in acutely deteriorating COPD or asthma.

Do not use to treat acute symptoms.

( 5.2 ) • Do not use in combination with an additional medicine containing a LABA because of risk of overdose.

( 5.3 ) • Candida albicans infection of the mouth and pharynx may occur.

Monitor patients periodically.

Advise the patient to rinse his/her mouth with water without swallowing after inhalation to help reduce the risk.

( 5.4 ) • Increased risk of pneumonia in patients with COPD.

Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of pneumonia.

( 5.5 ) • Potential worsening of infections (e.g., existing tuberculosis; fungal, bacterial, viral, or parasitic infections; ocular herpes simplex).

Use with caution in patients with these infections.

More serious or even fatal course of chickenpox or measles can occur in susceptible patients.

( 5.6 ) • Risk of impaired adrenal function when transferring from systemic corticosteroids.

Taper patients slowly from systemic corticosteroids if transferring to BREO ELLIPTA.

( 5.7 ) • Hypercorticism and adrenal suppression may occur with very high dosages or at the regular dosage in susceptible individuals.

If such changes occur, discontinue BREO ELLIPTA slowly.

( 5.8 ) • If paradoxical bronchospasm occurs, discontinue BREO ELLIPTA and institute alternative therapy.

( 5.10 ) • Use with caution in patients with cardiovascular disorders because of beta-adrenergic stimulation.

( 5.12 ) • Assess for decrease in bone mineral density initially and periodically thereafter.

( 5.13 ) • Close monitoring for glaucoma and cataracts is warranted.

( 5.14 ) • Use with caution in patients with convulsive disorders, thyrotoxicosis, diabetes mellitus, and ketoacidosis.

( 5.15 ) • Be alert to hypokalemia and hyperglycemia.

( 5.16 ) 5.1 Asthma-Related Death LABA, such as vilanterol, one of the active ingredients in BREO ELLIPTA, increase the risk of asthma-related death.

Currently available data are inadequate to determine whether concurrent use of inhaled corticosteroids or other long-term asthma control drugs mitigates the increased risk of asthma-related death from LABA.

Available data from controlled clinical trials suggest that LABA increase the risk of asthma-related hospitalization in pediatric and adolescent patients.

Therefore, when treating patients with asthma, physicians should only prescribe BREO ELLIPTA for patients not adequately controlled on a long-term asthma control medication, such as an inhaled corticosteroid, or whose disease severity clearly warrants initiation of treatment with both an inhaled corticosteroid and a LABA.

Once asthma control is achieved and maintained, assess the patient at regular intervals and step down therapy (e.g., discontinue BREO ELLIPTA) if possible without loss of asthma control and maintain the patient on a long-term asthma control medication, such as an inhaled corticosteroid.

Do not use BREO ELLIPTA for patients whose asthma is adequately controlled on low- or medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids.

A 28-week, placebo-controlled, US trial that compared the safety of another LABA (salmeterol) with placebo, each added to usual asthma therapy, showed an increase in asthma-related deaths in subjects receiving salmeterol (13/13,176 in subjects treated with salmeterol vs.

3/13,179 in subjects treated with placebo; relative risk: 4.37 [95% CI: 1.25, 15.34]).

The increased risk of asthma-related death is considered a class effect of LABA, including vilanterol, one of the active ingredients in BREO ELLIPTA.

No trial adequate to determine whether the rate of asthma-related death is increased in subjects treated with BREO ELLIPTA has been conducted.

Data are not available to determine whether the rate of death in patients with COPD is increased by LABA.

5.2 Deterioration of Disease and Acute Episodes BREO ELLIPTA should not be initiated in patients during rapidly deteriorating or potentially life-threatening episodes of COPD or asthma.

BREO ELLIPTA has not been studied in subjects with acutely deteriorating COPD or asthma.

The initiation of BREO ELLIPTA in this setting is not appropriate.

COPD may deteriorate acutely over a period of hours or chronically over several days or longer.

If BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 no longer controls symptoms of bronchoconstriction; the patient’s inhaled, short-acting, beta 2 -agonist becomes less effective; or the patient needs more short-acting beta 2 -agonist than usual, these may be markers of deterioration of disease.

In this setting a reevaluation of the patient and the COPD treatment regimen should be undertaken at once.

For COPD, increasing the daily dose of BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 is not appropriate in this situation.

Increasing use of inhaled, short-acting beta 2 -agonists is a marker of deteriorating asthma.

In this situation, the patient requires immediate reevaluation with reassessment of the treatment regimen, giving special consideration to the possible need for replacing the current strength of BREO ELLIPTA with a higher strength, adding additional inhaled corticosteroid, or initiating systemic corticosteroids.

Patients should not use more than 1 inhalation once daily of BREO ELLIPTA.

BREO ELLIPTA should not be used for the relief of acute symptoms, i.e., as rescue therapy for the treatment of acute episodes of bronchospasm.

BREO ELLIPTA has not been studied in the relief of acute symptoms and extra doses should not be used for that purpose.

Acute symptoms should be treated with an inhaled, short-acting beta 2 -agonist.

When beginning treatment with BREO ELLIPTA, patients who have been taking oral or inhaled, short-acting beta 2 -agonists on a regular basis (e.g., 4 times a day) should be instructed to discontinue the regular use of these drugs and to use them only for symptomatic relief of acute respiratory symptoms.

When prescribing BREO ELLIPTA, the healthcare provider should also prescribe an inhaled, short-acting beta 2 -agonist and instruct the patient on how it should be used.

5.3 Excessive Use of BREO ELLIPTA and Use with Other Long-acting Beta 2 -agonists BREO ELLIPTA should not be used more often than recommended, at higher doses than recommended, or in conjunction with other medicines containing LABA, as an overdose may result.

Clinically significant cardiovascular effects and fatalities have been reported in association with excessive use of inhaled sympathomimetic drugs.

Patients using BREO ELLIPTA should not use another medicine containing a LABA (e.g., salmeterol, formoterol fumarate, arformoterol tartrate, indacaterol) for any reason.

5.4 Local Effects of Inhaled Corticosteroids In clinical trials, the development of localized infections of the mouth and pharynx with Candida albicans has occurred in subjects treated with BREO ELLIPTA.

When such an infection develops, it should be treated with appropriate local or systemic (i.e., oral) antifungal therapy while treatment with BREO ELLIPTA continues, but at times therapy with BREO ELLIPTA may need to be interrupted.

Advise the patient to rinse his/her mouth with water without swallowing following inhalation to help reduce the risk of oropharyngeal candidiasis.

5.5 Pneumonia An increase in the incidence of pneumonia has been observed in subjects with COPD receiving BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 in clinical trials.

There was also an increased incidence of pneumonias resulting in hospitalization.

In some incidences these pneumonia events were fatal.

Physicians should remain vigilant for the possible development of pneumonia in patients with COPD as the clinical features of such infections overlap with the symptoms of COPD exacerbations.

In replicate 12-month trials in 3,255 subjects with COPD who had experienced a COPD exacerbation in the previous year, there was a higher incidence of pneumonia reported in subjects receiving fluticasone furoate/vilanterol 50 mcg/25 mcg: 6% (48 of 820 subjects); BREO ELLIPTA 100/25: 6% (51 of 806 subjects); or BREO ELLIPTA 200/25: 7% (55 of 811 subjects) than in subjects receiving vilanterol 25 mcg: 3% (27 of 818 subjects).

There was no fatal pneumonia in subjects receiving vilanterol or fluticasone furoate/vilanterol 50 mcg/25 mcg.

There was fatal pneumonia in 1 subject receiving BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 and in 7 subjects receiving BREO ELLIPTA 200/25 (less than 1% for each treatment group).

5.6 Immunosuppression Persons who are using drugs that suppress the immune system are more susceptible to infections than healthy individuals.

Chickenpox and measles, for example, can have a more serious or even fatal course in susceptible children or adults using corticosteroids.

In such children or adults who have not had these diseases or been properly immunized, particular care should be taken to avoid exposure.

How the dose, route, and duration of corticosteroid administration affect the risk of developing a disseminated infection is not known.

The contribution of the underlying disease and/or prior corticosteroid treatment to the risk is also not known.

If a patient is exposed to chickenpox, prophylaxis with varicella zoster immune globulin (VZIG) may be indicated.

If a patient is exposed to measles, prophylaxis with pooled intramuscular immunoglobulin (IG) may be indicated.

(See the respective package inserts for complete VZIG and IG prescribing information.) If chickenpox develops, treatment with antiviral agents may be considered.

Inhaled corticosteroids should be used with caution, if at all, in patients with active or quiescent tuberculosis infections of the respiratory tract; systemic fungal, bacterial, viral, or parasitic infections; or ocular herpes simplex.

5.7 Transferring Patients from Systemic Corticosteroid Therapy Particular care is needed for patients who have been transferred from systemically active corticosteroids to inhaled corticosteroids because deaths due to adrenal insufficiency have occurred in patients with asthma during and after transfer from systemic corticosteroids to less systemically available inhaled corticosteroids.

After withdrawal from systemic corticosteroids, a number of months are required for recovery of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) function.

Patients who have been previously maintained on 20 mg or more of prednisone (or its equivalent) may be most susceptible, particularly when their systemic corticosteroids have been almost completely withdrawn.

During this period of HPA suppression, patients may exhibit signs and symptoms of adrenal insufficiency when exposed to trauma, surgery, or infection (particularly gastroenteritis) or other conditions associated with severe electrolyte loss.

Although BREO ELLIPTA may control COPD or asthma symptoms during these episodes, in recommended doses it supplies less than normal physiological amounts of glucocorticoid systemically and does NOT provide the mineralocorticoid activity that is necessary for coping with these emergencies.

During periods of stress, a severe COPD exacerbation, or a severe asthma attack, patients who have been withdrawn from systemic corticosteroids should be instructed to resume oral corticosteroids (in large doses) immediately and to contact their physicians for further instruction.

These patients should also be instructed to carry a warning card indicating that they may need supplementary systemic corticosteroids during periods of stress, a severe COPD exacerbation, or a severe asthma attack.

Patients requiring oral corticosteroids should be weaned slowly from systemic corticosteroid use after transferring to BREO ELLIPTA.

Prednisone reduction can be accomplished by reducing the daily prednisone dose by 2.5 mg on a weekly basis during therapy with BREO ELLIPTA.

Lung function (FEV 1 or peak expiratory flow), beta-agonist use, and COPD or asthma symptoms should be carefully monitored during withdrawal of oral corticosteroids.

In addition, patients should be observed for signs and symptoms of adrenal insufficiency, such as fatigue, lassitude, weakness, nausea and vomiting, and hypotension.

Transfer of patients from systemic corticosteroid therapy to BREO ELLIPTA may unmask allergic conditions previously suppressed by the systemic corticosteroid therapy (e.g., rhinitis, conjunctivitis, eczema, arthritis, eosinophilic conditions).

During withdrawal from oral corticosteroids, some patients may experience symptoms of systemically active corticosteroid withdrawal (e.g., joint and/or muscular pain, lassitude, depression) despite maintenance or even improvement of respiratory function.

5.8 Hypercorticism and Adrenal Suppression Inhaled fluticasone furoate is absorbed into the circulation and can be systemically active.

Effects of fluticasone furoate on the HPA axis are not observed with the therapeutic doses of BREO ELLIPTA.

However, exceeding the recommended dosage or coadministration with a strong cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitor may result in HPA dysfunction [see Warnings and Precautions (5.9), Drug Interactions (7.1)] .

Because of the possibility of significant systemic absorption of inhaled corticosteroids in sensitive patients, patients treated with BREO ELLIPTA should be observed carefully for any evidence of systemic corticosteroid effects.

Particular care should be taken in observing patients postoperatively or during periods of stress for evidence of inadequate adrenal response.

It is possible that systemic corticosteroid effects such as hypercorticism and adrenal suppression (including adrenal crisis) may appear in a small number of patients who are sensitive to these effects.

If such effects occur, BREO ELLIPTA should be reduced slowly, consistent with accepted procedures for reducing systemic corticosteroids, and other treatments for management of COPD or asthma symptoms should be considered.

5.9 Drug Interactions with Strong Cytochrome P450 3A4 Inhibitors Caution should be exercised when considering the coadministration of BREO ELLIPTA with long-term ketoconazole and other known strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (e.g., ritonavir, clarithromycin, conivaptan, indinavir, itraconazole, lopinavir, nefazodone, nelfinavir, saquinavir, telithromycin, troleandomycin, voriconazole) because increased systemic corticosteroid and increased cardiovascular adverse effects may occur [see Drug Interactions (7.1), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

5.10 Paradoxical Bronchospasm As with other inhaled medicines, BREO ELLIPTA can produce paradoxical bronchospasm, which may be life threatening.

If paradoxical bronchospasm occurs following dosing with BREO ELLIPTA, it should be treated immediately with an inhaled, short-acting bronchodilator; BREO ELLIPTA should be discontinued immediately; and alternative therapy should be instituted.

5.11 Hypersensitivity Reactions, Including Anaphylaxis Hypersensitivity reactions such as anaphylaxis, angioedema, rash, and urticaria may occur after administration of BREO ELLIPTA.

Discontinue BREO ELLIPTA if such reactions occur.

There have been reports of anaphylactic reactions in patients with severe milk protein allergy after inhalation of other powder medications containing lactose; therefore, patients with severe milk protein allergy should not use BREO ELLIPTA [see Contraindications (4)] .

5.12 Cardiovascular Effects Vilanterol, like other beta 2 -agonists, can produce a clinically significant cardiovascular effect in some patients as measured by increases in pulse rate, systolic or diastolic blood pressure, and also cardiac arrhythmias, such as supraventricular tachycardia and extrasystoles.

If such effects occur, BREO ELLIPTA may need to be discontinued.

In addition, beta-agonists have been reported to produce electrocardiographic changes, such as flattening of the T wave, prolongation of the QTc interval, and ST segment depression, although the clinical significance of these findings is unknown.

Fatalities have been reported in association with excessive use of inhaled sympathomimetic drugs.

In healthy subjects, large doses of inhaled fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (4 times the recommended dose of vilanterol, representing a 12- or 10-fold higher systemic exposure than seen in subjects with COPD or asthma, respectively) have been associated with clinically significant prolongation of the QTc interval, which has the potential for producing ventricular arrhythmias.

Therefore, BREO ELLIPTA, like other sympathomimetic amines, should be used with caution in patients with cardiovascular disorders, especially coronary insufficiency, cardiac arrhythmias, and hypertension.

5.13 Reduction in Bone Mineral Density Decreases in bone mineral density (BMD) have been observed with long-term administration of products containing inhaled corticosteroids.

The clinical significance of small changes in BMD with regard to long-term consequences such as fracture is unknown.

Patients with major risk factors for decreased bone mineral content, such as prolonged immobilization, family history of osteoporosis, postmenopausal status, tobacco use, advanced age, poor nutrition, or chronic use of drugs that can reduce bone mass (e.g., anticonvulsants, oral corticosteroids) should be monitored and treated with established standards of care.

Since patients with COPD often have multiple risk factors for reduced BMD, assessment of BMD is recommended prior to initiating BREO ELLIPTA and periodically thereafter.

If significant reductions in BMD are seen and BREO ELLIPTA is still considered medically important for that patient’s COPD therapy, use of medicine to treat or prevent osteoporosis should be strongly considered.

5.14 Glaucoma and Cataracts Glaucoma, increased intraocular pressure, and cataracts have been reported in patients with COPD or asthma following the long-term administration of inhaled corticosteroids.

Therefore, close monitoring is warranted in patients with a change in vision or with a history of increased intraocular pressure, glaucoma, and/or cataracts.

5.15 Coexisting Conditions BREO ELLIPTA, like all medicines containing sympathomimetic amines, should be used with caution in patients with convulsive disorders or thyrotoxicosis and in those who are unusually responsive to sympathomimetic amines.

Doses of the related beta 2 -adrenoceptor agonist albuterol, when administered intravenously, have been reported to aggravate preexisting diabetes mellitus and ketoacidosis.

5.16 Hypokalemia and Hyperglycemia Beta-adrenergic agonist medicines may produce significant hypokalemia in some patients, possibly through intracellular shunting, which has the potential to produce adverse cardiovascular effects.

The decrease in serum potassium is usually transient, not requiring supplementation.

Beta-agonist medications may produce transient hyperglycemia in some patients.

In clinical trials evaluating BREO ELLIPTA in subjects with COPD or asthma, there was no evidence of a treatment effect on serum glucose or potassium.

5.17 Effect on Growth Orally inhaled corticosteroids may cause a reduction in growth velocity when administered to children and adolescents.

[See Use in Specific Populations (8.4).]

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS

17 PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION Advise the patient to read the FDA-approved patient labeling (Medication Guide and Instructions for Use).

Asthma-Related Death Inform patients with asthma that LABA, such as vilanterol, one of the active ingredients in BREO ELLIPTA, increase the risk of asthma-related death and may increase the risk of asthma-related hospitalization in pediatric and adolescent patients .

Also inform them that currently available data are inadequate to determine whether concurrent use of inhaled corticosteroids or other long-term asthma control drugs mitigates the increased risk of asthma-related death from LABA.

Not for Acute Symptoms Inform patients that BREO ELLIPTA is not meant to relieve acute symptoms of COPD or asthma and extra doses should not be used for that purpose.

Advise patients to treat acute symptoms with an inhaled, short-acting beta 2 -agonist such as albuterol.

Provide patients with such medication and instruct them in how it should be used.

Instruct patients to seek medical attention immediately if they experience any of the following: • Decreasing effectiveness of inhaled, short-acting beta 2 -agonists • Need for more inhalations than usual of inhaled, short-acting beta 2 -agonists • Significant decrease in lung function as outlined by the physician Tell patients they should not stop therapy with BREO ELLIPTA without physician/provider guidance since symptoms may recur after discontinuation.

Do Not Use Additional Long-acting Beta 2 -agonists Instruct patients not to use other LABA for COPD and asthma.

Local Effects Inform patients that localized infections with Candida albicans occurred in the mouth and pharynx in some patients.

If oropharyngeal candidiasis develops, it should be treated with appropriate local or systemic (i.e., oral) antifungal therapy while still continuing therapy with BREO ELLIPTA, but at times therapy with BREO ELLIPTA may need to be temporarily interrupted under close medical supervision.

Advise patients to rinse the mouth with water without swallowing after inhalation to help reduce the risk of thrush.

Pneumonia Patients with COPD have a higher risk of pneumonia; instruct them to contact their healthcare providers if they develop symptoms of pneumonia.

Immunosuppression Warn patients who are on immunosuppressant doses of corticosteroids to avoid exposure to chickenpox or measles and, if exposed, to consult their physicians without delay.

Inform patients of potential worsening of existing tuberculosis; fungal, bacterial, viral, or parasitic infections; or ocular herpes simplex.

Hypercorticism and Adrenal Suppression Advise patients that BREO ELLIPTA may cause systemic corticosteroid effects of hypercorticism and adrenal suppression.

Additionally, inform patients that deaths due to adrenal insufficiency have occurred during and after transfer from systemic corticosteroids.

Patients should taper slowly from systemic corticosteroids if transferring to BREO ELLIPTA.

Reduction in Bone Mineral Density Advise patients who are at an increased risk for decreased BMD that the use of corticosteroids may pose an additional risk.

Ocular Effects Inform patients that long-term use of inhaled corticosteroids may increase the risk of some eye problems (cataracts or glaucoma); consider regular eye examinations.

Risks Associated with Beta-agonist Therapy Inform patients of adverse effects associated with beta 2 ‑agonists, such as palpitations, chest pain, rapid heart rate, tremor, or nervousness.

Hypersensitivity Reactions, Including Anaphylaxis Advise patients that hypersensitivity reactions (e.g., anaphylaxis, angioedema, rash, urticaria) may occur after administration of BREO ELLIPTA.

Instruct patients to discontinue BREO ELLIPTA if such reactions occur.

There have been reports of anaphylactic reactions in patients with severe milk protein allergy after inhalation of other powder medications containing lactose; therefore, patients with severe milk protein allergy should not use BREO ELLIPTA.

BREO and ELLIPTA are registered trademarks of the GSK group of companies.

BREO ELLIPTA was developed in collaboration with Theravance.

GlaxoSmithKline Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 ©2016 the GSK group of companies.

All rights reserved.

BRE:7PI

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

2 BREO ELLIPTA should be administered once daily every day by the orally inhaled route only.

BREO ELLIPTA should be taken at the same time every day.

Do not use BREO ELLIPTA more than 1 time every 24 hours.

After inhalation, the patient should rinse his/her mouth with water without swallowing to help reduce the risk of oropharyngeal candidiasis.

More frequent administration or a greater number of inhalations (more than 1 inhalation daily) of the prescribed strength of BREO ELLIPTA is not recommended as some patients are more likely to experience adverse effects with higher doses.

Patients using BREO ELLIPTA should not use additional LABA for any reason.

[See Warnings and Precautions (5.3, 5.5, 5.8, 5.12).] • For oral inhalation only.

( 2 ) • Maintenance treatment of COPD: 1 inhalation of BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 once daily.

( 2.1 ) • Asthma: 1 inhalation of BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 or BREO ELLIPTA 200/25 once daily.

( 2.2 ) 2.1 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 should be administered as 1 inhalation once daily.

The maximum recommended dosage is 1 inhalation of BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 once daily, the only strength indicated for the treatment of COPD.

If shortness of breath occurs in the period between doses, an inhaled, short-acting beta 2 -agonist (rescue medicine, e.g., albuterol) should be taken for immediate relief.

2.2 Asthma If asthma symptoms arise in the period between doses, an inhaled, short-acting beta 2 -agonist (rescue medicine, e.g., albuterol) should be taken for immediate relief.

The recommended starting dosage is BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 or BREO ELLIPTA 200/25 administered as 1 inhalation once daily.

The maximum recommended dosage is 1 inhalation of BREO ELLIPTA 200/25 once daily.

The starting dosage is based on patients’ asthma severity.

For patients previously treated with low- to mid-dose corticosteroid–containing treatment, BREO ELLIPTA 100/25 should be considered.

For patients previously treated with mid- to high-dose corticosteroid–containing treatment, BREO ELLIPTA 200/25 should be considered.

The median time to onset, defined as a 100-mL increase from baseline in mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), was approximately 15 minutes after beginning treatment.

Individual patients will experience a variable time to onset and degree of symptom relief.

For patients who do not respond adequately to BREO ELLIPTA 100/25, increasing the dose to BREO ELLIPTA 200/25 may provide additional improvement in asthma control.

If a previously effective dosage regimen of BREO ELLIPTA fails to provide adequate improvement in asthma control, the therapeutic regimen should be reevaluated and additional therapeutic options (e.g., replacing the current strength of BREO ELLIPTA with a higher strength, adding additional inhaled corticosteroid, initiating oral corticosteroids) should be considered.

rifampin 300 MG / isoniazid 150 MG Oral Capsule

WARNINGS

Rifampin and isoniazid capsules are a combination of two drugs, each of which has been associated with liverdysfunction.

Liver function tests should be performed prior to therapy with rifampin/isoniazid and periodicallyduring treatment.

Rifampin Rifampin has been shown to produce liver dysfunction.

There have been fatalities associated with jaundice inpatients with liver disease or receiving rifampin concomitantly with other hepatoxic agents.

Since an increased riskmay exist for individuals with liver disease, benefits must be weighed carefully against the risk of further liver damage.

Several studies of tumorigenicity potential have been done in rodents.

In one strain of mice known to be particularlysusceptible to the spontaneous development of hepatomas, rifampin given at a level 2-10 times the maximumdosage used clinically resulted in a significant increase in the occurrence of hepatomas in female mice of this strainafter one year of administration.

There was no evidence of tumorigenicity in the males of this strain, in males or females of another mouse strain, orin rats.

Isoniazid See the boxed warning .

OVERDOSAGE

Rifampin Signs and Symptoms: Nausea, vomiting and increasing lethargy will probably occur within a short time after ingestion;actual unconsciousness may occur with severe hepatic involvement.

Brownish-red or orange discoloration ofthe skin, urine, sweat, saliva, tears, and feces is proportional to amount ingested.

Liver enlargement, possibly with tenderness, can develop within a few hours after severe overdosage, and jaundicemay develop rapidly.

Hepatic involvement may be more marked in patients with prior impairment of hepatic function.Other physical findings remain essentially normal.

Direct and total bilirubin levels may increase rapidly with severe overdosage; hepatic enzyme levels may be affected, especially with prior impairment of hepatic function.

A direct effect upon hemopoietic system, electrolyte levels, or acid-base balance is unlikely.

Isoniazid Signs and Symptoms: Isoniazid overdosage produces signs and symptoms within 30 minutes to 3 hours.

Nausea, vomiting, dizziness, slurring of speech, blurring of vision, visual hallucinations (including bright colors and strangedesigns), are among the early manifestations.

With marked overdosage, respiratory distress and CNS depression, progressing rapidly from stupor to profound coma, are to be expected, along with severe, intractable seizures.Severe metabolic acidosis, acetonuria, and hyperglycemia are typical laboratory findings.

Treatment The airway should be secured and adequate respiratory exchange established.

Only then should gastric emptying(lavage-aspiration) be attempted; this may be difficult because of seizures.

Since nausea and vomiting are likely tobe present, gastric lavage is probably preferable to induction of emesis.

Activated charcoal slurry instilled into the stomach following evacuation of gastric contents can help absorb anyremaining drug in the GI tract.

Antiemetic medication may be required to control severe nausea and vomiting.

Blood samples should be obtained for immediate determination of gases, electrolytes, BUN, glucose, etc.

Bloodshould be typed and cross matched in preparation for possible hemodialysis.

Rapid control of metabolic acidosis is fundamental to management.

Intravenous sodium bicarbonate should begiven at once and repeated as needed, adjusting subsequent dosage on the basis of laboratory findings (i.e., serumsodium, pH, etc.).

At the same time, anticonvulsants should be given intravenously (i.e., barbiturates, diphenylhydantoin, diazepam) as required, and large doses of intravenous pyridoxine.

Forced osmotic diuresis must be started early and should be continued for some hours after clinical improvementto hasten renal clearance of drug and help prevent relapse.

Fluid intake and output should be monitored.

Bile drainage may be indicated in presence of serious impairment of hepatic function lasting more than 24-48hours.

Under these circumstances and for severe cases, extracorporeal hemodialysis may be required; if this is notavailable, peritoneal dialysis can be used along with forced diuresis.

Along with measures based on initial and repeated determination of blood gases and other laboratory tests as needed,meticulous respiratory and other intensive care should be utilized to protect against hypoxia, hypotension, aspiration,pneumonitis, etc.

In patients with previously adequate hepatic function, reversal of liver enlargement and impaired hepatic excretoryfunction probably will be noted within 72 hours, with rapid return toward normal thereafter.

Untreated or inadequately treated cases of gross isoniazid overdosage can terminate fatally, but good response hasbeen reported in most patients brought under adequate treatment within the first few hours after drug ingestion.

DESCRIPTION

Rifampin/Isoniazid is a combination capsule containing 300 mg rifampin and 150 mg isoniazid.

Each capsule for oral administration, contain the following inactive ingredients: colloidal silicon dioxide, corn starch, lactose monohydrate,magnesium stearate, and pregelatinized starch.

Capsule shell contains: FD&C blue #1, FD&C red #40, gelatin and titanium dioxide.

The printing ink contains: ammonium hydroxide, isopropyl alcohol, N-butyl alcohol, pharmaceutical glaze, propylene glycol, simethicone, and titanium dioxide.

Rifampin is a semisynthetic antibiotic derivative of rifamycin B.

The chemical name for rifampin is 3-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyliminomethyl) rifamycin SV.

Isoniazid is the hydrazide of isonicotinic acid.

It exists as colorless or white crystals or as a white crystalline powderthat is water soluble, odorless and slowly affected by exposure to air and light.

HOW SUPPLIED

Rifampin and Isoniazid Capsules USP, 300 mg/150 mg are supplied as red powder filled No.

0 Scarlet Opaque HardGelatin Capsules; printed “IsonaRif™” on one end and “VP/017” on the other end in white ink; bottles of 60 capsules (NDC#61748-017-60).

Dispense in a tight, light-resistant container as defined in the USP using a child-resistant closure.

Keep tightly closed.

Store in a dry place.

Avoid excessive heat.

Store at 20-25°C (68-77°F) [See USP Controlled Room Temperature].

Protect from light and moisture.

Manufactured for: VersaPharm Incorporated Marietta, GA 30062 Manufactured by: West-ward Pharmaceutical Corp Eatontown, NJ 07724 Rev.

Feb.

2007

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

For pulmonary tuberculosis in which organisms are susceptible, and when the patient has been titrated on theindividual components and it has therefore been established that this fixed dosage is therapeutically effective.

This fixed-dosage combination drug is not recommended for initial therapy of tuberculosis or for preventive therapy.

In the treatment of tuberculosis, small numbers of resistant cells, present within large populations of susceptiblecells, can rapidly become the predominating type.

Since rapid emergence of resistance can occur, culture andsusceptibility tests should be performed in the event of persistent positive cultures.

This drug is not indicated for the treatment of meningococcal infections or asymptomatic carriers of N.

meningitides to eliminate meningococci from the nasopharynx.

BOXED WARNING

WARNING Severe and sometimes fatal hepatitis associated with isoniazid therapy may occur and may develop even after many months of treatment.

The risk of developing hepatitis is age related.

Approximate case rates by age are: 0 per 1,000 for persons under 20 years of age, 3 per 1,000 for persons in the 20-34 year age group, 12 per 1,000 for persons in the 35-49 year age group, 23 per 1,000 for persons in the 50-64 year age group, and 8 per 1,000 for persons over 65 years of age.

The risk of hepatitis is increased with daily consumption of alcohol.

Precise data to provide a fatality rate for isoniazid-related hepatitis is not available; however, in a U.S.

Public Health Service Surveillance Study of 13,838 persons taking isoniazid, there were 8 deaths among 174 cases of hepatitis.

Therefore, patients given isoniazid should be carefully monitored and interviewed at monthly intervals.

Serum transaminase concentration becomes elevated in about 10-20 percent of patients, usually during the first few months of therapy, but it can occur at any time.

Usually enzyme levels return to normal despite continuance of drug, but in some cases progressive liver dysfunction occurs.

Patients should be instructed to report immediately any of the prodromal symptoms of hepatitis, such as fatigue, weakness, malaise, anorexia, nausea, or vomiting.

If these symptoms appear or if signs suggestive of hepatic damage are detected, isoniazid should be discontinued promptly, since continued use of the drug in these cases has been reported to cause a more severe form of liver damage.

Patients with tuberculosis should be given appropriate treatment with alternative drugs.

If isoniazid must be reinstituted, it should be reinstituted only after symptoms and laboratory abnormalities have cleared.

The drug should be restarted in very small and gradually increasing doses and should be withdrawn immediately if there is any indication of recurrent liver involvement.

Treatment should be deferred in persons with acute hepatic diseases.

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

In general, therapy should be continued until bacterial conversion and maximal improvement have occurred.

Adults: Two Rifampin and Isoniazid Capsules, USP (600 mg rifampin, 300 mg isoniazid) once daily, administeredone hour before or two hours after a meal.

Concomitant administration of pyridoxine (B6) is recommended in the malnourished, in those predisposed toneuropathy (e.g., diabetic), and in adolescents.

Susceptibility Testing, Rifampin Rifampin susceptibility powders are available for both direct and indirect methods of determining the susceptibility of strains of mycobacteria.

The MIC’s of susceptible clinical isolates when determined in 7H10 or other non-eggcontainingmedia have ranged from 0.1 to 2 mcg/mL.

Quantitative methods that require measurement of zonediameters give the most precise estimates of antibiotic susceptibility.

One such procedure has been recommendedfor use with discs for testing susceptibility to rifampin.

Interpretations correlate zone diameters from the disc testwith MIC (minimal inhibitory concentration) values for rifampin.